Socialism is based on the very simple idea that we should
use the vast resources of society to meet people’s needs. It seems obvious that
society should guarantee every person enough to eat, a roof over their heads,
an education system and a health service accessible to all. In fact why
shouldn’t everything be available for free, we have the capability of producing
abundance and provide for all. Since Marx’s day critics have written libraries
full of books about why socialism cannot work.
A socialist society will carefully plans its way of life and
technology to be a harmonious part of our natural environment. This planning
needs to take place on regional, national, and international levels and covers
the production of energy, the use of scarce resources, land-use planning, the
prevention of pollution and the preservation of wildlife. The clean-up of the
contaminated world will be among the first tasks of a socialist society. It is
fashionable in some quarters to locate the cause of the environmental crisis in
the insatiable lust for “progress but before we condemn progress or growth, we
must recognize that more is at stake in rejecting progress or growth than
thwarting the undeniable rampant consumerism in the America and Europe. Billions of the world's population lack even
the basics of sustainable life, barely surviving in the midst of poverty, disease
with inadequate shelter, food and water. Until the material means to rectify
the sorry, inhuman plight of billions is available, progress and growth must
continue. To deny them a future and make them pay the price for Western
privileged waste and excess would be callous. Equality of sacrifice in the face
of vast economic inequities cannot be the solution to environmental
degradation.
Many environmentalists see the failure of either
market-based or regulatory measures as a failure of political will. They
believe that politicians have yet to recognize the dire consequences we face by
ignoring the environmental crisis. While this may be true, it fails to
recognize the acute limitations of market-based and regulatory solutions and
the impossibility of their effectiveness in a global capitalist economy. The political will is not absent because of
ignorance, but because the political system is owned and controlled by the
capitalists. Moreover, the global capitalist economy is fueled by profits and
profits alone. And profits are sustained and expanded by turning everything
material or immaterial into a commodity. As a commodity, nature's resources
hold no value other than what can be attached to the pursuit of profit. It is
the exploitation of human and natural resources-- labor and nature's bounty--
that is the grist for profit's mill. And capitalism puts profits ahead of
nature as well as ahead of people. Both history and the logic of capitalist
accumulation and expansion demonstrate the inevitability of waste and
destruction. Only when environmental degradation impedes the process of
accumulation and profit expansion will the capitalist system respond to the
crisis; environmental scientists tell us that will be too late. We will have
already reached the tipping point where runaway catastrophe will be
irreversible.
Only a system that will replace the logic of
profit-before-all with the broad interests of humanity possesses the answer. Only
a system that can substitute common ownership for the short-term self-interest of
private property can cope with the ecological crisis. Only a system that erases
the artificial borders and boundaries of nation-states can meet our needs. The
answer is quite simply: socialism. Environmental activists must embrace the
socialist option. For socialists, the “ecological crisis” is not a crisis of
ecology. It is not nature which is in crisis but society, and this crisis of
society engenders a crisis of relations between humanity and the rest of
nature. In our view, this crisis is not due to the human species as such. It is
not due in particular to the fact that our species socially produces its
existence by labour, which allows it to develop and gives substance to the
notion of progress. It is due to the capitalist mode of development, to the
capitalist mode of production (which includes a capitalist mode of consumption)
and to the productivist and consumerist ideology of “always more” that flows
from this. Capitalism does not produce use values for the satisfaction of human
needs but exchange values for the maximisation of profit. This profit is
monopolized by a minority fraction of the population: the owners of the means
of production. They exploit the labour power of the social majority in exchange
for a wage which is lower than the value of the labour supplied. The sole
conceivable alternative to capitalism is a system which does not produce
exchange values for the maximisation of the profit of capitalists but use
values for the satisfaction of real human needs (that is, uncorrupted by
commodification), democratically determined. A system in which collaboration
replaces competition, solidarity replaces individualism and emancipation
eliminates alienation. Indeed, such a new civilisation - corresponds to the
definition of a socialist society.
No comments:
Post a Comment