Military marching, patriotic parades, martial music - they
are mostly intended to give the impression that it’s ‘your’ country, that you
should be proud of it, that your leaders are there to protect you, that the
division into rich and poor is pre-ordained (perhaps by some god or other) and
there’s nothing you can do about it.
You may well, indeed, take pride in the place you live – its
landscape, architecture, people, etc, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But
in terms of possession, ownership and control, it’s the rich elite, the few
percent in any country, who collectively own the world’s land and resources
(including what you think of as your country), and they would naturally prefer
people to hold the view that this is an immutable state of affairs, all the
more to hold on to their power, backed up by governments and armies. It’s utter
tosh. They only keep their power (and send millions of us to die in wars to
help them do so) because the majority allow them to, and continue to let
themselves be duped by militaristic displays and patriotic twaddle.
Sir Richard Evans, Regius Professor of History and President
of Wolfson College Cambridge has raised the question of “How can you possibly claim that Britain was fighting for democracy and
liberal values when the main ally was Tsarist Russia? That was a despotism that
put Germany in the shade and sponsored pogroms in 1903-6.” He also pointed
out that unlike Germany where male suffrage was universal – 40 per cent of
those British troops fighting in the war did not have the vote until 1918.
An English officer, R.J. Fairhead, saw the evil of war, but
not in the soldiers. They just had to fight. He strongly attacked the political
structure in Europe and looked above the taught national stereotypes. His
learned hatred for the Germans was converted to a general hate for the whole
situation and the system which made a war like this possible.
“Politicians do not
listen to those whom they claim to represent and the failure to take notice of
the fragile peace declared for that brief period led to the anti-government
revolution throughout Europe.”
Lieutenant A.P. Sinkinson described similar experiences:
“As I walked slowly
back to our own trenches I thought of Mr. Asquith’s sentence about not
sheathing the sword until the enemy be finally crushed. It is all very well for
Englishmen living comfortable at home to talk in flowing periods, but when you
are out here you begin to realize that sustained hatred impossible.”
Sinkinson saw that Germans were not worse people than
himself. Only the people at home, far away from the cruelties, the brutalities,
from death and from the war’s real grimace, could keep their hatred.
That the opinion toward the enemies had changed after the Christmas
truce is emphasized by Westminster Rifle Man Percy. The new experiences he had
with the Germans whom he met made him rethink everything he had heard about
them. He wrote that:
“They [Germans] where
really magnificent in the whole thing [Christmas Truce] and jolly good sorts. I
now have a different opinion of the German. Both sides have now started firing,
and are deadly enemies again. Strange it all seems, doesn’t it?” Obviously
Percy recognized how surreal the situation was. He started to rethink his
attitude toward the Germans but he did not think about stopping fighting them.
After having met the enemy between the trenches, many
soldiers started thinking about all they had read and heard about them. For
many, the former hatred was vanished. They now recognized the soldiers from the
other side of the trenches as human as themselves. They were not mercenaries,
no inhuman monsters eager for war, just humans. The stereotypes they know from
the time before the war and before they met their enemies did not fit after
meeting their enemies. Not all Germans acted like it was described in the
newspaper and were not as arrogant as the German Kaiser.
On the other hand not all the English soldiers were
mercenaries fighting for material well-being. These soldiers started to reflect
their own experiences and started to compare their experiences with what they knew
before about their enemies. The conclusion they made was that their
prefabricated picture and the experiences they gained did not fit together. It
was hard for the soldiers, faced with the reality of the war, to maintain the
black and white propaganda picture.
Workers have NO country. Abolish the wages system and share
the world in common with your fellow workers. We really need to consider how to
get rid of capitalism, if we want to get rid of arms dealers, nuclear weapons
and war, which is concomitant upon capitalism along with poverty and waged
slavery. In a world of a potential superabundance of wealth, it is rationed out
to the producers and resources are fought over to be squandered by states in
the interest of their dominant capitalist interests.
Currently there is now a North Pole war-dance going on for
resources under the sea as well as in the South China Seas where old
protagonists are eyeing each other up once again.
'In America trillions of dollars go to military and homeland
security companies. Perpetual war represents perpetual profits for business and
government interests. According to Morgan Keegan, a wealth management and capital
firm, investment in homeland security companies is expected to yield a 12
percent annual growth through 2013 - a high return when compared to other parts
of the depressed US economy. Former DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff pushed the
purchase of the heavily criticised (and little tested) full-body scanners used
in airports. People were unaware that the manufacturer of the machine is a
client of the Chertoff Group, his highly profitable security consulting agency.
The US "black budget" of secret intelligence programmes alone was
estimated at $52.6bn for 2013. That is only the secret programmes, not the much
larger intelligence and counterintelligence budgets. America has now have 16
spy agencies that employ 107,035 employees. This is separate from the over one
million people employed by the military and national security law enforcement
agencies.
In the first 10 days of the Libyan war alone, the Obama
administration spent roughly $550m. That figure includes about $340m for
munitions - mostly cruise missiles that must be replaced.
There is only one way to prevent war and if it breaks out to
end it, namely, by the overthrow of capitalism, the real root from which war
springs. The solution rests in the power of the working class. If world
capitalism has no solution for its problems excepting new and more horrible
slaughter, it is time this insane system were ended. The fight for socialism is
the fight for peace. Destruction and carnage can be ended, not by the victory
of one or other of the combatants which would merely lay the basis for new wars
and is not in the interests of the workers of any country, but by the victory
of the workers over capitalism.
Some 50,000 non-combatants are estimated to have died as
British and American planes bombarded France in preparation for the invasion of
Europe. 20,000 French civilians were killed in the two-and-a-half months from
D-Day, 3,000 of them during the actual landings. On July 9, 1944, Field Marshal
Bernard Montgomery, the top British general in the D-Day offensive, ordered 450
aircraft to begin a devastating bombing campaign on German positions in France
as the Allies advanced. Henri Amouroux, a French academic, calculated that
about 20,000 people died in Calvados alone as towns and some cities, including
Lisieux and Le Havre, were all but wiped out. In his book on the landings,
Antony Beevor, the British historian, condemned the air raids as "stupid, counter-productive and above all
very close to a war crime". In fact, during the whole war, US and
British armed forces killed many more French civilians than did the German army
and airforce. You don't hear much about that but, then, the victors get the
right to write "history".
"Think of the
hundreds of tons of bombs destroying entire cities and wiping out families. But
the suffering of civilians was for many years masked by the over-riding image -
that of the French welcoming the liberators with open arms" Christopher
Prime, Historian
Cpl LF Roker of the Highland Light Infantry is quoted in a book
about the civilian impact of the campaign, ‘Liberation, The Bitter Road to
Freedom,’ by William Hitchcock.
"It was rather a
shock to find we were not welcomed ecstatically as liberators by the local
people, as we were told we should be... They saw us as bringers of destruction
and pain," Roker wrote in his diary.
Another soldier, Ivor Astley of the 43rd Wessex Infantry,
described the locals as "sullen and
silent... If we expected a welcome, we certainly failed to find it."
Hitchcock raises another issue that rarely features in
euphoric folk-memories of liberation: Allied looting, and worse. "The theft and looting of Normandy
households and farmsteads by liberating soldiers began on June 6 and never
stopped during the entire summer," he writes.
One woman - from the town of Colombieres - is quoted as
saying that "the enthusiasm for the
liberators is diminishing. They are looting... everything, and going into
houses everywhere on the pretext of looking for Germans."
The evidence shows that sexual violence against women in
liberated France was common. According to American historian J Robert Lilly,
there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in France between June
1944 and the end of the war.
Apologists of capitalism would claim the Second World War
was a just war. Regardless of the stated intentions, of the apparent excuse for
beginning a war, the only reason ever is the pursuit of the interest of the
capitalist class, which they will enforce without reserve upon the working
class. Hoping that war can be carried out in a gentlemanly way, that it can be
carried out without inflicting suffering on the working class is pie in the
sky.
No comments:
Post a Comment