We live in a time when change brings more disillusion than hope. To
shift socialist ideas from the fringes of politics to centre stage we
must be able to present it as a positive and practical alternative to
the present capitalist system. We live in a world of change which
includes the world of ideas. This means that the differences between
socialist ideas and popular politics are neither static nor fixed in
time. Sadly, not all developments have been progressive and sometimes
moves backwards such as the resurgence of militant religion and
nationalism. This need not be the whole story. Regardless of how
divided the world may seem to-day, all people share common needs which
can only be served, ultimately by cooperation. These needs arise from
our human make-up, are expressed in the best ways to live, and are
inescapable. They rise above national divisions or differences of race,
culture and language. Throughout the world, all people share a common
need to live in peace and material security and to be at friendly ease
with their communities and with other peoples in other countries.
Beneath all the conflict and the divisive politics that prevent people
of all countries from coming together as a united humanity, there is the
small voice which is always present which may lack systematic thought
yet expresses a yearning for a better world. So when The Socialist Party
proposes a world of cooperation organised solely for needs, in which
all citizens will stand in equal relation with each other, this does
echo the universal interests of all people. Socialist ideas may seem, on
the present face of things, to be estranged from popular politics, they
are in harmony with the real hopes of all people. It is when
socialist ideas become the conscious political expression of these hopes
that socialism will become an irresistible force for change.
The Socialist Party does not hold a monopoly on social concern but share
the hopes and intentions of thousands in many organisations. Despite
the fact that many thousands of people in such organisations as OXFAM
are battling against worsening problems with their efforts bringing
little success, the indignation they feel and their willingness to act
as a signpost towards a better world. The Socialist Party would draw
their attention to the need to alter the present economic and political
framework which is so destructive to their efforts. We would urge upon
charities and humanitarian NGOs that action to solve such problems, ie
world hunger, must include social and political action to bring about a
society where individuals and communities will be able to act more
effectively. The action to solve problems and the work of creating the
conditions in which they can be solved, cannot be separated; these go
together.
A global socialist movement that is growing would not be "demanding",
from a position of weakness, for governments take policies to deal with
this or that problem. There would, of course, be demonstrations but only
to demonstrate, from a position of gathering strength, a democratic
movement with developing plans for a new society; projects that could be
activated when the capture of political control has been accomplished.
This would confirm the beginnings of socialist organisation within the
heart of capitalism. The challenge of building a new world society is a
daunting task and involves great change and a re-organisation of the way
we live. When we speak of a "new world society", we should add the
caveat that the use of the word "new" should be qualified because there
would be nothing in socialist society that would be outside age-old
human experience. In this sense very little would be new.
Socialism will depend on voluntary cooperation and there would be
nothing new about this. Cooperation is a vital part of any society, even
capitalism. It was through social cooperation that humanity emerged as
modern mankind. Countless generations of early people could only survive
in groups based on cooperation and in doing so we became a social,
thinking, tool making species with increased powers of providing the
means of life. In looking forward to a society organised through
cooperation we do not imagine anything new, on the contrary, we recall
age old relationships which have always been in harmony with our basic
human make up. It is for this reason that every person is capable of
cooperating with others to the benefit of all. Cooperation is not simply
a moral choice, it is a relationship that enhances our lives and is in
every person's material interest. In setting out the practical ways in
which society could be organised through cooperation we are proposing
that cooperation be brought back to the activity that matters most, that
is, in the entire organisation of our lives. The need for cooperation
is also a response to the growing contradictions that arise from the
pace of technical development which the market system can never freely
use for the benefit of people; the economic forces that drive technology
forward prevent us from using it to solve problems. At our present
stage of advanced technology we have a potential for abundance which is
in contrast with the economics of scarcity on which the market system
depends. As this gap between possible production and actual production
widens, the capitalist system becomes more anachronistic, a straight
jacket on our powers of action and historically redundant. The campaign
for practical socialism will find growing support from these deepening
failures of the capitalist system.
Now is a time for looking at the past, learning from its mistakes and
for carrying the hopes of past activists forward in a more effective,
sound way. The fact that the capitalist system is stronger and more
extensive than ever is disappointing by it should also give fresh
impetus to the work for socialism. We now have the advantage of global
development in all spheres of life, enabling us to propose practical
ways it could be organised. This has the prospect of creating a body of
political ideas, based on socialist principles, presented in every-day
language of description rather than being asserted as great abstract
concepts of the the Socialist Party aims of common ownership, democratic
control and production solely for use. Practical socialism translates
them into what they could mean in the every day lives of people. This
not only makes the meaning of socialism more readily understood, it
projects life-styles with which people can identify, it gives
individuals a view of their greater possibilities, seeing themselves not
just in the role of wage-slave, but as constructive people in
cooperation in a society organised solely for the well-being of all
citizens.
The values of a socialist society centre upon freedom. Common ownership
will mean the freedom to place production and resources at the disposal
of the whole community; democratic control will mean freedom for every
person to relate to others on equal terms when making social decisions;
production solely for use will mean the freedom to use production
directly for needs. Above all, its social relations will empower every
person with the freedom to control their own lives, to decide on what
skills to have and what part to play in the community's programmes of
action. This is what is meant by self-determined individuality.
Socialism has to be clearly defined and systematically argued as a
distinct political choice, it rises above the traditional political
differences that have existed between radical, conservative and liberal
views. The various creeds that divide people into separate parties can
be seen as motivated by aims which have many things in common. To argue
and organise for a world in which each person would be responsible for
their own lives and by working in cooperation, for the lives of other
citizens; a world where this is made possible by the use of all
resources, solely and directly for the interests of communities, is not
an objective that should runs counter to the basic hopes of anyone.
Whilst a work on politics cannot avoid the use of political labels it is
all too often the case that labels act as a barrier to communication.
Look beyond unavoidable labels to simply consider its proposals, and its
supportive arguments. A better world need not wait on future events.
Even as individuals, one way of participating in a better world is to
work for it. The more people that work for it the better the world shall
be.