The growing global environmental crisis is in the opinion of
many the greatest challenge mankind has faced. Species and entire habitats are
disappearing at a pace unseen since the extinction of the dinosaurs. Natural resources
are being consumed far faster than they can regenerate. It is already clear
that climate change is leading toward catastrophic collapse of the natural
systems that billions of people depend upon. These problems are not accidental,
but are symptoms of the irrationality of our capitalist system of production
and distribution. Greenhouse gases will increase as long as our economy depends
on coal, oil and natural gas, controlled by some of the wealthiest corporations
in history following the logic that accumulating profits over-rides all other
concerns. Abandoning fossil fuel investments and converting the whole economy
to the use renewable energy would impose huge costs on corporate bank balances.
The UK government has provided well over a billion pounds in loans to fossil
fuel projects around the world despite a pledge to withdraw financial support
from such schemes, an analysis of loans made by the UK’s export credit agency
has revealed. Gazprom in Russia,
Brazil’s state-owned oil company and petrochemical companies in Saudi Arabia
are among the companies benefiting from around £1.7bn in government funding
over the course of the parliament. Coal-mining, petrochemical complexes, and
oil and gas exploration and infrastructure are among the industries benefiting
from the loans and guarantees, which cover projects in countries including
Slovakia, Russia, Brazil, India, Germany, Norway, Vietnam, the Phillipines and
Saudi Arabia. MP Joan Walley, the chair of the Environmental Audit Committee,
which has investigated the government’s fossil fuel subsidies, said: “At the UN
Rio+20 Earth Summit [in 2012] the UK government agreed to phase out harmful and
inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, so I am disappointed to discover the
government is still providing billions in loans to fossil energy projects
around the world that are fuelling climate change. Taxpayer cash should not be
used to subsidise the fossil fuel industry in the twenty first century.”
Under capitalism, decisions on what and how to produce are
made by CEOs seeking to maximise return by raising sales figures and cutting costs.
Individual lifestyle changes and some new technology may buy a little more time
but are grossly insufficient to save the planet while capitalist industries are
given free rein to continue polluting. Achieving an environmentally sustainable
social system will require fundamental political and economic change. The entire production system must be
transformed; we must change the way society allocates its resources. We call
such a system socialism which has at its material roots the inability of
capitalism to solve humanity's problems.
We are approaching tipping points that if reached will give
global warming a momentum that human actions will have little or no control
over where human intervention will be
unable to slow down and stop this process. Obviously civilization as we know it
will change drastically. It is easy to make a case that global warming is the
preeminent challenge for humanity to tackle. Every new scientific finding makes
it imperative to immediately recognise the need to reduce carbon emissions.
This degradation of nature is a compelling argument for the new urgency of
socialism - a society that protects people and the environment. World socialism
will put the preservation of the ecosystems of the entire planet above the
self-interest of nation-states and prevent widespread ecological collapse.
Freed from national rivalries this new society can share scientific knowledge
and technology with unprecedented planet-wide cooperation of scientists and the
involvement of local communities, learning from the experiences and insights of
all people around the world. We depend for our survival on the natural world. We
are linked with the natural world through complex evolutionary chains and
through networks of ecosystems. There is now pressing time-line for our actions
act. If we do not move quickly to stem climate change by protecting and
preserving our fast-disappearing flora and fauna this planet could very well
become uninhabitable for billions of people, and possibly all of humanity who
may well also vanish from the face of the Earth.
Socialism makes it possible for us all to live lives worthy
of human beings while at the same time living in harmony with our environment
and heighten our determination to make the socialist revolution happen. Socialism requires a conscious collective
decision about the lives we want to live and the communities we want to live
in–and it takes a collective effort in that goal – in order to create truly
sustainable communities–socially, economically, and environmentally sound. Even if you personally reduce, reuse and
recycle the changes necessary are so large and profound that they are beyond
the reach of individual action. Sadly, individual action does not work. It
distracts us from the need for collective action, and it doesn’t add up to
enough. Getting people excited about making individual environmental sacrifices
is doomed to fail. The reality is that we cannot overcome the global threats
posed by greenhouse gases without speaking the ultimate inconvenient truth: we
need a socialist revolution.
It’s capitalism, a global system based on prioritising
profits over people, which has brought us to the brink of a climate-induced
catastrophe that can destroy humanity. In a world with billions of people
living in poverty and exclusion, production is determined by the profit motive,
not human needs. In a world with millions of unemployed or low-income workers,
access (distribution) to wealth is conditioned to having a job. In a world of
globalized market, there is no coordination to supply and what is produced.
Instead there is a killer competition for profit between companies. There is no
"sustainable capitalism". There is only "disaster
capitalism". Green reformism – the default position of most environmental
campaigners and thinkers, pursue change through existing structures and it does
not seek to replace capitalism or challenge class structures. It isn’t
revolutionary, but attempts to work with government and business interests to
affect change. Ecological degradation is not halted; it is instead measured, monitored,
and manipulated within capitalism, Marx and Engels showed that capitalism is
driven to constantly “revolutionise” industry and commerce, continually
transforming the globe. This is not to satisfy basic needs or to genuinely
improve the quality of life of the population. Capitalism seeks to create new
needs, destroying what it built only yesterday and governments will continue to
bend to capitalist interests. In contrast socialists seek all people,
co-operatively and together, to be in control of their lives and work would be for
the long-lived benefit of all, caring for the whole global ecology and all its
inhabitants. Only mutual aid, not self-sacrifice, is enough to motivate real
changes. People can build their collective knowledge through the organisations
they need to advance their interests and build the confidence needed to take on
capitalism as they win a larger hearing from more and more people, and make the
socialist revolution possible.