Organise for Civilisation

WORLD FOR THE WORKERS

Organisation means getting together with a common understanding and a common end in view, and working systematically for the attainment of that end. For the workers to organise effectively, they must have an understanding of their position in society and of the conditions under which they live and work. If they fail to understand these things, they will organise in an ineffective manner. The effectiveness of their organisation depends on the correctness of their understanding. The better they understand conditions the more effectively they will organise.

The capitalist system  push working people down the economic ladder and concentrate wealth at the top. But promoters of capitalism, who dominate the media debate, simply blame the poor for poverty. Most of poverty is artificially manufactured. It is poverty created in the pursuit of market ideals expressed in recent times by the imposition of neo-liberal economic policies – the sort of policies that cut taxes on the wealthy, do away with fiscal and other business regulations, shred the social safety net, and erode middle-income stability – all while singing the praises of self-reliance and individual responsibility. As a result it has done very well in making the rich richer and the poor both poorer and more numerous. However, the working class is beginning to awaken from its long slumber. Slowly we are waking up. The people — the great "common herd" — are finding out what is wrong with the social, political and economical structure of the system of which they are a part. Slowly but surely the lesson is being learned that capitalists are not interested in production to benefit the peoples of the world . They are interested only in profits.

If the productive forces in the world were to be used for providing for the needs of people, the entire planet could be transformed and the standards of living and level of culture raised to undreamed of heights. This is not possible under capitalism. Despite the hunger and famine in dozens of countries, crops in millions of bushels have been destroyed because there was a “surplus”. It was not profitable to feed the starving peoples,  therefore the capitalist class preferred to plough it into the ground. Capitalism preys upon the life-blood of the poor, its ethics are expressed in beastly gluttony and insatiable greed, and whose track of conquest is strewn with the bones of its countless victim.

While the capitalists revel in luxury and riot in extravagance, the workers are condemned to lives of poverty, ignorance, toil and privation. They lack economic security. Poverty and the fear of poverty render their lives miserable. The average worker is not more than a few pay-days removed from a state of dependency. If he or she  should become sick or injured, they would soon become a burden to friends or relatives or to public charity. Thousands are killed annually in the industries. Hundreds of thousands die from occupational diseases. Having little standing before the law, workers are hounded by the police, victimised by the courts and subjected to all kinds of abuse, injustice and tyranny. Millions of children around the world are deprived of education and are stunted and dwarfed physically and mentally by slavery in factories and farms. Millions go hungry to school and suffer from countless diseases brought on by malnutrition.

 Only the unity of the workers can produce that “One World” which can abolish want and oppression, dictatorship and war. Capitalism attacks and destroys all the finer sentiments of the human heart; it ruthlessly sweeps away old traditions and ideas opposed to its progress, and it exploits and corrupts those things once held sacred. The structure of a society built upon such wrong basic principles is bound to retard the development of all people, even the most successful ones because it tends to divert a person’s energies into useless channels and to degrade his or her character. The result is a false standard of values. Trade and material prosperity are held to be the main objects of pursuit and conquest, the lowest instincts in human nature — love of gain, cunning and selfishness — are fostered. Nevertheless, although, crushed, stupefied by terrible poverty, people demand that they shall have some of the beauty, some of the comforts, some of the luxuries which they have produced. Socialism means plenty for all. We do not call for self-denial but for a great production that will supply all, and more than all the people can consume.Such a great production is already possible, with the knowledge already possessed. The majority of the population is not engaged in productive work. The greater part of the non-producers is employed in the buying, selling and advertising of the commodities.

The only way to abolish capitalism is to strike at the root. This is radical action.  The word "radical" is derived from the Latin word "radix," a root and radical means "pertaining to a root." Radical action means action that deals with causes instead of tinkering with effects.  Lacking wealth, workers lack power, and the wealth they produce constitutes the power of the capitalists which is used to hold them in subjection. he workers have a power infinitely greater than that of the capitalists - numbers.

 In socialism the land, the means of production and transport belong to all the people. The title to be one of the joint owners of the earth and its products and the inheritance of collective human labour does not rest on any question of inheritance or purchase; the only title required is that one is alive on this planet. In Socialism no one can lose the right to a share or the common possession. In socialism a comfortable, cultured and leisured people will produce artistic and scientific work for pleasure, and will have the ability and the desire to paint, to carve, to write, to play, and to compose music. They will adorn their dwellings with their arti, and will share them freely to whoever admires them.  There will be no buying and selling, no money, no barter or exchange of commodities.

There can be no organisation without action, and it must be systematic, not haphazard action. Getting together is not enough, we must get together and act systematically, otherwise we are not an organisation but only a herd. When the workers get together to demonstrate or protest they are only making of themselves a target for police-clubs and tear-gas. The power of the workers is not on the street but at the ballot box. If the workers are not  organised, they may easily become a blind force of destruction, unable to check their own momentum, their cry for justice drowned in a howl of rage.

When workers come together and join the Socialist Party, some will be speakers, some others will be writers, some arranging and advertising meetings, some distributing literature, all taking part in its administration, discussing and exchanging ideas, making decisions by the combined intelligence and experience of all, then we are organised and are using our power to the best advantage. Every worker can take part in this activity. Every member being valued equally.

Let us study the social and economic conditions that we may understand them and agree on a common end, and all work as one for the attainment of that end, which can be none other than to take over the means of production and distribution and operate them for use instead of profit. Whatever is good and beneficent in our civilisation can be saved only by the workers.

Cash before Nature

Socialist Courier has reported how the huntin’, shootin’ and fishin’ lobby has had a devastating effect on Scotland’s natural wild-life by slaughtering any threat to their grouse. It now transpires that they are also guilty of over-stocking deer herds to the point that they and the environment suffer.

Scotland’s sporting estates must be forced to cull thousands of deer, the country’s most powerful environmental groups have told MSPs. Deer numbers had spiralled and they were damaging the country’s moorland, peatland and “fragile populations” of other native species like capercaillie. The group, the membership of which includes the National Trust for Scotland, RSPB Scotland and the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, said a voluntary code of conduct has failed to tackle the scourge. But the group suggested that landowners were unwilling to take action because the value of Highland sporting estates is partly based on “the number of sporting stags available to shoot”.

The group argued estates want to keep deer numbers as high as possible to help stalking and called for them to bear the financial burden of culling under a “polluter pays” principle.Landowners warned about the harm this would cause the £105 million stalking industry and the 2,520 jobs it is estimated to support. Scottish Land & Estates, the body representing landowners, said: “Red deer stalking attracts relatively high-spending visitors who come outside the peak tourist seasons. These visitors are willing to come to our more remote areas where employment and other economic activities are scarce.”

Food for thought (updated) - Brazil's Deforestation

Deforestation in Brazil is increasing and that means a decline in the Rainforest. Environmentalists blame farming, mining, and infrastructure projects that are consistent with the Brazilian government's (lack of) environmental policies. 2, 776 square kilometres of the rainforest has been cleared in the last year, a thirty-five per cent increase over the previous year. The city of Los Angeles could fit twice into the cleared areas. One third of all plant and animal species on earth I found in the Amazon rainforest. It's only too obvious what the government's policy is – bring in the profits and to hell with the environment and that is tantamount to saying to hell with the future of the planet. Capitalism must be stopped! John Ayers.

UPDATE

Brazil says the rate of deforestation in the Amazon increased by 28% between August 2012 and last July. Environmentalists say the controversial reform of the forest protection law in 2012 is to blame for the upwards trend. The changes reduced protected areas in farms and declared an amnesty for areas destroyed before 2008. The reform, a long-standing demand of the country's farmers' lobby, known as the ruralists, was passed after several vetoes by President Dilma Rousseff. "If you sleep with the ruralist lobby, you wake up with deforestation," Amazon expert Paulo Adario from Greenpeace wrote

Support our troops?

NO WAR BUT THE CLASS WAR

Among men and women it is commonly held that we should support our troops because they’re protecting our country, they’re protecting the world, and we wouldn’t have freedom without them. It is no wonder such beliefs are widely held since those claims are continually repeated by politicians and the media. The undercurrent of  that “support” and “gratitude” for the military and those who serve in it is intrinsically apolitical. Often, the spectacle of public gratitude to the troops reaches absurd proportions. Recently we witnessed at Ibrox, soldiers chanting and singing along with the hard-core Protestant supporters in a celebration of Armed Services Day.

If our freedom is bestowed on us by soldiers the implication that people should feel boundless gratitude to the military as an institution and all the men and women who serve in it. But it also follows that if our freedom exists only at the pleasure of the military, of course, is that the same military can revoke said freedom if it so desires.

Supporting the military and expressing gratitude for what the military is actually doing around the world, are nothing if not explicitly political sentiments. It reflects the highly effective propaganda that has convinced generations of people that there is virtually nothing for which we should not thank the troops.  There is seemingly no limit to the scope of human activity that many of us sincerely believe would not be possible were it not for the military’s selflessness. We reduce our entire existence as free people to something that only exists at the whim of themilitary, and suffocate critical thought about the military and what it’s actually doing in the world such as the murder of wound prisoners in the name of freedom.

Adapted from here

One Planet, One People, For the Common Good

CLASS WAR

History is forever repeating itself without us learning much from it. The halo of capitalism has been smashed by the recession. The halo of our industrial system is gone. It is no longer a sacred thing, which must not be meddled with because of fear of the consequences. For years the working-class has been silent, a sleeping giant lulled to sleep by its own victories and the ability of capitalism to expand and provide a gradually rising standard of living. The working-class has had to struggle to realise these gains, but this struggle has been contained within the limits and rules established by the system. Now the system has been unable to raise real wages for the majority of workers or to prevent a drop in the living standards.  All sorts of estimates are made of the number of unemployed. One thing is sure. The number is not getting any smaller, but instead, it grows larger as each year passes by. The future looks as black as the past. The workers are beginning to ask: Will unemployment ever end? What is the world coming to? Capitalism’s instability and the growing crisis affects every aspect of life.

The lives of the workers are made up of worry, anxiety, insecurity, and hardships. There is the monotonous grind of uninteresting drudgery, the constant penny-pinching to make ends meet, and the continual necessity of learning to do without things. Workers are  abused like dogs by tyrannical foremen, pauperised by low wages, destroyed by piecework systems, crushed to death by faulty equipment. All this misery is created so a small clique of very wealthy individuals can continue to line their pockets. The only protection the workers have had from the most savage exploitation, the sole thing that has kept us from sinking into complete degradation is our trade unions. These organisations have achieved results entirely upon the basis of the amount of power they have been able to exert.

Profits and wages clash, and profits beat down wages. The two basic classes in our society, the working class and the capitalist class, are locked in a bitter struggle. A handful of capitalists  make fabulous profits off the labour of working people.  All the major means of production - the factories, the mines, telecommunications and transportation – are concentrated in the hands of  capitalists who employ millions of workers. Every bit of capitalists’ vast possessions was stolen from the people. It’s the capitalists that get rich by appropriating the fruits of our labour. At the end of a work week the worker collects his or her pay. The capitalists claim this is a fair exchange. But it is highway robbery. In reality, a worker gets paid for only a small part of the value he or she produced. The rest, the surplus value, goes straight into the boss’s pocket. The bosses get rich, not because they have “taken risks” or “worked harder,” as they would have us believe. The more they keep wages down and reduce the number of employees with speed-ups, the more they can steal from us and the greater their profits. And if the boss thinks he can make more profit somewhere else, he just closes his factory and throws the workers out on the street.

The idea that everyone can get rich under this system is a lie invented by the rich themselves. Under capitalism, the only way to get rich is to trample on someone else. This is why workers have only one choice: either submit to this wage slavery or fight it! As long as the wages system continues, part of the wealth which the workers create will be kept back from them. The share which is withheld from the workers is the larger share, and, as machinery increases and improves, the share will grow larger. The things necessary for the production of wealth must be made the common property of the workers, and must be controlled by them. The Socialist Party of Great Britain, therefore, advocates the organisation of the workers for the purpose of taking control of the means of production. The Socialist Party is not a political party in the sense that other parties are because it has no reform to advocate. Can reforms help the workers? Reforms are the trade of politicians. Reforms invariably result from economic pressures on the employers and so far as the workers is considered, their sole effect is to render tolerable if not beautiful the capitalist or wages system. The revolution comes about because of the economic experience of the working class, and has for its accomplishment the abolition of the wages system and the entire overthrow of capitalism to the end waste and want. We shall not compromise with the capitalists.

There exists a false belief and trust in the Labour Party, which is often considered a working-class party. The majority of its supporters are drawn from the workers.  This party cannot, and will not, free the workers; the workers must free themselves. We workers would be more than foolish to help one section of the capitalist robbers against another section. The capitalist robbers as a whole rob the workers and the robbers’ division of the spoils is not our problem. Rather, our problem is to expropriate the expropriators.

 The World is rich in natural resources. It is capable of satisfying the needs of all its people. Capitalism is a system based on exploitation. A handful of parasites live off the backs of the workers and could not care less about their situation.  There can never be class peace between exploiter and exploited, between boss and worker.The working class cannot eliminate exploitation and poverty unless it overthrows the capitalist system.

Quote of the Day

Dennis Skinner: "Half the Tories opposite are crooks"

Speaker: "Please retract"

Dennis Skinner: "Okay. Half the Tories opposite aren't crooks"

Food for thought

As always, the Canadian Communist Party never flags in its efforts to Improve life under capitalism. An article in the September 16-30 issue of "The Peoples' Voice" lists some of their achievements – "such as fighting against fascism, organizing industrial workers into unions, initiating movements to win unemployment insurance, public health care and other social programs, to campaign for peace and disarmament, fighting for the full national rights of aboriginal peoples and Quebec, and to defend Canada's sovereignty." Upholders of capitalism should admire and respect the so-called communist party, whereas we, of the SPC aim for creating a society where none of the social evils the Communist Party is working hard to reform will exist. John Ayers.

COOKING THE BOOKS

Capitalism has elevated book-keeping and accountancy into a near-religion and while this is perfectly understandable in the realms of business it is completely inappropriate when it comes to treating ill-health. 'The scandal over cancer treatment at a leading hospital has widened after it emerged that its own officials now fear that at least 6,000 patients may have had their records falsified to meet treatment targets. Investigations by the Observer into the crisis at Colchester general hospital have also established that inquiries into whether staff were bullied into changing records will include the questioning of the hospital's chief executive, Gordon Coutts.' (Observer, 10 November) Needless to say these 6,000 patients would all be members of the working class. The owning class could afford to pay for first-class treatment. RD

Real Eco-Socialism or Green Reformism

CHANGE THE SYSTEM NOT THE CLIMATE

“It’s blindingly obvious that our economic system is failing us,” said economist Tim Jackson, a professor of sustainable development at the University of Surrey in the UK. “It is a travesty of what economy should be. It has absolutely failed to create social well being and has hurt people and communities around the world.”

Jackson and number of ecological economists say the current self-destructive economy must be transformed into one that delivers a shared and lasting prosperity. This kind of Green Economy is far beyond business as usual with some clean technology thrown in. It is what Jackson calls a “fit-for-purpose economy” that is stable, based on equity and provides decent, satisfying livelihoods while treading lightly on the earth. The current growth-worshiping consumption economy is “perverse” and at odds with human nature and our real needs, he said. “Prosperity isn’t just about having more stuff,” he said. “Prosperity is the art of living well on a finite planet.”

With powerful vested interests in the current economy, making this transformation will be difficult but it is already starting to happen at the community level according to Jackson and co-author Peter Victor of Canada’s York University.

Sadly these well-intentioned academics' proposed alternative is another form of capitalism which is not capable of superseding the current system.  Community banks, credit unions and cooperative investment schemes that enhance local communities, creating local currencies and community-owned energy projects simply cannot prevail against the power and dominance of an alliance of corporations and governments. And even if they were to, it would be only a matter of time before in the search for profits to sustain their existence , these enterprises will revert back to the inherent base nature of exploitative capitalism. 

The Day of the People is Arriving

The spirit of our time is revolutionary and growing more so every day. The signs of change confront us everywhere. Social changes are preceded by discontent and unrest and we witness that near and far. Fortunately, the workers do not submit passively. If they did, their condition would be a thousand times worse than it is now.

Professional politicians act in the interests of the bosses and this fact has become so apparent that their sham theatricals have lost their magic and now treated with the scorn and derision by working men and women. We are seeing through the con tricks they have been playing with us, setting the agenda, deciding what election “issues”, all of their own making.

The capitalist system is distinguished by the fact that complete anarchy exists in the production of goods for the market. Within a factory everything is planned but the general system works in a plan-less fashion. Many capitalists compete amongst themselves, and they are all producing for a market, the extent of which they do not know.

In the struggle of the working class to free itself from wage slavery it cannot be repeated too often that everything depends upon the working class itself. The simple question is, can the workers equip themselves, by education, organisation and co-operation to take control of the productive forces and manage industry in the interest of the people and for the benefit of society? The workers must organise their own emancipation to achieve it and to control its limitless opportunities and possibilities. Suppose that you and I, and some thousands of others, agree that socialism is the only solution, what shall we do about it? It is possible that the solution is a correct one only in theory, that there is no way in which we can put it into effect. It is possible that the difficulties in the way are so great that all our attempts to bring socialism into actual existence must inevitably fail. It is necessary to convince many more people, than are at present convinced, of the desirability and necessity for socialism.

The workers who have made the world and who support the world, are preparing to take possession of the world. We demand the machinery of production in the name of the workers and the control of society in the name of the people. We demand the abolition of capitalism and wage-slavery and the surrender of the capitalist class.  We demand complete control of industry by the workers; we demand all the wealth they produce for their own enjoyment, and we demand the Earth for all the people. This is the meaning of socialism and is what the Socialist Party stands for.

Socialism is a matter of growth, of evolution, which can be advanced by wise methods, but never by obtaining for it a fictitious vote.Voting for socialism is not socialism any more than a menu is a meal.  We seek only the actual vote of socialism, no more and no less. In our propaganda we should state our principles clearly to convince those who should be with us and win them over through an understanding of our party case. We want the support of of those who believe in socialism and are ready to vote and work with us for the overthrow of capitalism. Nature’s storehouse is full to the surface of the earth. All of the raw materials are deposited here in abundance. We have the most marvelous machinery the world has ever known. Why should any man, woman or child suffer for food, clothing or shelter? Why? Because the capitalist  put his hands of the means of production and declared  “This is mine!”

The idea of socialism is that all the means of production and distribution be owned in common by all of the people, and that every person, who is not too young, or too old, or too sick, cooperate in producing those things which every member of society needs and uses. Instead of having individuals or corporations own all the factories and hire workers to produce goods only when a profit can be made from their sale, society as a whole will own the factories, and the workers will produce the things required to feed, house and clothe all of the people, and to satisfy all of their cultural needs. Administrators and co-ordinators elected by the workers using all manner of statistics, facts and figures will  calculate approximately how much of each article will be necessary to satisfy the needs of society and the factories will be set into motion to produce more than enough of each item. Every geographic region will produce that which it is best fitted to produce.

Instead of the anarchy and wasteful competition that prevail at the present,  production and distribution will be thoroughly planned by the participation of the workers. The plans will be constantly subjected to analysis and revision. It is impossible, of course, to furnish a complete blueprint indicating every detail of the functioning of society under socialism, but one thing we can be certain of.The change in the system of property from private ownership, producing for profit, to collective ownership, producing for use, will solve the major problems facing the workers.

We socialists contend that industry has developed to a point where a sufficient quantity of goods can be produced to assure every one a very high standard of living. Eliminate all the waste under capitalism and the present standard of living is immediately raise ten-fold.

There can be no gradual reform of capitalism into socialism. This is because capitalism operates by means of certain economic laws and, if you introduce certain types of reforms into it, those laws will result in economic collapse. A reform that makes the system less profitable will lead to economic downturn and increased unemployment. Therefore, the reformists get tossed out in the next elections and the conservatives come back to promote the needs of capital.

Nor is every type of reform incompatible with the health of capitalism. Some reforms, quite desirable in themselves, would improve the functioning of the system at the expense of certain entrenched sections of the capitalist class. An example that comes readily to mind is the proposal for introducing a single payer health insurance scheme in the US. This would result in massive savings for both households and the public sector, as well as a huge improvement in health outcomes for the population. It is resisted, however, for two reasons: Firstly, the private health insurance sector would be virtually wiped out and any sector of the capitalist class faced with annihilation will resist it. Secondly, many other sectors of the capitalist class object to such a reform on the grounds that it would set a bad example, that governments should not put any section of the capitalist class out of business because that would be to legitimate putting the rest of them out of business some time.

The capitalist system is not so delicate an instrument that it cannot handle a few reforms that run counter to the need for profits. It is only once they get to a certain point that they seriously affect the system.

POISONED BY PROFIT

One of the most rapid examples of the industrialised advance of modern capitalism is China. However, the Chinese workers must pay a terrible price for this advancing industrialisation. 'The number of lung cancer cases in the Chinese capital Beijing has soared over the last decade. According to figures published by the state-run Xinhua news agency, they have increased by more than 50%. Beijing health officials say smoking is still the number one cause of lung cancer, but they admit air pollution is also a factor. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently estimated that polluted air kills millions of people every year.' (BBC News, 9 November) In their smog-polluted cities the advance of lung cancer is the inevitable outcome of the mad drive for more and more profits. RD

Cheap hospital food

 Scotland’s biggest health board, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde’s catering budget was slashed last year by £1million and documents released under freedom of information laws suggest the average daily spend per person is just £4.08.

Critics say patients could end up taking longer to heal because they are not getting adequate nutrients and vitamins at a time when they need them most.

Dr Margaret Richie, of Edinburgh University, said it was unlikely the limited budget could provide a healthy diet, unless patients were served baked beans every day.

Killing nature for profits

Mountain hares are facing extinction in large parts of the Scottish Highlands because landowners are killing thousands of them every year in order to protect the grouse shooting industry, wildlife experts have warned. The distinctive mammals are being shot and snared by gamekeepers on grouse moors due to fears that ticks carried by hares spread a viral disease, which can be fatal to grouse. However, experts have poured doubt on claims that killing hares protects grouse.

“A preventable catastrophe has befallen the mountain hare,” said Dr Adam Watson, a veteran mountain ecologist. “This is a national scandal.” This was “due to deliberate efforts by estates to eradicate them,” he said. “Gamekeepers on several estates have told me that they were instructed to reduce hare numbers and to try to eradicate them.”

Watson condemned the government’s wildlife conservation agency, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), for failing to protect mountain hares under European law. “SNH has known what has been happening for years and has done nothing about it,” he said. “In my view, this is supine behavior, pleasing to or subservient to powerful grouse-shooting interests, but wholly against the wider public interest.”

Tim Baynes of Scottish Land and Estates claims that even though thousands of hares are destroyed each year, this was ‘less than 10% of the population’. The most up-to-date UK population estimate appears to have been made in a 1995 publication. It’s also ludicrous for Baynes to be referring to a (fairly dodgy) population estimate from 1995 – that was 18 years ago.  Baynes also failed to mention was that the 25,000 culled only related to information provided by 90 estates; a further 102 estates (68 driven grouse estates and 34 walked-up grouse estates) did not provide any information to the survey, so the actual figure culled was likely to be considerably higher.

Alex Hogg of the Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association is also quoted in The Herald article, claiming that gamekeepers have ‘no alternative but to suppress the numbers of mountain hares on grouse moors because of the dangers of Louping Ill Virus, which can infect humans’. However, here is an article that suggests humans are “rarely” affected by the Louping Ill Virus. And here is an article about a scientific publication that suggests there is “no compelling evidence base” that culling mountain hares can stop the spread of Louping Ill Virus. A tick-borne disease that seems to be of more concern to humans is Lyme Disease. And what spreads Lyme Disease? Pheasants, amongst other species. Given Mr Hogg’s concern for human health, can we expect to see him advocating a moratorium on the release of 43 million pheasants, per year, into our countryside?

Peace between the peoples! War against the exploiters!

WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE

The Socialist Party of Great Britainis a distinctive political  party, but more importantly, its vote is distinctively the vote of the working class who desire socialism. For the time being, the ignorance of the workers means only a very few cast their ballot for the Socialist Party, but this can and will be overcome. The existing class struggle going on is not due to the mischievous influence of agitators, as certain politicians, the emissaries of the rich and respectable would like it to appear. Class war is inherent in the capitalist system. Why? Simply because one set of men owns the tools (the machines) with which wealth is produced, while an other set uses them, and there is an irrepressible conflict over the division of the product. The capitalist owns the tools he does not use; the worker uses the tools he does not own.

This vast and resourceful world should be free from the scourge of poverty and the blight of ignorance; but it never will be until the private ownership of the means of sustaining life is abolished and society is organised on the basis of social ownership of the social means of wealth production. Many suffer hunger pangs for food and shiver with the cold in every capitalist city. Millions are poverty-stricken, the result, mainly, of no work or low wages. Is it not high time to call a halt to the ravages of capitalism and give a little thought and consideration to humanity?

The  frauds, the corruption, the cronyism and the graft all cry out in condemnation of private ownership of capital, the source and inspiration of it all. It isn’t confined to party lines. Both Tory and Labour Party politicians have their snouts in the trough yet these the debauchers of civic duty,  subservient and hypocritical underlings of the employers,  are forever preaching about “law and order” to the working class. The Robber Barons, the Banksters, who organise monopolies to exploit the people who write the laws to provide themselves with loop-holes are not in the business of ethics, commercial or otherwise. The only ethics they know is to “get away with as much as they can get " and the end always justifying the means.

But it is not to reform the evils of the day but to abolish the social system that produces them that the Socialist Party exists. It is the party not of reform but of revolution. Every social system changes ceaselessly, and, once having fulfilled its mission, they pass away.  The industrial forces of capitalism made socialism possible and sooner or later it is sure to come. Steadily the number of class-conscious workers is increasing. Let others talk about the introduction of regulation of  banking and finance - the more enlightened workers demand the common ownership of industry and they are building up the Socialist party as a means of getting them. This is the revolutionary demand of the socialist movement. The propaganda is one of education and is perfectly orderly and peaceable. The workers must be taught to unite and vote together as a class in support of the Socialist Party, the party that represents them as a class, and when they do this the government will pass into their hands and capitalism will be no more; private ownership will give way to social ownership, and production for profit to production for use; the wage-system will disappear, and with it the ignorance and poverty. misery and crime that such a inhuman system breeds; the working class will stand forth triumphant and free, and a new era will dawn in human progress and in the civilisation of humanity.

In the wage system you and your children, and your children’s children, if capitalism shall prevail until they are born, are condemned to slavery and there is no possible hope unless by over-throwing the capitalist and voting for socialism. What you want to do is to assert your class interests just as the class that is robbing you do. What we want is not to reform the capitalist system. We want to get rid of it. The revolution is under way. Let us work so that this revolution may come in peace. Socialists are organised to pave the way for its peaceful accomplishment.  It does not matter in the slightest whether it comes next year or next century, or in a thousand centuries, that is not a question that concerns us. We simply know that the change is bound to come sometime and know that it is our task to do all we can to hasten its coming. The capitalist system has  fulfilled its mission and it is time to go forward. The time has come when working men and women should open their eyes to the  struggle, when they should have an intelligent understanding of socialism and pave the way for its triumph and the abolishment of capitalism from the face of the world. There is no other alternative system. It is socialism or barbarism.

Food for thought

Most people work for about fifty years then retire ready to take it easy and enjoy life. However, many have seen their retirement saving go up in smoke. In Japan, crimes committed by the elderly have doubled in the last decade. Shoplifters are now more likely to be over sixty-five than teenagers. Seventy per cent of such thefts involve food. Last year the Japanese government spent C$86 million to add elevators, handrails, and ramps in three prisons to cater to elderly criminals. The struggle to make ends meet has no age limit under capitalism. This is especially surprising in a country that, until recently, was touted as an example of how the good life could be provided for all.
Toronto mayor Rob Ford announced a task force on homelessness. He even appointed a chairman. Trouble is, more than two years later, nothing has happened. Talk's cheap!

Bourgeois Blues

Me and my wife went all over town 
And everywhere we went people turned us down 
Lord, in a bourgeois town 
It's a bourgeois town 
I got the bourgeois blues 
Gonna spread the news all around

Well, me and my wife we were standing upstairs 
We heard the white man say'n I don't want no niggers up there 
Lord, in a bourgeois town 
Uhm, bourgeois town 
I got the bourgeois blues 
Gonna spread the news all around 

Home of the brave, land of the free 
I don't wanna be mistreated by no bourgeoisie 
Lord, in a bourgeois town 
Uhm, the bourgeois town 
I got the bourgeois blues 
Gonna spread the news all around 

Well, them white folks in Washington they know how 
To call a colored man a nigger just to see him bow 
Lord, it's a bourgeois town 
Uhm, the bourgeois town 
I got the bourgeois blues 
Gonna spread the news all around 

I tell all the colored folks to listen to me 
Don't try to find you no home in Washington, DC 
'Cause it's a bourgeois town 
Uhm, the bourgeois town 
I got the bourgeois blues 
Gonna spread the news all around

For a new civilisation

FOR WORLD SOCIALISM

The banks belong to the superstructure of capitalism while private property is its foundation. The financial crises,  credit squeezes and the like are nothing more than the reflections of the fundamental economic crisis arising from the fact that the private ownership of the means of production has become an anachronism in a society where social methods of production have superseded individual methods of production. No amount of credit supply to manufacturers, no amount of currency manipulation which leaves the question of property ownership untouched, can do other than aggravate the crisis of capitalism. This class ownership question is a political as well as an economic question in society divided into owning and non-owning classes. This is the basis of the struggle of classes which many appear to have forgotten. Social ownership, which must supersede the private ownership of the means of production, can only come about through the political victory of the class without property over the class with property. The bankers of the City of London and Wall St won’t flinch from the threat of legislation, but people may well be diverted from that which matters more than all else to-day, namely, the struggle to secure the social ownership of the means of production—the prerequisite of economic and social prosperity.

So let us be clear about what is the meaning of capitalism. Capitalism is an economic term. It is applied by economists and sociologists to the economic system of our civilisation, by means of which some people achieve economic independence and have the privilege of living idly upon the labour of others, who produce a surplus value above that which they receive for their own sustenance. Capitalism refers to the system. A capitalist is one who profits by the system. Even If he labours himself, it does not alter the fact that he has an income apart from his labor sufficient to sustain him for life without labour, and therefore his is economically independent. Capitalism divides society into two antagonistic forces, because it is based upon two sets of conflicting economic interests. The private ownership of land upholds with it the present planless system of production.  Private ownership of the means of production and distribution is the seed or germ of capitalism, of which wage slavery is the most revolting feature. The capitalistic system of production, under the rule of which we live, is the production of commodities for profit instead of for use for the private gain of those who own and control the tools and means of production and distribution. Out of this system of production and sale for profit spring all the entire problem of misery, want, and poverty that, as a deadly menace, now confronts civilisation.

 Socialism is defined as the common ownership of the social means of production and distribution. It is the name given to the next stage of civilisation, if civilisation is to survive.The Socialist Party, championing the working class, declares its intention to be “the abolition of wage slavery by the establishment of a national system of cooperative industry, based upon the social or common ownership of the means of production and distribution, to be administered by society in the common interest of all its members and the complete emancipation of the socially useful classes from the domination of capitalism. In socialism, private ownership and barter in capital being at an end, money would lose the functions which it possessed under capitalism and would be abolished.

Socialism can be described as the science of human association reduced to a practical programme, based upon a profound study of the social organism. It is an interpretation of the past, a diagnosis of the present, and a forecast of the future. It recognises that life in society as well as in the organic world, is constantly passing through a process of evolution. It is therefore founded upon an enduring basis of fact. It points out the great development of the behaviour of the individual that will take place from the environment that will be created by its adoption. It declares that labour is the sole creator of value. It teaches that the only way to attain the just distribution of wealth to those who produce it is through the collective or social ownership, control, and operation of the means of production and distribution, such as lands, mines, factories, railways, communications, etc., etc. It asserts that this production should be for use and not for sale or profit, thus doing away with all private ownership of the means of subsistence, it discards all forms of graft, corruption, and extortion in every department of society. It re-directs the vast amount of unproductive labour and an immense number of useless and harmful occupations into useful constructive labour. Socialism would conserve and not abolish personal possessions as distinguished from capital.Thus homes and their furnishings and all personal belongings not used to produce more wealth would be individually and not collectively owned. The right to work would be universal. The Cooperative Commonwealth is its goal. In order to be understood the socialist case  must be carefully studied. If you wish to oppose it, study it. No-one has a right to be a socialist or to criticize it without understanding the subject.

Some day in the not far off future — there will be an eruption. The hungry millions will turn against the overfed few. As long as the instruments of production remain in the hands of a few  they will naturally use this private ownership for their private advantage. It is not that socialists wish to impose on the future society a huge bureaucratic system, spreading its tentacles, octopus-like, over all the arrangements of social life, crushing all individuality, and reducing every detail of existence to rule and plan. But they do stand for social ownership and social control. All socialists are agreed upon their object, that object being social and economic freedom and equality for all, and the realisation of the highest individual development and liberty conceivable for all, through the social ownership and control of all the material means of production and existence. They must all agree upon this in order to be socialists. We are told sometimes that “we are all socialists now,” but only those who believe in the object as here defined can be properly so described. Those who so believe are socialists, and those who do not so believe are not socialists, whatever they may say to the contrary notwithstanding.

The principles of socialism are fixed and immutable; the means to be adopted to give practical effect to those principles change with time, and place, and circumstances. The object aimed at, the end to be attained, remains ever the same; the policy to be followed to attain that end requires to be frequently revised, and sometimes modified, as circumstances change. Socialism is the one world-wide force opposed to militarism and violence. The Socialist Party is apeace party, and the only political party which really endeavours to seek peace and ensue it.  Socialism implies the co-operation between individuals and groups of individuals, but also co-operation between peoples and lands. In a system of universal co-operation for production for use, all destruction of wealth, all waste, would be sheer loss. And all war is waste. Under the present system of capitalism, class ownership and control of all natural resources and production for profit, war is is not only inevitable but indispensable. All the cries which are raised to justify war – patriotism,democracy, freedom, religion, and so on – are so much humbug, and that the real cause and object is the conquest of markets and control or resources. That being so, it must be quite clear that capitalism and  peace are incompatible, and that however sincere and well-intentioned  advocates of peace may be, their plans are foredoomed to failure, for peace cannot be established while capitalism exists.  It is utopian to dream of establishing peace in the midst of capitalism.  Pacifists talk of universal disarmament but any socialist who has taken the trouble to understand the operations of the capitalist system must recognise that universal disarmament under capitalism is impossible. There is no Super Power which does not find the cost of armaments burdensome, and  would willingly come to some arrangement by which this burden might be reduced. Suppose some such arrangement were arrived at, and assuming, further, that, acting on that agreement, every nation were to disarm. The causes of conflict still remain, and there is nothing in the way of any rival country organising a predatory expedition against its neighbour, and nothing can prevent its doing so.

In Defence of Migrants

The Scotsman carries an article that tries to repudiate the xenophobic scare-mongering against Eastern European immigration.

She promotes the idea of the EU free movement of labour a little bit naively, however, instead of advocating the case for workers solidarity, regardless of nationality - and that also includes the right of non-EU citizens to seek a better life in the UK. 

Money goes to money

Jeremy Hunt, the Secretary of State for Health, is set to become the richest member of the Cabinet after it emerged that he is in line for a £17m windfall from the imminent sale of his own company.  Hunt, who is said to be currently worth £4.2m, would overtake Philip Hammond, the Secretary of State for Defence, as the wealthiest Cabinet minister. Hammond is worth £8.2m.

Dave Prentis, the General Secretary of the public service trade union Unison, said: “This is the man who has been let loose to slash the heart out of our NHS, and he can pocket £17m at a stroke. How can a man of such wealth possibly understand the problems of ordinary people or the value that we place on our public services?”

In 2012, the consultancy Wealth-X listed the wealthiest Cabinet ministers.
The top 10 were:

£9.6m Lord Strathclyde (no longer in Cabinet)
£8.2m Philip Hammond
£4.8m William Hague
£4.8m Jeremy Hunt
£4.5m Caroline Spelman (no longer in Cabinet)
£4.5m George Osborne
£3.8m David Cameron
£3.2m Francis Maude
£2.9m Dominic Grieve
£2.2m Andrew Mitchell

When Johny Comes Marching Home

The Hollywood image of heroic adventures about warfare has little in connection with reality.  In a book review of David Finkel's "Thank You For Your Service" we read the following about the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. 'The numbers Finkel presents are sobering enough. Of the nearly 2m service personnel who have performed active duty in those conflicts, the author writes that between 20% and 30% will suffer either from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or traumatic brain injury (TBI). By his estimation, that is around half a million Americans.' (Sunday Times, 3 November) Instead of heroes marching home to cheering crowds we are more likely to get them crawling off to a mental health clinic. RD

Food for thought

There's a strike going on in the Cambodian garment industry. The do not think the new minimum wage increase implemented by their government is enough. The increase would bring monthly wages to $75 plus $5 for a health benefit, or 45 cents per hour. The capitalist apologists have a hard time explaining the nineteenth century wage rates and conditions that capital is flocking to. Isn't capitalism supposed to bring widespread prosperity? John Ayers.

Our idea is Revolution

CLASS WAR

The Socialist Party of Great Britain often meets with the criticism that we are too small a political party and so of little consequence and significance. Numbers of itself is not sufficient justification to jettison an idea. You might have all the workers of the country embraced in some vast organisation and yet they would be very weak if they were not organised upon correct principles; if they did not understand, and understand clearly, what they were organised for, and what their organisation expected to accomplish. The Socialist Party has for its definite object not only the betterment of the condition of working people in the wage system, but the absolute overthrow of wage slavery that all men and women may be emancipated.

Society has been divided into two warring classes. The capitalist owns the machinery in modern industry, but he has nothing to do with its operation. He lives perhaps a thousand miles from where the factory is located and he owns all the product because he owns the machinery. By virtue of such ownership he has the economic power to appropriate to himself the wealth produced by the use of that equipment. What of the workers? In the first place they have to bitterly compete with each other for the privilege of being employed by the capitalist.  Every few years,, no matter what party is in power, no matter what our domestic policy is, how high the tariff or what the money standard, every few years the cry goes up about “overproduction” and the workers are  sacked by the thousands and thousands, and are idle. No work, no food, and after a while, no credit, and all this in the shadow of the abundance these very workers have created. Why should any worker surrender to anybody any part of what labour produces? If the person who produces wealth is not entitled to it, who is? The capitalist claims it. The capitalist has become a profit-taking parasite. Industry is now concentrated and operated on a very large scale. The capitalists hires executives, managers and overseers to operate their plants and produce wealth. The capitalists are absolutely unnecessary. They have no longer have a part in the process of production.

The most important thing for the worker is to recognise is the class struggle.  What is class-consciousness? It is simply a recognition of the fact on the part of the worker that his interest is identical with the interest of every other worker. Class-consciousness points out the necessity for working-class action, economic and political. What is it that keeps the working class in subjection? It can be stated in a single word - ignorance. The working class have not yet learned how to unite and act together. The capitalists have contrived during all these years to keep the working class divided, and as long as the working class is divided it will be helpless. It is only when the working class learn to unite and to act together, especially on election day, that there is any hope for emancipation.

 No-one can be for the worker without being against the capitalist. No man can be for the capitalist without being against the worker.  There is a quarrel between them over a division of the product. Each wants all they can get. If you increase the share of the capitalist don’t you decrease the share of the workers? Are their interest not diametrically opposite? If you support and vote for a party that opposes your interests it is because you don’t have intelligence enough to understand your interests. That is why the capitalists gets the better of you. They understand their vested interests and know how to .protect them. No-one can serve both capital and labour at the same time.

Workers may, at times, temporarily improve their conditions within certain limitations, but will still remain wage-slaves, and why wage-slaves? For just one reason and no other – they have got to work. To work they have got to have tools, and if they have no tools they have to beg for work, and if they have got to beg for work the boss who owns the tools will determine the conditions under which they shall work. As long as employers owns the tools they own your job, and if they own your job they are masters of your fate. You are in no sense free. You are subject to their interest and will. They  decide whether you shall work or not. Therefore, they decide whether you shall live or die. Any one who tries to persuade you that you are free  is guilty of insulting your intelligence. You will never be free until you are the master of the means of production. As long as  you live in capitalism, and you have nothing but your labour power you remain a wage-slave.

The socialist’s mission is to win the world. The reformists of  the Labour Party claim that a “promised land” can be brought about only if the capitalists and the working class are “reasonable”, if only we all “work together in the national interests”. With such slogans they paper over the class nature of the system. They cover up the inevitability of class conflict. Defence of capitalism lies beneath their every action. Labour Party politicians claim that they stand for improving the lot of the working class, but they will fight tooth and nail against any challenge to the system itself.

Presently, elements of the left-wing movement is attempting to build a new party. Various initiatives from left groups form part of this party building . Some indeed already identify themselves as “parties”. A new party” is proving to be a curious mixture and the may just simply turn out to be product of a disordered vision and confused mind. General agreement on the object by no means presupposes universal agreement on policy. There are wide differences between the groups involved in Left unity.

It will be time enough to forswear political action when the master class no longer strive to retain their mastery of the political machine. But for now, the Socialist Party determinedly engages in the battle of ideas and takes to the political field to contest the capitalist class at the ballot box. 

The Depressing Fact of the Day

Depression is the second most common cause of disability worldwide after back pain, according to research. Globally, only a small proportion of patients have access to treatment, the World Health Organization says.The disease must be treated as a world public health priority, experts report.

Commenting on the study, Dr Daniel Chisholm, a health economist at the department for mental health and substance abuse at the World Health Organization said depression was a very disabling condition.

"It's a big public health challenge and a big problem to be reckoned with but not enough is being done. Around the world only a tiny proportion of people get any sort of treatment or diagnosis."

The Middle East and North Africa suffer the world’s highest depression rates, according to a new study by researchers at Australia’s University of Queensland -- and it’s costing people in the region years off their lives.

Food for thought

A recent survey in the US showed that 80% of adults struggle with unemployment, near poverty, or reliance on welfare for at least part of their lives. Nineteen million white people live below the poverty line of $23, 021 for a family of four, nearly double the number of poor blacks. 1.5 million white single mothers live in poverty, comparable single black mothers. It is clear that poverty ( and the exigencies of capital) does not discriminate. John Ayers.

We are socialists

WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE

Vast changes are taking place in the world, sweeping away old political labels. There seems to be many ideas how not to do things. There seems to be a feeling that we can make ourselves more respectable by changing our name, to get away from that dreadful word socialism; that if we masqueraded the political expression of the class war under some other name, large numbers of the working class will be swayed and the all the factional differences in the labour movement ended. The Socialist Party of Great Britain, however, still declares it stands for socialism, a classless society, free from exploitation. The creators of all wealth, workers; obtain in wages only the minimum necessary to live and raise children so that capitalism has a steady supply of labour-power. All means of production, whether factories, machines or mines, are owned by the monopoly capitalist class. Workers possess only their own labour-power which they must sell in order to live. The class interest of the working class is to eliminate capitalism entirely and to build a socialist society. To overthrow capitalism and establish socialism the working class must have a revolution.  It must replace the dictatorship of the exploiters with the the rule of the majority. These are the real class interests of the working class.

Are the socialist principles fundamentally unsound? If so, we have been on the wrong track all the time. Any movement worthwhile, no matter what name it is given, will have to be founded on the cardinal principles of the socialist philosophy, viz, that society is divided into classes with conflicting economic interest; that economic materialism is the mainspring of human action; that surplus values are wrested from the working class through the private ownership and monopoly of the jobs If the basic ideas of socialism are sound, then why try to build another movement on a false foundation? Shall we abandon all for the sake of vague promises of some election gains?

Various political parties and trends claim to represent workers and working class interests and they attempt to win support among workers but their political ideas and aims are reformist. It is objectively their role to accommodate the capitalist system, not to defeat it. The Labour Party is committed to an all-out effort to make capitalism work indefinitely. As a result all those on the Left who seek their objective through a relationship with the Labour Party drift into tacit acceptance of capitalism.  They do not want power to pass from the existing state to the workers to dispossess the capitalist class and create a classless society.  There have been many splits, re-splits, counter-splits, duplicate splits, and all sorts of splits in the Left-wing. Calls for unity of the Left which ignore the fundamental conflict between Leftist liberal democracy and Marxism obscure the difference between reformist politics and class struggle. Unity against capitalism must be accompanied by the struggle against capitalist ideas which weaken the fight and limit its effectiveness. Without such struggle unity becomes a path to capitulation. In fighting increasingly against ideas which gloss over the class struggle the workers increase their own understanding and become conscious that their class has the power to carry through the necessary revolutionary transformation of society.

The capitalist class continuously tries to make the working class carry the burden of this crisis. The necessity of more repressive legislation to facilities this, together with the increasing spontaneous struggle of the workers against the attacks on their living standards, make it harder for the capitalists to rule in the old ’democratic’ way. Nationalism and racism must be continually and consciously struggled against. While there are differences among the British capitalists on the tactics to be employed, they are united in their central aim of maintaining their domination by divide and rule.

Our society can no longer afford to address all the pressing social problems that we face as separate and individual issues. Piecemeal solutions have been tried and they have failed. We can no longer rely on the empty promises of politicians and philanthropists to solve these problems through reforms. They have failed because all these problems are products of our social and economic system - capitalism. They cannot be solved by any means short of the abolition of that system. The capitalist system cannot be made to work in the interests of the majority. The only way that workers can win the struggle to make for themselves a safe, secure and better life is to organise and overthrow the capitalist status quo. But the workers have only won a few battles, achieved only limited and temporary advances in the class war. The Socialist Party while recognising the working class must fight its day-to-day battles, it emphasises the urgent need  for workers to organise for the revolutionary change to the present society. While engaged in its day-to day struggles workers should never lose sight of the final socialist goal. The Socialist Party is necessary to persuade of the viable possibility and desirability of socialism. For only a working class that is class conscious and understands its common class interests can act to take control of the economy and build a socialist society.

The Socialist Party of Great Britain  assists in the transformation to socialism by seeking control of the existing political state, capturing the state it for the express purpose of dismantling it. The potential of creating a world without money, without frontiers and without leaders is within our grasp but can only be realised  if workers themselves take control of their own lives by organising politically and industrially for socialism. 

We are All One

Capitalism is as much to blame for the death of migrants as human traffickers. Were the  fortification of borders not a priority, the value of the service offered by migrant traffickers would plummet along with their ability to detrimentally affect individual fates.

The New York Times notes: "European Commission officials expressed sadness about the Lampedusa accident and blamed criminal syndicates and human smugglers for exploiting desperate people. They called for a crackdown on the smugglers”

Yet in 2011 the Guardian's reported on a  'left-to-die' boat in 2011, in which 61 migrants were left to slowly perish  at sea, despite distress calls being sounded and their vessel's position being made known to European authorities and NATO ships".

Human Rights Watch researcher Judith Sunderland explains: "'What we really don't see is a presumption of saving lives; what we get instead is every effort to shut down borders, said Sunderland, who pointed out that security crackdowns on land crossings such as the Greece-Turkey border only displaced migrant flows and often forced more boats into the sea."

Disturbingly, many [white] Europeans view themselves as the real victims of the migration process, egged on in this perception by the xenophobic rhetoric of politicians.

Italy's recurring affliction, Silvio Berlusconi, for example, once complained that, "It is unacceptable that sometimes in certain parts of Milan there is such a presence of non-Italians that instead of thinking you are in an Italian or European city, you think you are in an African city."  The then-Prime Minister went on “Some people want a multi-coloured and multi-ethnic society. We do not share this opinion."

The Guardian reported: "In August the Italian authorities ordered two commercial ships to rescue a migrant boat in the sea and then demanded the ship's captains transport the migrants back to Libya, a move that experts believe could discourage commercial captains from attempting rescues at all and may be in breach of international law."

Marine Le Pen, president of the French far-right National Front party,  claims that, "No country in the world ... would accept to go through the fast and sizeable immigration of people who, without a doubt, have a different religion and culture."

The condemnation of Europe-bound human movement also conveniently overlooks the legacy of colonialism, imperialism, and attendant discord and economic oppression in determining migration patterns.

In an essay "The Case for Open Borders", J A Myerson discusses the reality of globalisation: "Multinational free trade agreements, supranational financial institutions, and transnational corporations ensure that capital can float between nations with all the ease of a monarch butterfly. Labour, on the other hand, remains under the jurisdiction of border-obsessed states." hE argues that "The emphasis on 'strengthening the border' should be tempered by an understanding of the political and economic decisions that have altered that border's characteristics", Myerson focuses on another global entity known for wildly erecting anti-migrant barricades: the US, where immigration was given a considerable boost by NAFTA's destruction of - among other things - the livelihoods of over a million farm workers in Mexico.  Myerson reasons: "When post-national North American capital created the conditions that made mass migration inevitable, it entered into an ethical contract with the migrant victims of its wealth accumulation scheme."

 According to Myerson, the establishment of "universal human rights" requires "globalising labour" and "eliminating borders", which merely convey arbitrary rights. Among the many "problems with defining rights with respect to the nation-state", he notes, is the fact that "most people consider rights more eternal than laws, which are merely expressions of momentary social attitudes. Wouldn't we say that enslaved black Americans had a right to freedom even before legal emancipation?"

Taken from here

 About 100 "high value" foreign executives will be invited to join the new club, to ensure their immigration checks are completed "swiftly and smoothly". They will be offered personal support in navigating the immigration system, including their own "account manager". Theresa May said it would enable the UK to maintain a "competitive visa system that can innovate in order to serve the ever-changing needs of business and ensure Britain succeeds in the global race". "We will continue to listen and respond to the needs of high-value and high-priority businesses so that we can provide them with a service that supports economic growth. The number of countries benefiting from a priority visa service - which enables eligible applicants to have their applications fast-tracked on paying a fee - will rise from 67 to 90 by next April. plans to impose visa restrictions on Brazilians were put on hold earlier this year amid concerns that it would damage commercial links with Brazil's fast-growing economy.

Business rights trumps human rights. 

Real Workers' Power

WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE

How can a social change be brought about?

The Socialist Party of Great Britain  has never relied on some sort of mystic faith in the inevitability of socialism to make things turn out all right in the end, so long as we repeat the right phrases. They will turn out all right in the end only if people make it happen.

Armed revolution is no longer practical. Non-violent resistance is a more effective method for bringing about desirable social change in the modern world than violence.  We are not primarily interested in maintaining that non-violence is morally preferable to violence, but that non-violence is superior as an instrument to bring about social change.  Socialists are against the sporadic, meaningless and inevitably self-defeating violence that suffering and resentment are always likely to provoke. Riots and violence alone will not achieve socialism. It is easy to understand the hatred of so many whose bodies are tormented and rent asunder by society: however, as soon as the hell in which they live is lit up by an ideal, hatred disappears and a burning desire of fighting for the good of all takes over. We are we are aiming at a better, a more human world but socialists will deal with the society that confronts them, not with hopes. The wrongs of society do not depend on the wickedness of one master or the other but rather on masters and governments as institutions; therefore, the remedy does not lie in changing the individual rulers, instead it is necessary to demolish the principle itself by which men dominate over men.

The owning, employing class are the ruling class because it controls the government. The government protects the capitalist class by protecting the source of its economic strength - private property. It is the will of the capitalist class that the rights of private property be protected. It uses its control of government to write down its will and call it the law of the land. It uses its control of government to enforce its will, the law. The law is the voice of the ruling class.

The process by which the capitalist class rules is called a democratic form of government. Democracy literally means “rule of the people”. We, however, live in a class society in which one class maintains its favourable economic position because it controls the rule by the people. True enough, the majority of people support the present system and therefore the capitalist class controls the government only as long as the majority of the voters permit them to.

Those who read the Leftist websites and journals will be well accustomed to their demands. “Public control of Banking and Finance ”, “the immediate re-nationalisation of the mines and railways” We should be asking ourselves who is the public? Who the “nation”? The outside observer will notice that the  Left makes “socialism” and “public ownership” or “nationalisation” synonymous terms.  Socialism which leaves the working class as a subject class is not socialism. The sooner this is grasped the sooner will it be realised that “workers’ control” as promised by the Bolsheviks continued to  subordinate the workers to the “Workers’ State”. The  path to socialism is not through state-capitalism.

Nor let there be any ambiguity about the use of the word socialisation. The Socialist Party mean by it, and so does every socialist worthy of the name, common ownership and democratic control of the means of production and distribution. As socialists we base our political policy on the class struggle of the workers, because we know that the self-interest of the workers lies our way. That the self-interest may sometimes go awry does not affect the correctness of our position.