Chattel
slavery was abolished because wage slavery was more suitable for the
growing capitalist economy. The subjugation of men and women has
always been inseparably connected to class society, is maintained by
class society, and cannot be resolved until classes are abolished.
All national strife will be abolished only when inequality and
capitalism are abolished.
The
reformers are having a hey-day devising the means by which the world
can be saved and the security working people is assured. The air is
so full of schemes to give the workers a few more crumbs. The social
consciousness of many people is being stirred. Men and women are
asking themselves some questions like: What am I going to get out of
all this misery? Do we have to have one war after the other? Isn’t
there some way we can end all this inequality? Such questions are
very dangerous for the capitalist system. Capitalism, with its system
of production for profit and system of international rivalry for
domination of foreign territories and trade, which produces one war
after another keeps millions subjugated and exploited, by its wage
system. Capitalism does not know how to abolish its many social
problems BUT WE SOCIALISTS DO. If this system cannot give peace and
plenty to its people, SOCIALISM CAN. A liberal reformer is someone
who doesn’t like what capitalism does, but likes capitalism. They
try to solve the problems created by the system by supporting the
system.
Abolish
the private ownership of the land and factories which will transfer
the means of production from private ownership to common ownership.
Socialism by makes all
of – society the joint heirs and owners of the tools of production,
will restore to the workers that private property of which capitalism
deprives them. The aim of your striving must be the triumph of
socialism. Socialism
means production for use and not for profit. Socialism means
internationalism. It means that one working class is not pitted
against the others in wars, It means that one working man is not
pitted against the other in the fight for a job. It means that one
working class is not cutting the throat of the other by producing at
lower wages than the other. The criteria for production under
socialism would be – how much is needed? Some people will argue
that it can’t work, it’s a utopia. We can only answer that
capitalism has demonstrated that IT can’t work. A society organised
on the basis of production for use would have more of a chance of
working than our present economic system. none of the politicians and
economists have been able to devise any kind of plan to solve the
basic ills of capitalism. They all seek to do the impossible: make
capitalism work. Untold misery, poverty and unemployment are the
living facts that prove that capitalism doesn’t work – not for
the working class, anyway. Socialism has not “broken down wherever
it has been tried,” because it
has never been tried.
Everything
you use, everything you eat or wear, your car, your house — you
didn’t make any of these things. We don’t produce these things as
individuals. We produce socially. We have a division of work in the
world. People in one part of the world make things which people in
another part of the world use. But,
even though we produce socially, through co-operation, we don’t own
the means of production socially. And this affects all the basic
decisions made in this society about what we produce. These decisions
are not made on the basis of what people need, but on the basis of
what makes a profit.
There
are people going hungry all over the world. And yet, because of the
profit system, governments pay some farmers not to farm. Farmers
don’t make their decisions by saying: “We need a lot of corn so
I’m going to plant a lot of corn.” They never say that. They say:
“How much money am I going to make if I plant corn?” Did you know
that if decisions were not made on this basis we would have the
potential to feed the whole world many times over? The economic
potential is there.
Take
the question of housing. If you took just the money that’s spent on
wars and armaments we could build beautiful free homes for every
family. We could wipe out every slum. The potential exists, not only
in the factories and materials for building, but in the potential to
build new machines and factories. Yet, they are not going to solve
the housing question because it’s not as profitable to build houses
as it is war-planes.
Did
you know that because of the way the system is structured a large
percentage of the people do not do any productive work at all? You
have the unemployed who are not hired because it’s not profitable
to hire them. Then you have the people in the army, not to mention
the police and private security, and others who consume a great deal
but don’t produce anything. Then you have things like the cashiers
on the check-out. They don’t do anything really useful or
necessary. In addition, you have a mammoth, organised effort to
create waste. For instance, if you designed a car that would last 50
years, they wouldn’t manufacture it. Because that would destroy the
purpose of making cars, which is to produce profits.
Say
you are a capitalist, and you’re about to build a factory. Do you
say: “I’ll build it where it’s nice, where there are trees and
fresh air, and where the workers will have nice homes and will be
able to go mountain climbing or hunting or swimming?” No, that’s
not the way you think. You say: “Well, where’s my market, where
are my raw materials coming in, how can I make the most profit?”
And this means you might build the factory where you will pump even
more pollution into the air, another
example of a problem which stems directly from this system.
All
the institutions under capitalism are ideological institutions in the
sense that all of them maintain and demand support for the system. So
it should be no surprise to you that the higher you go in a corporate
career, the higher you go in the university structure, the higher in
rank you get in the army, the people get more and more conservative.
They get more and more consciously pro-capitalist system; they are
more and more for whatever crimes the system has to commit. They
simply wouldn’t be there if they weren’t.
Socialists
have been accused for many years of wanting to overthrow the
capitalist class by force and violence. When they accuse us of this,
what they are really trying to do is to imply that we want to abolish
capitalism with a minority, that we want to force the will of the
minority on the majority. The opposite is the truth. We believe we
can win a majority of the people to support a change in the system.
Many people have a stereotyped picture of what a revolution is like.
What they do is they confuse revolution with insurrection. We
have a working-class army, for example, that has a great deal of
actual and potential power. Because workers run everything ask
yourself, why is this power never realised politically? The reason is
simple. The majority of people are under illusions and the
capitalists can rule only through maintaining illusions. Many believe
that the ruling class has unlimited power. If the ruling class
announced that they were cancelling all elections, cancelling
freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and so on and if there is any
resistance they’ll throw us all into detention camps, how long do
you think they would stay in power? They couldn’t do it. Their
power is already limited by a certain consciousness that exists in
the minds of the people. Their power is limited by the fact that
people believe in free speech, in free assembly and in democracy. For
sure, they will suppress opposition to them insofar as they can get
away with it. And they will use brutal means if it suits their needs.
But they will try to keep the repression in the bounds without
arousing the resistance of the people, without destroying the
illusions. Because, if the people begins to wake up, that’s a
greater danger. The hope the ruling class has is if it can isolate
the socialists completely from the rest of the people. That is why
the number-one task of all socialists who really want to change the
system is to reach out to the people. Capitalism does it for us. The
system creates the situation in which people awaken. People grow
dissatisfied, to the point of rebellion. They want to be free. And
they realise this is possible. All of a sudden, you have an increase
in consciousness, an awareness about the problems of society, created
by the capitalists. And this awareness can become much more
intensified. Now you can have radical uprisings of all sorts, but
that will never result in a change of the system, unless it’s
organised, because, people when they first become radicalised, don’t
fully understand the general problems. They don’t understand how to
change society. Very few individuals come to this consciousness
completely on their own. What you have is an overwhelming mass of
people who have objectively no interest in this system. They have to
be won over, and our whole strategy, everything we do, has got to be
directed at winning them. A socialist party, the collective
expression of a whole class is required. That’s what Marxism is all
about. That’s what revolutionary politics is all about.
Women
and men of the whole world let us clasp hands across the frontiers to
bar the road to war, oppression and poverty. Let us end the wars now
being waged.