The rule of the tiny minority is supported by a vast network
of ideology, myths and propaganda to justify the unjustifiable. Their message
is remarkably uniform in that they claim the system of capitalism, despite its
problems, is the best of all possible worlds and is based on human nature. It
is humanity, itself which is corrupted, by the innate human greed or divinely by
original sin and therefore exploitation of man by man is our normal state of
being. Business retains all of the power. With billions in profits they have
the ability to purchase the votes of MPs ensuring their riches will grow while
the wages and benefits of those they employ remain near the poverty level.
What concerns the Socialist Party is that far too many
either don’t see or are denying the truth. Don’t listen to the false rhetoric,
look at the facts and learn for yourself. Shouldn’t adequate shelter, clothing,
food and health care be universal? Shouldn’t everyone be guaranteed well-being.
"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is that well-known
phrase from the United States Declaration of Independence.
People ask us for our definition of socialism. The men and
women in the Socialist Party seek a better world founded on common ownership,
equality and democracy. Socialism is not government control of the economy. Yet
in the name of socialism we saw common ownership changed into state slavery, a
barrier to the very socialism which we seek as an aim. Socialists deny that
State ownership can end in anything other than a bureaucratic despotism. The
political State throughout history has meant the government by a ruling class.
Socialism will require no political State because there will be neither a
privileged property class nor a downtrodden propertyless class. The core of
socialism is the vision of human beings as social creatures linked by the
existence of a common humanity. As the poet John Donne put it, 'no man is an
Island entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the
main'. As human beings share a common humanity, they are bound together by a
sense of comradeship or fraternity (literally meaning 'brotherhood', but
broadened in this context to embrace all humans). This encourages socialists to
prefer cooperation to competition, and to favour collectivism over. In this
view, cooperation enables people to harness their collective energies and
strengthens the bonds of community, while competition pits individuals against
each other, breeding resentment, conflict and hostility.
For example, our agriculture system should be for sustaining
people but today it is denuding the nation’s topsoil while poisoning land,
water, workers and consumers and enriching corporations? Food should not be
just a commodity, a way to make money, but instead a way to nourish people and
the planet and a means to safeguard our future and we should reconfigure the
system for that purpose. But without an agreement on goals, without statements
of purpose, we are going to continue to see changes that are not in the
interest of the majority. Increasingly, it’s corporations that are determining
how the world works. Socialism challenges of us to rethink political philosophy
and political economy, whose goal should be to create a society in which
everyone can flourish. A society so much different from today. The big ideas
and strategies for how we should manage society and thrive with the planet are
not a set of rules handed down from on high. To develop them for now and the
future is a major challenge, and we, ourselves, have to do. No one is going to
figure it out for us.
Supporting capitalists with your votes is a vote against
yourself and your family. Too often democracy has meant voting every few years
for a candidate that is "the lesser of two evils." We need to think,
not just who or what we are voting for, but why we should vote at all. What we
are severely lacking in is genuine democracy. The concept of ‘democracy’ has
been used to curtail both our freedom and our independence of thought.
Politicians have told us, over and over again:
“We live in a democracy.
Now exercise your democratic right and vote for us.”
But what is the point of voting if, no matter who you vote
for, what you get is the same policies but with just a different presentation.
In a survey presented to the UK’s Political and Constitutional Reform Committee
when people were asked what would make them turn out and vote, the most popular
response was having a “None of the above” box on the ballot paper. In other words they wanted to vote, they
wanted their votes counted, but they also wanted to deliver a vote of no
confidence in the current system. The party politicians will argue that we
can’t have such an option because it might produce a result that was in support
of no party at all; and we must have a government, even if it is one we don’t
want.
Many ‘democracies’ end up being dominated by two main
parties, right and left, Tory and Labour, Republican and Democrat and so on. To
an outsider, there is little difference to be seen between America’s
Republicans and Democrats. In Britain, the Tories, Labour and the LibDems are
all claiming the centre ground. No one
seems to have realised that the centre ground itself has moved to the right.
Not for nothing has the Scottish Labour Party earned the name ‘Red
Tories’. It is now hard to find a
genuinely left mainstream party. The Scottish National Party, the Green Party
and the Welsh Plaid Cymru are declaring themselves the true left.
Democracy comes from ‘demos’ or ‘deme’, the Greek word for
‘village’. The deme was the smallest administrative unit of the Athenian
city-state. And there, essentially, is
the key. Democracy belongs to the little
people and their communities, not Washington or Westminster. And because there are now such large
populations everywhere, the administrative area has become too large to be
governed by anything other than draconian methods. The connection ‘of, by and for the people’
has been broken. Athenians didn’t vote; they chose by lot. That did mean that sometimes they got a lousy
lot of men governing, but that was balanced by occasionally getting a really
good council – of men. Of course, of
men. Only citizens’ names went into the
pot; landless men, slaves and women didn’t come into it. Not that much of a democracy, but a
beginning.
Doubtless the whole matter now appear Utopian to present‑day
“revolutionaries”. The point of view of
ourselves in the World Socialist Movement does not coincide with the present
policies of the various “radicals”. We even believe that their policies are, in
many respects, reactionary, and often narrowly opportunist. World Socialists
appeal to the reason of men and women who are capable of understanding, to urge
them to utilise and spread abroad everything that is rational; everything that
represents technical progress and helps to destroy the obstacles which impede
the advance of the workers. We refuse to participate in any national fight, and
recognise only the class struggle as necessary and profitable for the exploited
workers, with the object of abolishing classes, national characteristics and
all kinds of exploitation. We support everything which helps to annihilate
differences between the peoples and which leads towards a rational economic
organisation of the earth. We think that everything which mixes and welds the
peoples together is good for humanity. We hold the firm conviction that only
the exploited class, the workers, can be the historical force, which shall
establish a society in which there shall be no nationalities and no
exploitation. Not because the workers are essentially different in themselves
from the members of other classes, but because their class struggle for
emancipation urges them towards union on a world scale, and at the same time
compels the exploiters unceasingly to perfect and rationalise the means of
production.
Global capitalism is preparing a world culture but that does
not mean that socialists advocate that people become all of one pattern. There
will, indeed, be created a kind of uniformity in the mental outlook and
character of men and women. National distinctions will pass away, but there
will always be individual differences. And people, being able to come into
contact with all parts of the world, having several hours free every day and
the opportunity of devoting them to personal work and individual culture, one
may reasonably suppose that from all this there will emerge strong
personalities with original thoughts and feelings, which will find expression
in various forms of art capable of being understood and appreciated throughout
the entire world.
The vote is the people’s voice – Let it be heard – The
Socialist Party is their megaphone
No comments:
Post a Comment