We
are living in one of the most volatile periods in history. There
is the looming possibility of environmental catastrophe.
The
environmental crisis is not the fault of the working class. The only
thing the workers are “guilty” of is not as yet overthrowing the
capitalism system. Under the profit system, the majority does not
have a say in how resources are used or production is organized. The
capitalists are behind these decisions, and their main
decision-making criteria is the pursuit of profit. Under capitalism,
businesses must compete with one another and maximize profits in
order to survive. The individual efforts of consumers cannot defeat
the powerful structural incentives that drive environmental
destruction. The structure itself must be fundamentally transformed.
Capitalism is not something that can be reformed. Some in the
environmentalist movement, however, seek in effect to pass the burden
onto the shoulders of the working class. The workers are asked to
sacrifice their standard of living in an effort to stave off
environmental disaster, while the capitalists can continue to fill
their coffers with profits.
It
is true that workers have both the power and the responsibility to
ameliorate the effects of climate change. But this cannot require
punishing people for wanting a good quality of life. The working
class has the power to ensure that the planet is habitable for
everyone precisely because it has the power to defeat capitalism. The
environment is an interconnected system of which we are a part, in
which humanity participates and manipulates with our technology.
Humans must interact with nature. However, the interaction
between humans and nature – production of food, extraction of raw
material, waste disposal, pollution, etc. – can be better managed
to allow mutual prosperity. It is only in the epoch of capitalism,
that our tools have become so powerful that they threaten to destroy
the system on which everything, including ourselves, depends.
However, we are not fated to be doomed. Humans are rational beings.
We are able to adapt. Technological innovation has already provided
the possibility of re-tooling our economy and our societies with
clean, renewable energy from the sun, wind, and water. There is no
need for new breakthroughs to achieve this even though further
breakthroughs still arise. By shifting towards a cleaner and more
sustainable approach, this is entirely possible. For example, quality
food production does not inherently require stripping the soil of
nutrients and then clear-cutting rainforests to find more fertile
soil. No new technology or ideas are required to grow enough food to
feed humanity while preserving the soil (and the rainforests) for
future generations. We already know how to do that.
The
problem is that the capitalist economy is not subject to our
intelligence or reason. It is subject to the anarchy of the
market and not consciously planned to be in harmony with the
environment. Under capitalism, we allow the vast bulk of the economy
to be run undemocratically by a tiny minority. The only thing
standing in the way is Big Business and the elite who make the
decisions about what is produced and how it is produced based on the
prerequisite of increasing profits for the owners of corporations and
their investors. The incessant quest for profits at the expense
of climate stability and human well-being and life, serves only those
who collect the profits: the super-wealthy. Unsurprisingly, the
capitalists run things in a way that serves the interests of their
own class. In the capitalists’ eyes, the earth is there to be
plundered and exploited. Under capitalism, no value is placed
on nature or human life. Production, therefore, is driven by
short-term profit interests – and powered by “cheap,” polluting
carbon-based energy – with no consideration of the damage inflicted
on the environment and human lives.
What
is needed is the next step in social evolution. We need an economic
and political system that will not attack, but rather, will improve
our standard of living in a way that is not detrimental to the
environment. No longer would we need to rely on technology that
pollutes our water, air, and land because “the market” deems it
the cheapest. A socialist economy would be run by all layers of
society, democratically, from the bottom up. The producers
in every enterprise would link up with entire workplaces, industries,
states, countries, and eventually the whole world. This would be a
new, truly democratic political system embedded in the very structure
of the economy. Everyone would have the opportunity to put forward
their ideas and opinions. When workers have the ability to be
creative in the workplace they would innovate to make things safer,
more efficient, and environmentally sustainable. There would be
little interest in planning an economy that would create pollution or
rely on hazardous materials that kill and maim workers. We could put
our best and brightest minds to use, not in developing
earth-destroying technologies for the benefit of the minority. Under
capitalism, these are merely “externalities.” But if subject to a
democratic discussion, we are confident they would be quickly
eradicated. By ridding ourselves of the profit motive and private
ownership of the means of production, humans can reconnect with the
earth and their own labour, thereby fully connecting with each other
and their natural surroundings. Instead of the world being to
benefit huge multinationals, it would be organised to apply the
resources and skills of workers to improve the conditions of people
around the world. We could the attain the worldwide cooperation
necessary to deal with problems like global warming, and begin to
reverse the environmental catastrophe. Only by overthrowing the
capitalist system and replacing it with one where production is
democratically and collectively owned controlled by the community
will climate change be stopped and our future secured.
For the future
of humanity and for the panet, we need socialism.
Nice article. I agree with it all.
ReplyDeleteI was responding to a person's comment to an article about automation learning from humans, where he said that humans need jobs to survive. I responded with:
Well, if you want to be technical, humans don't NEED jobs in order to survive. What they need is access to what the job can provide. That is, an automated, vertical farm can output more than my own two hands. You can survive on what a machine produces.
Let's remember, you can't eat money. An electromechanical machine can't eat money. Ecosystems have developed over billions of years producing goods and services without monetary charge. These are the necessities of life that allow all to survive, including humans. The biosphere developed without the help of banks.
In other words, the earth doesn't need capitalism. Capitalism needs the earth. When astronauts go to space, they don't bring money with them. The earth needs a homeostatic control system for resource management.