It's time to talk about what's next. It's time to talk about
the alternative. It is time to promote real solutions and a radical transformation.
It’s time for system change. The time has come for socialism. Capitalism is
ignoring the needs and well-being of people, communities and the planet as a
whole. It is time to explore a genuine new economic model and move our world to
a very different place, one where outcomes that are truly sustainable,
equitable, and democratic are commonplace. Now is the time to shift the political
discourse about the future away from narrow debates over reform policies that
do not fundamentally alter any significant part of the nature of the
political-economic system itself. The Socialist Party must bring people together
who are serious about really tackling the system question, about building a new
system of society and re-defining the public debate. We believe there are
grounds for optimism that revolutionary change is possible.
For many political activists it is getting harder and harder
to be an optimist and a deep cynicism has grown about the prospects of ending
the capitalist system and establishing socialism. In an age of unprecedented
technological promise, politics has failed to keep up with this progress. For
sure there is no shortage of people today to tell us that something is wrong,
but there does exist a dearth of real ideas about removing the many problems we
all face each and every day around the globe. There are many diagnoses of our
social ills but few remedies offered. Any proposals for actually changing the system are treated
as impractical or a distraction from “immediate” demands. We are told that it
can only be capitalism as usual as our only option right now and that a viable,
plausible alternative system is not yet possible. But people are beginning to
stir and imagine a different world to this one. They are starting to realise
that without another type of society they may not have a future.
We live in a time of crisis, a time when millions of people
across the world are victims of capitalist policies of war, exploitation and
oppression, and destruction of the natural environment. There is renewed
interest in the idea of socialism; a system based on common ownership of the
means of production, rather than private ownership. But what do genuine people
find when they try to investigate this revolutionary alternative? They find
that all sorts of people, including political organisations and the governments
of various countries, proclaim themselves to be ‘socialist’ without ever really
defining what is meant by the term. There might be some vague and incomplete
references to the wealth and resources of society being used for the benefit of
all the people rather than a privileged minority, but not much else, and
rarely, any strategy of how to achieve this. There is a lot of confusion and
misunderstanding about what “socialism” means. For those who are not familiar
with it, let’s get one misconception out of the way right at the start.
Socialism, as we use the term, never existed in Soviet Russia, even before
Stalin, or in China, even under Mao. Socialism also is not the same as the
“social-democratic” capitalism that exists in Scandinavia and the” welfare
states” in some other parts of Europe today. None of them conforms to the
definition of socialism that we use. Their concepts of ‘socialism’ can mean
anything from mildly reformist liberalism to state ownership and the
nationalisation of water, gas and electricity, through to total state-capitalism.
None of these have much at all to do with the genuine socialism that we are
talking about, but are used to confuse and mislead the people, and hence to
deflect interest away.
Any attempt at defining socialism is dismissed on the
grounds that we can’t predict the future and that a blueprint cannot be
imposed. Since nobody is going to argue with that, it just closes off any
discussion of the subject, leaving ‘socialism’ as a pie-in the-sky vision
somewhere in the distant future. It also leaves the opportunists and
pragmatists free to vacillate and somersault through various policies and
tactics with no goals other than a ‘pragmatic’ and resigned critique of
capitalism. We believe the fundamental principles of socialism and their
universal application can be clearly defined without prescribing a blueprint
for the form of their application in any country.
The Socialist Party is committed to the emancipation of
working people everywhere. We believe that capitalism is an anarchic and
crisis-ridden economic system based on production for profit. We are for the
expropriation of the capitalist class and the abolition of capitalism. We are
for its replacement by socialist production planned to satisfy human needs. It is
becoming increasingly apparent that only a socialist rationally planned society
can make the changes in our production and use of energy and resources that are
essential to prevent, or at least mitigate, catastrophic climate change and
other environmental degradation.
Socialism, as we envision it, is an economic system under
which all natural resources, as well as all means of producing goods and of
organizing the delivery of services, will be owned in common and democratically
managed for the benefit of the society as a whole. Communities within a
socialist system will take full responsibility for meeting everyone’s
fundamental needs – food, clothing, shelter, health care, education,
transportation, a healthy eco-system, access to cultural and recreational
resources. Rational planning, not
competition for profit, will drive the allocation of resources, with the goal
of meeting the needs of society as a whole. Under capitalism, advances in
technology are used to replace workers, so that the wealthy owners of large
enterprises can increase their profits, while the displaced workers are thrown
out on the street and left to fend for themselves. In socialism, by contrast,
advances in technology – intelligently designed and environmentally sustainable
– will be planned and implemented so as to reduce the level of human drudgery.
Advances in productivity will result in reducing the length of the work week
and raising the standard of living for everyone, rather than enriching a
privileged elite. Everyone will reap equal benefits from, and thus have an
equal stake in, improving the way goods and services are produced and
distributed. Everyone will enjoy a decent standard of living, and an
opportunity to enjoy the richness of life. As machines and technology replace
more and more manual labour and routine chores, people will be freed to devote
more time to leisure pursuits such as recreation, creative endeavors, and
social relationships. Meanwhile, better education, improved technology,
humanely and democratically operated workplaces, a shorter work week, and an
emphasis on cooperation will all combine to make work a more rewarding, less
stressful experience. Under these circumstances, people will understand that
everyone who is able to do so must work, and few (if any) will be reluctant to
make their appropriate contribution to society in this way. All workers – not
just those in a few lucky professions – will be motivated by a positive desire
to help others, rather than by the need to avoid hunger and homelessness.
No comments:
Post a Comment