Celtic was founded to help the poor Irish peasantry who fled their homeland in the 19th century following the ravages of an Gorta Mór, the Great Famine, which ravaged the land. The descendants of these people still form the core of the Celtic support and many are also to be found working for the club on low wages or in a part-time capacity. Their love of Celtic and what they think the club represents play a major role in their job satisfaction and loyalty to their employers. For many of the supporters, poverty, multi-deprivation and health inequality remain significant factors in their day-to-day existence.
10,000 recently signed a petition seeking the removal of Ian
Livingston from Celtic’s board of directors. He is a lord of the realm who sits
in the Upper House as a representative of the Conservative party, Lord
Livingston of Parkhead. Earlier this month, he voted in that chamber to support
the government’s plans to end family tax credits, a measure that would have
increased the economic hardship being experienced by tens of thousands of
families who support Celtic. Parkhead is one of the five poorest neighbourhoods
in the United Kingdom, where male life expectancy is barely 60 years and where
the rates of heart disease, unemployment, poor academic achievement and fuel
poverty are scandalously high. Celtic, as a club, has grown successful and its
players very rich on generations of support from Parkhead and many other
districts like it. The petition to remove him was really a cri de coeur from
their core support at what they regard as the continuing betrayal of the club’s
founding principles.
Celtic chairman, Ian Bankier, is the man who defended
Celtic’s refusal to pay the living wage to its lowest-paid employees at the
2013 AGM. As well as that, he asserted inexplicably that Celtic did not
recognise any trade unions and that to pay the living wage to all of its
employees would cost the club around £500k a year. £500k wouldn’t cover the
bonuses of several of the current first team. Since then, Celtic has modified
its position by stating that it will pay the living wage to its full-time staff
but already one of its employees is distressed that in exchange for paying him
the living wage the club is asking him and others to forfeit their annual
bonus.
Celtic is concerned that by signing up to the living wage
set by the Living Wage Foundation it is ceding some control of its remuneration
policy to an outside agency. What it fails to recognise is that there would be
no requirement for the Living Wage Foundation to exist if rich organisations
such as Celtic FC paid all of its employees a wage that gave them an
opportunity to raise a family, feed and heat them and maintain a roof over all
of their heads. By adhering to the socially irresponsible philosophy of the
Conservative party in its wage policy it risks inflicting irreparable damage to
this jealously guarded reputation.
No comments:
Post a Comment