Thursday, February 08, 2018

Sweden - The Ideal Society? (book review)

There was a time when many spoke of Sweden as having the ideal society, blending the best features of capitalism and socialism, though meaning enlightened reforms. 

Anyone who still harbours such illusions would be well advised to read Jonas Jonasson's novels. The Swedish humourist digs deep into the dark underbelly of the perfect society as his main characters are not the kind you'd want your kids to marry; such as con artists, violent criminals, junkies, pushers, and hookers. 

In this respect, if one can use the word, his most recent book is outstanding - ''Hitman Anders And The Meaning Of It All'', Harper, $17.99.

For socialism, 
Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC.

An invitation

The Socialist Party's commitment is to the solution of working-class problems confronting mankind.  Our analysis of society is directed first towards a description of the way in which social problems arise and then to a programme of political action which would lead to their solution. Programmes of social reform leave the basic structure of capitalism intact. Therefore programmes of social reform cannot hope to solve social problems. 

The Socialist Party's opposition to reformism appears harsh, seemingly unsympathetic to worthy causes and which removes or organisation from the centre of important action. Neither charge is true. We do not doubt that there are much sincerity and indignation in reformist campaigns, but by itself, this is not enough. Of course, it is important to care but sincerity can be misdirected. The State has a technique for adapting the aspirations of reformists to its own purposes usually achieved by ensuring activists are "practical and pragmatic" and say that politics is the art of the possible. This justifies compromise and concessions, and the sacrifice of integrity of purpose and action. Capitalism generates reform in its own interests. Reform is part of the normal pattern of political administration, its function being to stabilise capitalism. Social reform is the political process through which capitalism continues its own economic development and since government and the state are the political expression of capitalist ownership, social reform will preserve that class interest. Reformism, inevitably then, involves an endorsement of capitalist productive relationships.

The surrender of principle is self-defeating. Whether it be through well-meaning ignorance or opportunism, one thing is certain, after over a century of campaigning for reforms, basic social problems remain unsolved. In formulating a political policy our starting point must always be economic reality. It is an undeniable fact that under capitalism mankind cannot control the productive process. We cannot set up productive objectives and then organise social resources to achieve those objectives. This is the price we pay for private ownership and the profit motive. The solution is to bring productive relationships into harmony with human needs. The means of producing wealth must be commonly owned, the earth's resources must be at the free disposal of the whole of mankind. In these relationships, freed from the economic barriers of capitalism, man can co-operate to simply produce the wealth that humanity needs. Socialism will not only achieve productive efficiency but will establish a pattern of relationships in which the dignity of humanity will be enhanced through equality and co-operation.

Socialism means democratic control of society in the human interest. This will be a society where the means of producing wealth and the whole of the earth's resources are held in common and at the free disposal of the whole human family. The object of socialism is fundamentally different to that of capitalism and provides for a completely different social organisation. Whereas under present world capitalism, the motive of production is to produce commodities for sale on the world's markets with a view to profit, so that privileged minorities in rival capitalist states can accumulate wealth, in a socialist society this will not be the case. Socialism will not produce commodities, but will simply produce useful things directly for human need, and there will be a shared interest between all members of the human family in that common object of production. If movements continue to support capitalism they must be responsible for all the ways in which capitalism develops. Because capitalism cannot be controlled in the human interest, we do not know all the ways in which it will develop. We are in the middle of a trade recession and we do not know what political effects it will have.

We invite fellow-workers to join us now in building a better world. We must build on their concern and indignation and broaden their horizons. They should not place their faith in governments; that is a sure recipe for disaster and disillusion. We come back to our first question, how do we control society in the human interest? We must not make pathetic appeals to governments to do something on our behalf. We must take the world into our own hands. Socialism will be a society of mankind for itself. The whole community will relate on equal terms about the means of production and the earth's resources and co-operate to produce goods, services, and amenities solely for use. This will be an association of men and women in conscious control of their own lives, living for themselves with the freedom to decide upon social projects and to organise resources to complete those projects. Socialism places people at the centre of social organisation. Equality, co-operation, and democratic participation will bring productive efficiency in response to human needs. But more than that, it will do so in circumstances in which the self-directed individual will live positively, integrating his own life with the development of the whole community.

Summer School 2018

Capitalism is a society of inequalities, in how both wealth and power are distributed. These inequalities have often affected women more adversely than men, and campaigns for women’s rights have been ongoing for over a century. But the debate around gender equality is no longer just about differences in wages or opportunities. Allegations of sexual harassment and abuse in Parliament and the entertainment industry especially have highlighted how some men have exercised their power. Also, the debate has broadened due to increased awareness of issues affecting transgender people, many of whom have felt marginalised.
How should socialists respond to the new prominence given to gender politics? What does gender inequality tell us about capitalist society, especially how it shapes gender roles? And how does the issue impact upon revolutionary politics? The Socialist Party argues that sexism and misogyny are expressions of how capitalism is inherently divisive and unequal. So, the solution is to address these problems at their source, by uniting to replace capitalism with a society based on equality and freedom.
Our weekend of talks and discussion will examine how gender issues relate to wider society and to revolutionary politics. Full residential cost (including accommodation and meals Friday evening to Sunday afternoon) is £100. The concessionary rate is £50. Day visitors are welcome, but please book in advance.
Details about the venue:
Fircroft College of Adult Education,
1018 Bristol Road, Selly Oak,
Birmingham, B29 6LH
E-mail enquiries should be sent to spgbschool@yahoo.co.uk. To book a place online, go to spgb.net/summerschool2018, or send a cheque (payable to the Socialist Party of Great Britain) with your contact details to Summer School, The Socialist Party, 52 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UN.

Wednesday, February 07, 2018

Scotland Needs Newcomers

REDUCING migration to the tens of thousands would cost Scotland’s economy up to £10 billion a year in lost economic growth from 2040, the Scottish Government has said.
External Affairs Secretary Fiona Hyslop insisted the UK Government’s preferred approach to migration would be “catastrophic” for the country.
 “Over the next 25 years, Scotland’s working age population will grow by only 1 per cent, compared with an increase of 25 per cent in the pension age population. It is welcome that people are living longer but this underlines the importance of migration to our economy.
“The UK Government’s policy of pursuing a reduction in net migration to only tens of thousands across the whole UK would be catastrophic for Scotland’s economy and do serious damage to our future prosperity, with the potential loss of up to £10 billion of GDP every year after 2040. That cannot be allowed to happen.
“Even a more modest reduction in migration as a result of the end of freedom of movement of workers through leaving the EU would see a £5 billion reduction in real GDP each year after 2040. That is not an acceptable scenario for Scotland.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15924501.Reduced_migration_would_cost_Scotland_up_to___10_billion_a_year__Government_says/

Wages Rising. Time To Panic For Some.

The main news on the Labour front in Ontario is Premier Kathleen Wynne's government increased the minimum wage from $11.40 an hour to $14.00. 

This has caused many small business owners to get their panties in a twist claiming it will either bankrupt them or cut into their profits. An owner of a cheese shop said it will cost her $50,000 a year. Some have threatened to cut hours, lay off help, put up prices or not hire. Surprisingly the most vocal in opposition isn't a small fry capitalist but the multi-billion dollar coffee-and-doughnut chain Tim Hortons, or as they are,''affectionately'', called Timmies. Some Ontario franchisees have eliminated paid breaks, fully covered health and dental plans, and have made it clear to customers that they must not tip the help. None of these changes violate Ontario labour laws, though Ms.Wynne said it was, ''not decent'' as if Timmies had broken some rules in a game. 

As Socialists, we do not oppose workers attempts to improve their lives but realize such improvements within capitalism is not the answer to their problems. At the time of writing it is too soon to tell how it will play out, but one thing's for sure - in a society based on from each according to his ability to each according to his needs the above chaotic situation could not occur.

For socialism, 
Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC.


This is Socialism


Our age is one of continuous discovery, yet the problems of humanity seem to be  insurmountable. Our age is full of contradictions. We could send men to the moon, yet many on this world have not enough to eat.  Science serves the ends of the capitalist system. It serves the military, not the community. The scientists are fettered by the prejudices of private property and refuse to recognise that the cause of the many social problems is capitalism itself. The drive for greater technical efficiency is basic to capitalism's insatiable thirst for profits; humanity's real needs are not considered.

Capitalism has engulfed the whole world. Every nation is involved in world trade and cannot escape its influence. Capitalism spreads it its own ideology and culture. Globalisation destroys diverse communities with their rich traditions. Today we all live very similar lives with same social ills. We are all cogs in the machinery of capitalism, and are exploited in the same way. Dress, diet and dialect may vary, but the workers day-to-day worries are essentially the same. Apart from socialism, nothing can stop capitalism. It subjugating greater numbers of people to wage slavery. Under capitalism the privileges of class ownership of wealth dominate community requirements, the needs of the majority take second place. World capitalism as the dominating system of production and distribution can never be rationally organised in such a way that it serves the needs of the community. Private ownership, economic exploitation and the distribution of commodities through a marketing system with a view to making profit from the barriers that prevent man from making the fullest possible use of his labour, technology and natural resources. This is the nature of the problem of poverty. Any attempt to deal with world poverty within the framework of capitalist society is bound to fail, since it accepts all the pre-conditions of the problem. The priorities of capitalist society are privileged property rights and the pursuit of profits. We must constantly draw attention to the contradiction inherent within capitalist society. The problem of hunger cannot be isolated from world poverty maintained year after year by the economic barriers of capitalism. This is not a technical problem: it is not a problem of overpopulation. It is a question of the kind of social priorities that people choose to accept. If it is to be capitalism, it will be production and distribution geared to the private accumulation of wealth by a privileged minority. It will mean economic recessions, unemployment, the curtailment of production at a time when humanity desperately needs more wealth. It will mean that technology will be stifled by the limitations of investment programmes. It will mean that the price mechanism and the market will sometimes result in the stockpiling or destruction of food whilst people are starving. It will mean the waste involved in war and commerce.

Socialism will mean the free application of human labour to the earth's resources with the most efficient utilisation and further development of technology. It will mean a productive system built up on relations of social equality and adjusted to the idea that man matters most. The object of socialism is to unite humanity and to solve social problems by building a society which can satisfy the universal need for co-operation and material security.  Socialism is the form of society most compatible with the needs of man. Its necessity springs from the enduring problems, the economic contradictions and social conflicts of present-day society. Socialist society must be based upon the common ownership and democratic control by the whole community of the means of life.Life will be based on human relationships of equality and co-operation. Through these relationships, man will produce useful things, construct amenities and establish desirable institutions.

Socialism will resolve the conflicts which at present divide man from man. Regardless of ethnic or cultural differences, the whole world community will share a common interest. The building of socialism requires a social reorganisation where the earth's resources and the apparatus of production are held in common by the whole community. Instead of serving sectional interests, they are made freely accessible to society as a whole. Production will be organized at world level with co-ordination of its differing parts down to local levels. In socialism there will be no market, trade or barter. In the absence of a system of exchange, money will have no function to perform. Individuals will participate freely in production and take what they need from what is produced. The fact that socialism will be based on common ownership does not mean that an individual will have no call on personal effects. It means essentially that no minority will have control over or possession of natural resources or means of production. Individuals will stand in relation to each other not as economic categories, not as employers and employees or buyers and sellers, but simply as human beings producing and consuming the necessary things of life. Socialist society will minimise waste and set free an immense amount of human labour. Armies and armament industries with their squandering of men and materials will be swept away. These will disappear together with all the wasteful appendages of trade and commerce.

In socialism there will be a common interest in the planning and smooth operation of production. Work will be a part of human co-operation in dealing with practical problems. Work will be one aspect of the varied yet integrated life of the community. With the change in the object of society, that is human welfare instead of profit, man will freely develop agriculture and housing, produce useful things and maintain services. As well as material production, man will freely develop desirable institutions such as libraries, education facilities, centres of art and crafts and centres of research in science and technology. It will be a problem of social planning, statistics and research to ascertain the requirements of the community. Although these techniques are used for different ends, there is already wide experience of them. With experience of Socialist production, these planning techniques will gain in accuracy. Once produced, goods will be transported to centres of distribution where all will have the same right of access to what is available according to individual need. It will be a simple matter of collecting what is required. As well as tradition and geography, it will be a matter of organization and practicality as to which things will require a complex world division of labour for their production and which things will be produced regionally.

Socialism will establish a community of interests. The development of the individual will enhance the lives of other men. Equality will manifest attitudes of co-operation. The individual will enjoy the security of being integrated with society at large. The establishment of socialism does not call for the complete destruction and reconstruction of society. Techniques of production and some of the machinery of administration which can be transformed already exist. The task is to allow their free use and development by and for the community. With the change in the object of society from profit to human welfare will come a change in the function of social institutions Socialism will continue those institutions necessary to its own organisation. For example, the Food and Agricultural Organization and World Health Organisation could be expanded to submit plans and execute decisions concerning world food production and global healthcare

The schools and universities will no longer be concerned with the training of wage and salary workers for the needs of trade and commerce. Education will be a social amenity for life, providing teachers and a storehouse of all accumulated knowledge and skill. Education will not be rigidly separated from other aspects of life. The provision of education facilities will call for some permanent specialists, but knowledge and skill will to a much greater extent be passed on by those actively engaged in their practical application. Education will be tied more closely to the whole process of living.

Socialism will end national barriers. The human family will have freedom of movement over the entire earth. Socialism would facilitate universal human contact but at the same time would take care to preserve diversity. Variety in language, music, handicrafts, art forms and diet etc will add to all human experience. Socialism will be democratic. World policies will be subject to the control of the world community. The most complete information relevant to all issues under discussion will be made fully available. Elected delegates will carry local viewpoints to a world congress where the broad decisions on all aspects of social policy will be made. From that point, the social machinery would be implemented to carry out these decisions, subject to democratic control through both local and world bodies. Decisions affecting only local interests would be made democratically by the local community. The elimination of vested interests will mean that men will have no ulterior motives influencing their decisions.

Within present capitalist society, people and resources serve profit. On all sides it can be seen that commerce and trade – the exchange economy - are preventing mankind from expanding production on a scale necessary to serve the community’s needs. Socialism will provide a social framework that will enable humanity to get on with the job. The initial task of producing enough goods for the whole human family will be a huge one. We do not underestimate the problems of organization and production involved, but to eliminate world poverty must be one of the first tasks of socialist society. It is the glaring contradiction of our times that wealth is socially produced but possessed by a minority. Whereas in science, technology and in the development of the means of production man has brilliantly asserted his genius, in his relationships man suffers an abiding failure. It is this failure which is expressed in war, nationalism, racism, world hunger and poverty, unemployment, industrial chaos and social disunity. In all history, man has never suffered such universal frustration whilst having so close at hand the means of building a better world.


Tuesday, February 06, 2018

Will Oprah Be Better?

After Oprah Winfrey's speech about sexual harassment at the Golden Globe awards there is speculation, as you may have heard, about the possibility of her running for prez. in 2020. Reaction has been different, as one may expect. Some say she couldn't do worse than the twit who has the job now, but then who could? Obviously Oprah has no experience in public service, but some who have screw up. She may be a well meaning person, but then we all know the paradigm about good intentions.

So in the interests of cutting the crap and calling a spade a spade, lets take a look at this woman. The differences between Oprah and Trump, besides the obvious ones of gender and colour are those of intelligence and couth; there is no way she would publicly refer to another country as a ''s...hole''.

 But one must seriously ask how different are they? She became famous through her show which catered to an audience mostly of women who wanted to lose weight and people who ate up the ''anyone can get rich quick'' apology for a philosophy. The most pathetic event of all was when she gave everyone a car and they later found it was taxable! In other words Oprah and Trump are a typical by-product of capitalism - hucksters.

The main question is, ''does it matter who is elected? and the answer is 'yes' in matters of detail. One politician may be more inclined to pass a much needed reform than another. However it doesn't matter who is elected as far as the fundamentals are concerned, meaning we live under capitalism a system that, by its very structure, divides society into haves and have nots and no amount of ''good laws'' will change that. So let's have done with the Trumps and Oprahs of this world, and the best way to do that is having done with the system that has created them.

For socialism,
 Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC.

Rethinking Socialism

What we want is what the people all over the world want.
We want peace, instead of bloodshed.
We want security, instead of insecurity.
We want comfort and prosperity, instead of unemployment and deprivation
We want to raise our families in decent homes instead of slums.
We want to give our children a good education.

We want democracy and freedom, instead of regimentation and authoritarianism
These are the simple things which you and I and all the people everywhere seek for ourselves and our children. Yet we don’t have them. We have undreamed-of natural resources. We have millions of trained and skilled workers running vast industrial complexes. We can produce in one day, what our fathers took years to produce. Yet we do not have prosperity. It is the capitalist system that stands in our way. Under capitalism, a handful of capitalists control all the wealth and power. They own the means of production and distribution. They own our jobs. Whoever owns all these things, controls our lives, the lives of you and me and every other person.

Capitalism works very well indeed to wage war, to kill and maim, to destroy and devastate. Capitalism is at its best when it is at its worst. That is what capitalism offers you. If that is what you want, you don’t even need to vote in favour of it. You can just stay at home and await your fate. But we in the Socialist Party believe there is an alternative. The alternative to a capitalism is socialism. We can have prosperity, peace, and liberty controlled and operated by YOU, working men and women. We want to take over the industries built by us. We want to take over the wealth produced by us. We want to, and we can, run all of society for the needs and comforts of the people, and not for the profits of the capitalist class. We are interested in production only to the extent that it provides all of society with the good and decent and comfortable things of life, that it provides them all the time, and provides us all with the opportunity to enjoy them.

Without capitalism and its markets, we can put an end to war, to poverty, to disease.  We can provide plenty for all, homes fit to live in, self-respect and human dignity. Those are the things we all want. They are the things socialism stands for. They are the things that we in the Socialist Party stand for. All that socialism sets itself to do is to achieve plenty for all, along with peace and freedom. There are jobs for all – but not within the profit-grabbing restrictions of capitalism. There can be plenty for all – but only by socialising the means of production. There is a new and full life to be built – but not by capitalist politicians.  For an economy of abundance, the means of production must become the common property of all the people. Socialism means getting the parasites off the workers' backs.  The Socialist Party has this crazy idea that workers are not machines. We think that they are human beings and entitled to the same right to live and enjoy life as the capitalist. As long as capitalism exists, the capitalist and the worker will never see eye to eye on this question. Regardless of what the capitalist may want to do, the laws of the capitalist economy drive him to regard the worker as a wealth-producing machine. As long as workers are not slaves they will fight to live as human beings. Capitalism, as Karl Marx pointed out long ago, separated the producer from his tools. The owner of the tools (plants, machinery, railroads, etc.) buys labour power (or hires workers, as we would say) to operate them. The more they produce, the higher his profit. When it is not profitable to produce, he lays off the workers.

Capitalism has made of labour power a commodity to be bought on the labour market. As with any other commodity, the cost of labour power (wages) is determined by the cost of production. The cost of production of labour power is in the main what it takes to maintain the worker at his accustomed standard of living. It is, therefore, the cost of living which determines wages under capitalism. The working class will become the owners and operators. The separation between the worker and the means of production introduced by capitalism will be ended by socialism. Until such a socialist system prevails, wage labour will remain a commodity to be bought on the market by capital.

Monday, February 05, 2018

Nature Doesn't Creatate Homeleassness. Capitalism does.

As anyone who has been in Toronto recently knows, it has been hit with a harder than usual winter. Its been a case of heavy snowfalls, bitterly cold weather or freezing rain; mild days have been rare. In the last week of December, the City opened a shelter at the appropriately named Better Living Centre but reported it was half full. On the night of Dec. 27, only 55 of its 110 cots were occupied, whereas other shelters had a 95% occupancy rate.

Cathy Crowe, a street nurse, and advocate for homeless people blamed the empty cots on the lack of awareness of the new shelter. She added, ''The city does a lousy job with communication and the city staff and local media should do outreach work with images showing nice cots, blankets and hot food being served, like you would in a natural disaster.'' 

The city did not comment. 

More than 5,000 people are staying in shelters in Toronto. 80 homeless people died in Toronto in 2017. 

Councillor Joe Mihevc said, ''Respite centres are really a bandage on a bandage.''

 Of course, he is perfectly right, especially when a major operation is necessary, one that requires abolishing a system where people are forced to live on the street.

For socialism, 
Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC. 

Doomsday Worries

A survey conducted by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram makes it plain that tensions between the US and North Korea and severe weather, such as hurricanes are causing many Americans to prepare for doomsday. 65.5 % respondents have stockpiled materials to survive a political or natural disaster; 36.4% spent up to $400 on survival kits in 2017; 9.2% bought materials because of recent political events; There were a 700% increase in orders for bomb shelters.

So, obviously, plenty of folks are worried and what is more obvious is the world is falling apart. Don't look for the answers within capitalism folks, because it is capitalism that's causing all this crapola.

For socialism,
 Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC.

Poor Results

University application rates from 18-year-olds from the poorest parts of Scotland have fallen. The application rate for those in the most affluent communities has increased.

The report stated: "The application rate for applicants living in the most advantaged areas in Scotland increased by 1.9%, widening the gap between the most and least."

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-42938097

Shattering illusions


Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children.”

Implicit in the membership of the Socialist Party is an understanding of socialist principles. In fact, membership is conditional upon this. Exploitation gives the key to an understanding of capitalism. Today the workers as a class are born, and remain, propertyless; they, therefore, do not own capital which is a form of wealth. Capital is the accumulated wealth of the capitalist class. It is useful for further production, but with only one object — that it may absorb the further unpaid labour of the workers, and thus produce . . . surplus value, the source of rent, interest, and profit. Not the means of wealth production in themselves, but the class relations under which they are used to obtain the surplus value, realised through sale in the world market — make them capital. The Labour Party and the Left do not stand as we do for common ownership, which would mean the abolition of such class relations. If the workers are to enjoy the fruits of their toil and drudgery, they must own and control the means by which they produce them. The land, factories, railways etc. must be made the common property of all to meet the needs of all. That is what we mean by socialism.

The conventional wisdom assumes that in order to motivate people to action or to win elections, leaders have to project optimism about our ability to cure all evils and create a world free of hardship.  The Socialist Party, on the other hand, risks popularity by revealing the harsh truths and hopelessness of politicians promises. We do not cling to painless delusions to capture votes because such a position alienates us from the authentic experience of conditions around us. When we deny our pain, doubt, and despair, we deny the opportunity for solidarity with others who feel the same thing.   We end up convinced that we are weak and isolated. Given the massively powerful forces that we must overcome there is nothing more hopeless than thinking of ourselves as atomised individuals. By building that sense that we are part of something much bigger and more powerful than our individual selves, we help expand what is possible. We can reconnect with what we truly value.   Abandoning the dream of some sort of ideal capitalism allows for a broader public discourse about what the purpose of an economy should be and who it should serve.

Socialism cannot be crafted from a diverse variety of groups focusing attention on their own issue at the expense of a universal project all can share. Anytime you support a political party that can’t keep the promise that it made to you during election time, and you still continue to identify yourself with that Party, you’re not only a chump, but you’re a traitor to your class.

The question often occurs when socialists explain the Materialist Conception of History how is it that in identical environment some are socialist-inclined and some are conservative-minded, if economic conditions determine, in the last resort, the views of men? The matter of this “identical environment ” can be illustrated by a simple analogy. Suppose a hundred soft clay balls were put in a bag and sat on, these balls would all be in an identical environment, like men in any class in society subjected to economic pressure, so what would happen? Some balls would be squared, ' some, slightly flattened, and some utterly squashed, as determined by their position in this so-called identical environment. In society, different classes have a different environment. In a given class some would be slightly modified Conservatives, and some revolutionary: as pressure increases so all would become entirely altered. All, then, would be affected, but slightly unequally, since no two balls, or two persons, could possibly be in exactly the same environment. So in society men picture the future from what they see and feel in the present. Some by hereditary fitness and actual environment would more easily and clearly comprehend the needs of the present and the tendency of things; others in conditions less violently affected would find it more difficult to see clearly, or would from the materials in their hands or inherited weakness, form false pictures which would lure them in wrong directions.


Inequality is no accident. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
 argued that the privileges of the elite were attained by “the first person to fence in a piece of land and to say, ‘this is mine,’ and to find people gullible enough to believe him.” We must give more attention to the “rules of the game” that maintain inequality.  In its analysis of the Oxfam report, the Guardian noted: “Booming global stock markets have been the main reason for the increase in wealth of those holding financial assets during 2017. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, saw his wealth rise by $6bn (£4.3bn) in the first 10 days of 2017 as a result of a bull market on Wall Street, making him the world’s richest man.”   


Sunday, February 04, 2018

Not all Jock Tamson's Bairns?

Urgent action is needed to address the “gross racial inequalities” in Scotland, according to a major study.  The Scottish Government, politicians and employers have been urged to tackle the country’s racism problem by the authors of a new book challenging the “myth” that Scotland is a more egalitarian country than others.

The book, No Problem Here: Understanding Racism in Scotland, warns that the job situation for black and minority communities is “bleak” and “in some cases” is getting worse. The book highlights discrimination in the workplace and the harassment suffered by the black and minority ethnic (BME) population. Davidson and Virdee accuse the SNP of creating a “dominant story”, through a more positive attitude towards immigration, that Scotland is more “egalitarian” than England. This, they argue, reinforces “the myth that Scotland does not have a serious racism problem”.

Jatin Haria, Executive Director of the Coalition of Racial Equality and Rights writes “Urgent and major action is needed to address the gross racial inequalities in the Scottish labour market if Scotland is truly to become the equal, egalitarian nation it wants to become.”  Haria said data revealed that after interviews for local authority jobs, white applicants are three times more likely to secure a position than non-white applicants. He also quoted the latest official figures which showed that just 1.6 per cent of Scottish Government employees identify themselves as BME, a statistic that showed no improvement since 2014.

According to the latest census figures, the percentage of people from minority ethnic groups stands at four per cent of the population, but the BME population is rising steadily. The Asian population is the largest minority ethnic group, representing three per cent of the population or 141,000 individuals. The BME population is proportionally larger in Scotland’s cities, accounting for 12 per cent in Glasgow and eight per cent in Edinburgh and Aberdeen.

Haria said: “You have a BME population in Glasgow of over 12 per cent and that’s from the census, so it has probably increased since then. And you have a Glasgow City Council workforce of about two per cent from their own published figures. “It just wouldn’t be acceptable south of the border. I would have thought there should be a greater outcry here. In Scotland it is allowed to go..." He continued, “The disparity in employment is so obvious, but there is so little action around it. Because employment is a long-term process, you won’t get promoted to headteacher for another 20 years or so – if we don’t do something about this now we are going to have a long-term problem.” He writes: “The real need is to deal with institutional, structural and direct racism by organisations and individual employers…

Elsewhere in the book, personal experiences of racial harassment are outlined, which the authors contrast with the inclusive image of Scotland promoted by politicians.

Last week Sarwar claimed a Labour councillor had told him “Scotland wouldn’t vote for a brown Muslim Paki” when he was standing against Richard Leonard in the Scottish Labour leadership contest. Councillor Davie McLachlan, leader of the Labour group on South Lanarkshire Council, has been suspended by the party. McLachlan denies the claim.

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/gross-racial-inequality-belies-scots-myth-say-experts-1-4682102

The Ups And Downs In Capitalism.

On Jan 5 Stats-Canada revealed that the Canadian economy had added 80,000 jobs in December owing to an increase in part-time employment. The unemployment rate fell to 5.7 per cent, its lowest since 1976. 

However, it ain't time to celebrate yet folks, statistics can sometimes be misleading. They don't include people who are out of work and have used up their,''benefits'', and how can part-timers make enough to pay the bills? 

Furthermore, if things on the employment front were as hunky-dory as the apologists for capitalism claim, there is, nevertheless a downside. Since everything is going so well, economists are predicting the Bank of Canada will hike interest rates.

That's life under capitalism; what you gain in one way, you lose in another. 

Boy what a system!

For socialism, 
Steve, Mehmet, John & contributing members of the SPC.