What is Socialism?

It’s been a long time in coming but socialism is finally back on the political scene. It’s no longer an anachronism. For the first time in decades, socialism is out of the closet. Socialism is no longer a dirty word (the “S-word”). However, it is incumbent upon the Socialist Party that we should put some meat on the bone. We have to have our model post-scarcity society heard above the clamour and confusion of every claim to be socialist. Being green and progressive is not enough.

Who Owns What?

Socialism is the common ownership by all the people of the factories, mills, mines, transportation, land and all other instruments of production.

Who Benefits?

Socialism means production to satisfy human needs, not as under capitalism, for sale and profit.

Who Runs Things?

Socialism means  the control and management of the industries and social services by the workers through a system of delegated and recallable democratic administration processes based on their worldwide economic organisation. In socialism, all authority will originate from society, integrally united in various self-managed associations. In each workplace, the producers will elect whatever committees or representatives are needed to facilitate production. Within each shop or office division of a plant, the workers will participate directly in formulating and implementing all plans necessary for efficient operations. Such a system would make possible the fullest democracy and freedom. It would be a society based on the most primary freedom—economic freedom. For individuals, socialism means an end to economic insecurity and exploitation. It means workers cease to be commodities bought and sold on the labor market and forced to work as appendages to tools owned by someone else. It means a chance to develop all individual capacities and potentials within a free community of free individuals. It means a class-free society that guarantees full democratic rights for all the people.

Socialism will be a society in which the things we need to live, work and control our own lives—the industries, services and natural resources—are owned in common by all the people, and in which the democratic organisation of the people within the industries and services is the government. Socialism means that government of the people, for the people and by the people will become a reality for the first time.

What Socialism is Not…

Socialism does not mean government or state ownership. It does not mean a one party-run system without democratic rights. Those things are the very opposite of socialism. "Socialism," as the American Socialist Daniel De Leon defined it, "is that social system under which the necessaries of production are owned, controlled and administered by the people, for the people, and under which, accordingly, the cause of political and economic despotism having been abolished, class rule is at end. That is socialism, nothing short of that."

Remember: If it does not fit this description, it is not socialism—no matter who says differently. Those who claim that socialism existed and failed in places like Russia and China simply do not know the facts. Socialism has never been tried Socialism has never existed. It did not exist in the old U.S.S.R., and it does not exist in China.

How We Can Get Socialism

To win the struggle for socialist freedom requires enormous efforts in organisational and educational work. It requires building a political party of socialism to contest the power of the capitalist class on the political field, and to educate the majority of workers about the need for socialism. It requires building economic organisations to unite all workers into a class-conscious industrial force, a One Big Union, and to prepare them to operate the tools of production.

Socialists are fighting for a better world—to end poverty, racism, sexism, war and environmental disaster. The Socialist Party’s position, in brief, is that the workers can only advance towards socialism in the light of socialist knowledge. A class-conscious socialist working class presupposes the acceptance and understanding of the essentials of socialist principles by a majority of the exploited class. And if the workers would turn their attention to socialism, the whole form of the class struggle with the employing class would change. So far, despite heroic fights by trade unionists against wage reductions, the employing class have never had reason to fear that the working class was turning away from their belief in the capitalist system. But when a considerable body of workers learn the lesson that no reformist policy or party is of any use and begin to understand and support the demand for socialism, we can confidently anticipate a less aggressive and less cheese-paring attitude on the part of employers. They will, when that time comes, be anxious to surrender part of their wealth in the hope that by so doing they may stave off the day when they must yield it all. We shall then be well on the way to the acquisition by a society of the means of wealth production now privately owned by a privileged class. So who have the workers to turn to in their fight against the class that lives off them? Only themselves. They are in the vast majority and able at any time to vote out the system that plagues us all. It may seem disheartening that they still won’t listen to the small voice of the Socialist Party who urge them to do so. But our voice will continue to be heard because it speaks historic fact and logic. Marx argued the case for a future society without buying and selling, wage-labour or capital. That alone is the object of the Socialist Party. 

The Price of Death

The cost of burying a loved one has risen by 8% in the past year, while the cost of a cremation went up by 11%.

Citizens Advice Scotland said the average cost of a basic burial in Scotland, excluding undertakers fees, was now £1,373.

A local authority cremation costs on average £670, the organisation said. The cost of cremations rose significantly, with Highland Council increasing its fees by 59% in just 12 months, becoming the most expensive in Scotland at £849.

The most expensive council area for a basic burial was Edinburgh at £2,253, while the least expensive was the Western Isles at £701. East Dunbartonshire had the second highest burial fees at £2,088, while in neighbouring West Dunbartonshire it was £1,364.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-37360681

Socialism - a movement for abundance

Capitalism has now outrun its usefulness to human development. Having fulfilled its purpose, it now hampers the power of the productive forces which could be at our command. Humanity can have the  world in which wealth is turned out in a cornucopia of abundance, freely available to everyone the world in which human interests come first in everything. What prevents this is the continuation of the social relationships of capitalism. To change them needs a social revolution. This revolution will be the first conscious one, by and in the interests of the majority, in human history. To bring about the change to socialism by a democratic political act needs a working class who are informed and aware about capitalism and about how socialism will abolish the problems we suffer under today.

Capitalism rests on exchange, the means of production are private property and the owning class draw a profit from them by selling what is produced at the highest price competition permits. People who possess nothing sell their labour as dear as competition permits and get wages which allow them to buy what they need to live. It is clear that such a system cannot exist with abundance since this suppresses profit. In fact, only products and services which have some value can be sold. But only scarce products keep their value and sell at a profit. Abundant products have no value: they are given and taken; they are not sold.

It is thus a truism to say that abundance does not exist: it will never exist in a capitalist society since production is not motivated by the desire to satisfy consumption but by that of realising a profit. When this profit becomes impossible, production stops. It is then said that there is a crisis, even if many consumers lack the bare necessities. The magnificent scientific achievements of new technology and automation have made abundance appear in all the industrialised countries, upsetting their economies from top to bottom since these can only function with a “scarcity" of products and services. This obviously requires explanation: At the present time, money is almost as indispensable to existence as air to the lungs. But money doesn’t fall from heaven; it is production as a whole which distributes it in the form of wages and profits. The pursuit of money being thus at the centre of our concerns, we do not grow corn to have corn, but to have money; for if we don’t gain any money then we don’t sow any more corn. Similarly, all other agricultural, commercial and industrial enterprises are only viable to the extent that they succeed in bringing into their tills more money than they pay out. When abundance appears, workers are sacked since there is no more work to give them. But they then don’t buy the products and these, remaining at the charge of the producers, make their profits disappear: he who can't buy ruins him who wants to sell! People then complain about “overproduction", for this is what everything that cannot be sold is called. But chronic overproduction, is that not abundance? So goods are not produced in abundance quite simply because they would not be able to be sold. The exchange economy must be replaced by an economy in which wealth is no longer produced to be exchanged but is produced instead simply in order to be distributed to human beings to satisfy their needs. This new economic system can be called the distribution economy. Under this system the means for producing wealth are to cease to be the private property of individuals and to become the common heritage of all the members of society; the wages system was to be redundant. From the moment when production has become the property of society as a whole, the economic process can no longer be carried out by a series of exchanges (which imply individual or group property of the products exchanged) but only by allocation (or distribution.)

The Socialist Party favours a system of free access, of goods being freely available for people to take according to need from the abundance which is technologically possible now but which will only become socially possible once capitalism has been replaced by socialism. With common ownership and economic democracy, a socialist society would produce things to satisfy human needs and not to make a profit. Anyone who believes that capitalism can ever be made to work more humanely is being both naive and idealistic. In socialism there will be no waste or want as production will be solely to satisfy human needs and desires. n socialism, the maxim “from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs” will transform the character and quality of human existence. People will be able to choose the sort of work they most enjoy and be creative to the best of their ability. People will be glad to give their best and take the best of everyone else. in socialism work will become the ultimate form of art. In socialism we will be building houses, for instance, with a mind to safety, comfort and elegance rather than as now when houses are knocked together with maximum scrimping to lower costs and thereby increase profit. Price and profit dictate in capitalism what pleasure and purpose will dictate in socialism. In socialism, there will be an abundance of everything pleasant.  In return for his or her work, everyone in socialism will have free access to all that is produced, to all services and all entertainments. People will take according to their needs, or more accurately their self-determined needs. As socialism will be a propertyless, money-free society people will no longer have cause to be greedy or acquisitive. Greed, like envy and theft, is an axiom of capitalism.

Apart from the unshackled use of industrial technology on the earth’s resources, people in socialism will also be able to benefit from the work of millions of men and women who had previously been employed in socially useless work under capitalism. The multitudes for instance, who were being trained by their governments in the savagery of war, or who were building death-machines, or who were stockbrokers, insurance men or bank employees—the list is extensive. Plus those who, under capitalism, were involved in absolutely no work whatsoever, like the unemployed, tramps and, of course, the aristocracy. For the same reasons that people will be producing such an abundance, production will enjoy paramount efficiency, and, for the greater part of their time, people will be able to do exactly as they please. In socialism, education will be voluntarily undertaken by children and adults because it will be a fascinating and useful pursuit. People will attend schools and colleges to cultivate their interests and refine their thoughts. They will, not, as now, attend to be inculcated from childhood with an orthodox framework of thought, nor will they attend to apprentice themselves as a better caste of wage-slave. Again, on a similar issue, in socialism, science will be used to assist humanity in its pleasure, safety and welfare. It will not be used to invent something like the nuclear bomb.

In socialism, the natural beauty of the earth will be uncontaminated by industrial toxic waste. The earth is polluted in this way now as it is a cheaper and therefore more profitable - means of disposal than others. The interests of the whole community will be catered for under socialism and not the interests of a profit-hungry minority. Socialist society will be void of instability and insecurity. People involved in administration will have the same standing as everyone else, and no reason to try and usurp power. Even if one or two maniacs wanted to, there would be no unemployment or poverty on the back of which anyone could ride to power. People in socialism will have no use for leaders. The terrifying threat of war will be unknown in socialism because there will be no artificial national boundaries, and no governments to squabble over international markets.

Socialism is yet unborn. We will not see the birth of it until workers choose to consummate their experience and knowledge to obtain socialist consciousness and the necessary gestation period of education, agitation and organisation have been gone through.

For a worldwide socialist society

Working people spend a major part of our lives working for the benefit of another class. We sell our abilities to the highest bidder and lose something irreplaceable—our time. We’ve little control in the organisation of our working life, in what we produce, the quality of what we make and so on. We pass hour after hour, every day, engaged in monotonous, repetitive drudgery which mean little to us but which help give our masters, the capitalists, a life of freedom.  And what can we have instead of this wage-slavery? A worldwide socialist society where we won’t be supporting any parasite owning class and we won’t be wasting our time making weapons, working in finance and the like. We'll democratically manage our own work as society requires and we'll only turn out the best available and possible.  We can achieve security, abundance and fulfilment in a socialist society. This is why we say nothing short of socialism will do.

The ownership of immense wealth by a small minority is very often the result of inheritance. So if social privilege is a reward for merit, the only merit which is being referred to is the wisdom of a baby such as Prince George is to be born from the womb of a royal parasite rather than a worker. According to this theory, Prince William’s son, who will never need to go out and sell his royal labour power, is being rewarded for his initiative, enterprise and intelligence. The fact that he is as yet illiterate is quite beside the point. Social parasitism is not confined to the aristocracy. A parasite is an organism which lives by feeding off other live organisms. Such is the position of the entire capitalist class. They can only accumulate capital so long as the majority of people will produce wealth and receive a price for their labour power which is less than the value of their product. The exploitation of the working class by the capitalist class is the social equivalent of biological parasitism. The capitalists get their money and power by hard work -Yes, by our hard work.

Oh, for sure the apologists for the capitalist economic system will bring forth the example of the self-made man. But they also have become wealthy by employing and exploiting the labour of others. Richard Branson did not pilot the jets of Virgin Air. Occasional members of the working class do manage to make their way in to the exploiting class, but they can only ever do so by riding on the backs of their fellow workers. Most people are born and die in a class which subjects them to the dictates of the labour market. Capitalism causes poverty because it limits workers’ access to wealth. Wages and salaries determine how much members of the working class can eat, where we can live, and every other aspect of our social existence. Under the wages system, all workers are impoverished in the sense that we are denied ownership and control of the means of wealth production and distribution. The only way to end poverty is to abolish classes and this can only happen when what is now the property of private capitalists or the state is transferred to the common ownership and democratic control of the whole community. Being hired and fired is a part of working class culture and always will be so long as we allow capital to use us when and where it wants. Our class must one day make the capitalist system the victim of the biggest redundancy of all.

The Socialist Party repudiates any programme of immediate demands, on the grounds that such programmes do not serve as a means of organising for socialism but thrust the socialist objective into the background, and attract non-socialist elements. While it is true that workers have to struggle over wages and conditions this must be confined to the industrial, trade union field, separate from the political. Some reforms may be of sectional or temporary benefit but this in no way equals the effort required to achieve them. The capitalist class often offer concessions both to improve the productive capacity of workers and to quiet social unrest. But a growing socialist movement will bring more concessions to the working class than any amount of pleading or agitation for reform. We have seen the alleged Labour parties gain mass support and political power and once they are in government we have learned that capitalism cannot be run in the interest of the working class. Outside parliament the working class movement brought forth movements that claimed it was possible to get socialism by industrial action, by-passing Parliament. Bitter reality has shown the fallacy of this views. Whoever controls Parliament controls the armed forces and police, and in prolonged strikes, the suffering of the workers far outweighs any discomfort to the capitalists. But syndicalist ideas still linger on. The Bolsheviks of 1917 saw the birth of the Leninist theory of revolution. In a predominantly capitalist world and lacking both productive capacity and the acceptance of socialist ideas by the population, the only way Russia could develop was along capitalist lines. A repressive state capitalist regime masquerading as socialism developed, adding to the confusion and misunderstanding of workers and thus making the spread of socialist ideas that much harder. The lesson is that the most important part of revolution being the working class it must first be ready. It is impossible to get socialism without first making socialists.

Socialism is Social Democracy – People Power

Is the goal of socialism simply a projection of an idealistic notion, a utopian aspiration, an unrealisable dream? Cynics mock when they first come across the Socialist Party’s revolutionary proposition. We are depicted as the painters of a pretty portrait of an unobtainable future, rather than informed critics of the real world. Our idea of a future society arises from the potentiality of producing abundant wealth which has been created by capitalism but cannot be achieved within the limitations of a profit system. For so long as a single child starves for lack of food or a single drop of working class blood is shed in a war over property, the struggle for socialism remains the most urgent challenge of our time. Reformism presents an absurd promise to tackle thousands of social problems while leaving the cause of these problems intact. Capitalism is inevitably exploitative and undemocratic and its crises; housing problems, pollution, starvation, unemployment and wars are symptoms of the system and cannot be eradicated independently of the cause. The socialist answer to capitalism does not embrace utopias or gods or states or leaders or reforms.

Socialism will be the first ever social democracy in the sense that there will be no governments, authoritarianism or imposed morality. The limited political democracy of today will be expanded into a full social democracy. All aspects of society, including the production and distribution of wealth, will be subject to democratic social control. The coercive state machine and government over people of class society — with the armed forces and police, the judges and gaolers — will be replaced by the simple democratic administration of social affairs. Those chosen by society to carry out administrative functions on its behalf will not be in any special privileged position. They will not have at their command any means of coercing people. Nor will they be materially better off than anyone else since, as we shall see next, in socialism everybody will have free access to the wealth they need to live and enjoy life. The community will make decisions, using the advanced machinery of communication which is now available. In a social democracy, the needs of minorities will be accommodated, including the needs of those who are critical and opposed to socialism. For the first time in the history of human society men and women will live in a humane society designed to meet their needs. In the socialist society, the means of producing wealth will be democratically owned and controlled by the community, without distinction of race or sex. The wages system, which we have demonstrated to be a system of exploitation, will be replaced by an economy in which each will give according to his or her abilities and each will take according to his or her needs. There will be free access to all wealth, without the need to buy what already belongs to you as a member of society. With the abolition of property money and barter will no longer have any use. There cannot be socialism in one country, just as there is not capitalism in one country. The present fragmented world system must be replaced by a united world system. The evils of racial and national division, which now split the working class, will give way to a common social bond linking every man, woman and child on the face of the earth.

The socialist case proposes uncompromising political revolution. Having recognised that capitalism is a system of class exploitation, that the working class constitutes a majority of society, and that the capitalist class owe their hegemony to the consent of the working class, socialists advocate the withdrawal of working class consent to capitalism. Once workers understand and desire the abolition of the present system they must organise themselves for the political, democratic conquest of the state machine, including the government and the armed forces. It is to this sole end that the Socialist Party is organised. After the socialist revolution, there will be no classes, for all will stand in equal relation to the means of life. The state will cease to exist as there will be no privileged group for governments to maintain and no private property for the police and armies to defend. There will be conscious human co-operation to meet the needs of the world community. The world will, at last, belong to its inhabitants as a whole.

So to sum up, the essential features of socialism are that the land, industry, transport and communications will have become the common property of the whole community. This means that classes will have been abolished, everyone having an equal say in how the means of production are used. There will no longer be a propertied employing class, nor a propertyless working class. Wages will not be paid or received as nobody will be in a position either to buy or to sell a human being’s ability to work. There will simply be people, free men and women, co-operating to produce what they need. Wealth will be produced solely and directly for human use. It will not be produced for sale, but for people to take according to their needs. Goods will not be priced, nor will people’s consumption be limited by the amount of money they have. There will, in fact, be no need for money in a socialist society, as the principle “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” will apply.

Free distribution of wealth is now possible because modern industry and agriculture can turn out an abundance of the things people need. A world of plenty is now possible. There is no need for any man, woman or child in any part of the world to go hungry, be badly clothed or live in slums. The technical problem of producing plenty for all has been solved for a long time. The problem now is that the present social system, capitalism places a fetter on production because it operates, and must operate, according to the rule of “no profit, no production.” What the world suffers from today is not over-population, but the chronic under-production that is built into capitalism. Not only does world capitalism hold back production, but it also misuses and wastes the resources of the world. Think of the waste involved in armed forces and of the destruction of wars. Think of the waste of commerce and finance — of banks, insurance companies, salesmen, ticket collectors, accountants, economists, cashiers. Only a minority of the world’s population is actually engaged in producing useful things. Then, of course, there is the deliberate destruction of wealth that is carried out every year in order to maintain prices and profits: the bonfires of coffee and cocoa, the pouring of milk down coal mines, the dumping of vegetables in rivers, the feeding of butter to pigs.

Socialism, where people will cooperate freely to produce an abundance of wealth from which they can take freely according to their needs, is not only possible but is also the only solution to humanity’s problems.

Paper Doctoring

The Toronto Star, with its usual reforming zeal, has investigated complaints made about the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). Its article of July 23 claims the number of complaints made to the provincial watchdog about Ontario's worker compensation system is up 20% over the past year. Nearly 600 complaints between last April and March of this year, a jump from 2014/15 when there were 480 grievances against the board.

141 complaints have been lodged since March.

Doctors, labour groups, and injured workers' lawyers are demanding an investigation. They allege the WSIB ignore the diagnoses of victims own doctors which leads them being "kicked off benefits."

The Star has detailed allegations of unfair and unlawful cost cutting measures that include the use of so-called 'paper doctors' who review injured workers' files without examining them in person and wrongly attributing accident victims symptoms to pre-existing conditions so as to reduce compensation.

To quote Aidan MacDonald of the Injured Workers Consultants' Community Legal Clinic: "It's a pretty good indication to the ombudsman that external intervention is needed. Injured workers are just being cut off benefits.

They're being denied treatment that they need, they're being denied medication that they need."

Such news to workers is not surprising. Those who attempt to administrate capital. John Ayers.

Understanding the system

The Socialist Party has a very clear and practical conception of what is meant by socialism or communism; to us, both these terms mean the same thing. By socialism we mean a fundamental change in the economic basis of society, that is the way in which the members of society are organised to produce and distribute the things they need to exist. It means a world-wide social system where the entire productive and distributive resources of the planet are commonly owned, consciously controlled and democratically operated by the world community as a whole. It means a society where social wealth is produced solely to meet the needs of the community, on the basis of free and equal access by all, without money or any other medium of exchange taking place.

This contrasts sharply with capitalism. Its underlying features are the class ownership of the means of wealth production and distribution by a small minority of people in all countries of the world, and the exclusion of the great majority of people from any significant ownership and control of these means. Having little or no resources at their disposal, the working class majority are forced by economic necessity to sell their working abilities to the capitalist minority in order to live. Wealth produced by the workers takes the form of commodities which are sold on a competitive market with a view to profit for the capitalists. In return for selling their labour power—which itself becomes a commodity—workers receive payment in the form of wages or salaries. However, in the process of production generally, these payments represent less than the value which the workers as a class create, and the difference between them is surplus value, which the capitalists repeatedly accumulate and which is the source of their monetary profit, realised through sales.

So capitalism is a class-divided, profit-generating system governed by impersonal market forces and not the needs of the human community. The useful, producing majority are in a subordinate position of wage slavery, whilst the useless, non-producing minority enjoy a privileged unearned income from their economic exploitation of the workers. The capitalists wield power through their control of governments, together with the legal and military might of the state machine. This apparatus ensures that, firstly, workers are legally robbed when they produce wealth and, secondly, it conditions them by force and ideological persuasion to accept these social arrangements as necessary, inevitable and. indeed, natural.

The Socialist Party has consistently opposed the profit system, no matter how its supporters or apologists have tried to disguise it as something else. In this country and the United States of America, for example, the classic free market form of capitalism developed with the ownership and control of resources in the hands of predominantly private shareholders holding legal property rights backed up by the state. In Russia, starting with the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917, another form of capitalism came into being: the state-managed variety. This soon spread to most of Eastern Europe and as far afield as Cuba and China. The rulers of these countries, using the rhetoric of Marxism and the theories of Lenin, labelled these countries communist or socialist, but in reality, they were state-capitalist systems of class monopoly and control, where the state itself was the collective employer of wage labour. A minority of top officials in these '‘communist’’ parties personified the capitalist class: they directed the production of goods and services which did not belong to the "people" but were sold within a buying and selling framework.

Once we rid ourselves of the idea that the capitalist economy can be rational or benevolent, we can quickly move towards rejecting the whole concept of the exchange economy. According to the economists, the market is an arena for trading commodities, where various groups and individuals express their preferences among comparative, complimentary and exchangeable goods that have relative utilities. The dynamics of the market mechanism include competition, promotion, and balances of the utility-quality-price triangle, but only with respect to commodities, not with respect to the whole economic cycle and industries in society. Markets are promoted as, under conducive conditions and all things being equal, in circulating goods widely, improving standards of quality, responding to consumer feedback, and encouraging innovation in fair competition. The market economy is an economy that puts the market at the steering wheel of the entire economic life of society: production, relations of production, redistribution, and development provision services. The main idea is based on the postulate that market mechanisms can be self-regulating - i.e. self-monitoring, self-correcting and self-sustaining - and therefore should not be regulated by social or political authorities.

Marxist economists, however, hold contrary views on the market and describe it as anarchic.

(1) Land is not a commodity because it is another word for nature. Humans did not create or devise land; the other way around sounds closer to the truth. When the value of land and its utility is determined by the market it is commodified (i.e. made into a commodity) irrespective of the many complexities that entangle humans and their natural and built environment which cannot be reduced to simple 'property value'. Generally, the market price of land is called 'rent' and some other words, and in its absolute versions leads to the disintegration of nature and all sorts of violations of environmental balances and long-standing socio-ecological relations. The alarming ecological degradation in the planet today is largely related to practices of land commodification normalised by the market economy.

(2) Labour is a form of human activity, an extension of the human themselves, combining their physical, intellectual and psychological effort and springing from skills and knowledge earned through learning and experience. Labour cannot be a commodity unless you take a human being and own/control their effort in a particular time and place. Commodifying labour has an element of commodifying a person's existence in a particular context, for which the price is paid and determined by others with power. The price of labour in the market is called wage, salary, etc.

(3) Money was created by human societies as a medium of exchanging commodities, but not as a commodity itself. Money took many forms (of currency) throughout history, from salt to minerals to tender paper, yet always as a way to exchange various commodities in the market using a standard method of payment, but not as a commodity itself. The idea of 'buying money with another money' seems automatically ludicrous to our sensibilities for that reason. However, the market economy succeeded in making a huge 'market' for the activity of selling and buying money across the globe---through interest rates, debt financing, derivatives markets, foreign exchange markets, and other  related financial transactions. In such markets, money can literally get you more money without any productive work (value addition) or genuine commodity exchange taking place. Folks can get richer for no other reason than that they are already rich.

When a majority of the world's workers understand what socialism is and want it, they can organise themselves to take the necessary democratic political action to abolish the capital/wage-labour relationship and bring in common ownership of all resources, democratic control by the majority, and production solely for use in accordance with their self-defined needs.

Socialism is a vision of a world freed from artificial, market-based restrictions which will allow human beings to live in peace with each other. With the problems of social living solved, we will be able to determine for ourselves the kind of relationships and lifestyles most suited to our changed conditions, relationships not imposed from above but freely chosen by ourselves.

We need socialism

Things are changing, and not always for the better. Within capitalism our basic needs are met only as a means to improve our productive efficiency and not for their own sake; they are measured as costs. Human beings are not ends in themselves; they are but instruments in the productive machine. Commercial and costing values take precedence over human values. We are continuously subjected to a barrage of advertising for products of positive harm to the human constitution. Ad campaigns encourage the invidious distinctions we make between ourselves. We are encouraged to ape our supposed betters. The world of advertising is an escapist dream world. This is life today; people treated not as human beings but as machines. Socialists reject the present degrading social system lock, stock, and barrel; we will have nothing to do with patching it up and making it more efficient. We want men and women to free themselves from this existence and set up a truly human society in which the productive machine will be used to satisfy the many and various needs of people. What we want is a new society in which the commodity and cost status of human beings will be ended.

The socialist analysis of society has many unique features in that our analysis fits in with reality, with the material experience of society. No other analysis explains the wars, the poverty, the numerous social problems of capitalism. The socialist analysis is based rock-firm on the principle that capitalism’s problems spring from the nature of that social system and that they can be abolished only by ending capitalism and replacing it with socialism. This principle stands because capitalism itself is essentially unchanged, as it has to be. Thus a socialist party must be uncompromising and consistent, at all times pressing the case for the social revolution.

 Socialism means different things to different people. To some, it means social reforms, to others state ownership of industry, to others the kind of one-party state that exists in Russia or China. Very few people, however, view socialism in the same way as the Socialist Party. We possess a clear definition of socialism; it will be a society of common, not state or private, ownership of the means of wealth production and distribution; there will be democratic and not minority control of social affairs; production will be solely for use rather than for sale or profit; there will be free access by all people to all goods and services, without the fetters of the money economy. All of that is clear and anyone who cares to go back to 1904 will find all of our literature advocating the same principled and unequivocal socialist aim. There will be no state in a socialist society. The state is the body which has existed for as long as property society has existed, in order to defend the propertied ruling class against the propertyless majority. Socialism will be a classless society, without exploiters and exploited, rulers and the ruled, coercion and submission. There is no point in having a state unless there are people to be bullied and coerced.  Once the capitalists have been stripped of their power to exploit workers economically there will be no need to control them with a state: there will be a classless society without the need for a body of class rule. There will be no classes, no banks or exchange controls or capital, and no money—for what use could money have in a society where everything belongs to everyone? Our appeal is to those who are committed to the concept of a self-organised majority revolution without leaders to abandon their opposition to the working class forming a political party to contest elections and eventually win control of political power, not to form a government but to immediately abolish capitalism and usher in the class-free, state-free, money-free, wage-free society that real socialism will be.

Capitalism means the whole economic system of buying and selling which keeps a small minority extremely rich and powerful and the vast majority, all those who depend on a wage or salary, relatively poor, problem-ridden and powerless. This system has as its lynch-pin “profitability” which “sacrifices on its altar the interest of peoples”, brings insoluble problems such as unemployment and corruption, and prevents the realisation of the abundance of goods and services which modern technology is capable of producing. The way out of the mess is through the abolition, by democratic means (by people consciously voting for it) of the present “exchange economy” and the introduction of what CAN BE termed a “distributive economy of abundance”.  Therefore those few already conscious of the need for such a change must make an immense effort to spread their ideas and educate people to accept them

We are told by the defenders of capitalism that the ordinary person in the street would not be intelligent enough to take over the running of society from top to bottom. In fact, it is the workers who run society now — from managers to doctors to coal miners — but far from using their abilities for their own benefit, they use them for the benefit of the privileged few who own and control the means of wealth production and distribution. It is not new leaders that are needed, but a new system which puts human needs, instead of the hunger for profit, first. It is to advocate a new system of society, not new and superior leaders. Our alternative to capitalism is socialism, which will only be achieved when the majority of the working class understand and realise the need for it. Socialism will not be brought about by workers following some self-appointed vanguard.

Our whole miserable and aimless existence can be traced back to the social system under which we live. The basis of this system is the use of the productive machine to create articles for sale for the market with a view to profit. The problem of production has been solved long ago; scarcity is no longer a necessity. However, the vast productive forces of the world have yet to be harnessed to the satisfaction of human needs. Instead, they are used only where a profit can be made and controlled by a minority to the detriment of the vast majority of us. We who make up this majority do all kinds of work—in mines, on ships, in factories, shops, offices, and schools—but we have one thing in common: we are every one of us sellers of working power.

No piecemeal tinkering will solve all our problems; what is required is a social revolution—a change in the basis of society which will allow the productive machine to be used to satisfy our many needs. This is not a utopian dream. The productive resources of the world are quite sufficient to allow men and women to free themselves from their present degradation. We can construct a world society which will be a community in the real sense of the term, in which we can treat others as fellow human beings; in which we can assert the balance between human beings and society and society and nature; in which we can live a truly human life. The Socialist Party rejects reformist policies and advocates social revolution. Capitalism cannot be made to work in the interest of the workers; those who claim otherwise are not realists — they have been wrong every time.

Socialist society will be a society where there will be no money and free access to all the wealth produced; no buying and selling will take place because no private property will exist. Instead, the means of wealth production will be commonly owned and democratically controlled. Wars, poverty, class division and the environment from which leadership emerges will have gone forever. The need for socialism is more urgent now than ever, as capitalism advances towards environmental crises that could possibly wipe out much of the human race.

Elections – yes or no?

Engaging in the bourgeois democracy process and contesting elections has always been the position of the Socialist Party of Great Britain and the World Socialist Party of the United States. It has brought us up against those who disagree and who otherwise would have been comrades such as Proletarian Party of America and the council communists such as Paul Mattick.

The SPGB position as it presently stands is that this should not be an either/or issue. Neither action is exclusive but extra-parliamentary activities should be engaged alongside electoral action in a coordinated complementary strategy.

We suggest a read of the SPGB pamphlet (if you have not already done so)

http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pamphlets/whats-wrong-using-parliament

Having fought and died for the ballot, we tend to forget it is not the X on the voting paper which counts but the person's consciousness behind it. We want the working class to take over the State and convert it into an unarmed democratic administration of things. We want to see an end to capitalist class rule not the breakdown of society. The workers en masse don't need to create a different and more democratic decision-making structure from the ground up. What they need to do is to take over and perfect the existing, historically-evolved structures. We don't need to construct a socialist society from scratch; this is not the way social evolution works; there will be a degree of continuity between what exists now and what will exist in socialism as there always has been between one system of society and another.

We are not utopian system-builders. You don't abolish the state, getting rid of your control of your society at the point of actually having won the thing, and then play at utopias. You grab it and hang on against anything and everything the capitalist class, nationally and internationally, throws at you. During this process also you are transforming the institutions you hold from capitalist into socialist ones. People recognise it will be by both parliament and non-parliament means to socialism. It is the democratic result that we want. Our case for Parliament is that it is the most efficacious application of the workers' will to establish socialism. We seek the least disruptive method of revolution and in the UK, at this moment in time, parliament is that route. It is by no means a universal one size fits all prescription.

Socialists appreciate that many people focus are engaged in all kinds of worthy projects and struggles, but why do they often focus on the ephemeral and ignore the serious issues and their consequences. The Socialist Party seeks to conceivably become a lasting democratic participatory organization preserving and enriching the movement for social change. We also expect many new organizations to emerge from neighborhoods and workplaces but, alas, we are not there yet. The SociaIist Party endorses both electoral and social activism without letting either be exclusive political strategies. The Socialist Party seeks to capture the state for the purpose of abolishing the state which will ‘wither way’ and be replaced merely with an ‘administration of things’. There is no necessary clash between socialists and anarchists in their conception of future society – both are state-free.

Unable or unwilling to look beyond the short-term horizon of the next election, politicians are essentially prohibited from taking a long view of things. To avoid making hard decisions on the environment costs are pushed into the future, glossed over by an optimism on the technological innovation and market mechanisms. From this perspective, there is no need for urgent change. We must, therefore, reinvent democracy at the ballot box. The Socialist Party rejects the need for a ‘vanguard party’ to capture the state through forceful means, instead calling for the democratically mandated institution of socialism via the mechanisms of parliament. The Socialist Party argue that the state under capitalism is merely an instrument or tool of the capitalist class, meaning that politicians (knowingly or unknowingly) can only enact laws and policies that furthered the narrow interests of that class. We do not think that political representatives of the ruling class will advance the genuine interests of the working class.  Socialism is the alternative to the capitalist mode of economy. What is needed is a revolutionary movement, driven by the working class, which would dismantle the capitalist state, abolish private property, and establish socialism which means ‘from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.’ Various revolutions have taken place, masquerading as socialist, but none Marx nor any Marxist would consider genuine.

One of the most common objections to the Socialist Party’s vision is framed in terms of ‘human nature’. The criticism is that free access and production for use sounds all very nice in theory, but it would not work in practice because generally human beings are too weak in character, selfish, or lazy to be able to function without being ruled over either by employers or government with their structures of laws, deterrents, and incentives. We view people who are capable of living co-operatively without coercion. And indeed there is much evidence indicating that societies based on cooperation rather than competition are most likely to prevail in the long term. Our case denies that there is such a thing as a fixed ‘human nature’ that we are born with. Granted, human beings are products of a long evolutionary history that doubtless shapes our psychological constitution, but ultimately we are free to choose how we behave through our decisions (which means we have no pre-determined nature, as such – humans are neither inherently good nor inherently bad). Socialists can turn the human nature objection on its head, arguing that even if it is true what our critics claim in human beings are inherently weak and greedy, that is all the more reason not to uphold the concentrations of power. Socialists recognise the reality that structures and systems within which we live deeply shape and influence us. It is all well and good to try to ignore the state or to ignore capitalism, such as to ‘build the new world within the shell of the old but from the perspective of socialism may be naïve. Establishing environmentally sound public transport networks or extending bike lanes, creating co-operatives and credit unions, are more readily achievable in the short term via state policy. Likewise, looking towards a crisis or collapse situation for capitalism may not be at all an unrealistic scenario  but it would be the case where the the state would be strengthened and reinforced to maintain and administer the most basic social services and infrastructure (e.g. electricity, water, hospitals, food rationing etc.). A complete societal breakdown and the suffering such would bring would prove counter-productive for any socialist revolution. The Socialist Party believes it is better to plan and design a post-scarcity economy rather than rely upon the crises of capitalism to deepen and intensify further.

If a mass movement is what is needed and desired then recognising the importance of ‘presenting’ our visions in the best way possible is an issue that cannot be dismissed as secondary. Socialists need to think about how best to ‘brand’ our political perspectives. We have to be as clear as possible. We need to be heard and that means understanding different audiences and adapting our language when we need to. In other words tailoring our message and using a diversity of mediums to express our ideas yet somehow managing to remain united under one banner.

Goodbye money

However the Labour Party reconstitutes itself, it can only run capitalism in the interests of the capitalist system, which means waged slavery for the vast majority and wealth, ease, and luxury for an economic parasitic, capitalist class, living off the wealth created by the immense majority. Time for a post-capitalist upgrade, a democratic, commonly-owned, production-for-use world, of free-access to the common wealth without any elite parasite class.

Communism/socialism is a post -capitalist society, means exactly the same thing to us as they did to Marx also. The common ownership and democratic control by us all, of all the means and instruments for creating and distributing wealth. 'Common' and 'social' mean the same. Nothing to do with state ownership or corporate or private ownership. Nothing to do with central control either. It is a post-capitalist system which utilises the technological advances of capitalism to produce for use to satisfy human needs, using self-feeding loopback informational tools for stock measurements and control with direct inputs at local regional and global levels to allow calculation in kind, as opposed to the economic calculation of capitalism, only necessary to satisfy profit taking.

If you are born poor you will most likely die poor. Poverty is both absolute and relative. All wealth comes from the exploited labour of the working class which creates a surplus value above its rationed access (wages). A commonly owned society, would not have rich or poor, we would all have free access to the commonly produced wealth, with no elite classes creaming it off and storing it.

We are all component parts of the wealth producing social class, called the working class, comprising 90-95% of the world population, who collectively produce all of the world’s wealth, effectively runs capitalism from top to bottom, in conditions of wage slavery. Our attribute is to assist in the re-focusing of the attention of my class, from the foolish notion of ever reforming this abominable system, in which the richest 300 capitalist parasites have more wealth than the half of all humanity, in favour of a revolutionary change, to a post-capitalist society, in order to make all wealth to be held, produced for use and distributed according to self-assessed needs, in common for all on this planet, all of its human family.

The new Duke of Westminster is set to inherit his family's £9billion fortune aged just 25 following his dad's tragic death. Hugh Richard Louis Grosvenor is already godfather to Prince George after being asked to accept the prestigious role by Prince William in 2013. And now, he will be among the richest people in the world after his 64-year-old dad, Gerald, passed away at Royal Preston Hospital in Lancashire yesterday. Hugh, who is the 7th Duke of Westminster, will receive his father's estimated £9.35billion wealth - including the family seat, Eaton Hall near Chester. He will also gain a staggering property portfolio, including land in the wealthiest areas of London.

In Capital, Karl Marx describes how an aristocratic lady’s lands were accrued because of her skills at performing fellatio “Lady Orkney’s endearing offices are supposed to have been foeda labiorum ministeria,” (base services performed with the lips).

 July 28, 2013, Washington Dateline Report said:

“Four out of 5 US adults struggle with joblessness, near-poverty or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives …” And, “measured in terms of a person’s lifetime risk … 4 in 10 adults falls into poverty for at least a year of their lives.”

A report in The Asahi Shimbun on June 23 presents a poverty-picture in Japan, an economic model to a section of mainstream economists in poor countries. The report “Young people struggle to emerge from poverty” by Masaki Hashida mentioned a middle-aged person. To save money, the person’s only meal is breakfast, and the breakfast is with rice, miso soup, fermented beans and broiled fish. The person has lost 30 kilograms in two years. The man, according to the report, is a victim of a “black company”, an employer that harasses employees, forces them to work long hours often without pay, and presses them to resign. The monthly pay from these companies appears limited to 200,000 yen ($2,104). The AS report cited Haruki Kono, head of nonprofit organization POSSE: The black companies “exploit employees by forcing them to work for the same job as stated in manuals to such an extent that they get sick and eventually quit.”

Hence, it comes out: Big entrepreneurs irrespective of poor and rich societies are the same while they compete in the market. They harass, they force to work long hours, and often they don’t pay, and these give them a competitive edge. How much value, after the above fact, sermons from rich societies carry?

Doesn't it sound like Marx, as he detailed back-breaking work of industrial labour in the capitalist economy in Europe? Too many fellow workers are servile, unable to comprehend the world where all would be freed from wage slavery, able to freely partake of the wealth from the common store which they had collectively created, so conditioned had he become to accept what his master taught him.

The class system is a result of varied, succeeding minority revolutions and the economic modes which prevailed up until the advent of the capitalist class, another minority led revolution, which displaced the landowning aristocrats as the ruling class and absorbed them into itself, establishing bourgeois democracy in its wake as a method of social control.

Effectively, there are only two economic classes. The ruling capitalist one which exists in a parasitic relationship to the immense majority working class , wealth producing one, by virtue of its ownership of the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth. Wielding this ownership to exploit workers in waged slavery, for rationed access to the wealth only workers produce, in return for producing vast surplus value for the parasite class.

Changing the class system is straight forward, as changing the mode of production and distribution from private, corporate, state or any combination of those ownerships, into a democratic, commonly owned, production for use , free-access, post-capitalist, class-less, elite-free society, eliminates the economic foundation of the class system. There is then, no need for any representative government over us anymore, as a government is the executive arm of the dominant parasite class, which 'represents' in capitalism, the economic interests of its ruling class. What we would have would be an administration of 'things' rather, than one in control over people, but it would be self-administered with delegated recall where this was deemed appropriate. Workers, unlike the peasants before who at least had some land and crops of their own, have no country to be independent in. It belongs to a local, regional and global capitalist class. Capitalism is a global system which requires a global working class response to it.

Abolish the wage system.

Wee Matt

The One Percent and the Rest of Us

The case for socialism is one which has to be understood and implemented by the world's working class seizing control of their own destiny. It is not something which can be given or gifted by a political party dropping it onto people’s laps like the proverbial 'Manna from Heaven'.

It requires the development of a political consciousness which understands that capitalism is already obsolete as a useful social system. Which draws these conclusions from its never-ending crises, wars, two world wars last century, war science on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, still doing war dances in the North Sea, the Arctic Circle, the Middle East and the South China seas over raw materials, trade routes and spheres of geo-political interests.

On June 20th the United Nations Refugee Agency released their annual global trends report which contained the startling news that 65.3 million people have been forcibly removed from their homes. This is an all time high record and it means one in every 113 people is a refugee. The causes are due to on-going persecution, human rights violations and war. In 2015 more than 1 million reached Europe, fleeing conflict and persecution in Syria, Somalia, and Afghanistan. If this 65.3 million were a nation it would be the 21st largest in the world.

The dominant ideas of any time are those of the ruling class (Ideology). How can it presently be any other way? The electorate is persuaded through the education system, the media, slavish fellow workers espousing 'common sense', that capitalism is the only system around.

To this end all capitalist political parties do attempt to appeal to electorates that all of the above madness is quite normal, inevitable, due to human nature, but with their husbandry, as the 'lesser of the other's evil', war-mongering, poor-bashing, immigrant and refugee scapegoating, better outcomes or reforms can be achieved. A demonstrably monstrous lie. Capitalism cannot be reformed. All the above are not fixable, nor reformable aberrations of capitalism, but entrenched parts of it.

The onus is not on us to put it to the electorate, but for you to engage your intellect, to put it to yourself and ask yourself the question, why so many wonderful things are happening lately. In Britain the Brexit vote caused stock markets to plunge trillions of dollars. Five cops were shot dead in Dallas. Suicide bombers killed 36 at Istanbul airport. In the U.S. they seem ready to elect a racist moron as president. In Venezuela, starving people were shot dead as they stormed grocery stores to get food which their fellow working class people produced. In Africa and Asia women are being violated by the armies of war-lords. Global warming continues unabated.

Doesn't it occur to you that something is fundamentally wrong in society and that being such, something should be done about it?  Poverty absolute or relative, war, (business by other means) either total or by proxy, are inevitable concomitants of capitalism. The world’s workers produce all of the world’s wealth yet can only access a fraction of it rationed by wages or salaries. The world’s workers run capitalism from top to bottom although this is not in their ultimate interest.

Tim Di Muzio, senior lecturer in international relations and political economy at Wollongong University in Australia, in ‘The 1% and the Rest of Us: A Political Economy of Dominant Ownership’. He further states that “The market and price system were imposed on humanity not as a matrix of choice but as a mechanism of domination.” Di Muzio reveals that the 12 million high net worth individuals (HNWIs) on a global scale represent 0.2% of the population. the top ten percent own 85 percent of the world’s wealth, the bottom 50 percent scarcely one percent. The 1%-ers have almost 40 times more than the bottom 50 percent. The goal of capitalists is differential accumulation – to primarily increase the wealth gap between themselves and others: i.e., they seek greater wealth inequality. At the corporate level, the goal is the same: to gain a larger share of the wealth pie than competitors. For this reason, the capitalist system cannot rid wealth inequality or significantly reduce the inequality. Di Muzio writes: “this addiction for wealth and power is destroying the planet for future generations.”

All of the above problems can be swept away easily as anything by the establishment of a commonly owned production for use society, without markets, without buying and selling, without money, where we would all be better off and in delegated democratic control of our commonly owned world as a fellow human family.

The task of creating the socialist post-capitalist, production for use, free access, commonly owned, world is that of the working class itself. There is no short cut to this. It is you, and I and our fellow workers worldwide who have to aspire to this task. There are some anarchists with whom we can share a degree of affinity, Bookchin,  anarcho-communists or such, others are as crazy as fervid leaderist bolsheviks and would get workers heads blown off, instead of trying to capture the state initially, to prevent this outcome backed up by the populace already organised to implement common ownership and production for use. For us, it is peacefully, if we can violently if we must. The end determines the means, which is why it has to be a democratic majority-led movement and not seized or gazumped by a political clique.

We still had to have two world wars, innumerable small ones and wars by proxy, over trade routes, raw materials, spheres of geopolitical interest, war science on civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, fire-bombing of Dresden, by the 'good guys', bombing of Britain by the 'bad guys'. 'Homes fit for heroes after WW1, the introduction of reforms ,'from the cradle to the grave’ after WW2, the failure of state capitalism in Russia all to show that, war and poverty absolute or relative are intrinsical concomitants of capitalism and that capitalism cannot be reformed.

Capitalism is based on the ownership and control of the means of production by a 'privileged few' and production for the market with a view to profit, the source of their high incomes and privileged lifestyle. Capitalism runs on profits. Any government, whatever its intentions, has to respect this and give priority to profits and conditions for profit-making, unless they want to provoke an economic crisis and slump. This means putting profit-making before meeting the needs of 'ordinary working-class families'. All governments have done – have had to do – this, some Tory governments with relish, some Labour governments reluctantly, but they've all done it. Capitalism cannot be 'socially responsible', i.e. responsible to society as a whole. It is a profit-driven system that can only work in the interest of the privileged few who are the profit-takers.

The reason given by the majority of Labour MPs for wanting to depose Corbyn is their perception that, with him as leader, the Labour Party is unelectable and so cannot, as some of them have been tearfully proclaiming, get into a position where it can govern in the interest of – of course – the working class.

Are they any more sincere – or insincere – than May and her Conservatives? Not that it matters. It is not a question of sincerity but of what is practicably possible, and it is not possible to govern capitalism in the interest of the majority class of wage and salary workers. Both the Labour Party and the Tory Party stand for capitalism, and no government, not even one under Corbyn, can make capitalism work for the working class.

It is time we all got a life, ended the tyranny of capitalism, its anarchy of the market place and production only for the profit of the few and ushered in the, commonly owned, democratically controlled by us all, free access, production for use, post-capitalist future.

We have a world to win for all the world’s people. Socialism would be a global system, as capitalism is at present. There wouldn't be any foreign powers organised in nation states. Workers worldwide would be organised by themselves, locally regionally and globally, to administer resources in the cooperative world commonwealth There would be no government over people, (this is only needed in a minority class dominated competitive society), government ceases to be, other than the collective administration and sharing of resources, (an administration of things rather than people) that in capitalism war is waged over.

It is workers who presently run capitalism from top to bottom in the interests of the capitalist parasite class, they will be more than capable to run the post-capitalist world with a production for use, free access distribution, with no top-bottom dichotomy, or elites in privileged conditions.

We don’t really care less what it is called, socialism, communism, anarchy or macaroniHow long, how long? We advocate what socialism was, originally prior to the reform parties of capitalism utilising its popular appeal to their own, doomed to failure, gradualist and reformist ends and Lenin's gross distortions into two phases, to justify Bolshevik control of their aspiration to state capitalism revolution. They called us "Impossibilists", but reforming capitalism is what proved impossible.

Educate! Agitate! Organise!

"From each according to their ability to each according to their needs".

Wee Matt

Victims Of Drug Abuse

On July 20, April Corcoran, 32, was sentenced to 51 years in prison in Ohio after pleading guilty to raising money to feed her heroin addiction by loaning out her 11 year old daughter to her drug dealer, who, with the mother's blessing, raped and abused her, sometimes videotaping it, reported the Cincinnati Enquirer.

According to Corcoran's lawyer, "they tell me before she became hooked on heroin she was a very loving and attentive parent." As horrifying as all this is to most of us, it wasn't the rural area of Ohio where Corcoran lived. "I mean things like this happen a lot down here," said resident Keith Benson.

It's another appalling example of what a very sick world we live in. Socialists cannot say there will be no use of narcotics in a socialist society, but we can say the awful pressures that drive people to take them will not exist in it. '

John Ayers.

All for one, one for all

The future does not look good. Things are dark. Another financial crisis and economic collapse are just around the corner. There should not be this many this much unemployment and underemployment, this much homelessness, hunger, poverty, this ever widening gap between the income and wealth of the rich and everyone else. Another World War is increasingly possible while innumerable smaller wars proliferate. The wealthy control the world. There are no genuine democracies in the world, only oligarchies and plutocracies.

The capitalist class has never had it better. Never in recorded history has this class had higher income and wealth compared to the average working family. Oxfam reported that the richest 50% of the people own over 99% of the world’s wealth, the richest 1% of the world’s population hold over 50% of the world’s wealth, and the richest 62 people in the world has as much wealth as the poorest half of the global population, about 3.6 billion people. Yet, 32,000 children die around the world every day from hunger and hunger-related diseases. They die because their parents do not have enough money to feed them a nourishing diet. The ruling class has brought the world to a lamentable state. Make no mistake about it, the wealthy class and their lackey politician are responsible for the wretched misery of the world today. They looted the assets of countries around the globe and stole our future. We are left with nothing but confusion. Our confusion is rapidly turning to anger as we learn more about how they deceived us, betrayed us, and ruined our lives. They have robbed us of our hope and dreams.

There is no solution to this insane economic system except socialism. We, the people of the world now have an important decision to make; we can continue to curse the wealthy or, we can begin seeking and employing methods of uniting us so we can defeat our common enemy and move us to a better way of living together. If we do not have a clear picture in our minds of how we want to live together in peace and harmony chaos will occur when the socio-economic system collapses. We have to know where we are going, or we are lost. Where do we go? The answer is obvious; we are all human beings we are all brothers and sisters and all have exactly the same innate needs for food, water, shelter, warmth, sleep, social order, safety, security, stability, employment, a sense of belonging and love, and the opportunity to develop to our fullest potential. Simply put, we want and need to live in a world where people around the globe are at peace with each other and live in harmony with each other and where we have the opportunity to develop our lives to our fullest potential. The only way out is if a vast majority of people around the world solidly unite as brothers and sisters under the motto, “All for one, one for all.” Brothers and sisters take care of each other. The human family looks after one another.

Abridged and adapted from here 

The Vision of the Socialist Party

The Socialist Party is anti-capitalist, anti-statist and anti-reformist. One of the tasks of the Socialist Party is to help inspire a vision of an alternative way of living where all the world’s resources are owned in common and democratically controlled by communities on an ecologically sustainable and socially harmonious basis. Socialism will be a society based on cooperation and solidarity, meeting human needs. Instead of ownership or control of the means of production - land, factories, offices and so on - being in the hands of private individuals or the state, a socialist society is based on the common ownership and control of those means. And instead of production for exchange and profit, socialism means production to meet human needs. It is we, the workers, who produce everything and run all the services necessary for life. We build the roads, lay the rail tracks and drive the trains, we construct the houses, care for the sick, raise the children, grow the food, invent and design the products, manufacture the clothes and we teach the next generation. And every worker knows that often the system hinders us more than it helps. There is ample evidence demonstrating that we do not need the threat of destitution or starvation enforced by the wage system in order to engage in productive activity.

Capitalism is an economic system that necessitates continuous expansion, exploitation, and the concentrated ownership of wealth. The driving force of capitalism is the competitive market. The market economy's essential purpose is to sell commodities for profit. Profit has to be made, regardless of the impact on the environment or society at large. In order to gain a competitive advantage over other businesses, the capitalist is compelled to exploit labor and lower the cost of production.  Due to the “grow or die” imperative imposed by the market, economic growth cannot be contained by moral persuasion, it must continue to expand without any regard for human needs or environmental impact. Thus, capitalism should be seen for what it is, malignant cancer.

Amongst some of those who advocate their version of “socialism” are those who insist that nationalisation of industry, land, and services are the basis of socialism. Yet across the world, there are countries that have nationalised all or a part of their economies so one would expect them to have wised up. It could be suggested that they really do not want to acknowledge the failure of state-ownership AKA state-capitalism because they aspire to be leaders and become a new state bourgeoisie. The very act of nationalisation implies state control over all that is being nationalized and it means the extension of the state instead of the socialist principle of the withering away of the. An expanding state is the very anti-thesis to a state that should be withering away. Since the state and not the working class would control the means of production, the working class would still be alienated and would still remain commodities. State-appointed managers would use the same methods that the capitalists used to extract surplus-value. Socialists have no interest in reforming capitalism; we want to end it. We have no interest to make capitalism more rational or livable, a utopian venture. Reformism is in practice an appeal for government intervention to rectify a defect in the system. Remember anything that governments grant today can easily be taken back tomorrow by another government in office. Socialists seek to create permanent change. There is no shortage in the world of politicians or political parties claiming to have ready-made blueprints for creating a fairer society. However, socialism is not something which can be decreed into being by political parties or individual politicians but must be created, through mass participation and by workers ourselves.

Humans are the most adaptable of life that ever existed. That is why we are a reflection of the education we receive. The forms of interaction from birth and then for at least the first half of a decade determines the way we function. All individuals need that early education to have any meaningful social interaction in their life. This would indicate that our human nature will take on whatever hue of interactions we are exposed to from birth. The different relationships we have observed over the last few centuries show an amazing variety of beliefs or non-beliefs and ways people relate to one another and to nature. We feel better and live in more harmony in some systems and condition than others. The kind of life that can give everyone the greatest security and satisfaction is likely to correlate with the most social life; whatever system people live in, we’re always social even as we have strong antisocial elements in our economic system.

 An economic system can contradict our genetic makeup; provided there’s some sociability in that life we can get by, but it does produce physical and mental strain on us and the environment. When one looks around the world one can hear so many languages and many lifestyles, cultures and viewpoint, yet none of those particular qualities are inherited, they are all learned. Our body shape and skin colour is due to the environment we have adapted to and are then in our genes, but the way we feel and interact with our companions and nature is learned due to our physical and mental ability to learn and be social. We are educated to fit into society’s structure, but does that structure suit human needs, does it harmonize with nature, can it be sustainable?

If we could abandon all the bad things in capitalism, we would be left with people and our knowledge. We would then see ourselves as the most extraordinary and wonderful life, our sociability is supreme it even shines through whatever shocking type of civilisation we ever had. The learning process is the way life survives. All living things maintain life due to that process. Nature produced the first life by trial and error; we learn by that process, our information is the outcome of that. Many folk tend to minimise the hopeless conditions our children will encounter but if we don’t have united action soon to stop the capitalist wasteful destructive activities and establish socialism there will be no hope.

Various Tyrannies

Russians have lived under various forms of tyranny in the 20th century. First the tyranny of the Czars and their dreaded secret police, the Okhrana.

Then that of the provisional government of 1917 which prolonged Russian participation in World War 1 and prosecuted those who wanted to end it.

Next of course were the Bolsheviks who, though ending the war, employed officials of the Okhrana and instituted a ruthless police state.

Now the Russian people have supposedly a democratic form of government, but, nevertheless, gangsters have enormous power economically, which they use to gain political influence.

Capitalism can be administrated in various ways but all of them are, to one extent or another, tyrannical. Another good reason to abolish it. 

John Ayers.