Everywhere people are the same in that they seek happiness,
desire prosperity and love liberty. Everywhere the rich are the same, i.e.,
they profit from the common misery to enrich themselves and desire make the
people suffer. Capitalism has failed us. We’re overworked, underemployed and
powerless. The aim of the Socialist Party is to replace world capitalist
economy by a world socialism for it alone can abolish the contradictions of the
capitalist system which threaten to destroy humanity. A socialist society will
end the class division of society and cease the anarchy in production. It will
abolish all forms of exploitation and oppression of man by man. Society will no
longer consist of antagonistic classes in conflict with each other, but will
present a world cooperative commonwealth. For the first time in its history
mankind will take its fate into its own hands. Instead of destroying
innumerable human lives and incalculable wealth in struggles between classes
and nations, mankind will devote all its energy to the development and
strengthening of its own evolution. The future of our human civilisation hangs
in the balance.
After abolishing private ownership of the means of
production and converting these means into social property, the world socialism
will replace the elemental forces of the world market, competitive and blind
processes of social production, by consciously organised and planned production
for the purpose of satisfying rapidly growing social needs. With the abolition
of competition and anarchy in production, devastating crises and still more
devastating wars will disappear. Instead of colossal waste of productive forces
and spasmodic development of society-there will be a planned utilisation of all
material resources and a painless economic development on the basis of
unrestricted, smooth and rapid development of productive forces.
The abolition of private property and the disappearance of
classes will do away with the exploitation of man by man. Work will cease to be
toiling for the benefit of a class enemy: instead of being merely a means of
livelihood it will become a necessity of life: want and economic inequality,
the misery of enslaved classes, and a wretched standard of life generally will
disappear; the hierarchy created in the division of labour system will be
abolished together with the antagonism between mental and manual labour; and
the last vestige of the social inequality of the sexes will be removed. At the
same time, the organs of class domination, and the State in the first place,
will disappear also. The State, being the embodiment of class domination, will
die out in so far as classes die out, and with it all measures of coercion will
expire.
Private ownership in the means of production, the selfish
lust for profits, the artificial retention of the masses in a state of
ignorance, poverty-which retards technical progress in capitalist society, and
unproductive expenditures will have no place in a socialist society. The
development of the productive forces of world socialism will make it possible
to raise the well-being of the whole of humanity and to reduce to a minimum the
time devoted to material production and, consequently, will enable culture to
flourish as never before in history. This new culture of a humanity that is
united for the first time in history, and has abolished all State boundaries,
will, unlike capitalist culture, be based upon clear and transparent human
relationships. Hence, it will bury forever all mysticism, religion, prejudice
and superstition and will give a powerful impetus to the development of
all-conquering, scientific knowledge. The most important lesson from the
history of capitalism is this: It has sown the seeds of its own destruction. Capitalism is not eternal but historical. It
too shall pass — but only if we make it so. The socialist case is, and always
has been, that socialism can come about only through democratic action by a
working-class majority, throughout the world. The socialist revolution will be
a majority, democratic act—the first social revolution in human history in the
interests of the majority.
When it comes down to it there is no real choice between
reform and revolution. These are not two alternative ways of reaching the same
goal. Certainly people can try to reform capitalism to make it work in the
interest of all, but they can never succeed. All their efforts are wasted. The
only way forward is social revolution, in the sense of rapidly abolishing
present-day society by a political act and establishing a new and different
society in its place. Capitalism is an economic system which operates according
to economic laws which cannot be changed by human action, and which human
beings have to accept and submit to in the same way as they do to natural
forces like the weather and the tides. As long as capitalism remains its
economic laws will continue to function roughly like the tides. If people
decided to end this system, then these forces would cease to operate.
We are talking about people being in charge of the
production of the wealth they must have to survive. This is what socialism is
about: subjecting production to conscious human control so that it can be
directed to the single purpose of turning out goods and services to satisfy
human needs. Why should this not be possible? After all, production for use —
production to satisfy human needs — is the logical purpose of producing wealth.
Production to satisfy human needs is possible, but it requires a fundamental
social change to make it a reality. Basically, all that is in and on the earth
must become the common property of everyone. In other words, there must no
longer be any territorial rights or any private property rights over any part
of the globe. The farms, factories, mines and all other places where wealth is
produced will not belong to anybody. This means that a section only of society
would no longer stand between the rest of society and the means of production.
Social classes would cease to exist and all men and women would stand in equal
relationship to the means of production as free and equal members of a class-free
community.
In a socialist society democratic control will extend to all
aspects of social life, including — and in fact in particular — decisions about
the production of wealth. This is what production is about: bringing the
production and distribution of wealth under conscious human control which, in a
class-free community of free and equal men and women, can only be democratic
control. Otherwise society would no longer be class-free: access to. and
control over, the means of production would then remain in the hands of the
minority. This is why democracy and socialism are inseparable. There is no
choice about the matter. An undemocratic socialism is a contradiction in terms.
Socialism is democratic or it is not socialism. If the means of production are
commonly owned and democratically controlled, there is only one end for which
they can and will be used: to produce wealth to satisfy the needs, individual
and collective, of the class-free community.
When we say production for use we mean production solely for
use. In socialism wealth no longer will be produced for sale; buying and
selling and all that goes with it, money, prices, wages, profits, banks, and so
on — will have no place; they will, in fact, have no sense in socialism. Since
the means of production will be commonly owned, it follows that what is
produced will also be commonly owned — that is, by the classless community of
free men and women who will have produced it. In these circumstances the
question of selling what has been produced just would not — could not — arise.
For how can what is commonly owned be sold to those who commonly own it?
Since the turn of the century, we have left the Age of
Scarcity and entered the Age of Abundance — potential abundance. that is. To
the extent that scarcity survives today, as of course it very much does, this
is an artificial scarcity maintained by the economic laws of capitalism, and
particularly its basic principle of "No Profit, No Production". The artificial barrier to the production of
abundance (that is, the profit motive) will be removed and we shall be able to
produce an abundance of the basic things — food, clothing, shelter — which
people need to enjoy life. Material wants and poverty can be banished forever.
Technologically speaking, there is no reason why any man, woman or child in any
part of the world should starve or go without proper shelter. Socialism will
allow this technological possibility to be realised, which will no doubt have
to be one of the first priorities of socialism when it is established. Let
people come and take what they need. Wealth could be produced in such abundance
today that there is no need to ration access to it. People will simply take
what they need from the stores as and when they need it. Ensuring that these
stores are always stocked with what people need will be no problem given the
technological possibility of producing in abundance. This will essentially be a
question of stock control.
We either have common ownership or some sort of class
ownership, private or state. We either have production for use or production
for sale. The only way forward is social revolution — not in the sense of insurrections
and street-fighting, but of a rapid change in the basis of society. This is
what the Socialist Party is working for. But it is not us who are going to
establish socialism. We could not do it. No minority can. How could a minority
impose upon others a society based on voluntary co-operation and democratic
decision-making? This is why all the efforts of the Socialist Party is directed
towards helping to spread the idea that there is an alternative to capitalism
with its waste and wars, its insecurity and anxiety. Our role is to inform people
about this and get people to want to change society and to organise to do this.