Under
capitalism, the capitalists own the means of production. Workers are
forced to sell their labor power and the capitalist exploits and
oppresses them. In socialism, the main means of production are owned
in common by the whole of society.
According
to the Marxian theory of the law of value, the value of every
commodity is determined by the amount of socially necessary labour
required for its production (or reproduction). In the highest stage
of commodity production, the one in which it becomes predominant,
namely, capitalism, labor power itself becomes almost universally a
commodity, a peculiar commodity, it is true, but one whose value is
nevertheless determined like that of any other commodity. The worker
sells his commodity, as he must, to the capitalist. But, exploiter
though he is, the capitalist pays the worker the full value (more or
less) of his labor power. He pays him in the form of another peculiar
commodity, money, which is a universal equivalent and with which the
worker in turn acquires those commodities he needs to live on (that
is, to reproduce his labor power). He in turn pays the full value
(more or less) for these commodities. For the value of his labour
power, the worker receives an equivalent value in other commodities.
The bourgeois principle of equality is perfectly maintained. Equal
values have been exchanged. There has been no cheating, no stealing.
Commodity exchange can operate on no other principle, above all under
the conditions of capitalism, than that of the exchange of
equivalents.
Yet
the capitalist exploits the worker. In paying for labour power at its
value, the capitalist has the use
of labour power, namely, labour itself, for a longer time than is
needed to reproduce the value of the labour power he has bought. That
is, he disposes of its use during the time when it is necessary
labour,
and during the time when it is surplus
labour,
that is, while it produces a value above that of the labour power
purchased. The secret of surplus value is laid bare. No cheating,
equal values fairly exchanged – and that is exactly how the worker
is exploited and surplus value appropriated by the capitalist.
Thus,
the Marxian theory of value is nothing but the theory of surplus
value. How
can this profit be made by the capitalist? Only in one way. Only by
compelling the worker to produce, in the course of the production
process, more values than those he receives in the form of wages. The
worker is compelled to produce surplus
value
for
the capitalist; which is only another way of saying that he is
compelled to do a certain proportion of unpaid
labor
for
the capitalist. The capitalist relation is thus an exploitative
relation.
Which is why we had repeatedly to point out that if you preserve
private profits, you are bound
to
preserve exploitation.
The
only way to abolish capitalist exploitation is to abolish capitalist
private property. Capitalist private property is but the capitalist
means to private profit. No profits; no production: that is the
capitalist law. For, the whole purpose of the capitalist production
process is – private profit, which is but another name for the
self-expansion of capital. The capitalist throws into the productive
process a certain quantity of capital as a means to expanding it.
That is the whole point in the process – for the capitalist. If at
the end of the process the capital thus thrown in has not expanded,
i.e.
increased in quantity, the whole process is, from his point of view,
useless. Which is why we say that capitalist production is but a
means to capitalist profit. Production, which is essential to
society, is only incidental to the process; profit is its motive, and
profit its purpose.
That
is the sum and substance of Das
Kapital.
Property
will no longer belong to a small number of capitalists nor the state,
which is the instrument of a class, but to the community. Socialism
is a self-acting society of associated producers will also be
class-free inasmuch as its members will have no differential relation
to the means of production and distribution. That is the socialist
society.. Nationalisation is the act of vesting in the state;
socialization is the process of vesting in the community. You cannot
vest in the community if classes exist; for, in that case, whatever
you may term it in form, it will in fact be a vesting in the dominant
class. You vest in the state precisely because classes exist; and
statification is the method by which the working class takes into its
hands the property of which it has expropriated the capitalists. This
does not to bring in the class-free society. Without the abolition of
private property, you cannot free the productive forces of society
from the fetters of private profit which obstructs that further
development of them which is essential to the building of socialism.
The
Socialist Party holds that socialism is the only alternative to
capitalism. When Marxists declare that socialism is the only
alternative to capitalism, they thereby mean, firstly, that socialism
is the next higher
stage in society’s evolution; and, secondly, that it provides the
only progressive
solution of capitalism’s contradictions. Capitalism is not an
eternal system which has existed from the beginning and will prevail
to the end. On the contrary, it is only one system in an historical
series (primitive communism – slave owning society – feudalism –
capitalism.) Like all preceding social systems, however, capitalism
too must die. It is dying because it is being choked by the working
out of its inherent contradictions, the basic one of which is the
contradiction between the associated labor process and the individual
appropriation of the product. Socialism is thus the road forward
from capitalism, the next higher stage of progressive social
evolution. The world was ripening under capitalism itself for
socialism.
Marx
did not say or imply that if you somehow
destroy capitalism socialism must
dawn. That is a fatalist and mechanistic conception with which
Marxism has nothing in common. What Marx did teach and demonstrate
was that if you destroy capitalism in
a certain way,
that is, by a certain form of social action, the road to socialism
would be opened. In what way? In the revolutionary way. If socialism
is to be the outcome of capitalism’s downfall, it is necessary that
mankind take conscious action in that direction. Marx showed that the
successful carrying forward of the struggle of the working class to
free itself from capitalist exploitation would open the road to
socialism by demonstrating that the working class could not
emancipate itself without also emancipating all society. In order to
emancipate itself, the working class would have to expropriate the
capitalists and socialize their property. the carrying forward of the
class struggle to success connotes the overthrow of the capitalist
state power and the expropriation of the capitalist class. You cannot
keep the capitalist state power and expropriate the capitalist class.
It cannot be used for the opposite purpose. It must be replaced.
Socialism
is the only progressive alternative to capitalism and that the
bringing of the socialist society into being demands the carrying
forward of the revolutionary class struggle to its logical
conclusion, i.e.
the overthrow of the capitalist class and its state. Abandon the end,
and you abandon the means.