The Socialist Party believes that socialism is the alternative
to capitalism. Socialism requires the joint efforts of workers worldwide. Socialism
is the only answer for the working class. And that we must organise as a class
whose goal is that. The Socialist Party has never had as a policy that
“socialism can wait.”
The Scottish National Party is the party of a certain
segment of the Scottish capitalist class. Brian Souter, the owner of the
Stagecoach transport network has given more than a million pounds to the SNP.
Needless to say, he did so knowing full well that the party would not challenge
his wealth or power. In particular, the SNP has made it clear that the bus
system and the railroads will remain in the private sector. The SNP has gone
out of the way to reassure the business community, including the transnational
corporations, that they have nothing to fear because an independent Scotland
would not threaten their interests. There can be no question that the SNP will
act to protect the interests of the capitalist class, even though this means
defending the interests of huge transnational corporations based outside of
Scotland. The SNP has been skilful in presenting one face to the people and a
very different one to the corporations. To the former the SNP claim to be
social democrats who believed in greater equality and to the latter, the SNP
stands for a strong economy and continued growth. The SNP leaders support a
continuation of capitalist exploitation in an independent Scotland. This was
summed up in their White Paper that proposed cuts to corporation tax for big
business while seeking to bind the trade unions into ‘partnership’ and a ‘Team
Scotland’ approach. In practice, this means accepting attacks on their wages
and working conditions for the so-called “national interest”. The SNP has
"tacked leftwards" in rhetoric, though not at all in policy
implementation. Voting for nationalist parties simply helps to confuse and
divide an already confused and divided British working class even more.
For too long, the left has accepted the orthodoxy that there
exists a “right to national self-determination”, and that we should support any
struggle to that end. The left is wrong, and that the damage caused by this mistaken
idea is second only to that caused by the corruption to the socialist cause
from the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
At first hearing, the very sound of a “struggle for national
self-determination” suggests that it is democratic and progressive. To throw
off the yoke of imperial government, to fight the occupiers and the
foreign-appointed governors: it all sounds just. And yet what does it amount
to? Having thrown off the yoke of foreign rule, the ex-colonies of the European
empires have largely established their 'own' governments. Has this seen their
peoples achieve freedom and plenty? In most, undemocratic foreign rule has been
replaced by undemocratic home rule. Different face in different uniforms hold
the same guns, and the people still stare down the barrels.
Worse, the old colonial rulers retain all their former power
through overpowering military supremacy and economic dominance. What the UK
once controlled through occupation, the US now controls through their
manipulation of trade backed by the implicit threat posed by their sole
superpower status. The EU and China desperately compete, and the 'great game'
of rival empires continues. The new 'home' governments of ex-colonies are
allowed to line their own pockets and bully their populations, but are
otherwise kept it in line. The question remains, when the left have supported
demands for 'national self-determination' - which can only mean the right to
form nation states - have they expected it to bring freedom and plenty? The
answer is no. Socialists are internationalists, and do not believe that
socialism can exist within a single state: the results of Stalin's 'socialism
in one country' proved that forever. It can be seen that when the left limit
their demands to what they see as the 'limited’ perspective of the people they
claim to 'lead', this patronising nonsense does enormous harm. As a result, our
most famous slogan must always be: “Workers of the world, unite!” We demand
open borders, and the abolition of states altogether. We believe that states
exist to oppress!
If socialists oppose the state, how much more that we oppose
the nation state. It is bad enough that people should be penned by the world's
rulers like cattle owned by farmers. It is worse that such states should
attempt to exclude those of the wrong 'nation' or 'people' or ‘race’. In
attempting to harness the power of struggles for national self-determination to
the socialist cause, the left have dragged the workers’ movement into the mud
and mire of nationalism. The right of self-determination is not national, but
the right of every individual, and of all humanity. It includes to right to
determine where to live and work, regardless of states, or borders, or
'nationality'. Humanity's freedom will not be won by building new states, but
by destroying them all. The problem with countries is if you love your country
or only your ethnicity, you separate from others like you. We become divided as
a human race. Countries divide us; governments divide us; when we truly are one
global species, one people.
We know that the future belongs to us, the workers. We know
socialism is possible. We know that only the working class can bring socialism
about. We need to build a society where we own the factories, the land, the
transport—a society where we are guaranteed housing, education, healthcare and
jobs. A society where there will be no borders for people. Rosa Luxemburg’s once
wrote “socialism or barbarism” but these days we may very well qualify it by
adding “Barbarism… if we are lucky”. Our choice in these days of environmental
cataclysm is one world or none.
.jpg)
