The notion of socialism can be traced back centuries in
various forms, notably among the earliest Christians (Acts 4:34-5:11); and the
model of “gospel” communism as in the Anabaptist and other religious movements,
with individuals owning nothing except what they collectively shared. But the
roots of modern socialism lie in the period of the industrial revolution. The
goals and ideals of socialism had their beginnings in 19th-century pre-industrial
movements and organisations, which cultivated in workers a keen sense of common
identity. The Industrial Revolution had many profound effects on European
civilization. It rendered much of the old aristocracy irrelevant, boosted the capitalists
to economic and political power, and drafted much of the old peasant class into
its factories. The result was naturally a shift in attitude toward wealth.
Capitalist wealth seemed to have no natural limits. Partly because the new
industrial modes of production had no pre-assigned place in feudal order of
things, the industrialists viewed themselves as the creators of their wealth. Dependency
was considered self-destructive, so the poor were punished for their poverty by
harsh laws designed to drive them to work. Ideas still very familiar to us
today with attacks on benefit claimants and how investment is viewed, now as
then, as the engine that drives the economy. Any measure which can encourage
investors to buy more stock is viewed as beneficial to society as a whole. This
class also created the various movements for democratic government which swept
across Europe; and it was only natural that they should have viewed their
economic and political ideals as functioning hand in hand. Democracy was
necessary to wrest power from the old nobility, to pass laws enabling business
to thrive, and to guarantee their property rights.
Not everyone agreed that the shift of power into the hands
of the new rich was entirely benign. In the newly industrialising countries of
England and Germany, people suffered under many forms of exploitation. The old
feudal restrictions which had fixed peasants in place on the land and limited
their income had also guaranteed them a place in the world. They may not have
prospered, but they were often able to fend off starvation and homelessness
simply because they had been born onto estates from which they could not be
removed against their wills. The dissolution of this old order meant that
workers could be hired and fired at will and had to sell their labor for
whatever the going rate was--and that rate was determined by their competition
with each other to work cheaply enough to gain them an advantage in the job
market. Traditional rules and protections went by the board in the new
factories, which often ran for twenty-four hours a day (two twelve-hour shifts),
seven days a week under the most inhumane conditions. Women and children were
absorbed into the work force as well, often preferred because they cost much
less than men. Industries severely polluted their environments, their machinery
maimed and killed many workers, and food in the new factory towns was often of
poor quality and in short supply. Living
standards and educational levels actually declined in many areas. Even many
well-to-do people became concerned over the wretched conditions under which the
new working class toiled, as reflected in the novels of Charles Dickens.
The late 1830s and 1840s saw the development of a mass
movement known as Chartism, which demanded an end to political corruption and
the introduction of democratic reforms. Chartism was not exactly a socialist
movement, but it was a very important early, mass-political movement that
tapped into the political energies of the working class. In the 1840s, Karl
Marx was just one of a diverse group of socialist thinkers who gained adherents
because he provided a solid historical justification for socialism.
According to Marx, human societies had progressed through a series of economic
stages determined by the forces of production, each one calling forth the next
through an unavoidable conflict between old and new forces of production. Thus,
the slave societies of the ancient world had given rise to feudalism, which in
turn had been supplanted by capitalism. Marx further argued that capitalism was
planting the seeds of its own destruction by first creating - and then
increasingly oppressing and impoverishing - the working class (the proletariat.)
The logic of competition and profit accumulation inherent to capitalism tended
to keep wages at the minimal level necessary to physically sustain the
proletariat.
The capitalist class owns the factories, the banks, and
transportation, all the means of production and distribution. Workers sell
their ability to work in order to acquire the necessities of life. Capitalists
buy the workers ability to labour, but pay them only a portion of the wealth
they create. Because the capitalists own the means of production, they are able
to keep the surplus wealth created by workers above and beyond the cost of
paying workers’ wages and other costs of production — unpaid labour that the
capitalists appropriate and use to achieve ever-greater profits. This surplus
is the source of profit. These profits are turned into capital which
capitalists use to further exploit the sources of all wealth — nature and the working
class. Capitalists are compelled by competition to seek to maximise profits.
The capitalist class as a whole can do that only by extracting a greater
surplus from the unpaid labor of workers, by increasing exploitation what
capitalists often call increasing productivity. Under capitalism, economic
development happens only if it is profitable to the individual capitalists, not
for any social need or good. The profit drive is inherent in capitalism, and
underlies or exacerbates all major social ills of our times. With the rapid
advance of technology and productivity, new forms of capitalist ownership have
developed to maximise profit and exploit new markets.
"Socialism" is an exceedingly fuzzy term which has
been used to label an extraordinarily wide array of political and economic
beliefs. But generally socialists advocate a democratically controlled economy
run for the benefit of all. The unfettered competition of capitalists is
replaced by cooperation and the anarchic business cycle by planned stability. Private
ownership of industry and land abolished and replaced by a moneyless society in
which market forces play no role, in which production is for the use of the
producers, in which lands and factories are commonly owned and in which the State
- and with it, war - is abolished.
No comments:
Post a Comment