The Anti-capitalist Campaigners

Capitalism continues to generate recessions, waste and wars. Amid the many crises today people are once again debating the meaning of socialism. The nearest thing to a common understanding of the various “socialisms” is the negative “anti-capitalism” yet more and more parties on the Left spectrum, have virtually dropped the building of socialism from their manifestoes, promising to maintain some sort of version of regulatory capitalism until it makes us wonder in what sense are these parties still “socialist”? One reason why the Socialist Party view reformists with such antipathy is that they made the abolition of that system and the creation of a socialist society more distant and difficult.

The simplest description of a socialist system of production is that, unlike all class societies, there is no ruling class that extracts surplus labour from the producers. The capitalist class profits because they control. As Rosa Luxemburg contended, until a socialist revolution is successful, the most important result of any struggle is the building of working-class self-confidence and self-organisation. If the class must rely on itself, it must be united.

The Socialist Party’s central message was stated in the Rules of the First International, "that the emancipation of the working classes must be conquered by the working classes themselves." We strive to get fellow-workers to trust in their own power to achieve their own emancipation and that our belief is that there is no task that a worker cannot accomplish. We educate fellow-workers to look inward upon their own class for everything required, to have confidence in the ability of their own class to fill every position in the revolutionary movement. In short, we ask fellow members of the working class to take to heart the full meaning of socialism, a free association of social individuals. The revolutionary movement is the gravedigger of capitalism. It is part of the world movement of the global working class for peace, social democracy and socialism. The emancipation of the working class is the revolutionary act of self-emancipation. The Socialist Party declares that its aim is to develop the class consciousness of the workers through our agitation in the class struggle. The job we envisage for is to bring together social and political analysis that has special relevance to the waging of the class struggle and the deepening of working class consciousness. Our ambition is to achieve socialism alongside the working class as a whole, for the whole of mankind. The central core of the Socialist Party’s politics is the belief in socialism as the self-emancipation of the working class. This involves a rejection of the Leninist vanguards and national liberation anti-imperialists.

The Socialist Party swam against the current by rebutting reformism and left reformist illusions that capitalism could be transformed by the action of various social groups such as technocrats without the conquest of power by the working class. It involved, repudiating the widespread belief that capitalism can permanently solved its inherent tendency to crisis and the associated idea that capitalism will collapse without the agency of socialist revolution. Capitalism continues with its ups and downs. These ideas were unpopular amongst broad circles of the left. They were widely regarded as ‘dogmatic’ and ‘sectarian’.  Countless reformists have come and gone, believing that within the framework of the capitalist system, of commodity production and of exploitation they could achieve a better society. It is a hard and difficult job struggling for real socialism and not piecemeal palliatives. It may the efforts of several generations. But for anybody to whom the word “solidarity” remains meaningful, it is worth all the effort. The endeavour of total human emancipation, the endeavor to build a socialist society on a worldwide basis, is in our hearts. The Socialist Party represents the continuation of the essence of Marx's thought: the self-emancipation of the working class as its fundamental guiding principle to establish a new society built on the "association of free and equal producers."

Lothian Socialist Discussion (24 May)

Wednesday, May 24, 

• 7:30 PM

• ACE,

• 17 West Montgomery Place,

   Edinburgh EH7 5HA

• Most people would probably agree that the future of mankind should be hammered out on the anvil of free discussion and debate 

• 

  
  

Refugees need more help

FOR WORLD SOCIALISM

MSPs looking at the problems facing asylum seekers in Scotland have said "destitution" is built into the process. The equalities and human rights committee said that, too often, vulnerable people fell victim to homelessness, ill health and misery.

The committee investigated asylum and destitution, where people are left without adequate accommodation or the ability to meet essential living needs. Committee convener, the SNP's Christina McKelvie, said the evidence they heard pointed to "huge gaps" in the asylum system which suffered from a "serious lack of compassion and humanity".

The British Red Cross in Scotland told the committee the number of destitute refugees and asylum seekers it had helped in Glasgow had more than doubled from 326 in 2014 to 820 in 2016.

End nationalism

SUPPORT FOR THE SOCIALIST PARTY
IS SUPPORT FOR WORLD SOCIALISM

Before the rise of class society, and even until comparatively modern times before communications and transport broke down geographical barriers, the workers did have an interest in the country of their birth. But now that we have all become wage earners, the basis of patriotism has gone. Still the sentiment persists and the master class who control the forces and services of the State are able to identify their own private interests with the patriotism of the class which has now no stake in the country. 

With the weakening power of religion to keep the workers docile and obedient, the cult of nationalism and patriotism is being exploited to the full for the furtherance of the damnable policy of the slave-holding class: to divide and rule. Like religion, patriotism has its vestments, its ceremonies, its sacred emblems, its sacred hymns and inspired music; all of which are called in aid of the class interests of our masters. Patriotic nationalism is nothing more or less than a convenient and potent instrument of domination. Patriotism is the handmaiden of class rule. The nation they call “ours” is the result of a conquest over original inhabitants, and over ourselves, by successive ruling classes.  We possess no country.  Patriotism is a fraudulent thing. The “country” is that of the owning class alone. Patriotism is not love of your country. Patriotism is love for someone else’s country. You see, the UK and its resources are owned by a few corporations and a handful of families - it is their country and not ours.

What is the fatherland and our motherland ? Our fathers and mothers came from many different parts of the world. Rather humankind are my brethren, the world is my country. Despite the shameless attempts by the robber class, the great impulse to human solidarity is by no means dead.  In the class struggle of the workers against the employers and exploiters, of the socially useful against the socially pernicious, in this struggle for the liberation of humanity from wage-slavery, the great principle of human solidarity will come to full fruition. That is our hope and aspiration. For us, all nationalism is destructive of human values, simply pitting one section of the working class against another with the sole aim of furthering the capitalist cause. The people of the world are worth more than that, much more. They are part of a world society which collectively could choose to work for peace, justice and prosperity for all in our time, putting aside the divisive issues of capitalism and recognising at last that with socialism unity is strength.

Patriotism festers politics like a weeping sore. It does not represent progressive ideas Enormous damage has been done, throughout the world, by the notion that one country and its people are superior to the others. A truly progressive policy – socialism – recognises the essential unity of the human race and the urgent need to celebrate it by building society on that basis. Socialism would be worldwide, with no nation states, no borders, and the common ownership of the whole Earth by the whole of humanity.  No one would be an immigrant or emigrant in a socialist world without states and therefore without boundaries. It’s like saying a person born and raised in Hampshire or Surrey who then moves to Berkshire is an immigrant.  Socialists dont prescribe where people, let alone “masses” of people,  should live or move to in a socialist world.  It’s entirely up to them as free individuals in a free society

The nation state did not materalise out of thin air.  Still less did it always exist as some kind of  looming background presence or potentiality way back in the mists of time as nationalist mythology would have it.  Rather, it  was an almost deliberately crafted invention (see Benedict Anderson's book, "Imagined Communities") the outcome of a complex process of structural and spatial reorganisation coinciding the emergence of capitalism. In Europe in 1500. for instance,  there were approximately 500 more or less autonomous  political units - an intricate patchwork ranging from Italian city states to numerous principalities  and duchies. France was not the natural expression of a pre-existing French nation. At the revolution in 1789, half its residents did not speak French. In 1860, when Italy unified, only 2.5 per cent of residents regularly spoke standard Italian. Its leaders spoke French to each other. One famously said that, having created Italy, they now had to create Italians.

Patriotism is not supportable with fact and reason but by deception and prejudice. That is why it is so quickly inflates into racism, prejudice and discrimination. One of the strongest holds the capitalists have over the minds of the workers is the workers' ready acceptance of the dogmas of patriotism. 

The problem that belief in a nation has grown stronger and has become more of an obstacle for achieving socialism. People have adopted a belief that nations, even continents in respect to European "civilisation". As for us, the Socialist Party, we have discarded the flag and disowned the so many deeds of butchery committed in our name. All over the world, in every capitalist state, there are masses of people who depend for their living on the sale of their labour power. Internationally, these people have a common interest which is opposed to that of their ruling classes.  This has been true for as long as there has been a society of two classes - for as long as capitalism has existed. In wars, for example, the workers who were fighting and killing each other were doing so in ignorance of their international common interests. Instead of firing at each other, they should be extending the hand of fraternal greeting and unity. The unity of socialism will unleash, for the first time in history, the full powers of the human race. Socialism will be established by a people who have seen through the divisive cynicism of patriotism. 

Which city has the wealthiest?

Glasgow is the wealthiest city in Scotland, according to analysis of the fortunes of the 100 richest individuals and families from north of the border.

The city has produced 16 millionaires from the 2017 Sunday Times Scottish Rich List. Their combined wealth is just under £4.5bn – 13.7 per cent of the £32.7bn accumulated by the top 100.

The figures put Glasgow ahead of Edinburgh, which has 17 millionaires worth a total of £3.9bn, and Aberdeen with 16 millionaires with a combined wealth of £3.6bn.

The Glasgow Rich List is headed by John Shaw, who left the city to build a £1.15bn pharmaceuticals fortune in Bangalore with his Indian wife, Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw.

The richest person from Edinburgh is property investor Jim Mellon, worth £920m, and now based in the Isle of Man. Author JK Rowling is number two on Edinburgh’s list, with a fortune of £650m.

Aberdeen’s richest is billionaire Sir Ian Wood, worth £1.6bn, who made his money in the North Sea oil industry.

Meanwhile, Moray has produced seven fortunes worth almost £5.4bn – 16.5 per cent of the wealth of the top 100.

Much of the money is centred on Speyside where the Grant Gordon family – who head the rich list in Scotland with £2.37bn – have two of their whisky distilleries.

The richest in Perthshire and Tayside account for 14.1 per cent (£4.6bn) of the rich list wealth. The Dundee-based Thomson publishing family are among the richest in Scotland having accumulated £1.285bn.

To say "Glasgow is the wealthiest city in Scotland," is mistaken. Their wealth doesn't reflect the wealth or otherwise of the city itself. Glasgow is one of the few cities that has so many run-down poor areas so close to the city centre. Apart from the west end of Glasgow if you leave the city-centre going north, south or east you very quickly come to the less prosperous areas without going very far from the centre of town. Glasgow has been badly served over the years and when we consider its rich successful industrial history that contributed so much wealth to the country it seems particularly sad.

Our Socialist Vision

One of the snags of presenting a vision of socialism as a solution to our numerous crises is that it's hard to know where to begin. The gap between where we are now with capitalism and where we'd like to be with socialism appears enormous and therefore we wonder how it might be accomplished. Charles Eisenstein once said “There is a vast territory between what we’re trying to leave behind, and where we want to go – and we don’t have any maps for that territory”.

Capitalists do not direct their capital, but in fact are themselves directed by and enslaved by capital, as Marx pointed out. Capital spontaneously flows wherever the most profit can be made. There is no society-wide overall planning under capitalism, nor can a capitalist economy as a whole be a planned economy. The interests of the capitalists are individual interests. Capitalists all fight for their own immediate interests, the interests of a particular company or sector. By their very nature, that is their sole consideration. They come into antagonistic conflict with other capitalists, other sectors and other industries. So long as the prevailing ideology supports it and the State apparatus is in the hands of the owners and so long its system maintains a reasonable hold, then the owning class are in control. Their system of exploitation is safe. Socialism challenges the whole prevailing ideology and socialist aim to capture of the State machine. The very experience of workers of their exploitation educates them. They ultimately require and acquire socialist ideas.

Socialism is the free association of completely free men and women, where no separation between private and common interest exist. The predictions of socialists with regard to future society cannot be exact because the great complexity of social phenomena does not permit, in our present time, of their being completely observed in all details, but only in their main features, and for that reason the picture of the new system also can only be drawn in its main outlines; but these are the most important considerations for the people of the present day. Socialism, however, can’t be built on the ruins of the existing society by a revolt of starving beggars in rags.

A British worker, employed in a nationalised industry is a ‘wage-earner’ in the Marxian sense of the word, and still ‘exploited’, he is only a wage-slave. Yet extraordinary enough in the former Soviet Union his opposite number earns less, works longer hours, has much less variety of goods on which to spend his money, has trade unions which exist only to squeeze more and more work out of him, is tied to his particular factory, and had the prospect of being sent to a forced labour camp if he protests against his lot; yet here presented the most advanced, emancipated and free worker in the world. Somehow when the amount of unpaid labour which is ‘surplus value’ goes to the British state, the same amount of unpaid labour is not ‘surplus value’ when the Russian state is on the receiving end. Who was kidding who? As Engels pointed out in his Anti-Duhring “State ownership of the productive forces is not the solution...neither the conversion into joint-stock companies nor into state property deprives the productive forces of their character as capital... The workers remain wage-earners, proletarians. The capitalist relationship is not abolished; it is rather pushed to an extreme.” The state is the owner of the conditions of production (‘the general capitalist’) and the direct producers are wage-earners, that therefore the relations between them are still the relations between capital and labour, between employer and employee. All the characteristics of the capitalistic system of exploitation are to be found in the Russian system of relationship between the state, owner of the means of production, and the direct producer, the worker. The state pays the labour it employs with wages, and ‘wages... by their very nature always imply the performance of a certain quantity of unpaid labour on the part of the labourer’ (Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 25/1), that is ‘surplus value’.

The Leninist platform contained nothing that was incompatible with capitalism. It allowed exploitation itself and class opposition to remain in place, and suppressed political rights, enslaved its workers to the yoke of militarism and the senseless waste of its labour power.

This is a general picture of the social process of change to socialism. While capitalism exists, it is suffice for socialism to establish the possibility of the emancipation of the working-class and to work towards that emancipation. There is no necessity to work out and settle every detail of the organization of the future socialist society. Let us not have the presumption to lay down rules for those who are to come after us, and let us be content with our present task. The whole goal of the Socialist Party consists in educating their fellow-workers, in explaining to assist them become conscious of their condition, their task and their responsibility, of organising them in readiness for the day when the political power shall fall into their hands. To win for socialism the greatest possible number of supporters, that is the task to which the Socialist Party must dedicate their efforts and energies. The Socialist Party is the only party which pursues these aims in a practical fashion. What is the use of talking of anything but socialism. We must talk of revolution and our aim should be to overthrow the capitalist system, not to modify it.

Our solution appears 'utopian' and not practical and so the aspiration is abandoned in favour of short-term remedies that prove to be no cure.  Socialism is a society without money, barter or trade, with the awareness that Humanity is One family and where technology, science and spirituality is used to its fullest to develop and manage the planet’s resources to provide abundance for everyone in the most sustainable way. That is a big leap to make because this idea of an abundant, peaceful, sustainable and cooperative world may well seem impossible yet it isn't. It is a feasible future.

Remember Our Past, Organise Our Future

'If they speak consciously and openly to the working class, then they summarise their philanthropy in the following words: It is better to be exploited by one’s fellow-countrymen than by foreigners.’ Marx, 1848

'Because the condition of the workers of all countries is the same, because their interests are the same, their enemies the same, they must also fight together, they must oppose the brotherhood of the bourgeoisie of all nations with a brotherhood of the workers of all nations.'- Engels, 1847.

The abolition of capitalism and the transformation to a socialist society is the only solution to Scotland's many problems. The capitalist class say that socialism is impossible because it is in their class interests to say so. No party of capitalism can solve the problems faced by the wage and salary working class and so none of them are worth voting for. Scotland's independence is just not possible within the context of globalised capitalism. Certainly, formal sovereignty, is possible, where it would have the full power to make decisions without reference to any “mother parliament”. But there’s a difference between the mere legal power to do something and what can be done in practice. In practice all states, when exercising their sovereign power to make decisions, have to take into account the economic reality that there exists a single world market economy on which they are dependent. A state can exercise some degree of influence on how the world market operates in relation to it - it erect tariff walls, subsidise exports, devalue its currency - but this depends on its economic clout. The interest of the working class in all countries is to reject all nationalism, to reject in fact the very idea of “foreigner”, and to recognise that they have a common interest with people in other countries in the same economic situation of being obliged to sell their mental and physical energies in order to get a living.  The liberation for Scottish workers can only come about by overthrowing capitalism itself. If this is not done, no amount of separatism can ever succeed in bringing freedom. Instead of tragically wasting time fostering nationalism, workers should be struggling for a socialist society without national borders. All the fuss abour Scottish separatism is an irrelevance. It will not give the people of Sotland more control over their own affairs. The only change that will do that is a change in the whole social system, replacing competitive production for profit and minority ownership by co-operative production. Neither an independent sovereign Scotland or United Kingdom can achieve this. It is only feasible in a money-free, frontier-free society which, for those with vision, is the next stage in human social evolution.  Scotland can achieve, along with the workers of all countries, the victory which will end for all time the exploitation of man-by-man. The history of the future will tell of the final assault and triumph of humanity over slavery and humiliation and the world will be the inheritance of the people as a whole.

Independence from England will not cure the poverty and insecurity of the Scottish workers, because they will still be the wages labour and capital relationship. There is no truly independent country in the world, because international capitalism has made sure of this. The SNP tell us that independence from England and the control of our own purse strings will cure all our problems. What they do not seem to realise is that the problems they are going to try to solve are an integral part of the capitalist system. The SNP demand for its constitutional “right" to control the economy, completely ignores the fact that this is purely a paper right. The capitalist economy works according to certain economic laws which no government or legislative body can over-ride. So the argument about sovereignty is not really about what the constitution may or may not say. It's about the effective power that a capitalist state can exercise within the capitalist economy. Capitalism has always existed within a framework of competing states, none of which is strong enough to impose its will on all the others. States, as weapons in the hands of rival groups of capitalists, intervene to further the interests of the capitalists that control them. They do this by using state power to set up protected markets, raw materials sources, trade routes and investment outlets. In normal times their weapons are tariffs, taxes, quotas, export rebates and other economic measures. When they judge that their vital interest is at stake their weapons are . . . weapons. They go to war.

Workers have nothing to gain from the redrawing of the boundaries, but some Scottish entrepreneurs and bureaucrats certainly do have a chance of making good if only they can persuade the electorate to back them. Can't we see that the only people who would gain anything from Scottish independence would be local politicians who would become big fish in a small pond?  There can be no relief for the oppressed Scotsman in changing an English robber for an Scottish one. The person of the robber does not matter—it is the fact of the robbery that spells misery. National divisions are a hindrance to working-class unity and action, and national jealousies and differences are fostered by the capitalists for their own ends. The Scottish capitalist is in no wise more merciful than the English exploiter. The Scottish capitalist competes with the English capitalist because the latter stands in the way of a more thorough exploitation of the Scot workers by Scottish capital. Let the thieves fight their own battles! For the worker in Scotland there is but one hope. It is to join the Scottish branches of the Socialist Party and to make common cause with the socialist workers of all countries for the end of all forms of exploitation; saying to both English and native capitalists: "A plague on both your houses". For the true battle-cry of the working class in broader, more significant and more inspiring than mere nationalism, and that rally cry is: THE WORLD FOR THE WORKERS!

What, in all honesty, do nationalists got to gain with the “independence” they so dearly yearn after. It means being trapped within borders - artificial constructs, no, prisons - inside of the bigger prison of capitalism. We always have a choice: we can continue to place our power as a class into the hands of leaders who use it to pursue the interests of a capitalist elite, or, we can take responsibility for it collectively and use it to further the interests of all humanity. Socialism is a form of globalisation – a globalisation of human community that abolishes capital against the sort of globalisation that is subservient to the transnational corporations.  Members of the Socialist Party do not aspire to Scottish independence but to the emancipation of all humanity through the establishment of world socialism. It is not “English rule” that is responsible for the problems faced by workers in Scotland, but capitalism. Socialist society will mean the liberation of all mankind. As socialists, we don't take sides in any inter-capitalist argument. We don't support one section of the capitalist class or the other.  Let the capitalist class and their parties and supporters settle the matter for themselves. In the meantime we continue to campaign for the establishment of a world society without frontiers where the resources of the Earth are the common heritage of humanity. 

The voice of the Socialist Party in Scotland is a small but a constant one. All parties are in opposition to it but it persists. It will continue to expose those who, under the guise of liberators, continue to mislead the working class.

Why we are for socialism

Many of us in our advanced years understand only too well that we will not be members the socialist future, except by anticipation. But it is precisely this anticipation, this vision of the future that we continue to advocate the revolution and promote the liberation of humanity. And that is the most worthy of causes for any man or woman, regardless of whether we personally see the dawn of socialism or not.  No matter what our personal fate may be, our fight for the social revolution has right on its side and will bring all mankind a new day. Socialists are concerned more with people and change than with anything else.

Most of us wonder what the future holds for ourselves, our family and our friends and we want to know if it is possible to see a future free from the poverty for millions free from hunger and free from homelessness. We ask ourselves I there can be such a thing as a secure and happy future for all of the world, or must the rat-race continue where a small number of rich people cream off the benefits of modern technology, while the rest of us spend our days in monotonous drudgery whether in a factory, building site or plush office?

People know that their lives can be improved and made better. It is not “human nature” that is the cause of the problems people face today but the way society is organised, where a minority of people own and control the wealth and exclude the vast majority of the people from any real say in the running of the world. This is what lies at the root of the problems that working people face. It is this capitalist system which cannot guarantee security of employment, which cannot provide the good things of life, which cannot offer an improved standard of living for the millions and cannot safe-guard peace around the world. It is this that must be changed. The working people who have produced all the wealth around us must come into ownership and control of what is their own by right, so that they can then build the society and produce the things they want. Socialists think that conditions can be changed for the better if the people are willing to fight for this. The vast majority of the people gain nothing from capitalism and would lose nothing with its passing.

Once political power has been taken out of the hands of the capitalists and placed in the hands of the people production-for-profit will be changed to production-for-use which is production of what is wanted and needed by the people. Rather than accumulate capital for the employing owning class, industry and technology will have a completely different purpose in socialism - to serve the people. The enormous waste by which the same goods are sold by competing companies under different labels using advertising to convince you that their product is best, will be replaced by real choice and not an illusion of choice. Socialism will enable us to overcome the brakes on progress of capitalism. It will release the creative energies of people. Mankind will be freed from worry about basic material needs as we know them today making it possible to open up vast new horizons of cultural and educational possibilities for millions. Classes will cease to exist and people will be free to make their contribution to the productive life of society. Men and women will be able to develop their own personality and talents to the full. With the harnessing of science and technology, boring and repetitive work will be eliminated and will become satisfying.

Empathy in Montrose

We read:

The destruction of the town of Guernica by Nazi planes under the direction of Francisco Franco in April 1937 saw the Basque government appeal to foreign nations to give temporary asylum to children. An old steamship designed to carry 800 passengers was loaded with 3,840 children set sail for Southampton Docks. Over the following weeks the children were sent to 90 locations across Britain which had been organised by churches, trade unions and private individuals.

On September 17 1937, 24 children aged between five and 15 arrived at Montrose Station where they were greeted by a number of the charities. A sign stating ‘Viva Espano Salud’ greeted the children. At the end of April 1938, nine children were returned to their parents in Bilbao but they were replaced by others who had either been orphaned or whose parents were themselves, refugees.

As tokens of their appreciation for their happy stay almost 50 years earlier, the former refugees presented Angus Council with a silver plaque from Bilbao and a silver salver from the Province of Biscay.

Surely, the desperate need still exists today to help refugees and the compassion expressed by the folk of Montrose can easily be repeated. 

Karl's Quotes

Many a non-Socialist has asked many an SPC'er ,''You guys say a Socialist Society would solve the social problems humanity faces, so why haven't we got it? why haven't millions flocked to your banner?'' Good question, though once again our old buddies Karly and Fred come through for us by supplying the answer. In the ''Communist Manifesto'', one sentence says it all, ''The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of the ruling class.''

Since the Capitalist Class own the tools of production, it logically follows the own the tools of propaganda which produce ideas, and ideas are a product too, a product of the mind. One can hardly expect newspapers, movies, radio and TV to advocate anything which runs counter to its owners' interests.

For the capitalist the rest becomes easy, from the moment of birth one is brainwashed to think their way, ''hate him, he's black or white or Jew or gentile, Catholic, Protestant, long haired, short haired, the list is endless, but it all boils down to one thing - at a given time and place a person is different in some way to everyone else who is hanging around, therefore this person must be shunned and harmed, all of which is pressure to conform.

Many folks will say they think for themselves and sure they do but within the framework of Capitalism. It's like two guys arguing and one saying he will vote Liberal and the other saying he will vote Tory. Since both are speaking within the context of Capitalism they have more in common than in discord.

So one must surely wonder how will Socialism be established and the best answer I can give is that when people realize that only through co-operation can humanity survive they will establish the great world-wide co-operative commonwealth of Socialism.

For socialism, Steve and John

Sickening Attacks on Sick Benefits.

Employees of the Canadian Hearing Society (CHS) have been on strike since March 6, their first since being, unionized in 1943. These workers perform a very valuable service for thousands of deaf and hard of hearing people who rely on them for counselling, employment help, interpretation, hearing aids and communication devices.

The union and CHS management started negotiating three years ago; the workers haven't had a contract or a wage increase for four years. They have maintained a sick bank that let them carry over unused sick days into the following year. CHS wants them to cut back to six paid sick days a year and bring in a short-term disability plan for anything longer which the employees have, quite understandably rejected.

Ninety per cent of the union membership are women who, one can assume, have families to support. It's enough to make anyone feel bitter just to think the working class fight for years to get benefits like paid sick days and then see management try to eradicate them. I'm sure they would just "love it'' if the government suggested cutting their fat salaries.

Though naturally enough, Socialists hope the strikers prevail, we nevertheless realize the limitations of union activity which at best will bring an improvement into their lives under Capitalism. A greater improvement would be its abolition so there would be no need for anyone to strike. 

Steve and John.

All change for no change

NEITHER GODS NOR MASTERS

The capitalist class – national and international – being in possession of the wealth stolen from the workers, compete with each other for the control of the world's markets. This capitalist class are continually embroiled over the disposal of the spoils on the markets, but they present a solid front to the workers whenever the latter get out of hand in the endeavour to better their conditions of life.  It is a false notion of the Scottish nationalists that the Scot workers must struggle for national independence before they can tackle the problem of poverty. But the working class everywhere is under one capitalist government or another. The form of government makes no difference to the workers. Government implies subjects and under the capitalist system of society the actual government machinery, Parliament, councils and judiciary, etc., are representative of the capitalist class – the necessary machinery for ruling a subject class composed of wage-slaves. There is no essential difference between the capitalists of England and Scotland. Both are characterised by the same greed for money, the same ambition for power, the same hypocrisy and corruption.  It is of no concern to workers in Scotland whether they are governed from London or by a separate independent government in Edinburgh. This is because the cause of the problems they face is the capitalist economic system of production for profit, not the form of government. And the capitalist economic system would continue to exist in a politically independent Scotland. The only people to benefit from Scottish independence would be the local politicians, who would be able to award themselves grander titles and greater salaries.

We oppose nationalism. We, as Socialists, have no sympathy whatever with the demand for independence. We would no more assist the SNP than assist the British Government against them. A plague on both their houses! Our only interest is to try to get fellow-workers in both camps to mind their own business and leave this quarrel about the right to exploit to the people who gain from exploitation. Left-nationalists think and act, differently. Some of them are still very much the victims of the mental disorder patriotism, and their understanding of socialism is nil; others are playing a double game which they call "tactics." They argue that as the people among whom it is desired to propagate socialism are still entirely wrapped up in all kinds of antiquated illusions, then the way to clear their minds is to tack their superstitions on to the socialist case. It is hard to imagine anything less calculated to further socialism, their propaganda becomes a farce and they degenerate usually into the more or less open tools of local business interests. They talk about smashing up British imperialism as a step towards the final struggle with the capitalist class. They forget some things. First, there is no movement or combination of movements which has at the moment the power to scratch the power of Britain's hegemony, much less dismember it. Secondly, the effect of their attitude is simply to strengthen the patriotism of the British worker and make him still more ignorant of, and hostile to, socialism.

To split territories, set up new governments, or to re-establish old ones will not help Scottish workers nor even simplify the problem. Their only hope lies in the speedy establishment of socialism. They must join hands with the workers of the world, and make common cause against the ruling class. Not until the working class in Scotland clearly grip the essential fact that they are slaves to the master class no matter what nationality these latter may be; fully realise that such slavery is confined within no national boundary but is worldwide; throw off the mental shackles of "nationalism" and join their fellow-workers the world over to abolish capitalism - not until then will they be free to enjoy Nature's resources. We don’t want or care about Scottish independence any more than we care or support an “independent” Britain after Brexit,

For many people, nationalism has a bad reputation. Yet, few take issue with identifying with their home nation – they call it patriotism. Marxism explains how workers are exploited and unfree, not as individuals or particular nationalities, but as members of a class. From this perspective, identifying with a class provides a rational basis for working class political action. The objective would be a state-free world community. Given that nationalism does nothing to further this understanding, however, it is an obstruction to world socialism. The simple truth is that capitalism will be just the same as far as the working class is concerned in a “free” Scotland. What is required is another system of society, not new administrators for the old one. Independence will be merely a change of masters. Would the working class be worse or better off under London or Edinburgh? Would there be anything to choose between the two "solutions"? Surely, in both a British Union or a sovereign separate Scotland, the workers' standard of living would be much the same. So would the slums, the unemployment and the other problems of capitalist society. The only difference would be the colour of the flag that would fly over the government buildings: Union Jack or the Saltire? Independence will solve none of the problems resulting from capitalist exploitation. All governments are wedded to the same set of priorities and subject to the same constraints. What then has national independence done for the mass of the population, whether we take the European nationalist movements of the 19^th century, such as the Italian struggle against Austria or the Balkan countries’ struggles against Turkey, or the new States set up in former colonies of the European empires? We can say that independence is good for local politicians, lawyers, army officers, manufacturers and business men; it opens up careers and money-making opportunities for them, as also for those in local government posts. The disappointing results of nationalism from the worker's point of view is that when countries achieved independence, absolutely nothing changed except the personnel of the State machine. The sooner the left-nationalists give up pandering to working-class political ignorance and devote themselves to socialism, the sooner will the nationality problem be solved.

Free the wage slaves

Future society will be socialist society. This means primarily, that there will be no classes in that society; there will be neither capitalists nor proletarians and, consequently, there will be no exploitation. In that society there will be only workers engaged in collective labour. Future society will be socialist society. This means also that, with the abolition of exploitation commodity production and buying and selling will also be abolished and, therefore, there will be no room for buyers and sellers of labour power, for employers and employed -- there will be only free workers. Where there are no classes, where there are neither rich nor poor, there is no need for a state, there is no need either for political power, which oppresses the poor and protects the rich. Consequently, in socialist society there will be no need for the existence of political power. Socialism entails the total abolition of money and the wages system. Any system by which the buying and selling system is retained means the employment of vast sections of the population in unproductive work. It leaves the productive work to be done by one portion of the people whilst the other portion is spending its energies in keeping shop, banking, making advertisements and all the various developments of commerce which, in fact, employ more than two-thirds of the people today. So long as the money system remains, each productive enterprise must be run on a paying basis. Therefore it will tend to aim at employing as few workers as possible, in order to spend less on wages. The payment of wages entails the power to dismiss the worker by officials. The existence of a wage system almost inevitably leads to unequal wages; overtime, bonuses, higher pay for work requiring special qualifications. The future society will not produce "commodities" to be "bought" and "sold", but produces the necessaries of life that are used up, consumed, and have no other purpose. In the new society the capacity to consume is not limited by the individual's ability to buy, as it is in bourgeois society, but by the collective capacity to produce. If the instruments of labour and the labour force are available every need can be satisfied. The social capacity to consume is limited only by the consumers' saturation point. There being no "commodities" in the future society, neither call there be any money. There will not even be any bookkeeping transactions or coupons to regulate how much one works and how much one gets. When labour has ceased to be a mere means of life and becomes life’s prime necessity, people will work without any compulsion and take what they need.  For in the socialist society, when there is plenty and abundance for all, what will be the point in keeping account of each one’s share. “Wages” will become an obsolete word. There would be no need for compulsion or forcible allotment of material means by the means of rationing via wages.

Society cannot exist without labour, though. But, work should be useful productive activity. No enjoyment without work, no work without enjoyment. Each individual decides on the type of work he wishes to engage in. The great number of diverse fields of activity makes it possible to take account of the most varied wishes. If it appears that there is a surplus of labour in one field and a shortage in another, then arrangements must be made to establish an equilibrium. To organise production and to give the various workers the chance to be used in the right place, this will be the main task of the elected administrators. The various sectors of production and departments choose organisers, who are to take over adminstration. They are not task-masters like the managers and overseers of today but fellow-workers who exercise an administrative function specially entrusted to them instead of a productive function. Since all work for each other's benefit, all are interested in producing articles of the best possible quality with the least effort and in the shortest possible time. Labour is organised on the basis of complete freedom and democratic equality, where it is each for all and all for each, hence, where full solidarity reigns, will generate a desire to create and a spirit of emulation not to be found anywhere in the economic system of today. This creative impulse affects the productivity of labour as well. In socialist society the antagonism of interests is removed. The application of new technology, which under capitalism is determined by considerations of profit, in the future system will depend entirely upon productivity. Technology which may be very useful for saving labour is very frequently useless from the standpoint of capitalist profits. In socialist society such a point of view will not prevail and there will therefore be no obstacles to the application of labour-saving machinery.

Socialist society does not come into being so that men and women shall live in proletarian conditions but to abolish the proletarian way of life. Socialism should not be thought of as an arbitrary scheme of society to be constructed from a preconceived plan, but understood as the next stage of social evolution. Future society will grow out of the new conditions when the class struggle will have been carried to its conclusion—that is, to the abolition of classes and consequently of all class struggles. Our vision of the future socialist society is a forecast of the lines of future development already indicated in the present. Instead of capitalism’s: “From each whatever you can get—to each whatever you can grab.” The socialist society of universal abundance will be “From each according to ability—to each according to needs.” In the socialist future society of shared abundance, a nightmare will be lifted from the minds of the people. They will be secure and free from fear; and there will come about a revolution in their attitude toward life and their enjoyment of it. Humanity will get a chance to show what it is really made of.

Travelling Pollution System

We continue our monthly soap opera about the TTC. On April 16th, a study that was published in the journal, "Environmental Science and Technology", claimed that concentrations of fine particulate matter on the Toronto subway system, are roughly ten times the level found outside TTC stations. At 95 micrograms per cubic metre, researchers say the levels are typical of an average day in pollution-choked Beijing.

Under some conditions, the kind of particulate matter that was measured, known as PM2.5 has been associated with lung problems and Health Canada advised that indoor concentrations "should be kept as low as possible."

And I thought smoking was bad for one's health! As long as the capitalists have a transit system to get their workers to their places of exploitation, they ain't going to worry too much about their health. 

Steve and John.