We
are not a part of the "Left". We are opposed to measures
which tinker with and attempt to reform capitalism. The "Left" on the
other hand have kept their agenda well hidden, if it has a
discernable revolutionary current, it isn't obvious, indeed, even
their active supporters appear afraid to engage with any discussion
about what socialism is.
However,
it has been a "Left" tactic in the past where they are hypocritically
asking workers to vote for a parliamentary party to get reforms which
you know you can't get, on a road which they dont support, to
socialism, which is not defined except, that it is recognisable as
another state capitalism. The Socialist Party is opposed to such
trickery of workers. This left-wingers call socialism. Such cynicism
and hypocrisy allied to political opportunism is breathtaking. It
started quite early this, Tommy Sheridan, at a radical book fair held
in Edinburgh outlined his view of socialism which was nationalisation
- with the maximum and minimum permitted wages of worker being in the
ratio of 4-5:1, he added, that this lessening disparity of income was
realistic as a society where equality of income existed wasn't
realistic. Besides making him a “socialist” who doesn't believe
in socialism, the society he mentions retains every feature of
capitalism and therefore could only ever be a bastardised capitalist
society.
Simply,
the "Left" are not socialists. Lesson number one for
would-be Leftists.
Even limited equality can not be achieved, while retaining the
profit motive - It is economically impossible .
We
on the other hand are quite explicit that socialism is, the common
ownership and democratic control of all the means and instruments for
producing and distributing wealth by and on behalf of the whole
population. In other word a free access society. We stand for the
original idea of socialism.
Untrammelled
by statist failures, indeed we predicted all of these failures. The "Left" appear to want to administer capitalism with minimum
levels of wage slavery permitted in this.
Far
from splitting the "Left", we, in the Socialist Party
despise the "Left" for its political cowardice (being
unable or unwilling to describe socialism to workers and nail their
true colours to the socialist mast), of opportunism (interference in
workers struggles and grass roots movements to subvert them to their
cause), and for its pretensions (of presuming to know what socialism
is, and presenting itself as the leadership to-wards it).
As
the only Socialist Party we urge workers to "Abolish the wages
system." We insist that socialism is an immediate and practical
possibility, requiring only a majority of workers who know what it
is, who desire it and are willing to organise as equals, without a
vanguard of political leaders forming an elite and a cadre of
misinformed workers, as their expendable cannon fodder and irrelevant
pawns. Unlike the Leninist-Trotskyite, and former CP-er Stalinist
Left, we dont, as Lenin said, regard workers, "left to their own devices as being only capable of achieving trade
union consciousness"
What
exactly is the purpose of the Socialist Party standing in elections? To
put the case for socialism, as no others do this, made by workers
seizing control of their own destiny and working for socialism ,
without the leadership of vanguardist organisations or any other
leadership. The Socialist Party does not look for support or
supporters, rather we insist, on the contrary, that workers learn
what socialism is, and join us as equals to bring it about. We dont
wish to lead them. They will not need leadership if they make
themselves socialists. Far from having no link to working class
people, we are the working class who are organised for socialism,
admittedly pitifully small, though we are, but we dont lie to workers
by pretending that by voting for reforms, or any other measure, they
are supporting socialism. We do not intervene in workers struggles,
except as workers in struggle.
Isn't standing
against the Left is simply splitting the Left and helping the forces
of capitalism? We are standing against all the capitalist parties, this inevitably
includes the "Left" as they support a reformed capitalism with them as
the new bosses, retaining wage labour capital, government control,
and their platform reflects this. The "Leftists" ARE
the
forces of capitalism.
Simply put, we are the only revolutionary
alternative to capitalism. It is by insisting that left-wing style
reforms can ameliorate the conditions of workers, and that this
equates to a "socialist" response, the "Left" and any and
all others who so mistrust the workers, that they can't describe the
socialist alternative to them, are the reactionary element, leaving
workers confusedly equating socialism with these tired and out-moded
tried and failed remedies of the last century (the Labour Party, the Communist Party, social democrat parties of all stripes.)
The
Socialist Party has an honourable record since 1904 of never selling
socialism short and insisting it is an immediate and practical goal,
requiring no other minimum demand, now that the vote has been won,
that it can only be brought into existence by the workers themselves,
comprising a majority, who know and understand what socialism is, a
free access global society, without nation states. We don't pander to
nationalist sentiments, following slavishly Lenin's silly
"Imperialism as the highest form of capitalism" dogma.
Our
demand is the world for the workers and not for some new
state-capitalist entity, or a permissible level of wage slavery. In
fact, the "Left's" platform is even less radical than the Old Labour
one, where mistakenly, they thought they were ushering in a new era,
and piously mouthed phrases such as "we
are the masters now"
and "socialism
will come like a thief in the night
"
.
Matt
Culbert
(slightly adapted)