Today,
many thousands of workers are on the streets of Glasgow to demand
Scottish independence. Those who think that an independent Scotland
would make things any better, there is sorry news.
The conflict
between the national and international factions of the capitalist
class would remain and it is crystal clear that the rich who run the
current devolved Scotland would be the same as the rich who would run
independent "free" Scotland. The capitalist class, either
local or global, would still run the country with the connivance of
an independent parliament. The SNP represent that section of the
Scottish elite which feels it could do better in negotiating with
international financiers as a separate entity than as a part the
United Kingdom. The major companies would have little problem
with the political power being transferred from UK to Scottish
control, particularly since the SNP has indicated it is prepared to
cut corporation tax. Globalisation has increasingly made redundant
the question of "national sovereignty". The growth of
multinational corporations, some with a turnover exceeding the GDP of
most states, has dramatically transformed the role of government as
the locus of economic decision-making. The most important
decisions are now made, not by politicians, but in the boardrooms in
the City of London, Wall St or Shangai. Even so, many locally-based
businesses are indirectly tied into this economy as sub-contractors
and the ever-deepening nexus of international linkages means they
cannot escape economic crises emanating from elsewhere which impact
upon the local economy. The limited leeway of governments to
ameliorate such localised effects has been correspondingly reduced.
And,
of course, the Scottish “business community” like transport
operator, Brian Souter, who helps fund the SNP, do so not because
they want to better Glasgow’s dismal life expectancy but because he
believes that Scotland’s super-rich will benefit. Freedom is not
intended for the people of Scotland, but for Big Business. The only
independence is for corporations to maximise returns.
The
Socialist Party opposes both the separatist Scottish nationalism and
British unionist nationalism and supports only working-class unity
for the establishment of world socialism. Members of the Socialist
Party are against nationalism in all its forms, defying the rituals
singing of "Flower of Scotland" and the flag-waving of the
Saltire or any other expression of loyalty to the nation-state, that
help enforce the idea of nation in our minds. We
are in fact proud to be anti-patriotic.
There
is no “national interest” for workers. Self-determination just
equates with self-determination for a ruling class. It must be
opposed in favour of self-determination for people and their
self-emancipation from wage-slavery. Nationalism and patriotism must
be opposed with socialism,
a “society organised as a conscious and planned association”
and "a community of free individuals, carrying on their work
with the means of production in common," as Marx describes it to
be.
Independence
would be a purely political and a mere constitutional change which
would leave the basic economic structure of society unchanged. There
would still be a privileged class owning and controlling the means of
production with the rest having to work for them for a living. Just
as now. An independent sovereign Scottish government would still have
to operate within the constraints of the world capitalist system. It
would still have to ensure that goods produced in Scotland were
competitive on world markets and that capitalists investing in
Scotland were allowed to make the same level of profits as they could
in other countries. In other words, it would still be subject to the
same economic pressures as the existing London-based government to
promote profits and restrict wages and benefits. Should independence
eventually arrive, workers will discover that they cannot legislate
away the problems of capitalism.
Our
fellow-workers on this demonstration today for Scottish independence
are wasting their time when they struggle to make some aspect of
capitalism better, to make capitalism more acceptable. Capitalism is
not a system that can be humanised or reformed into something better.
It is a profit system subject to economic laws which can only work in
one way: as a system of profit-making and accumulation of capital in
the interest of a tiny minority of profit-takers. You
can have the most democratic constitution imaginable but this won’t
make any difference to the fact that profits have to come before
meeting people's needs under capitalism. If our rulers want to reform
the machinery of capitalist government, that’s up to them. But
spare us the pretence that nationalism is some great extension of
democracy. It is not imperfections in the political decision-making
process that’s the problem but the exchange economy and its
economic laws. And the answer is not sovereignty but socialism.
The
problems of capitalism can only be solved within the framework of a
socialist world. Socialism
will be a co-operative world wide system. National frontiers and
governments and armed forces will disappear. Groups of people may
well preserve their languages and customs but this will have nothing
to do with claiming territorial rights or military dominances over
pieces of the world surface. To move forward, the dispossessed
majority across the world must now look beyond the artificial
barriers of nation-states and regional blocs, to perceive a common
identity and purpose. There
is but one world and we exist as one people in need of each other and
with the same basic needs. There is far more that unites us than can
ever divide us along cultural, nationalistic or religious lines.
Together we can create a civilisation worth living in, but before
that happens we need the conscious cooperation of ordinary people
across the world, united in one common cause—to create a world in
which each person has free access to the benefits of civilisation, a
world without borders or frontiers, social classes or leaders and a
world in which production is at last freed from the craving to
accumulate capital and used for the good of humanity.
The
Scottish separatists see themselves as visionaries but they cannot
see beyond the narrow confines of the nation-state, conceived in
pre-medieval times and as outmoded as the clan system it replaced.
It
is the Socialist Party who possess real vision, who look forward to a
new world of common ownership and democratic control of society's
resources. The Socialist Party recognises the essential unity of the
human family and the urgent need to celebrate it by building society
on that basis. In a socialist society the traditional knowledge and
expertise held by small communities will be respected, especially
where this relates to local ecology and sustainable systems of land
use, and hence priority given to local decision-making over whatever
has to be delegated to wider regional or global democratic control.
Our
fellow-workers
can waste their time supporting parties that openly stand for
capitalism; they can delude themselves into believing that there is a
half-way house between capitalism and socialism; they can even bury
their heads in the sand and say they are not interested in politics.
Or they can study the case for world socialism. They have the choice
of enduring the miseries of capitalism within the confines of
national frontiers or enjoying emancipation in a socialist world.
No comments:
Post a Comment