The capitalist system is behind all the ills that burden
humanity today. Poverty, deprivation, discrimination, inequality, political
repression, ignorance, bigotry, unemployment, homelessness, insecurity and
crime are all inevitable products of this system. For sure those problems that
ails society were not invented by capitalism and existed before capitalism but
importantly they have found a new meaning in this society and found a new lease
of life, corresponding to the needs of capitalism. The draw their rationale
from the needs of the system that rules the world today and serve specific
interests in this world. The capitalist system itself has continually and
relentlessly resists people's effort to eradicate and overcome these ills. Whenever
people rose to take charge of their lives, the first barrier they face was the
capitalist who stand in the way a society worthy of human beings and thwart
efforts to change the system. Present society is based on the exploitation of
direct producers — the appropriation of a part of the product of their labour
by the ruling classes. Exploitation in capitalist society takes place without
yokes upon the shoulders and shackles around the ankles of the producers. It is
through the medium of the market and free and exchange of commodities, the
fundamental features of capitalism. The
surplus value obtained from the exploitation of the working class is divided
out among the various sections of the capitalist class essentially through the
market mechanism and also through state fiscal and monetary policies. Profit,
interest and rent are the major forms in which the different capitals share in
the fruits of this class exploitation. The competition of capitals in the
market determines the share of each capitalist branch, unit and enterprise. Violence
and coercion have driven the expansion of capitalism from its start, and
continue to be an indispensable glue holding together what has become a world
economic system. Yet no level of brutality can itself keep a system, or any
ruling structure, in place for a long period of time, much less for centuries,
unless there is some level of cooperation.
That cooperation must rest, at least partially, on belief.
Why did so many people in the past believe that God picked one dynastic family
to rule in perpetuity? What peasants believed helped keep monarchs on thrones.
Today, with education so much more available, such a belief would be laughed
at. Ideology accordingly must be much more sophisticated. We must distinguish between
governing and ruling. Presidents and prime ministers may govern for set periods
of time, giving way to new officials, but these men and women do only that:
govern. They manage the government on behalf of the dominant social forces
within their borders, and those dominant social forces are in turn, depending
where on the international capitalist pecking order the governed space lies,
connected to and/or subordinate to more powerful social forces based elsewhere.
It is capitalists — industrialists and financiers — who actually rule. The more
power capitalists can command, the more effectively they can bend government
policy and legislation to their preferred outcomes. More aspects of human life
are steadily put at the mercy of “market forces.” Those are not neutral,
disinterested mechanisms sitting loftily above the clouds, as the corporate
media incessantly promotes. Rather, market forces are nothing more than the
aggregate interests of the most powerful industrialists and financiers. Thus
capitalist fundamentalism is telling us that a handful of exceedingly powerful
industrialists and financiers should decide social and economic matters; that
wealth automatically confers on them the right to dominate society. Not so different
from feudal beliefs in monarchs. Without people believing that the rule of
capitalists is a natural law, capitalism would not endure. When people ceased
to believe in monarchs, that system of rule crumbled. With capitalism it is no
different. “Socialism,” is no longer a bogey word. But capitalism is as strong
as ever today, the mantra “There Is No Alternative” still prevails in the
popular psyche.
Capitalism is what people know and believe in and until that belief is broken through
persuasion and people are compelled to confront the cause of their deteriorating
living conditions capitalism will be nearly impossible to dislodge. Even
allowing for the rise of the Internet, and the better ability for dissenting
news and viewpoints to be circulated it is indisputable the corporate media
remains dominant and allows only a narrow range of perspectives to be given a
hearing. So many different media outlets report the same news item in a nearly
identical way, that “spin” can easily gain wide acceptance as truth. The same
dominant set of presumptions underlie them, those dominant presumptions,
products of ideologies widely propagated by elite institutions, serve as
ideological reinforcement. Public opinion is shaped by repetition, and not
repetition in a handful of obviously biased publications or networks, but
rather repetition of viewpoints, reporting angles and underlying themes and
assumptions, across the entire corporate media. This propaganda does not fall
out of the sky; its seeming pervasiveness flows from the ability of capitalists
to disseminate their viewpoints through a variety of institutions, those they
directly set up and control. Something as fundamental as who generates the
wealth of society, and how wealth is generated, is obscured as part of this
process of opinion formation. It can’t be otherwise, for this is the building
block on which capitalist ideology rests. Incessant spin claims that profit is
the result of the acumen of the capitalist and the capitalist’s magical ability
to create profit out of thin air, when in actuality corporate profit comes from
the difference between what an employee produces and what the employee is paid.
Many people must be poor for one person to be rich, because the private profit
of a few is taken from the underpayment of work to the many.
Can “socialism” be part of the mainstream political
vocabulary? Can it displace the “There Is No Alternative? Is it a term we can
fight for. The only way we can be true to our principles is if we are willing
to fight for them. If our goal is to change the world then we work to create a
new one. It comes down to a choice:
1) Work to change the personnel of the oligarchy
2) Work to create a new structure that represents
people/planet over profit
It is time to stop tinkering around with a deeply broken
system and time to now pursue radical transformation. Many more eyes will need
to be opened, with a concomitant willingness to struggle and organize, if a
better world is to be created. A better world is not only possible but can be
created once a sufficient portion of society comes to believe in ourselves and that
cooperation rather than dog-eat-dog competition is the route to a sustainable
economy with enough for all.
No comments:
Post a Comment