The Solution is Ending Capitalism

Away with all the quack remedies for patching up capitalism—the sugar-coated pills of reforms, and let our fellow-workers prescribe the only scientific treatment for the ills of society—socialism. So long as capitalism remains, so long will doctors be overworked in the thankless task of patching up people, whose chief affliction is not the ravages of some viruses, but overwork, anxiety, and poverty. In these times of the internet and global cable news services, we are given the advantages of knowing fully and almost at once what the other half of the world is thinking. We find that they are thinking very much the same as we are. They are thinking that life is very hard, and the outlook very cheerless for the humanity. If they are workers they are wondering why it is so difficult to get and to keep employment; why there is food and the means of producing food alongside idle men who lack a sufficiency of it; why it is that work is so drab, tedious and exhausting when obviously it could be made very much more agreeable; why the ingenuity of craftsmen, scientists, inventors and so on is being devoted so largely to producing and perfecting weapons of destruction; why the world’s statesmen all proclaim their brotherly sentiments, but cannot translate them into the practical form of abolishing or reducing the military. These and many other questions flow through the minds of the world’s workers as they set off to or return from their employers' factory, mine or office, or line up at the Labour Exchange or its equivalent, in New York, in London, in Tokyo, and in Berlin.

The Socialist Party can look at the world without pessimism or despair. We in the Socialist Party never built up false hopes, and have not been disillusioned. Seeing the world as it is we know how great the task is, but we know what can be done by determined, organised work towards a clearly-outlined goal. The world is out of joint because the social system is faulty at the foundation. The private ownership of the means of production and distribution is no longer necessary or desirable. It produces the evils of poverty, unemployment, competition, war and class hatred. It has got to be abolished. Instead of an anarchistic war of private owners seeking profit and permitting the workers to produce wealth only when profit is to be obtained by so doing, the social system needs to be refashioned on the new basis of common ownership. Society must assume possession of its means of life. The private owners must be dispossessed. Their private interests and their class privilege must not be allowed to stand in the way of social progress and the welfare of the whole community. The Socialist Party has taken on the great task of organising for that end. We concentrate on the one vital question, capitalism to be replaced by Socialism, private ownership to give place to common ownership, privilege to give place to equality. Our aim is one to which the workers of the whole world can rally, ‘without distinction of race or sex’. The World Socialist Movement is the one movement able to face the present global worries and troubles with understanding and confidence. Socialism can only come about when a majority of the working class want it

Workers should reject the nonsense idea of nationalism and should unite for their common good to abolish capitalism and nationalism and work for socialism.

 Capitalism is the pursuit of profit maximisation - the thing that underpins capitalism. Socialism is an economy which nurtures our capacity for solidarity, cooperation, reciprocity, mutual aid, altruism, caring, sharing, compassion, and love. Increasingly, research across many disciplines has shown that we are hard-wired to cooperate—that in fact, the survival of the human species has depended on our ability to work together.  The Socialist Party holds no blueprint but possesses a broad framework which aligns with the values of humanity - solidarity, participatory democracy, equality in class, race, and gender, with sustainability and pluralism, which means that it can’t be a one-size-fits-all approach. Nevertheless, the idea of living well and in harmony with nature and each other permeates everything the World Socialist Movement advocates. The idea of the socialist solidarity economy is to build and knit together all of these practices in order to create a new society.  We need to build an economy that provides social solidarity. We will all be engaged in the valuable social and economic work of providing for our children, elders, neighbours, and communities—not for money, but from our innate capacity for companionship and compassion. Two roads lie ahead before humanity. The first road leads to annihilation. The second road leads to a new world.  The onus is on the creation of people’s movements, grasping growing political power to change the fixation on profits and markets rather than on an economic system that understands the rhythms of life.

It is time for action and the time left is short

On the political field the Socialist Party has no common ground with any other political party; being a working-class organisation, we have all the “sympathy” in the world with members of our class. This "sympathy” is shared by many members of the capitalist class, who are always prepared to shed a tear for the underdogs of that class and to throw charity at them. But our “sympathy” finds practical expression as a political body in seeking to show the way out through socialism. Anything short of that leads to muddle-headedness; it delays understanding and therefore is detrimental to socialism. To be told this may hurt the feelings of the enthusiastic young leftist lad or lassie; it may bring painful surprise to the conceited old fools who were a “socialist” long before you were born.

The Socialist Party holds that the material factors in the capitalist world have ripened to the point of plucking the unexpected fruit of socialism; the harvest awaits reaping; the banditry of a decayed feudalism, glorified Banksters and Factory Robber Barons are now stage- at the gates of the Socialist Paradise. The really effective enemy barring the way is the slimy monster wooing Eve with the deadly apple of Reform.

A socialist organisation cannot seek alliances with groups dominated by, or subordinated to, a capitalist ideology. The Socialist Party is right in its insistence that socialism will come, not as the result of impersonal economic processes, not in consequence of the manipulation of the masses by astute demagogues, but only when the majority of the workers consciously desire socialism. One of the main arguments of the opponents of the Socialist Party is that which accuses us of being "dreamers" because we claim that the working class are astute enough to establish socialism without the use of leaders. True, the Socialist Party not only denies the necessity of leaders in the socialist movement but declare that socialism cannot be established until workers have dispensed with the notion of leadership.

Throughout the ages, men and women in their struggle for survival have continually turned to the strongest and the wisest among them for inspiration and courage in their battles with nature and with each other. To-day, however, when everyone has access to the knowledge needed for the achievement of socialism, and the necessities of life are produced in abundance, there is no longer any need for "chiefs". The minimum knowledge that a wage slave requires before he or she is fitted to take his or her place in the revolutionary struggle is easily obtained, and well within the range of proletarian comprehension. Workers must know they are poor and why, and must then find the solution to their economic problems. What does this imply? The knowledge of a Marx and Engels or comprehension of Hegelian philosophy? Certainly not!

It is sheer impudence and indeed megalomania when leftist vanguards claim that by trusting them, the workers will, in consequence, become free men and women. The Socialist Party has continually attacked and exposed these "pseudo-socialists," who are among the working class's greatest enemies. We have stated that the workers must emancipate themselves, and establish the new society, not with the aid of “leaders," but in spite of them!

Workers must learn that they are poor because they sell their labour power to a master for wages; which at all times are at a subsistence level. They must understand that in a capitalist society wealth is produced for sale at a profit. They must realise that the capitalists are able to live in abundance because of the poverty of the masses and that the latter are dispossessed of the goods they produce by masters who in the main take no part in the production, but who nevertheless own and control all wealth.

When we all assimilate that basic knowledge we will then have the mental capacity to immunise ourselves to the false slogans mouthed by nationalist and religious leaders. We will treat with contempt the rogues and who said we were too ignorant to know the solution to our own social problems. The conclusions we will draw are socialist conclusions, and we will realise the necessity of organising for political action within the workers' own party, the Socialist Party. By capturing control of the State machine, workers will abolish private property, and convert the means of producing wealth into the property of society as a whole. This will end for all time poverty, social degradation and war. Such, then, is the minimum knowledge that the exploited class need to acquire. With it, socialism will be something easily understood, enthusiastically acclaimed; and the worker will laugh disdainfully at the futile and absurd idea of the necessity of leaders.

Taxing Empty Homes

More than 15,000 empty homes were charged double council tax last year in a bid to reduce the number of unoccupied properties in Scotland.

Since April 2014, Scotland's local authorities have been allowed to charge 200% council tax on properties that have been unoccupied for more than a year. The aim of the law change was to reduce the estimated 37,000 homes lying empty across the country and was intended to encourage owners to bring empty properties back into use and reduce the blight of unoccupied homes.

It does not apply to second or holiday homes, where the owner can prove they are used for more than 25 days a year.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-45476146

The poor face dying alone

People in the most deprived areas of Scotland are more likely to die alone at home, according to research that reveals the significant impact of health inequalities on end-of-life care.

Researchers at Edinburgh Napier University discovered found that, in the last 12 weeks of their lives, 37% of those in the least deprived areas lived with a family member or friend who was a carer, compared with 28% of those in the most deprived areas and that elderly people in those areas which were most deprived were 37% less likely to die in a care home or hospice than those living in the least deprived areas.

Higher deprivation was connected to a greater chance of living alone. In the last 12 weeks of their lives, 23.3% of people in the least deprived areas lived alone, as opposed to 38.4% of those in the most deprived areas.

The researchers found that, of those who died in the most deprived areas during the research period, 13% did so in a care home, 6% in a hospice, 53% in hospital and 28% at home. They died on average aged 72.5, 6.3 years earlier than someone in the least deprived areas.

For those in the least deprived areas, 22% died in a care home, 8% in a hospice, 20% at home and 50% in hospital. On average, they died aged 78.8.

Scotland continues to have some of the lowest life expectancy rates in western Europe, with the country also trailing behind the UK as a whole. The average male life expectancy north of the border is 77.1, compared with 79.2 for the UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2018/sep/13/scotlands-most-deprived-more-likely-die-alone-at-home

Auld Reekie's Child Poverty

About 22% of children in Edinburgh live in relative poverty - defined as their household income being below 60% of the average income. It can be as high as 35% in some areas.

The city council has set up a child poverty action unit to help reduce the number of young people in Edinburgh living in relative poverty.

Glasgow Branch decides to contest election (1945)

Party News from the April 1945 issue of the Socialist Standard

Glasgow Branch of the Socialist Party of Great Britain has decided to contest a seat at the next municipal election in Glasgow.

Already, candidates have been selected, a campaign committee is busily engaged in the task of organising meetings, and planning the assault on Woodside (the ward to be contested), and a tremendous wave of enthusiasm has enveloped the members of the branch, who are now making an all-out effort to put the S.P.G.B. bang on Glasgow's political map.

Years of unremitting toil by the small group of pioneers who struggled on determinedly against the apathy and political backwardness of the working class, is now bearing fruit; and whatever vote the party obtains at the forthcoming election, in Glasgow at least, our opponents are going to know that the S.P.G.B. is on the march and that we mean business!

Over a dozen young speakers are now in training for the outdoor propaganda season. They will be assisted then, by a number of London speakers who will be visiting Scotland during the summer months.

In the meantime, a series of indoor lectures are being held every Sunday in the Central Halls, and the response here has been encouraging.

We expect to be installed in our own election premises very shortly:—a shop where literature will be sold, and discussion groups, etc., held every evening. Members are resolved that we must make more headway in Scotland this year than ever before in the history of the organisation.

Here is the opportunity of all members and friends to “come to the aid of the party."

We will need money, and plenty of it! How about digging deep into the pocket. Every little donation will help, and you can be assured that it will be made good use of. Address all envelopes to Socialist Party of Great Britain, Central Halls, 25, Bath Street, Glasgow, C.2. And mark envelopes "Campaign."

Every donation will be acknowledged as received.

Do not fail us, in this hour of endeavour. We have the members and the speakers, you can help us obtain the funds!

Fred Crowe (Campaign Organiser).

We, the workers, want change

All of the marvelous complex technology and the scientific methods are under capitalism not for the welfare of the many nor the social good of the majority. It is for the exploitation of working people and for the enrichment of a privileged class. It is a system based upon exploitation for profit making in the interest of a capitalist class. Capitalism is organised for a class purpose. All machines, inventions, processes and scientific knowledge are made subservient to it purpose.


Only working people can act in their own self-interest. The employers will not. The government, controlled by the wealthy, will not. Politicians will not, for they seek to control the power of the many for their own personal gain. To create that new vision there needs to be a foundation to build upon. At the beginning of the labour movement, workers organised into trade unions. When they found that this was not effective, they organised into political parties. What’s good for the capitalists -- poverty wages, freedom to destroy the environment we live in, no protections against abuse at work, no social assistance to those who have been hurt by their policies -- is bad for us. What’s good for us -- control over working conditions, wages, and benefits that let us lead dignified lives, protection against lay-offs -- hurts profit and the employing class will do all they can to increase profitability.   Those in power portray working families as the problem, yet they lead lives of wealth, privilege and power most of us can’t imagine and will never experience.

The self-interest of the working people is a society that is based upon the well being of all, not a society that is designed for the benefit of a few. Think about it; think of your own well-being, and that of your family and your fellow workers. Think about the well being of future generations. If you are tired of working for the benefit of the wealthy few, then think about joining the Socialist Party and start to work for those who really matter to you. The Socialist Party stands in solidarity with workers all over the world who are struggling against capitalism. The ruling class has diverted the minds of working people away from the true cause of their problems. They create the myth that black people are out to take jobs from white workers, that so-called “illegals ” or “immigrant” workers are trying to steal jobs away, or that women are taking jobs from men. In reality, these workers only want what every worker wants, a decent living. Rather than blame each other, working people need to place the blame for low pay and rotten conditions where it belongs, and that is on the employers who profit from our misery. All workers are oppressed by class.


Prevailing society, controlled by the ruling class, is based on a Eurocentric viewpoint. In other words, European or “Western” civilisation is the centre or standard of the “civilised” world. A good example of this is a world map familiar to most of us where Europe and North America dominate the centre and occupy two thirds of the map, with the remainder of the world squeezed onto the edges and the remaining third. The map distorts the world and our perception of it to the apparent advantage of the dominant countries. For example, India appears on this map to be smaller than Scandinavia, even though the subcontinent is three times the size of the combined Scandinavian countries. The Euro-centric ideology often views indigenous peoples as “uncivilised”, even though many of these peoples live in social systems far older and more complex than Western society. Accordingly, the dominant society sets out to “civilise” the native people by stealing their land and natural resources and turning them into wage-slaves or corpses to facilitate the theft. The working class must cast off this Euro-centric ideology and try to develop a more international view, where all people who work within any sort of social system are regarded as being of equal importance and worth, and where indigenous people, like all working peoples, have a right to their land, their lives, and their self-determination. If the labour movement fails to do this, it will be nothing more than a pawn used by the ruling classes to defeat foreign fellow workers and, ultimately, to defeat itself.



When we workers act as a group we are making a statement to each fellow worker involved. This statement is clear; We are willing to stand here with you, if you are here to stand with us. We may win this fight, or we may lose, but that statement always stays with us. It resonates with us as we go through our lives. When we organise and when we take action that effectively challenges our ruling class, we have the power to demand the changes we want to see. 

Our Objective

We are often told we do not work hard enough nor long enough. Facts, however, prove the contrary to be true. The more we work, the greater our poverty becomes; the more we work, the greater the wealth of the master class becomes. Fellow-workers, you have the power to alter all this; you have the power to make life well worth living, by gaining control of the means of living. You have this power because the numbers of the working class far exceed those of the capitalist class. Riots, strikes, and bloody revolutions of the past have not given workers control of the means of living. To-day, these methods are still useless. But we have one method which is a sure method—the vote. To be able to use the vote to advantage requires knowledge. Workers, study socialism, fight for socialism, and bring about the socialist commonwealth which will free you from your chains and give a full and happy life to all.

 The simple fact that socialism can only be established by a socialist working-class is ignored. The leaders are criticised not because they are leaders, but because, in the eyes of their followers, they are not "good” leaders. The bewildered following look around for other leaders, but do not realise that similar results must follow. All leaders are "good” (i.e., make extravagant promises) so long as they are still on the climb. Their intentions may be benevolent or merely ambitious, but in the long run, their actions are determined by the conditions of their existence. These conditions are capitalist society, and a blind following, which, though dissatisfied therewith, does not understand how to overthrow it. Ignoring the necessity for socialist education of the workers has led, and can lead, to nothing more than the elevation of a series of "leaders” to office and favour with the master-class. If working-class history is any guide, it is only a matter of time before each little group of "leaders,” as it arises, follows its predecessor along the path to "responsibility” to the capitalist class and practical inability to reduce Utopia to a working formula. A knowledge of the economic laws of capitalist development would prevent the workers indulging in day-dreams about "a living wage,” and would impel them to organise for the abolition of the wages system.

The Socialist Party advocates the conversion into the common property of all industrial undertakings which are indispensable for the provision of the wants of the workers, and we see no reason why the workers are obliged to pick and choose, in a piecemeal manner, the industries to be dealt with. That process is only necessary to the "Labour” politicians who know that they have no mandate for socialism, and are thus obliged to frame a programme which will suit the interests of some section or other of the capitalist class. Any attempt to introduce socialism with a non-socialist electorate is foredoomed to failure, and it is only the dupes of the "Left Wing ” that imagine otherwise.

The Socialist Party was formed with a definite revolutionary objective expressed in unswerving tactics. Marx and Engels have been a guide. Hence for us, there has been no wandering in circles; no futile attempts to advance before we have accumulated the army for the attack. That we are satisfied with our rate of progress we do not, for one moment, pretend; but we have at least the satisfaction of knowing that if the workers exhibit the signs of confusion, it is not due to our educational campaigns. When the workers learn to see in socialism their only hope, when they realise that it can only be gained by their own efforts in the teeth of the opposition of their masters, then we know that they will march forward as one body, blundering neither to right or left, till their emancipation is achieved.

The Dundee Poverty Divide

Plans to create a community fridge in the West End – a converted shipping container that would allow people to pick up free produce at any time day or night – have outraged some businesses in the area. They fear the fridge would see the West End inundated with ne’er-do-wells of all hue who might, it is suggested, scare away their customers by getting up to, presumably, all manner of vegetable-related anti-social and threatening behaviour. While everyone is keen to stress they are not against the idea of a community fridge per se, they are just against having it in their own back-yard. Some business owners said that while the fridge is probably a very good idea indeed, it would be far better suited to areas of the city where there is greater deprivation.

 It’s true the West End is generally more affluent than other parts of Dundee, the harsh truth is that poverty is no respecter of postcodes. Just because someone lives in one part of a city rather than another does not mean they are free from money worries or do not need assistance. The sad fact of the matter is that while some areas have greater numbers of people in poverty than others, there are people in every street, in every block, struggling to make ends meet and to put food on their table.

Does a child go to bed less hungry just because they live in one part of the city and not another? Perth Road and its environs may be, on the surface, far more affluent than Lochee, Charleston or Menzieshill, but it is wrong to think that poverty does not affect people there, or that some invisible line is enough to separate the haves from the have-nots.

The real outrage – and it is as an outrage – is that in the developed world something like a community fridge or a food-bank is necessary at all

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/local/dundee/721032/dundee-matters-west-end-furore-cannot-mask-truth-about-poverty/

Knowledge is Power

Labour theory of value 

Socialism may be divided into three parts.

In the beginning is the Materialist Conception of History, which examines man’s social development and relates it to his power of wealth production. In this perspective, history is the process of struggle between classes for social and economic dominance.

In the end is the recognition of the class struggle under the present capitalist social system. Modern society is divided into workers and capitalists, who are in dispute over the division of wealth. When the subject working class take conscious political action to overthrow the capitalists' dominance, society will evolve into its next and higher stage—Socialism.

These two ends are linked by the Marxist analysis of capitalism. This analysis probes to the economic root of the system uncovers the course of capitalism's sustenance and expands into its outermost branches. The basis of Marx's examination of capitalism is the Labour Theory of Value.

 Karl Marx opened his great work Capital with the statement:

  "The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as "an immense accumulation of commodities ” . 

What, then, is a commodity? It is not simply something which has physical properties. It is also something which has social properties, something which exists and operates under certain social conditions. Commodities in the mass are peculiar to capitalism and therefore typify that social system.

To understand capitalism, then, we must understand the commodity. To do this we must first isolate the commodity from its social sophistication so that it can be seen in its pure form. Only when we have thus examined it can we introduce the complications of its real existence.

A commodity is an article—a loaf of bread, a pair of shoes, or a service—a haircut, technical knowledge, which has use value. That is, it is useful to human beings because it satisfies some need or some fancy. A commodity must be able to be constantly reproduced in social production, as are the goods which come out of modern factories. It is produced, not for the individual consumption of the person who worked on it, but for sale on a market at a profit.

Selling a commodity is, in fact, exchanging it for another, with money intervening as a convenient method of carrying through the exchange. When commodities exchange they do so in a certain regulated proportion. If at a certain time a ton of coal may exchange for half a hundred-weight of tea, something must explain why the coal does not equal more or less tea. What is it that regulates the proportion in which commodities exchange with each other?

The only way in which commodities can be compared is through something which they have in common. This means that a commodity's physical properties, which are obviously dissimilar from that of other commodities, must be disregarded. Coal has nothing physically in common with tea, or butter, or any of the other things with which it exchanges.

There is only one thing which all commodities have in common. They are all produced by the application of human labour to some available material. Human labour, then, is the common property of all commodities and this, measured in time, is what must determine the proportion in which commodities exchange with each other.

But the labour time taken up in producing a commodity varies with the occasion and the condition of its production. With coal, for instance, it varies with the abundance of the seam which is being worked and with the degree of mechanisation involved. Thus the exchange value of a commodity is fixed by the amount of labour time which is socially necessary to produce it, under average conditions and intensity of work, at the time and place at which it is wanted.

This value regulates the rate at which commodities exchange with each other. It fixes the line above and below which a commodity’s price, under the pressures of market forces, may vary.

This conclusion applies to the commodity which we are all born with, but which emerges as a commodity only under the necessary social conditions—labour power. When our employers engage us, they are buying our labour-power at the price of our wage. This wage, just like any other price, can fluctuate. But the fluctuations are regulated to the value of the labour power.

Now what is the value of labour power? It is the amount of socially necessary labour involved in producing it—the labour in the houses, clothes, food, entertainments, and so forth, which contribute to the re-energising and reproduction of our ability to work. This value can be varied by a number of influences—among them the workers’ struggles in their Trade Unions.

So far so good. But if all commodities, including labour power, exchange generally at their value, how does profit arise? The answer to this question is found in the peculiar nature of labour power.

Employment is the process of synthesising part of the value of a number of commodities—of raw materials, of machines, of part finished products, and so on. At the end of this process, the finished product has a value greater than that of all the commodities embodied in it. It is labour power which, in the acts of its application, has done this—it has created value.

This is how it comes about that a capitalist buys his materials, his buildings, his machines and the workers’ labour power, all, on average, at their value. When these are all joined by human labour the result is a commodity of a value greater than the sum of all the commodities originally put into it.

It is from this surplus value, from the exploitation of human labour, that the capitalist gets his profit out of which he pays dividends, rent, interest on loans, taxes for the upkeep of the State, and so on.

This exploitation is the mainspring of capitalism; by understanding it we also understand the mechanisms of the system. We understand why capitalism works as it does, why it produces the problems that it does and why it must end as it will. The practice of modern capitalism in concentrating upon reducing the time spent in producing articles in order to sell cheaper, is a tribute to the truth of the labour theory of value. 

It is this understanding what makes the Socialist Party a distinctive organisation, marked by its exclusive ability to understand capitalism and to work for the next and higher stage in mankind's social advance.

Confessions of a Labour Leader (1944)

From the September 1944 issue of the Socialist Standard

Mr. Tom Johnston, Labour M.P., says we are better fed during the war than ever before: —

  Nutritionally, we had never been better fed in our history than we were now, Mr. Tom Johnston, Secretary for Scotland, said at Dundee yesterday.
  Despite shortages, other difficulties and the rationing system, everyone for the first time was able to get three meals a day.
  It was tragic that it took the war to ensure that the most necessitous—children and infants—got priorities, fruit juices, and so on. (News Chronicle, August 19th, 1944.)

Mr. Johnston was a supporter of the Labour Government in 1924 and again in 1929-31, and held office under the latter as Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Scotland and Lord Privy Seal. Will he explain why the Labour Governments did not tackle this elementary problem of nutrition?

No Socialism without Socialists.

Our aim is World Socialism, a system based on the common ownership and democratic control of the means of life by and for the whole community. With Socialism, production will be for use and distribution direct. The working class must establish socialism itself. This cannot be done for them. Thus we reject leadership. Self-styled leaders cannot lead the workers to socialism, but they can, and do, lead a cosy life on the backs of the working class. We also reject the view that socialism can be legislated into being by a majority of MP's over a passive and non-socialist working class. We do, however, believe that the way to socialism lies through revolutionary political action. Before socialism can be established the working class must gain control of the machinery of government Then, being also organised economically for socialism, they can use it to effect the change from capitalism to ocialism. We hold that only a consciously socialist working class can establish socialism. Thus we place extreme importance on socialist understanding. Our primary task is to help to bring about such understanding and we believe the way to do this is to campaign for socialism and socialism alone. Otherwise, we would get the support of those who merely want a reformed capitalism and eventually cease to be a socialist party. Thus we have no reform programme. This does not mean that we are opposed to all reforms. We are not. But we are against a reformist policy. A socialist programme can contain only one demand: Socialism.

We accept, and act on, the doctrine of the class struggle between the capitalist class and the working class and we are therefore opposed to all other political parties whether they claim to be socialist or not. In our view the Labour Party is a capitalist reform party. Its policy of piecemeal reforms cannot lead to socialism. When in power. Labour parties have always acted as faithful caretakers for capitalism and against the interests of the working class. 

Under capitalism trade unions are necessary and inevitable. We are not against trade unionism when it is used to improve workers' wages and conditions, but we say that trade unionism has its limits and cannot be used to overthrow capitalism. So long as this lasts—and it will last as long as the capitalist system of society—it will not be possible for the workers of any trades union organisation to more than slightly modify their condition, and their power in this direction is becoming every day more limited by the combinations among employers to defeat the aims of the working class.

Religion acts as a delusory escape from the misery of capitalism and is thus a buttress of this system. Nationalism, too, is an illusion which help to maintain capitalism. It obscures the class struggle and leads the workers into actions which are altogether against their interests. A socialist working class can have no use for nationalism. The most pernicious of these illusions is perhaps racialism. Scientific evidence shows that all race theories are so much nonsense. The colour of the skin has no connection with intelligence. No group of people sharing particular characteristics is inherently inferior to any other. The interests of all the workers of the world are one; they should not be led by the delusions of religion, nationalism and racialism to think otherwise. Nor do we back the so-called anti-colonial revolutions or national liberation movements. It is our view, and experience confirms this, that these independence revolutions are mere changes of rulers, equally cruel taskmasters to the workers of the territories concerned.

Modern war is the product of the capitalist system. So are the horrifying methods of prosecuting it, including nuclear weapons. We have opposed, and are opposed, to the shredding of a single drop of working class blood in capitalism’s wars. The articulate opposition to war is often the pacifist, to poverty the philanthropist, to suppression the libertarian. These people may be very sincere. But because they treat their problems in isolation, because they regard the problems in terms of idealistic defects in society, they are doomed to failure.

Anti-capitalism with its emotional platitudes are not enough. Nobody in their senses likes the effects of capitalism— nobody enjoys war or poverty or suppression. But what to do about them? Up to the present, these problems have provoked, in the main, apathetic grumbling on one hand or emotional idealism on the other. Both are ineffective. The sterility of simple discontent is obvious. What really counts is understanding the effects of capitalism, linking those effects to their cause and explaining this whole process in consistent materialist terms and in a scientific manner.

We reject capitalism. We reject its inhumanities, its inadequacies, its values. We know that human beings are capable of something better than a society in which millions of people suffer varying degrees of poverty and outright destitution, a society which periodically divides itself into armed camps which proceed to smash the life out of each other. Capitalism is abundant in the hypocrisy of its platitudes.  

A bit of economics

As a wage-working man or woman, your life is conditioned upon having access to a job; you must establish yourself as an employee to some employer. You have the power to produce wealth—labour power. It is the only thing you have, but it is an essential factor in industry. In fact, all capitalist industry is predicated upon the existence of men and women like you who have no other way to live, except by offering their life energy, labour power, for sale. When you sell your labor power to the boss you agree to deliver to him the use of it for so many hours per day, for which he, in turn, agrees to pay you a stipulated price known as wages.  You sell your labour power to the boss, measured by the clock. The boss buys labour power because he needs it to operate his establishment, whether that be a factory, a mine, a railway company or a farm. The most up-to-date equipment is valueless as a means of producing wealth unless the magic influence of labor power sets it in operation.  Workers sell their labour power and receive in return a wage, out of which they must provide the means of life for themselves and their dependents.  It is not a philanthropic motive that inspires the boss to employ the wage worker; it is because he must employ him, or fail in his enterprise. A favorite argument on behalf of capitalism is that "labour needs capital and capital needs labour." This is not at all so, for capital in that connection is meant to disguise the capitalists. Labour does not need capital as capital. What labour needs, and will eventually have, is the instruments of production, without their character of capital. This character, which is a character imposed upon the means of production, the workers will destroy without injuring these tools, without so much as even scratching the paint on them. Only the instruments, without their capitalist ownership, are necessary to labour.

The capitalist system must be replaced by a system which will recognise in industry a means through which social wants and comforts are provided. To accomplish this is the mission of the working class. It is our duty to ourselves and to the future to profit by the experiences of our predecessors and by our own.  The power of the workers in production is the power of the life and death over society. This power can only be used to serve society by organisation of all the workers in all the working places. The capitalists are using their control over industry to destroy society with wars, unemployment and inadequate living standards. Industry must be for human service, not for the profit of the few. To bring this about is the mission of the working class.  The workers are learning more and more about the necessity of removing every barrier and impediment to class unity.

Under any system in which the means of producing a living are the exclusive property of a limited class, the worker, deprived of such means, purchases the right to work for his living, paying for it in surplus labor. The worker's day, economically speaking, is divided into two parts; the first period during which he or she works to reproduce the value of his or her own labour-power, or, in other words, their living; and a second and longer period in which employees produces the surplus value which by necessity is yielded to the owner of the land, machinery or other means of producing wealth. The commodities produced during the entire working day, no matter what their kind or character may be, are sold by the employer and thus are transmuted into a price-form, money, and the employer returns the worker's portion to him in this form. It is called wages, but the money-form in which it is paid to the worker merely conceals the commodity-form in which it was originally produced. It is in reality merely part of the total amount of commodities produced by the worker during the whole day's work, and the smaller part; for the greater portion is retained by the employer. The transmutation into the money or price-form also conceals the division of the day's work into its two constituent parts—the necessary labor and the surplus labour. The part of the day's product retained by the capitalist employer is surplus value. It is the wealth produced in this second period of the working day—surplus value—that constitutes the sole object of all capital investment. It is the basis of all capitalist values. It is the substance of all so-called earning power of capital. It is the soul of capitalism. It is the sacred cow that is worshipped as a god. It is the incentive of all endeavor by capitalist-minded humans. It is the subject of all sermons and precepts by gowned clerics and bewhiskered philosophers who do homage to the sacred cow: 
"Servants, obey your masters—work long and hard for him, and great will be your reward—in heaven. On earth you will get just wages—a mere subsistence—while your master takes the rest; but in heaven, after you are dead—ah! the golden glories that await you—ideological reflections of all the product of the unrequited surplus labor which you gave to your master on earth and which he converted into the physical earthly realities that he enjoys ease, comfort, luxury, peace."

To, produce this surplus value and to convert it into the price form of money and credit to the utmost possible expansion is the object of all capitalist endeavor. The more efficient the worker and the more effective the machinery and tools upon which his labor-power is expended, the greater the share of wealth accruing to the owner of the means of production. The workers' share remains fairly constant—just enough to reproduce their labour-power—relatively subsistence-level plus enough more to breed and support a family—reproducing a new generation of workers when they are worn out and "scrapped." There is also always a reserve army of unemployed workers on hand even in the best of times to keep down the wage through competition for the job at the level of a mere subsistence. Indeed, the entire working mechanism of capitalist society—its laws, institutions and political forms as well as its religions and ethical and moral codes are devised to that end—to maintain a surplus army of propertyless, unemployed workers for the purpose of stabilizing the wages and controlling the workers at a subsistence level. 

The surplus wealth that may be produced by the extension of the working day or the intensification of the surplus labour, either through speeding up the work or developing the effectiveness of the implements and means of production, is practically unlimited. We may say that while the worker's share of the wealth produced always remains practically at a bare living level, the master's share may be indefinitely increased by any or all of the following means:
1.—By prolonging the working day.
2.—By improving and increasing the efficiency of the machinery and means of production.
3.—By lowering the wages or the worker's share of the day's product.
4.—By intensifying the labour by speeding up the worker.
5.—By expanding the market or raising the price of the produce without raising wages

It will be noticed that by any or all of these means the part of the product of the day's work remaining in the hands of the employer is increased while the worker's share remains unchanged. That is the peculiar quality of the surplus value upon which our capitalist system rests and which so endears it to the gamblers in the wealth produced by others, called capitalists—the unproductive gentry who "toil not neither do they spin," yet Solomon in all his glory was a poor skate compared to one of these latter-day parasites.

Plenty for Everybody

The Socialist Party is not in existence to malign or misrepresent anybody; neither is it prepared to lie in the interests of the organization or in any other interest. It exists to speak the truth upon questions affecting the working class. Since its inception, The Socialist Party has consistently propagated the principles of socialism and consistently refused to retreat from its position of irreconcilable antagonism to every manifestation of capitalism. In so doing it claims to be proceeding along the only lines that a party rightly expressing working-class interests — which are, and can never by any chance be other than, in diametrical opposition to capitalist interests — can pursue. In entering the arena of political activity, The Socialist Party has, of necessity, to continually justify its position in the eyes of those —whether members of bodies claiming to be socialist or not — who are not in possession of all the facts—just as it has to justify its existence in opposition to the orthodox political parties. To do so effectively it must, of course, make references to the actions of persons and parties. Such references we assert most emphatically have never been in the nature of abuse of individuals or misrepresentation of organizations. If it can be shown that we have been guilty either of the one or of the other, we are quite as ready now, as we always have been, to make honourable and straightforward amends. We ask the workers whose class interests we champion and to whom we belong, to constitute themselves our judges in this.

We are the “impossiblists.” If possiblism consists in determination to do the thing that cannot affect the result desired, we are the “impossiblists.” We accept the epithet and all the opprobrium that attaches to it. Workers of Great Britain, we who tell the whole truth are the “impossiblists.” They who squander your energies and divert your purpose and lead you into a ditch are the “possiblists.” Choose ye this day whom ye will have as champions of your interests. A study of the Socialist Party's literature will help you recognise the folly of placing your trust in "leaders.” Replace blind faith in “leadership” with working class understanding.

To end poverty we need to know how it began.   poverty is a relatively recent phenomenon unknown to our "primitive" forbears. Early hunter-gatherer needs were easily met with little effort, permitting a surfeit of leisure. Wealth was more or less evenly shared on a communistic basis. Anti-social behaviour was minimised because in a small group everyone knew everyone else. Social hierarchies, as such, did not exist although a kind of "pecking order" operated based on respect and influence, not authority. This way of life came to an end although its remnants can still be found in remote corners of the world today.

Colin Clark, an agricultural economist, in the 1970s denied that overpopulation is, or is ever likely to be, a problem and has insisted that the world is quite capable of providing for many times its present population.  Clark estimates that the average consumption of people in North America and Western Europe is about 8 times the bare human subsistence level. How much land, he asks, would be needed to allow one person to live at the American level if the best agricultural techniques were applied? Only 2763 square metres or about two-thirds of an acre. Is there enough land in the world to allow the present world's population to live at this level? The potential agricultural area of the world . . . could provide for the consumption. at these very high standards, of 35.1 billion people, or over 10 times the world’s present population. This, it will be remembered, is on the assumption of the general use of agricultural methods already practiced by the average farmer in the Netherlands or similar countries, without allowing for any further improvements in agricultural technology, for any provision of food from the sea, or for any extension of present systems of irrigation. This. remember, is only a measure of what the world could provide if the most productive modern techniques were applied everywhere. To do this would take time and demand a massive technical and educational programme of a kind only a rationally-organised socialist world could mount. But it does show that nobody need now starve and that overpopulation is just a myth.

Producing enough food to feed the world’s growing population is not a problem in itself: We have the technology to get the rest of the world into the position of food surplus that the West has enjoyed in recent years. The problem of course is poverty. The hungry people of the world simply do not have the money to buy the food they need and so do not constitute a profitable market. Food production is limited to what can be sold profitably, and its rate of expansion is governed by the rate of expansion of the market for food. A balance between supply and demand means no more than that there is as much food on the market as can be purchased with the money available. It does not mean that there is enough food to meet all human needs. The only framework for a rational solution of this problem is production to meet human needs on the basis of the common ownership of the world’s resources. This means an end to finance and trade, and the problems they bring, and the institution of the planned distribution of food to where it is needed.

 If all we had to do to maintain the world’s population in food was to measure now much we needed, apply scientific discoveries and then grow the food required, we would have few food problems. In a socialist world this essentially is all we would have to do. Certainly some of the problems — the technical (including the training of farmers in modern methods) not the financial ones — that they go on to discuss would be inherited, but they too could be solved within a society geared to serving human needs instead of profits.

To Win

If misrepresentation could destroy a new thought, an idea, or a movement as the expression of theories crystallized, then socialism would have been dead long ago. The adherents to the principles and the program would have been buried with the death of the idea. They would today be remembered only as confusers of minds trained in the school of dogmatism. The advocates of implied faith in the textbooks of never-to-be disputed authorities on social phenomena would have another rest. Questions would no longer need answering; the workers could trust its fate in the hands of and to the intellectual guardianship of self-styled “leaders”. The tide is turning. The workers have begun to think, to meditate and to act. In ever-increasing numbers, stirred by a deeper knowledge of the principles underlying the socialist ideal, they have begun to move of their own accord and to take matters into their own hands. Perhaps great "leaders" have been blind to the fact that the economic forces in society are among the great factors in overturning all the vague theories and plans upon which the would-be deliverers believe a benevolent kind of Welfare State could be ushered into existence.

The owners of all resources and means of wealth form a class of their own; the owners of labour power as their only possession in the market, another. Political, judicial, and other institutions are only the mirror of the prevailing system of ownership in the resources and means of production.
One class owns and controls the necessaries,: the economic resources of the world. That class, for its own protection and perpetuation in power, subjects all other institutions to their prevailing class interests.

Conversely, there is a class that strives to change the foundation of the society. The workers realise that immediately following the change these social relations will also be shifted; institutions deriving their support and sustenance from the class in power will be made to conform to new conditions after the overthrow of the previous system. Co-operative control of industries by all engaged in the process of production must build its foundation on the highly perfected form and methods of production, and upon the conditions which accelerate the passing away of the capitalist system of ownership in the instruments of production and distribution. The working class alone is interested in the removal of economic inequality, and that can only be accomplished by revolution. The workers, in their collectivity, must take over and operate all the means of production and distribution, for the well-being of all humanity.  Harmonious relations of mankind in all their material affairs will evolve out of the change in the control and ownership in industrial resources of the world. That accomplished, the men and women, all members of society in equal enjoyment of all the good things and comforts of life, will be the arbiters of their own destinies in a free society.


The socialist movement is a worldwide movement. We are "patriotic" for our class, the working class. We realise that as workers we have no country. National flags and national anthems mean naught to us but oppression and tyranny.  As long as we quarrel among ourselves over differences of nationality we weaken our cause, we defeat our own purpose. Our party is open to all workers. Differences of colour and language are not obstacles to us. In our organisation, we are all on the same footing. All are workers and as such their interests are the same. An injury to them is an injury to us all. Local unity is not sufficient. It seems that the working class in every country has to pass through the same school of experiences before they will find the road that leads straight to the storehouses of wealth created in abundance by the toilers of the world.


The arsenal of facts based on economic developments and conditions, in support of socialism, is almost inexhaustible. Socialism is not an infallible dogma hatched out in the brains of a few doctrinaires. It is a theory based on investigation of the organized forces of production, and on the proposition that these organized elements of production should be utilized to create things for the use of all human beings and not for the profit of the few who are in control of the machinery and implements with which, by the application of obedient human servants of the machines, all wealth is created. Human intellect and energy has developed the system of production to a very high point of perfection. But the great majority realizes more and more that they are denied a just share in the enjoyment of the yields and fruit. 


What workers of all epochs have been after has been a better world. No one knows the suffering better than the slaves themselves, and therefore it must be they who must free themselves from the lash of the masters. Nothing can be stronger than the working class, when all the workers are properly organised; when they all stand together, the same as the masters do today.

Technology today is used to enslave people, while it could be used to help society as a whole. Practically all inventions and everything worthwhile are made by the workers; and as soon as we wake up to the fact that everything should belong to those only who produce and who do useful labour—then they need not suffer any longer, because then the machine—the real organiser—will be a blessing to mankind, instead of a curse as it is today.

Then will come the time about which poets all through the ages have dreamed; the time which broken-hearted, sweating toilers, men and women, have suffered for; the time which the Socialist Party is fighting for, and will fight for until the workers come to their own, and the master and the slave shall have disappeared from the earth. The bankers, brokers, merchants, soldiers and the whole gang of parasites do not produce one day's need in their whole lifetime; they make money, but do not create wealth. But, one might say, the capitalists furnish the machines. But it was the steel mill workers who did that. The capitalists keep them alive while they are building the machines and then take the machines away from the workers, by power of police, if necessary.


To go toward victory in the socialist revolution that is already in its beginning stage, the workers must embue their brains with the spirit of attack. That means, "To Win."