No fun during the summer holidays

In a study, titled 'The Cost of School Holidays for Children from Low Income Families',  published in the journal Childhood by researchers at the University of Glasgow, hunger, food insecurity, isolation, boredom, and stress are the reality of the summer break for many children in Scotland.

Far from the happy and carefree time it should be, the study found the summer break for children from low-income families is weeks of additional stress. Researchers found the effects of poverty increased during this time. The study said poor childcare, limited access to activities and food worries all had an impact on children's health.

Prof Nicolas Watson, from the Institute of Health of Wellbeing at the university, said: "The long summer holidays can offer children the chance to have new experiences, opportunities to play, relax, create memories and develop essential social skills. While this is true for many children, for some the school holidays are a stressful and impoverished period of isolation, boredom, and inactivity." Prof Watson added: "For low-income families, summer holidays often entail increased financial pressures, food insecurity, poor health and exclusion from culturally enriching and healthful activities."

The lack of educational and developmental opportunities enjoyed by more affluent children means that the long summer break may be one of the most fundamental contributors toward the attainment gap between richest and poorest children, accounting for almost two-thirds of the gap by the time children reach the age of 14.

"These children need help immediately," said Prof Watson. "First and foremost, steps must be taken to address the national problem of food insecurity to ensure that children do not go hungry or become malnourished during the school holidays. Second, providing accessible, good quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of families is vital if children's learning and wellbeing are to be supported while enabling parents to pursue better paid and more secure employment. Third, although there is a substantial amount of evidence to support the claim that summer learning loss is a problem - and a particular concern for low-income families - there is a lack of research on the long-term impact upon attainment and life outcomes, a gap that must be addressed through rigorous academic scrutiny." "These children need help immediately," said Prof Watson. "First and foremost, steps must be taken to address the national problem of food insecurity to ensure that children do not go hungry or become malnourished during the school holidays.

Prof Watson said: "Unless we take steps to tackle this problem, the evidence would suggest that attempts to rectify the attainment gaps in education, health and wellbeing that exist between the wealthiest and poorest school children will be unlikely to succeed."

Child Poverty Action Group reported the number of children living in poverty in the UK is now four million and that in-work poverty is the most prevalent form of child poverty with 67% of poor children living in low-income households.

John Dickie, director of the Child Poverty Action Group, said: "There is no question the summer holidays place a lot of pressure on low-income families who struggle to meet the extra costs of activities, lunches the children would normally be provided within school and childcare.

"We hear parents talk of their guilt and sadness that they cannot provide the carefree summer holidays they would like to for their children. Some give up work or reduce hours to look after their children in the long holidays. The ultimate solution is to boost family income to make sure they can afford the extra costs."

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-44411518

The SPGB vision of the world

Our global society is in crisis with the rise of the right and left demagogue populists. It is an old pattern, economic recessions often result in society becoming very much more brutal for most people. The class struggle was not invented by Marx. It is a fact, which exists whether we wish it or not. While capitalism lasts, so too will the inevitable class struggle. The change from capitalism to socialism is a revolution, the most far-reaching revolution in human history.  The abolition of private ownership of the means of production is what the capitalists oppose with all their might. We do not consider that socialisation is a piecemeal process. It is the Socialist Party's determined intention to do all in our power to spread the principles of socialism throughout the world. Being socialists our politics always includes socialism. The most important work that men and women can engage in is that of helping on the overthrow of capitalism, and the building up of the Socialist Co-operative Commonwealth.

For Marx and Engels socialism meant a free association of completely free men and women, where no separation between ‘private and common interest’ existed: a society where ‘everyone could give himself a complete education in whatever domain he fancied’. For ‘man’s activity becomes an adverse force which subjugates him, instead of his being its master’ when there is ‘a division of labour’; everyone must then have a profession, that is a ‘determined, exclusive sphere of activity’ he has not chosen and in which ‘he is forced to remain if he does not want to lose his means of existence’. In their socialist society, on the contrary, a person would be given ‘the possibility to do this today and that tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, to go fishing in the afternoon, to do cattle breeding in the evening, to criticise after dinner’, as he or she chose (‘The German Ideology').

The 'dictatorship of the proletaria't is a much misused phrase; when socialism is in being there will be no proletariat, as we understand the term today and no dictatorship. The dictatorship, so far as it is genuine and defensible, is the suppression by workers’ of capitalism and the attempt to re-establish it. This should be a temporary phase. Once the capitalist have given up any attempt to re-establish capitalism, then away with dictatorship; away with compulsion.

There would be little compulsion in socialism; some people may say: “What the majority decides is good enough for me.” Others will say: “I like to have a voice in it.” As a rule, when things affecting a group of people who are working together come up for decision every one of the group will join in and give his or her opinion, and generally the thing will be decided by mutual agreement. Compulsion of any kind is repugnant to socialist ideals. No-one may make a wage-slave of another; no-one may hoard up goods for himself that he does not require and cannot use, but the only way to prevent such practices is not by making them punishable; it is by creating a society in which no-one needs to become a wage slave, and no-one cares to be encumbered with a private hoard of goods when all that he needs is readily supplied as he needs it from the common storehouse when all things that nature and mankind produce are free in abundance for the asking.

Capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class. Labour Party politicians talked about socialism, in practice they carried on running capitalism. They did introduce certain reforms which ameliorated the effects of some of the worst features of capitalism in the spheres of health, housing, and family support. Collectively, these became known as the ‘Welfare State’ – but they were not socialism. The essential feature of capitalism, that very thing which makes the system one of exploitation and robbery of the mass of wage workers by the ruling class of capitalists, namely the private ownership of the means of production and exchange, this remained untouched.

The Socialist Party proposes that all resources, all land and buildings, all manufacturing establishments, mines, and means of transportation and communication, should be, not private property, but the common property of all. We propose that production be made to serve the needs of the majority, rather than to serve the needs of a few parasites.  We hold that production and distribution of goods can be planned to avoid anything resembling the crises in capitalist society. Such an economy on the basis of common ownership without any class divide is called socialism. Experience has proved that planning under capitalism is impossible. When the Socialist Party speak of planned economy we do not mean nationalisation or the mixed economy which leaves all the wastefulness, all the inefficiency and all the criminal parasitism of capitalism untouched, only increasing the power of the big industrialists, the financiers, and the government bureaucrats.

We mean something entirely different. What we have in mind is very simple and clear-cut. Do away with production for profit. But isn’t it a utopia? Isn't that a socialist dream? The members of the Socialist Party are realists, claiming that our case is not only capable of fulfilment, but that the forces to realise it are already in existence. With the workers coming into their own, the road is open for economic and cultural progress undreamed of under capitalism. Production is rapidly increased. Standards of living rise higher and higher. Education, art, invention blossom in socialism. Exploitation of man by man is abolished. The rule is soon established: “let each person work according to ability; let each person receive from the common stock of goods according to needs.” This is socialism. Man himself changes under such conditions. Soon the State is no more needed. In a classless society, there is nobody to suppress or keep in check. They manage their affairs without the State force. Mankind is free, forever.

Socialism is “an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.” As such, it is the watchword for free individual fulfilment – to be confused with neither the mirage of individualism without individuality mired in the conformism promoted by advertising; nor crude egalitarianism. The development of the specific needs and talents of each person contributes to the universal development of the human species. Reciprocally, the free development of each person implies the free development of all, because emancipation is not a solitary pleasure.

SNP and their Scotch Myths

The SNP's annual conference takes place in Aberdeen over this weekend so it is apt that we remind ourselves of the poison of nationalism.

The SNP talk about the Scottish culture and the Scottish way of life. But in what way is the life of a Scottish wage-slave basically different from that of any other nationality.  There is no basic difference in the way of life of the world’s working class because we all suffer from the same problems such as poverty and insecurity. Independence from England will not cure the poverty and insecurity of the Scottish workers, because they will still be the wages, labour and capital relationship. There is no truly independent country in the world because international capitalism has made sure of this.

The illusions of nationality are yet another way the ruling class trick workers into thinking that this really is some kind of collective society, and to misplace their passions that could otherwise be directed into the class struggle. Nationalism is the ideology which seeks to justify the capitalist division of the world into separate “nation-states”. We utterly reject this view of the way humanity should organise itself. We condemn all nationalisms equally. When countries achieved independence little changed except the personnel of the state machinery, the local politicians, who would be able to award themselves grander titles and grander salaries.

The SNP separatists see themselves as visionaries but they cannot see beyond the narrow confines of the nation-state, conceived in pre-medieval times and as outmoded as the clan system it replaced. It is the Socialist Party who are the true men and women of vision, who look forward to and struggle for a new world of common ownership and democratic control of society's resources. Socialists recognise the essential unity of the human race and the urgent need to celebrate it by building a society on that basis. In a socialist society the traditional knowledge and expertise held by small communities will be respected, especially where this relates to local ecology and sustainable systems of land use, and hence priority given to local decision-making over whatever has to be delegated to wider regional or global democratic control.

Expropriation of the Expropriators

At the present moment, the difficulties of capitalism are increasing in every country. There is a scramble all over the world for control of oil fields, ore deposits and sources of supply of all kinds. The result of this scramble has been war. In such a situation, the capitalists have only one solution of the difficulty, i.e., the increased exploitation of the working class. There are two ways in which the capitalists can increase this exploitation: (1) to reduce the wages of the working class, and (2) to speed up the working class while continuing to pay them the same wages. These methods are not mutually exclusive. Very often both of them are adopted by the same body of employers, one after the other. Political leaders hold that capitalism, as a result of the 2007/2008 Recession is not in a “normal” condition. If wage reductions and cuts in working conditions will help in getting capitalism back to “normal,” then they hold that these austerity policies ought to be agreed to by the working class. They have pursued this policy, not merely in theory, but in action in the endeavour to induce the workers to help capitalism back to “normal.” This policy to make sacrifices in order to help capitalism back to normal runs through the whole policy of the politicians. The Socialist Party contends that the difficulties of the capitalist system are due to the normal development of the capitalist system itself, and no amount of concessions by the workers can ameliorate the difficulties which the capitalist class face.  Sooner or later new crises will arise in the development of the system, and the capitalists will call upon the workers for further sacrifice.   The Socialist Party, therefore, call upon the workers to resist all attempts to lower their standard of living, to unite their forces industrially and to make their resistance as widespread and as united as possible, and to then attack the capitalist system itself. 

If we look at the production of wealth in present-day society, we find that that production of wealth can only take place through the co-operation of many diverse trades and industries interlocked one with the other. Within a given factory, the whole variety of workers, manual and mental, co-operate together in order to produce a common product. Within society as a whole, all industries co-operate together in order to produce wealth, the raw material of one industry being the finished product of the other. Without this co-operation of all the useful elements of society in production, there can be no society as we understand it to-day. Wealth to-day can only be produced and industry maintained through this co-operation.

The vast industries in which men and women co-operate to produce wealth to-day are not the creation of any particular class, but have only been created and can only be maintained by the co-operative labour of all useful elements in society. The technical knowledge, the science which is utilised by these industries is not the creation of any particular social class but is the shared legacy of all co-operating together in society.

This knowledge and its application to industry, is constantly increasing, and with it, the power to produce wealth quickly and efficiently. Within our lifetimes we have seen tremendous progress in science and technology. The ability to produce wealth grows every year, and with it, in a rational system of society, the welfare of the mass of the people should grow also. Yet in the capitalist society, the opposite process is taking place. Alongside growing power to produce wealth, there is growing poverty. The wealth which is produced by the co-operative labour of all active workers in industry is divided in most hopelessly unequal fashion. In addition, the existing powers of wealth production are not being used to their fullest capacity.

The cause of the flawed distribution of wealth lies in the nature of the capitalist order of society. Whilst wealth is cooperatively produced, while industries can only be maintained by the co-operative labour of millions of workers, these industries are not owned by the workers who operate them, but by a small idle class owning the land, and the means of production. Because this class owns the means of life, it is able to dictate to the producers the terms on which they will work. These terms may vary for different classes of workers, in accordance with their scarcity, skill, or organisation, but they are always of such a character as to allow to the employing class the lion’s share of the wealth which is produced by the labour of others.

In addition to the unequal distribution of wealth, capitalism wastes many of the advantages of science and invention because of the unplanned character of modern industry taken as a whole. In a single enterprise, or even within a single industry, production may be planned according to the most scientific methods, but in capitalist society as a whole, there is no plan regulating the production and distribution of wealth. The whole system is based on the pursuit of profit by the owners of the means of production. The regulator of the whole system determining whether industry shall be expanded or shall go on short time is the rise and fall of prices on the market, reflecting the rise and fall in the possibilities of profit for the capitalists whose industries produce for the market.

The chaos of capitalism taken as a whole renders it incapable of completely utilising the results of modern science and invention or of overcoming the crises in the basic industries in this country. No capitalist will make any effort to reorganise an industry on more efficient lines, however, unless there is the prospects of a vast profit accruing from the expenditure on that reorganisation. Even when capitalism was on the upgrade, however, continually expanding year after year, the workers did not receive the advantages of the mighty technical progress that was being made.

The scramble for profit leads also to the scramble for markets for sources of investment and raw materials on an international scale and leads inevitably to war. In the period of the greatest expansion of capitalism, colossal wealth existed alongside the most heart-rending poverty. The idea promoted is that the more capitalism produces wealth the better off everyone will become. This is not the case. The more wealth capitalism produces the greater its difficulties as a functioning system; the more difficult it is to obtain markets, the more intensive international competition becomes; the greater becomes the danger of the antagonisms created by this competition ripening into war. Thus, on the one hand, capitalism, in its development, widens the gulf between the active workers and the non-producing capitalists, increases the difficulties of capitalism to dispose of its product, and drives the capitalist states irresistibly towards war.

Remembering the Miners' Strike

While the UK government ruled out an inquiry into the "Battle of Orgreave", an independent review of the impact of policing on communities during the miners' strike has been set up by the Scottish government.

It is estimated that 500 Scottish miners were arrested during the year-long strike, with Scotland seeing 30% of the arrests during the disputes despite only having 10% of the UK's mining workforce.

 David Hamilton, a former miner's leader who went on to become Labour MP for Midlothian, explained, "They'll be able to look at what's happened, they'll be able to see the mistakes that were made.

"They'll be able to see that it was a state versus a trade union.

"And I think if they come to a conclusion that proves beyond doubt, something that we've always known as miners, that the general public have never known, and young people don't understand, that the power of the state was used in a way that should never have been used...It's about recognising they were criminalised during that strike and they should never have been criminalised."

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-44402284

Scotland's Empty Houses

Figures used in the report from the National Records of Scotland suggest there is nearly 80,000 empty homes in Scotland.

Edinburgh came out with the highest number of empty properties, with the city having nearly 8000 empty properties, followed by Glasgow which had over 7500.

In 2007, 2.67 per cent of properties in Scotland were empty, but this has grown to over 3 per cent in 2018.

https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/12851/over-100000-empty-homes-and-under-used-second-homes-scotland-worsening-housing-crisis

The Price of Death

The basic cost of a burial in Scotland has risen on average by 75% since 2010.  Citizens Advice Scotland said of the 55,000 funerals taking place in Scotland each year 10% of families struggle to pay the bill.

Jim Brodie, of the Scottish Association of Independent Funeral Directors, believed council charges for interment and cremations were "immoral". Mr Brodie said grieving families were being subjected to a "postcode lottery" because of the variety of fees being levied by the country's 32 councils.

BBC Scotland showed that the basic cost for an interment varied between £310 in the Western Isles to £1,780 in Stirling, with the Scottish average being £730 - a rise of 75% in eight years. In Shetland, interment fees have increased by 355% from £110 to £500 since 2010 and in South Lanarkshire and East Renfrewshire the charge has risen by 151% and 136% respectively.

Pay an additional £67 to Dundee Council for "extra depth
Permission from Dundee Council to scatter ashes will set you back £47
Music for a cremation service by Falkirk Council will cost you an additional £147

Overthrow capitalism and replace it with something nicer

Socialism is not some idyllic Utopia, which we OUGHT to establish but a future system which we MUST attain if humanity is to continue civilisation. Capitalism is tremendously wasteful and destructive of men, goods, power, land. The ultimate destiny of all useful goods is to be consumed. Yet under capitalism goods are not produced to be consumed, but for profit, and if a greater profit can be made by destroying the goods, the destruction takes place. While production is a social act, the appropriation of the product, under the present system, is individual. As capitalism develops, larger and larger factories are built, thousands of labourers co-operate in the production of a single article, yet the article does not belong to them but to the owner of the means of production. The labourers are merely paid wages for the use of their labour power, wages which constantly grow less and less an aliquot part of the total product as the total product ever increases. Simultaneously the owner of the industries becomes progressively more divorced from the productive process. Small mom and pop enterprises become big corporations or are driven out of business, the original entrepreneurs become mere rentiers. The corporation also develops, becomes more and more a public utility. The state begins to take a hand and to run the industry. The former individual owner now becomes a purely parasitic hanger-on, his dividends paid regularly by the state apparatus which he controls.  The greater the productivity of labour and the greater the amount of production, the greater becomes the surplus product in the hands of the owners, the greater the need for markets, the greater, therefore, the competition among the capitalists, and the greater the tendency to lower the rate of profit, the greater the lowering of the wages of the workers, the larger the army of unemployed and paupers, the more vigorous the drive for foreign markets for exploitation, and the more violent the military interventions to control the world. The greater the globalisation of markets, the greater the need to have a military machine to defend the market interests, the greater grows the oppressive burdens of the state apparatus, the greater grows the necessity to transform the whole nation into an armed, economically ruthless, chauvinistic state.

  It was capitalism which created the working class who bear the full weight of capitalism upon their backs and as the working class fights against its increasingly worsened position it comes to the realisation that the only way out is for labour to take what it has produced for itself. To take over the means of production, the mines, mills, factories, resources, utilities and run them for their own benefit. Then we will have production for use and not for profit. Then we will end both despotism in the factory and anarchy in the market. Then society will allocate its resources and labour power according to a social plan that will benefit all. It is capitalism which sharpens the workers' intelligence and gives it its science. It is capitalism that arms the workers with knowledge and gives them the strength to carry out their own interests. In short, capitalism, as it grows out of date, creates its own grave-diggers. The interest of the workers is diametrically opposed to the interest of the capitalists and exploiters of the workers who, controlling the government and the social educational agencies, strive to keep the workers down. Surely, the victory of the working class cannot be forever delayed as the capitalists, blinded by their interests, try to stop the Juggernaut of progress. When the workers of the world unite to take political power and to supplant the capitalist system, then the rule over people will begin to give way to an administration over things. The state and religion will begin to wither away. There will be no exploitation. There will be no classes. The productivity of labour will greatly increase, each will receive according to needs and will contribute according to his ability.

When we have reached socialism we will have reached a rational economic where society will be a free one and mankind emancipated. 

Nationalist Questions

Only 59% of people in Scotland say they feel strongly British, well down on the 79% who do so in Wales and the 82% in England.

 More than four in five say they feel strongly Scottish. Indeed, as many as 61% saying they feel "very strongly" Scottish.

In contrast, only 54% of people in England feel "very strongly" English, while just 41% of those in Wales claim they are "very strongly" Welsh.

 A strong Scottish identity - and a weak British one - is the hallmark of SNP support. No less than 79% of those who voted for the party in last year's general election say they feel "very strongly" Scottish, whereas only 9% say they feel "very strongly" British.

 Only one in six people in England say they are English and are not British. No less than 70% of "English nationalists" say that "England was better in the past" and only 13% that its "best years are still in the future". In contrast, just 16% of SNP supporters believe that "Scotland was better in the past", while as many as 64% feel that the country's best years are yet to come. The optimism of SNP supporters is sustained by the prospect that one day Scotland will become independent and their belief - disputed by others of course - that Scotland will be better off as a result.

The SNP has long argued that it promotes an inclusive sense of Scottish identity - anyone who comes to live in Scotland has the right to be regarded as Scottish, irrespective of whether they or their parents were born in Scotland or not. In England, however, politicians have tended to promote Britishness rather than Englishness as the identity to which all living in England can lay claim.

Only about half (47%) say that someone who has lived in Scotland for more than 10 years makes someone Scottish. However, that is nearly twice the proportion of "English nationalists" (25%) who say that having lived in England for more than 10 years makes someone English. Half say that Scotland's "diverse cultural life" adds strongly to their sense of belonging to where they currently live, whereas only 22% of "English nationalists" do so. Half say that Scotland's "diverse cultural life" adds strongly to their sense of belonging to where they currently live, whereas only 22% of "English nationalists" do so.

There is one thing on which SNP supporters and "English nationalists" agree - that their country is better than most others. Three in five SNP supporters (60%) and almost two in three "English nationalists" express that view. In both cases, little more than a handful think that their country is worse than most other countries.

The novelist, Victor Hugo once said, “Let's not be English, French or German anymore. Let's be European. No not European, let's be men. Let's be Humanity. All we have to do is get rid of one last piece of egocentricity - patriotism." 

Why love a country more than any another simply on the basis of the bit of soil you happen to have been born on? The Socialist Party case against nationalism is straightforward. We do not advocate re-drawing the border. No socialist will ever fight to defend any border — we want to do away with the divisiveness of countries and states. Nationalism can never be a solution to the problems of oppression. The problem is class, not national, racial, or religious origins. As a class, workers have no country. The Scots do not own Scotland.

The independence movement seeks to persuade all those who live here that a better Scotland is possible. Nationalists endeavour to prove an independent Scotland would make everyone better off yet political power lies with a global elite and the economics is inter-linked across borders. Multi-national companies lobby and fund political parties across the world. No nation in a capitalist world has economic independence, they are all interconnected though obviously, the more powerful economies dominate the rest. Given the growing globalisation and unification of the world – contrary to the will of nations and governments – some people cling to what is familiar. 

Would an independent capitalism Scotland be any different than now - of course not? You've got to ask yourself, will the average Scot really gain much by Scottish independence? Or will he continue to be part of an exploited majority in a system run by a privileged minority, whether they be Scots or English?  If you think that some people have "rights" based on "nation" ("right of nations to self-determination" or a "right of abode" based on national/ethnic criteria) then you are arguing for nationalism and the right of bourgeoisie to dominate its "own" working class, not internationalism. If you support the "right of a nation to self-determination" you merge the population comprising this so-called nation into a homogenised mass with an over-riding common interest and common identity that is their national identity. Class differences are suppressed or even completely ignored for the sake of upholding this national identity. This is class collaborationism for the sake of an abstraction called the "nation state" which is itself a product of capitalism. Nationalism is not only a product of capitalism but a major means by which capitalism perpetuates itself. By buying into the illusion of nationalism you are aiding capitalism.

A "Saintly" Society

“Nature furnishes its wealth to all men in common. God beneficiently has created all things that their enjoyment be common to all living beings, and that the earth become the common possession of all. It is nature itself that has given birth to the right of the community, while it is only unjust usurpation that has created the right of private property.” - St Ambrose (340-397 AD)

More and more workers are realizing that the capitalist system is rotten to the core. They are open to new ideas; looking for an alternative. The road to transforming the society into a socialist system cannot be achieved in 1001 different ways. There is only one way, that’s the way traced out by the history of the working class’s struggle against exploitation. 

The right of private property is the right of a few to own and control the means by which all must live, the right of the owners of the means of production to utilise it to exploit the rest of the community in the interest of their personal profit, the right to determine what shall be produced and how, regardless of the misery and wretchedness of those who produce it. In the wake of that principle, that so-called right, came slavery, in which the multitude toiled in chains that a few masters might live in luxury; feudalism, when a handful of nobles feasted and wallowed in idleness on the enforced labour of others; then capitalism, when the masses were herded into factories, to get the wherewithal to live, while the product of their labour was appropriated by the new lords of capital. The right to private property, the right to exploit, the right to rob, the right to over-produce and cause crises, the right to compete, and cause wars. The basic cause of all the ills of present-day society, which is normally attributed to the imperfection of human nature, is, in fact, the lack of rational organisation of human society.

Socialism begins when capitalist society causes so much suffering to the people that they are ready to break with the even tenor of life and rise up against the domination of capital when the ’masses can no longer endure the conditions created by capitalist society.  Capitalism leads to the bloodiest anarchy, to the destruction of the few cultural achievements which have been created, to the deepest misery of the masses and their literal enslavement. Socialism is the only way by which the workers can hope to emerge from the want and misery of capitalist society. Socialism assumes a society where the productive forces have grown to such dimensions that it is possible to meet all the needs of society when the bourgeoisie and its state have disappeared along with all class oppression and distinctions. No such society can exist unless the productive forces have attained the level of assuring abundance for all. Today, we have achieved that accomplishment. No longer can socialists be accused of levelling down.  One day, the story goes, Baron Rothschild took a walk. Two labourers met him and accosted him thus: “Baron, you are a rich man; we want you to share with us.” Rothschild took out his purse and answered: “Certainly! We can do that business on the spot. The account is easily made. I own 40 millions of florins; there are 40 millions of Germans. Consequently, each German has to receive one florin; here is your share;” and giving one florin to each of the labourers, who looked at their money quite confused, he walked off smiling.

Bourgeois "equality" in fact perpetuates inequality, and attain the distribution of wealth according to the formula "from each according to ability, to each according to work." The goal of socialism is to go beyond to "from each according to ability, to each according to needs."  Socialists, if we read their papers and pamphlets, what do we find? They do not intend to introduce division of property; on the contrary, they are for abolishing its division. Slavery has been, abolished, serfdom has been abolished, so the power which capital exercises now will be abolished. Certain left-wingers tell us “the workers are not ready to hear about socialism and revolution. We have to wait. If we start talking about socialism, they will desert us and we will isolate ourselves.” The Socialist Party is perfectly clear on this matter. We must openly and clearly tell them about socialism.  This is not book-learning but not to do education about socialist revolution is to cut off the socialist movement from the workers’ movement.  The socialist ideal is beautiful, while the reality of the existing capitalist world is ugly. This is precisely why the majority of the people demand the changing of that reality and why it must be changed. In order to change the world we must not divorce ourselves from reality, disregard it or escape from it, nor must we surrender to ugly reality. We must face reality squarely, study and understand it, live and grow in it, fight against the ugly reality and transform it, so that we can gradually realise our idea.

The Socialist Party's case is for the abolition of the right of private property, and instead the common ownership of the means of production, so that all may enjoy the fruit of their labour, and consume it, thus eliminating hunger, poverty, and war. For there is no other way. It is capitalism, economic crisis, and armed conflict – or socialism, freedom, economic planning and peace.

The three essential points of socialism are:

[1] The abolition of the wage system,
[2] The abolition of individual property in the means of production and distribution.
[3] The emancipation of the individual and of society from the political machinery, the State, which helps to maintain economic slavery.

Scots without a home

The use of hostels to house the homeless in Scotland has risen by 43% since 2010.

On an average night, more than 10,000 Scottish households will be living in temporary accommodation.

Almost a third of the households considered to be without permanent accommodation were living in hostels or B&Bs,

http://thirdforcenews.org.uk/tfn-news/10000-people-sleep-on-scotlands-streets

Towards a Socialist Co-operative Commonwealth.

There seem a great many persons, calling themselves socialists nowadays but who foremost fancy themselves before all things as sensible and level-headed so the immediate prospect of building a socialist society is placed on the back-burner for some time in the indeterminable future. The members of the Socialist Party are no utopians. They are not are impractical visionaries. The Socialist Party claims to possess an adequate explanation of the present economic facts (and of a great many other things besides), and also to show the only way out of the present situation. Capitalism – production for profit – presupposes a class of property-holders, who monopolise the means of living, and a class who have only their labour-force to offer in exchange for the necessaries of life. The capitalist, as a capitalist, must seek to intensify the working day and to keep down wages, in order thereby to increase his share in the product of labour – his profit.  The worker has to defend him or herself against the capitalist and soon finds that the only way to do this is by organisation. Hence the trades union. But we ask you to consider that the great aim of socialism is the abolition of capitalism, itself and the transformation of the divided world into communal world. Capitalism must be abolished. Working people need to throw the capitalist parties out of office and form their own administration committed to fundamentally transform society. The needs of working people can only be met by creating a planned economy, where ownership and control of production and distribution are taken from the tiny minority of capitalists and placed in the hands of the working people, to be run democratically. When the vast resources available to us are used to serve the needs of all instead of the profits of the few, in a world socialist commonwealth, then the way will be opened for unparalleled growth in culture, freedom and the development of every individual. Such a society is worth fighting for.

The capitalist mode of production has posed before humanity the alternatives: Socialism or Barbarism.  Capitalism has long been the central obstacle to social progress and can promise the world’s peoples only further economic crises, famine, war, oppression, and the destruction of the environment. The world capitalist economy remains shaky and unstable. The relatively good economic activity still observed in a number of capitalist countries is due in large measure to the arms drive and other transient factors. However, the capitalist economy is bound to encounter deeper slumps and crises.

The only definitive solution to these problems is the elimination of capitalism and its institutions, and the establishment of common ownership of the means of production with rational social planning.


Thus, the fundamental task of revolutionary Marxists is to build a mass socialist party capable of overthrowing capitalism and establishing socialism. We in the Socialist Party, desire above all things to advance the case for socialism, and by socialism we mean, the common ownership of all the agencies of wealth production, and this involves the complete supercession of the capitalist system and the conducting of all industry on a co-operative basis. The abolition of the present system of production means substituting production for use for production for sale. Ownership by the workers in common of the instruments of production; that means a co-operative system of production and the extinction of the exploitation of the workers, who become masters of their own products and who themselves appropriate the surplus of which, under our system, they are deprived by the capitalist.

 Capitalism has developed as a world economic system. It is illusory to believe that the much higher development of the productive forces that socialism entails can be achieved within the framework of a single country. The division of the world into different nation-states imposes a definite form on the revolutionary process. The working-class must and can take power in the territories defined by different existing states. But the construction of socialism can be completed only on a world scale. The Socialist Party wants not only a society in which people’s needs are provided for by an abundance of goods and better social services but in which their great and varied capacities can be fully developed. Changing the economic system is not an end in itself. It is a means of creating conditions in which human beings will be able to realise their full potentialities and work together for the common good, instead of being divided by class, sex, or race. Capitalism distorts human individuality, subordinates men and women to the needs of the profit system sets them against each other. Socialism aims to develop their individuality by creating a society in which exploitation and poverty are ended, and the resources of science and technology used to reduce the time spent in monotonous and mechanical jobs to a minimum, and vastly increase the amount devoted to leisure and creative work. It is the people themselves who have to build socialism, become involved in government, and be responsible for the development of society. In the process, new attitudes to society, to work and to culture will develop. New relations, based on co-operation instead of domination and exploitation, will come into being between the sexes, between generations, between races, and between nations.

We declare that the most important work that men and women can engage in is that of helping on the overthrow of capitalism, and the building of the socialist co-operative commonwealth.

Freedom for the wage-enslaved working class.

The idea of a socialist cooperative commonwealth is that wealth comes from our association together in society.  The Socialist Party holds a vision of a society based on solidarity, of collective empowerment, of social institutions that nurture the fuller development of all. Ours is a struggle to establish a human world in the midst of the myriad crises thrown up by the capitalist system.  If social harmony, peace and environmental integrity are to be brought about, we need socialism. Capitalism is the root cause in the catastrophe that is climate change and global warfare. Marx and Engels wrote in “The Communist Manifesto” about how the long-standing class struggle between producers and appropriators always ends “either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.” It’s “socialism or barbarism.” wrote Rosa Luxemburg  with a later Marxist scholar adding “if we’re lucky.” The rich are destroying the chances for a decent human future. Capitalists are driven to pillage and poison the planet by the profit imperative compelling them to relentlessly commodify everything and to drive business expansion. Beseeching our capitalist masters to be nicer and smarter for the common good is a fool’s errand. The Socialist Party recognises that there’s no appealing to capitalists' better nature where money and profit are concerned. The Socialist Party understands that five people owning as much wealth as the bottom half of the species while millions starve and lack adequate health-care is capitalism working as intended. know that giant corporations buying up every last family farm, tapping every new reserve of cheap global labour, raping the planet’s raw materials in alliance with local warlords, purchasing the votes of nearly every elected official, extracting every last fossil fuel and driving the planet past the limits of environmental sustainability is capitalism working. The Socialist Party knows that a giant military-industrial complex, generating vast fortunes for the owners of the high-tech “defence” industry while schools and hospitals are underfunded—we can see that capitalism is working.

The only solution is for workers and citizens to organize collectively to overthrow the profits system and take control of what they produce and how society is organised. The only thing that’s going to ever bring about any meaningful change is an ongoing, dedicated, socialist movement that must coalesce into a unified popular movement that can really do things.  If the socialist movement has no future then there can be no future for humanity itself.

 “The history of all hitherto existing society i.e. recorded history is the history of class struggle.” With these words Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848 introduced their Communist Manifesto. 

Class struggles arise out of a form of production which divides society into classes, one of which carries out the actual process of production (slave, serf, wage-worker), while the other (slave-owner, lord, capitalist employer) enjoys a part of the product without having to work to produce it.  Class struggle, and with it the setting up of a State apparatus to protect the interests of the ruling class, came out of the division of human society into classes whose interests clashed in production. Class struggle and the State continue through history as long as human society remains divided in classes. But when the working class takes power it does so in order to end the class divisions – to bring in a new form of production in which there is no longer any class living on the labour of another class; in other words, to bring about a class-free society, in which all serve society as a whole.  When this process has been completed (on a world scale), there will be no class conflict because there are no classes with separate interests, and therefore there will be no need of a State – an apparatus of force – to protect one set of interests against another. The State will “wither away”. As Engels put it: “Government over persons is replaced by the administration of things and the direction of the processes of production.”

 Socialism is primarily distinguished by analysing every social and political problem from a class point of view. This means that socialism always explains and interprets events only in the light of the fundamental conflict whose course determines the direction of historical development: the conflict between the capitalist class and the working class. Socialism interprets the role of the state as the political executive of the capitalist class, whose historical function is to maintain the social power of the employers and investors and to uphold the system of property relations upon which that social power is based.

The working class can play no revolutionary role in society while the majority of its members desire to improve their situation individually, within the framework of the existing society, by leaving the ranks of their class.