The
Socialist Party has long contended that only socialism can solve the
major social and economic problems plaguing our society today. But
many people have been taught all their lives that "socialism"
means the state-controlled system that existed in the former Soviet
Union and its satellite states, exists today in China or Cuba. the
Bolshevik and Chinese revolutions weren't socialist in character.
They occurred in pre-industrial
societies. Without a majority working class and the ability to
eliminate scarcity of needed goods and services, creation of a
classless society was impossible. Material conditions there bred
conflict and made the continuation of the class struggle inevitable
in such countries. Socialism can only be built in a developed,
industrialised society with a working-class majority. In the
Bolshevik and Chinese revolutions, an elite "vanguard"
party seized control of the state and used the state to control the
means of production. Instead of establishing a classless society, the
party-state bureaucracy became a new ruling class.
The
socialism upheld by the Socialist Party, however, is completely
different from any existing system. It has nothing to do with
nationalisation, a welfare state or any kind of state ownership or
control of industry whatsoever. On
the contrary, it would give power not to the state, but to the people
themselves, allowing collective control of their own economic future.
A socialist political party is needed to educate the working class
and to recruit workers to the socialist cause. Socialism would bring
social democracy -- the rule of the people -- to the most vital part
of our lives, the economy.
Socialism
means a class-free society. Unlike under capitalism, where a tiny
minority owns the vast majority of wealth and the means of producing
it, everyone would share equally in the ownership of all the means of
production, and everyone able to do so would work. There wouldn't be
separate classes of owners and workers. The economy would be
administered by the workers themselves through democratic
"associations of free and equal producers," as Marx
described it. The workers collectively would decide what they
want produced and how they want it produced. They would control their
own workplaces and make the decisions governing their particular
industry. Engels once described
socialism as a system in "which every member of society will be
enabled to participate not only in the production but also in the
distribution of social wealth." Far from being a
state-controlled society, socialism would be a society WITHOUT A
STATE. Marx said that "the existence of the state is inseparable
from the existence of slavery. The people themselves, through the
democratic associations of workers, would administer the various
levels of society.
Socialism
will allow for us to carry on production for use in the most modern
production conditions we can possibly create, utilising the safest
and most manufacturing methods. The more we collectively produce, the
more we shall collectively enjoy. All of us will be useful producers,
working but a fraction of the time we are forced to work today. But
we shall not only be useful producers, we shall all share equitably
in the wealth we produce, and our compensation will literally dwarf
anything we can imagine today.
In
socialist society there will be neither involuntary unemployment nor
poverty. The young will be educated not only to prepare them to
participate in social production but also to enable them to expand
their interests and develop their individual interests and talents.
The
aged will be cared for, and not by any such demeaning methods as are
used today. We shall provide all their material needs and create a
social atmosphere in which they can live lives that are culturally
and intellectually satisfying. It will not be charity, but their
rightful share as former contributors to production.
Under
capitalism, improved methods and machinery of production kick workers
out of jobs. With socialism, such improvements will be blessings for
the simple reason that they will increase the amount of wealth
producible and make possible ever higher standards of living, while
providing us with greater and greater leisure in which to enjoy them.
Inside
socialism, we shall produce everything we need and want in abundance
under conditions best suited to our welfare, aiming for the highest
quality. We shall constantly strive to improve our methods and
equipment in order to reduce the hours of work. We shall provide
ourselves with the best of everything: the finest educational
facilities, the most modern and scientific health facilities and
adequate and varied recreational facilities. We shall constantly seek
to improve our socialist society. Purposeful research, expansion of
the arts and culture, preservation and replacement of our natural
resources, all will receive the most serious attention. It will be a
society in which everyone will have the fullest opportunity to
develop his or her individuality without sacrificing the blessings of
cooperation.
Freed
from the compulsions of competition and the profit motive that
presently hurl capitalist nations into war, socialism will also be a
society of peace.
In
short, socialist society will be a society of secure human beings,
living in peace, in harmony and human brotherhood.
This
all may sound too good to be true. Yet the world has the productive
capacity to provide a high standard of living for all, to provide
security and comfort for all, to create safe workplaces and clean
industries, and to help other nations reach these same goals. The
only thing keeping us from reaching these goals is that the workers
don't own and control that productive capacity; it is owned and
controlled by a few who use it solely to profit themselves.
Organising
to bring the industries under the ownership of all the people, to
build a socialist society of peace, plenty and freedom, is the only
real alternative workers have. For, as William Morris once wrote,
"While theologians are disputing the existence of a hell
elsewhere, we are on the way to realising it here: and if capitalism
is to endure, whatever may become of men when they die, they will
come into hell when they are born."