There exists no definition of socialism that is generally
understood and accepted. The dilemma of socialism today is first of all the
dilemma of the meaning of socialism, because the term has been applied to such
an all-encompassing range of persons, parties, philosophies, states, and social
systems, often completely antagonistic to each other, that the very term
‘socialism’ has become virtually meaningless. ‘Socialism’ has become another
name for another form of capitalism. The temptation is strong to abandon the
label entirely, to adopt some new term to indicate the kind of social change we
propose. But to do so would be to attempt to side-step the problem. Since the
main challenge to capitalism has always come from that which called itself
socialism, the intellectual harlots of capitalist ideology empty the word of
all meaning and purpose, denying the very possibility of an alternative to this
system, hoping to bury of all its revolutionary content. We have to take the
word ‘socialism’ back, for without words there can be no concepts, and where
there is no language of freedom, there can be no dream of liberation. We cannot
simply abdicate the terminology of socialism and arbitrarily invent new labels.
To do so would be futile, because any new terms will be similarly sucked dry if
they acquire popular recognition. Words such as ‘socialism’, ‘revolution’,
‘democracy’, and ‘freedom’ do contain within themselves a critique of the
existing order. That critique can be realized only by reconquering it and
giving it new life, not by abandoning it and searching for another. For this
reason, we continue with the term ‘socialism’, but ensuring that we give its
proper meaning so people understand exactly what we mean by it.
Today humanity faces a global crisis stemming from the
incredible rapacity of the capitalist system. There is catastrophic climate
change which threatens to end life on our planet. Socialism offers the best hope for humanity. We
think a society run by people themselves, freed from both bosses and
bureaucrats, would be far more democratic and liberating than capitalism ever
has been. We think that a society
premised upon the enhancement of life rather than the perpetuation of profit
would stand the best chance of putting a halt to the environmental devastation
now ravishing the globe. Socialists often talked about capitalism's
‘contradictions’ but never have they been more painfully in evidence than right
than now. Millions find no work while
manufacturing plants lie idle. Fortunes
are spent on high-tech weapons to bomb homes while homeless people sleep in
doorways. The hungry rummage through garbage bins outside of supermarkets with
well-stocked shelves. People starve while big grain corporations hoard their
surpluses in their storehouses. White-collar criminals in the banking and
finance industry are rewarded with huge bonuses. Agri-business pushes millions
of small farmers and peasants off the land, destroys life-sustaining topsoil,
creates vegetables without taste or nutritional value, and sprays farmworkers
with carcinogenic pesticides. The result is system ruled by insanity, obsessed
with acquisition and accumulation that it will leave the planet a wasteland. It
may be hard to believe, but there is a method to this madness: it lies in the
basic dynamics of capitalist society, which is organised for profit above all
else.
Socialists use the term ‘social revolution’ in a very
precise way. Whereas reforms are changes within an existing social and economic
system, social revolutions make a sharp break from one social system to
another. A socialist revolution would end the private ownership of the
factories, mines, transportation and offices by a tiny clique of capitalists. Some
politicians imagine that changing the tax code or campaigning for finance
reforms will fix the ill of the social system.
But the cause is much deeper than bad policy or poor decisions, and will
not be solved by tinkering around the edges. Nor is the problem an evil plot,
as some on both left and right have alleged.
Powerful people frequently benefit from social inequality, economic
waste and ecological degradation, but under capitalism such things happen
whether or not anyone plans them. At
fault is not a calculating conspiracy but the very driving force of capitalism:
the relentless pursuit of private profit. Capitalism is a generalized regime of
commodity production characterised by market exchange, including the purchase
and sale of labor power. Production
under capitalism is organised for private profit, which is extracted from
workers' labor and realised in the sale of goods at the highest allowable
price. This system of social and property relations works to benefit a ruling
class made up of owners, financiers, merchants and executives who control key
institutions of production and exchange: banks, insurance companies, stock
exchanges, service concerns such as airlines and trucking, extractive
industries such as coal and oil, and manufacturers and distributors of
commodities like cars, computers and toothpaste. This ruling class appropriates the surplus of
the value created by the working class - the majority of us, whose living comes
not from owning capital but from working for those who do. By virtue of its
dominant social position the ruling class has a common and basic interest in
defending private property and maximising profit rates. But it is not a giant conspiracy. Sometimes
real differences emerge in its ranks.
Sectors of capital clash over appropriate measures for the maintenance
of profit rates, and they enter into political contest by underwriting
different candidates in elections and lobbying for different public policy
measures. Precisely through the open
expression of such differences, consensus is established within the dominant
class. The capitalists may feel the effects of crises and competition but as a
class, capitalists continue to do well and they rarely suffer like those of us
at the bottom of society.
Although to many people the prospect of a revived socialist
movement seems but a pipe dream, capitalism is showing its impracticality and
obsolescence in a host of ways. A rebirth of socialism is possible, just as
periods of calm in the past have been interrupted by resurgences of radicalism
and militancy. Many reservations that people hold about socialism are the
result of a perfectly reasonable revulsion against the monstrosities which have
masquerades as ‘socialism’. Around the world, countries ruled by single parties
and dictatorial autocrats draped themselves with the trappings of Marx, minuscule
groups announced themselves ‘the vanguard’ of the working class with some supposedly standing for equality,
worshipping authoritarian leaders and stifling democratic norms under the name
‘democratic centralism’. Socialism is a vision of a new world, based on one
central conviction: that human beings can construct a society without
exploitation and oppression through, and only through, the maximum extension of
democratic control. The emancipation of humanity from capitalism will only come
about when workers act in the offices, factories and streets on their own
behalf. It cannot be achieved through any shortcut, though many have been
tried.
The paradox of reformism is that it's not the way to win
reforms, especially in periods of crisis, when the system's ability to absorb
demands is minimal, substantial social gains can only be won through the
militant collective action of working people and mass movements aiming at the
democratic conquest of social power. The
aim of socialism can be sacrificed at crucial moments to the error of moderation
and gradualism. We don't object to reformism because it advocates reforms, but
because it has such a sorry record for obtaining them. We have no callous desire to ‘bring the system
down’ by letting people starve, as is sometimes attributed to
revolutionaries. On the contrary, we aim
to show people that by organising and struggling, they can win. We try to
generate a common political orientation. The main reason to join a socialist
organisation, of course, is work for socialism. The abolition of class rule and
establishment of workers' democracy will not come about unless there are
socialists organised to push for it. Through debate and analysis, socialists
help one another understand what's happening in the world. We need your
participation, talents and ideas. Join us.
No comments:
Post a Comment