Workers don't have a country. The nation is run in the
collective interests of the ruling class. Most of us don’t own a single square
inch of Scotland. It doesn’t belong to us: we just live here and work for the
people who do own it. In or out of the United Kingdom, in and out of the EU,
that won’t change. In Scotland, society is run in the interests of those who
own the wealth. They argue among each other over billions of barrels of oil,
GDP rates, profits and exports, because where the borders lie matters to them.
Every border is an opportunity to wring cash out of other property owners.
Scotland will remain dependent upon their whims and interests whatever the
state of sovereignty. They’ll try to sway us one way or another with crumbs (or
the promises of crumbs) but we’ll only get what they feel they can spare to
protect their privilege and wealth.
We will remain dependent upon their investments making a profit for them before we can get our needs and interests seen to. The only way to stop this dependency would be for us to take ownership and control of the wealth of the world into our own hands. We could, together, use the wealth of the world to meet our mutual needs and grant the true independence of being able to control our work and our lives in free and voluntary association of equals.
We will remain dependent upon their investments making a profit for them before we can get our needs and interests seen to. The only way to stop this dependency would be for us to take ownership and control of the wealth of the world into our own hands. We could, together, use the wealth of the world to meet our mutual needs and grant the true independence of being able to control our work and our lives in free and voluntary association of equals.
There is no such thing as a, "fair day’s work for a fair day’s
pay". Exploitation takes place at the point of production or you would not be
hired. The Labour Party has ever served the interest of the ruling class, even
to the extent of supporting war on their behalf .The welfare state would have
happened anyway, no matter who was elected. The Labour Party doesn't have
socialist roots. Its aim was always to
reform capitalism. Any party which intends to run capitalism with its, waged
labour, buying and selling, money system, production for sale on a market, is
by definition a capitalist party. Equally notions of employment full or
otherwise are nothing to do with socialism. Capitalism can't be reformed and
shorn of its rapacious tendencies. It has to be replaced by a new post
capitalist social revolution. We fail to see why you should continue to elect
people to police 'us' on behalf of the parasitic capitalist class, but require
to police 'them', on behalf of the slavish electorate.
You only need to develop a political awareness which
dispenses with government over us, replacing the capitalist system with a
self-regulated and self-correcting, democratic, global, free access society of
common ownership, which requires no police, as it ensures all wealth is commonly
produced ,owned and accessed freely without wages, prices, or minority
ownership intervening in the free access to it. Remove privileged accumulation
of wealth and its political class. Abolish the market and its wages system,
establish real socialism.
The biggest charade is the notion that politicians or political
parties can left, right, centre, statist, free-market, mixed-market, can make
anything other than a marginal difference in running capitalism. Capitalism
can't be run in any way which interferes with the exploitative boom-slump cycle
of the market system and conditions of wage-slavery for the vast majority.
Capitalism cannot solve the problem of distribution, through its market
mechanisms, wages or prices, as it must choke off production, as its markets
become saturated reducing profit but, always before human needs can be
satisfied. All political parties are business friendly in this sense.
The Labour Party in office claimed the benefit for establishing the welfare state. They started clawing back some measures very quickly and putting up prescription charges. Workers are not better off in relative terms. Any changes in welfare system for example increase profits derived from labour. The rate of exploitation is greater. If you are born poor you will die poor with few exceptions.
Nationalisation was in the interests of the capitalist class. State capitalist measures such as that, does nothing about wage slavery or the rate of exploitation. They didn't dispossess the mine owners or railway owners, they compensated them and in many cases paid them with high salary seats on the boards of trade and management which run the industries. Any safety reforms arose out of union action.
Attlee's socialist ‘movement’ must have taken place on the porcelain seat in the lavatory.
Attlee's socialist ‘movement’ must have taken place on the porcelain seat in the lavatory.
Capitalism has to be replaced, through the conscious and
informed action of the majority, with a new post - capitalist society,
harnessing all of the productive capacity of this one and more, freeing up
human resources intrinsic to capitalism, but unnecessary in a new
post-capitalist one, banks, money, insurance, armies, navies, war production,
and by harnessing all of the infrastructure and techno-structure.
We, the world’s workers, whether waged, salaried, white or
blue-collared, can create a world of superabundance, which has free access,
without wages and prices, to produce of our collective endeavours, within a
global, regional and local democratic participatory framework, by all the world’s
people and an organising "from each
according to their ability, to each according to their needs.”
To do this we, the world’s workers, must dispossess the
global capitalist class, whether private individuals, bureaucratic, governmental,
or corporate, of their ownership of the means of production and distribution
and take them into common ownership. Politicians are irrelevant. Les get rid of
capitalism and its politicians for good.
Socialism is a free access society which doesn't need
reformist political parties to bring it into being. It only needs a working
class conscious of itself and in itself aware, that it is its class interests
to overthrow private and state ownership of the means and instruments of
creating and distributing wealth and willing to engage with fellow workers
worldwide, to replace them with common ownership and democratic control
globally in conditions of free access without wage slavery or prices or
markets.
Workers have no country. The world for the workers.
No comments:
Post a Comment