SOCIALIST CONSCIOUSNESS |
How can we try to avoid potential catastrophic consequences
of capitalism? Are we afraid to scare people away if we tell them how it is? Isn’t
this one reason why there is no action, because people are told there is a
solution to their predicament? Shouldn’t people be told that if things are left
unchanged, civilisation is very likely to be doomed? Isn’t it their right to know
that capitalism has gone too far so humanity as we know it may not make it into
the next century? Capitalist interlocking, self-serving interests have managed
to institute a globalised system of war, poverty and food insecurity which has effectively
turned the world into a free-for-all. People are told to pretend it will be all
okay lest all hope for the future disappears. The full shock of the issues
which face mankind leave us feelings of desolation, despondency and despair. But
the Socialist Party holds that people’s ideas and attitudes can change.
Hopelessness is not inevitable. We are also free of Utopian false hope and can
realistically prepare for the future. Members of the Socialist Party are not be
afraid of the truth and we do not seek to avoid reality. What we witness today
is just a little taste of a possible future but it is not the full outcome. Men
and women are in control of our destiny, we can make our future. We can make
history. It will be in an utterly different world if we take control and
determine the course of events ourselves. We owe it to our children and to our
grandchildren to work together to build what is needed to be able to survive. We
must maximise human well-being by re-organising our society. We require a
different economic system based on a different set of values. We must look at
the social relations of production and distribution through another lens to inspire
us to consider the possibilities and alternatives to the present that we can
shape in desirable forms.
If workers want a constant reminder of the futility of
reforms as such then they could do no worse than study the history of housing
reforms both before and after they were enacted by Parliament. A similar lesson
could well be learnt by the reformers themselves. The high number of often
well-meaning individuals who attempt to alleviate the housing problem under
capitalism have taken on a job for life; one that will result in regular
frustration and hopelessness. In fact, taken globally, and bearing in mind all
the various housing reform bodies now in existence. the housing problem as it
affects the world's working class could hardly be worse. Unable and incapable
of meeting workers' housing needs capitalism forces them to either sink or swim
according to the private or government dictates of housing provision. So not
only do workers have to cope with the very real problems of lack of space, of
repair and maintenance, of housing obsolescence and unfit habitation, they also
have to cope with the constant financial pressures of mortgage and rent demands
where the inability to meet the high amounts involved means repossession and
subsequent homelessness. Similarly, since the end of the nineteenth century,
workers have seen every housing reform supposedly enacted in their interests
fail. The state has not been able to end the housing shortage, provide the wide
and different housing workers require throughout their lives, nor alleviate the
dangers to health and overcrowding within the decaying inner cities. In fact,
the state's interference has more often than not contributed to the worsening
of the problem. The reality for workers is that there is no direct access to
land, materials and technical advice. The capitalist class monopolises it for
themselves. Workers' access is governed by their ability to pay. In a society
freed from the utter absurdity of buying and selling, of commodity production
and of classes, people will be in control of their lives and the society in
which they live.
Let us start by saying what we mean by ‘socialism’. We
should not allow this word to be stolen from us. It ought to be re-claimed and
restored to the meaning given to it by Marx. Profit is derived from unpaid
labour time. Workers’ labour power is purchased on the market by the owners of
capital. Put to work, on average in half the working week, it produces values
sufficient to cover wages to maintain a worker and family. The value produced
in the remainder of the working week constitutes surplus value, the source of
profit. The commodities produced by workers’ socialised labour are privately
appropriated by capitalists. They will continue to be produced so long as they
can be sold for profit on the market. This factor is the cause of the
alternating cycle of boom or crisis of capitalism. It is inevitable that sooner
or later these social conditions will impel people to organise to end the
conflict between the socialised labour process and private ownership of the
decisive means of production, the big factories, mines and corporate farms by
the establishment of socialism. With socialism, production takes place for
people’s use.
No comments:
Post a Comment