Every
day workers sweat on the production lines and experience the
exploitation on which the capitalist system is built. They take part
in struggles, together with fellow workers against the abuses and
outrages of the capitalist system. The handful of billionaires who
dominate the political and economic life has no right to rule. They
have built an empire on the foundations of exploitation, oppression,
and inequality. We know their interests are international as
much as national and they are the most powerful group since their
control of the means of production and of the state is most extensive
and absolute.
Is
there is an alternative to the system we live under? Is socialism a
better system? Can it be achieved? Many people have asked these and
similar questions. Intellectuals, academics and the mass media have
rushed to defend the capitalist system. The
aim of these apologists for capitalism is to turn workers away from
socialism and to discredit Marxism, claiming that its ideas are no
longer relevant. They
claim socialists have been incapable of explaining the failures of
socialism and the restoration of capitalism in previously “socialist”
countries. It requires socialists to
redouble
our efforts in the ideological struggle against these arguments. We
must show that socialism is a valid and necessary alternative and
remains an effective guide for the working class. The productive
forces developed in capitalist society have outgrown the form of
private ownership of the means of production. Fundamental changes are
imperative. The mission of rebuilding
society on a basis of social justice to-day rests with the workers'
movement.
Socialism
does not arise automatically out of the development of the productive
forces themselves. If it were purely a question of the automatic
change in society once the productive forces are developed,
revolution would not have been necessary in the changes from one
society to another. As has been explained many times, the
nationalisation of the productive forces alone does not abolish all
social contradictions. The State is not an autonomous,
self-determined structure hovering over the social and property
relations of a particular regime. It is the fully conscious
expression of the collective interests of the dominant class in a
particular society. Therefore, to bring something under state
ownership does not mean to socialise it where ownership is
transferred to the whole of society. To bring something under state
ownership, simply by having the workers get their wages from the
state rather than from private bosses, is not sufficient to transform
social relations in a socialist sense.
Objective
conditions, therefore, can create a revolutionary situation or at any
rate a revolutionary opening, whether or not there is a subjective
revolutionary factor with a mass base. But these conditions alone are
not enough for the situation to evolve in some sort of automatic way
towards ‘victory’; they are not enough to finish off the process
that has been begun. To accomplish this leap, people power has to
exert its force.
By bringing men and women together primarily as buyers and sellers of each other, by enshrining profitability and personal gain in place of humanity, capitalism has always been inherently alienating. A socialist transformation of society will return to mankind its humanity and end the sense of being a mere commodity. We will continue to make our contribution to the struggle to break their power and overturn the exploitative system we live under.
Our
organisation is not large. While we have had some success in our
campaigns, there is no reason to be arrogant or boastful. The
oppressed and exploited working people do not need a reformist party.
Of those there are plenty to choose from. People need a Marxist-based
one. The achievement of socialism awaits the building of a mass base
of socialists, in factories and offices. The Socialist Party can be
seen as the parliamentary wing of a wider movement dedicated to
fundamental social change.