Thursday, October 31, 2019
Out of the Dark and into the Light
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
The General Election
So
it looks like 12th December is going to be agreed as the
date of the General Election. As is our usual policy, we are standing
only token candidates in this general election to ensure that the
voice of socialism is not entirely lost. It is unfortunate that the
Socialist Party is unable to contest any constituencies in Scotland.
But, that does not mean our voice will not be heard.
We
don’t believe any politician can solve capitalism's problems, as
long as the flawed basis of our society remains intact. In fact, we
believe only you and your fellow workers can solve these problems. We
believe that it will take a revolution in how we organise our lives,
a fundamental change. We want to see a society based on the fact that
you know how to run your lives, know your needs and have the skills
and capacity to organise with your fellows to satisfy them. With
democratic control of production we can ensure that looking after our
communities and our environment becomes a priority. Together, we have
the ability to run our world for ourselves. We need to build a mass
socialist movement to effect that change. Our candidate makes no
promises except only to be the means by which you can re-make
society.
The
Socialist Party is standing alone as a party which aims at the
capture of political power by the working class, to abolish
capitalism and replace it with a society based on common ownership of
wealth production and distribution and making that wealth freely
available to everyone. That is socialism – the only alternative to
capitalism and its political parties. If you agree with this aim,
then this is the most important general election ever for you.
Our Future is Now
The
coming hope the future day,
When
wrong to right shall bow,
And
hearts that have the courage man
To
make the future NOW”
Ernest
Jones, Chartist
The
Socialist Party aims to remove the capitalist anarchy of production,
which today is again leading to economic crisis; a crisis which, as
in the past, the working class will be made to pay for, unless it
puts an end to the capitalist system. Today
the contradictions of capitalism threatens to plunge the working
class into the chaos of climate change. Inherent in the realities of
capitalism, historically and down to the present moment, have been a
deep authoritarianism and inhumanity. Such things threaten the very
survival of humanity. This is the capitalist system, which some
reformists work day and night to save. Today this is often called
“getting our priorities right”. Working people will not break
with their exploiters and their machinery of deception.
Capitalism
is the right of private property, the right of a few to own and
control the means by which all must live, the right of the owners of
the means of production to use it to exploit the rest of the
community in the interest of their personal profit, the right to
determine what shall be produced and how, regardless of the misery
and wretchedness of those who produce it. Capitalism is the right to
exploit, the right to rob, the right to over-produce and cause
crises, the right to compete, and cause wars. These are basic cause
of capitalist ills. To exist economically, the capitalist must
accumulate; not that he wants to or doesn’t – he must accumulate
in order to live. To accumulate, he must be assured profit. To
profit, he must exploit labour. There is no other way. No one, no
genius, not the greatest, has discovered another way. Capital always
seeks to intensify exploitation; labour always and necessarily seeks
to resist exploitation. Capitalism seeks what is rightfully its own,
from its point of view: the maximum that it can get out of the
worker. Labour seeks what is rightfully its
own: that’s why it forms class organisations, labour unions. Now
what is rightfully labour’s own, at least from our point of view?
The
abolition of the right of private property, and instead the common
ownership of the means of production, so that all may enjoy the fruit
of their labour, and consume it, thus eliminating the crises of
over-production, and the crises of wars is the socialist answer.
Socialism demands the common ownership and democratic control and
management of the means of production and exchange for the benefit
and welfare of the people as a whole; nothing less than that
suffices. We base that upon the fact that capitalism, which is
founded upon and cannot exist without the ownership and control of
the means of production has brought society almost literally to the
edge of a precipice, where it cannot guarantee security to the
people, cannot guarantee peace to the people, cannot guarantee
brotherhood to the people, cannot guarantee abundance to the people.
Any social system which cannot guarantee those to the people stands
condemned. The only way to replace capitalism, the only socialism.
The
development to socialism is inevitable because just as feudalism
replaced slavery, and capitalism feudalism – all based upon the
right of private property – so capitalism, having enormously
developed the productive processes on a social basis, has reached the
stage when, because of the private ownership of those processes, the
system has become a fetter on production itself. What is in question
is how much more of the ills caused by capitalism, from wage
servitude to atomic war, we have to go through, and that depends upon
all of us, upon you. Capitalism produces
its own grave-diggers, the wage workers and they reach a point where
it is no longer possible to live, they see the limitations of the
trade union struggle in the persistence of insecurity...private
ownership must go, common ownership must plustake its place,
socialism. It
is capitalism, economic and environmental crises and war – or
socialism, freedom, economic planning and peace. Private wnership on
the one hand, non-ownership of the means of production on the other
hand
“Nature
furnishes its wealth to all men in common. God beneficiently has
created all things that their enjoyment be common to all living
beings, and that the earth become the common possession of all. It is
nature itself that has given birth to the right of the community,
while it is only unjust usurpation that has created the right of
private property.” - St Ambrose (340-397 AD)
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
The Essence of the Socialist Party
What
does the Socialist Party seek? Nothing less than a social revolution,
a complete transformation of human society from its base. That is not
a little thing. It is about the biggest job that any body of men and
women have ever set out to do. And what means are at our disposal in
which to perform this task. We have nothing than people like
ourselves. Apart from the tremendous forces set in motion by the
economic development - forces which are hastening the revolution more
rapidly every day, and which make it, as we believe, inevitable - the
revolutionary instrument we have been trying to forge is a
proletarian political party, conscious of the present class
subjection . So far, our efforts in this direction have not been
particularly successful. But what of it? Didn't we know, when we were
first founded in 1904, difficulty of our task? Didn't we know it
would take years and years? Didn't we know that we should meet with
set-backs? Didn't we know that many of our members would go their
graves without even a glimpse of that free co-operative commonwealth
of which they were unquestioningly assured, and which, even in their
lifetime, seemed so near? How many years ago is it since Morris wrote
the words: "Only three little words to speak: We will it!"?
But the people do not will it yet!
The
emancipation of the working class must be the work of the
working-class themselves. There is no other way. The socialist
movement is fundamentally a movement for the emancipation of the
working-class, they cannot be emancipated against their will, and so
far we have not succeeded in inspiring them with that consciousness
of their present enslaved condition, that passionate desire for their
own emancipation, which is essential to an active, aggressive
revolutionary movement on their part. That is where we have
failed. But is the failure due to our own fault, or should it cause
us discouragement and despair? We believe not. If we saw others
succeeding where the Socialist Party has failed we might conclude
that the fault was ours. We have been frequently and constantly
derided by rival organisations and critics, nevertheless, we do not
see that they have succeeded any better than we have. Over and over
again attempts have been made to show what a poor, hopeless lot of
ineffectual cranks we of the Socialist Party were, and they presented
their own maps for the road to socialism. But they were lost in
side-tracks , in dead-end short-cuts and lost in the by-ways of
history. We claim that the road we have marked out is the right road,
and that no other party has, as yet, discovered a better way and that
whatever may be the sins of omission or commission with which we have
to reproach ourselves, it is scarcely a fault to be laid to our
charge if those to whom we appeal deliberately refuse to take the
road we point out to them, and persist in continually marching up and
down a blind alley.
The
Left have not rallied the workers to any greater extent than the
Socialist Party have done, and only achieved greater success in this
direction in so far as their socialist ideas have grown more hazy and
the vague principles less definite. It is not pleasing to dwell upon
these failures to organise a mass socialist working-class political
party. We would have been delighted had any one of them succeeded.
We could then have heartily joined with them in their work, rejoicing
in their progress. But alas...The cause of our own lack of success
cannot be centred on our own error because the present position of
the socialist movement is one that is not a matter solely of the
failure of the Socialist Party to rally the workers under our banner
and into a class-conscious political party, but the failure of all
bodies which have attempted the task. It is a quite common mistake on
the part of young, enthusiastic activists to envisage the working
class as in a state of discontent, seething unrest , latent
revolt, only waiting for a strong lead to spring into vigorous
militant action. Such ardent activists soon, as a rule, become
discouraged by disillusionment. But we know better - have always
known better. Our fellow-workers for the moment are imbued with
bourgeois ideas; unconscious of its own subjugated position as a
class; unconscious of the essential class antagonism of the
capitalist social order, and reverential towards the master class.
And add to this conservatism, the readiness of the ruling class to
adopt - and to adapt to their own ends - any ameliorative measures.
Measures of social reform which we first formulated as
stepping-stones towards a complete revolution, in the teeth of
the bitterest opposition from all quarters, have been in many cases
adopted in a modified form, and even where that is not the case they
are no longer opposed but are generally admitted to be necessary and
beneficial. Those handicaps are sufficient to account for our
failure. But it ought not to overwhelm us with despair.
In
the direction of building up a class-conscious working-class
Socialist Party is where we have still to bend our efforts with
renewed energy. Agitate, Educate, Organise! And above all, Organise!
Let us look to and eliminate the faults and defects of our own
organisation, for it is not free from them. The causes which have
operated to prevent our success in rallying the whole working-class
to our banner do not supply the reasons for the fact that so many
avowed, earnest and active socialists are outside our party. Let us
enquire into these reasons and if possible remedy them. Are we, as is
sometimes alleged, too narrow, too sectarian, too intolerant? Are we
too discourteous, not to enemies, but to would-be friends and allies?
Do we seek to antagonise people rather than to win them? These are
searching questions to which it may be worth while to give some
consideration.
There
should be no heresy-hunting; no nosing out of non-essential points of
difference;. but rather a seeking for essential points of agreement -
In things doubtful, liberty; in things essential, unity; and in all
things, charity; courtesy and forbearance to each other; good
comradeship - as among a body which is organised to fight a world in
arms against it; to have the word "comrade" less frequently
on our lips and its spirit more constantly in our hearts; to disarm
hostility and to bring together all comrades and friends into a
united Socialist Party, a live, active, vigorous instrument for the
realisation of the emancipation of humanity.
Monday, October 28, 2019
No To Nationalism
The
Radical Independence Campaign's conference at the weekend in Glasgow
has come and gone. Invited speakers of the likes of Tariq Ali, SNP,
Catalan and Basque politicians along with various political
activists have had their say and declared their positions. The
Socialist Party was not among the invited guest speakers and our
message would have been one that would not have been welcomed.
In
the struggle to win the minds of the working class one of the biggest
obstacles to the establishment of socialism, is nationalism ― the
loyalty and patriotism felt by many members of the working class
towards "their country." Feelings of loyalty to a nation
are purely subjective, having no basis in reality; the working class
in Scotland has more in common with the workers in other regions of
the UK and in other countries than it has with the any Scottish
capitalist. Like it or not, but nationalist movements represent the
interests of a section of the capitalist class. Nationalism can take
on a "right-wing" or a "left-wing" form. This
depends upon the position of the capitalist class in the particular
time and place. However, once independence is achieved and the new
ruling class has consolidated its power, then nationalism becomes a
conservative force.
The
Socialist Party opposes all nationalist movements, recognising that
the working class has no country. But there are certain other groups
the left-nationalists in Scotland who, though claiming to have a
class outlook, possess a wholly opportunist attitude to nationalism,
which reflects not so much the interest of the working class as it
does a certain part of the Scottish business. They accept the
mythology of the existence of "the Scottish nation" and
espouse the right of people of each nation to self-determination and
national sovereignty. Scotland is a nation; Scotland is not Britain;
and the Scots have a right to decide whether or not they wish to have
any association with the rest of the UK. This is a complete denial of
Marxism; it is almost incomprehensible that people who call
themselves as “socialists” should call for the right to
re-establish Scottish nationhood. The Scottish independence is in
essence no different from any other nationalist movement; it has been
brought into being to further the ambitions of a fledgling native
capitalist class to break away from Britain.
Some
on the Left resort to the argument argued Marx and Engels supported
particular nationalist movements and that therefore socialists should
do so today. Such an assertion is based on a faulty understanding of
the Materialist Conception of History. Marx and Engels were living in
time when the bourgeoisie was engaged in a struggle to assert itself
against the old feudal regimes. The victory of this class was a
historically progressive step at that time in that it brought about
the re-organisation of society on a capitalist basis, the essential
pre-condition for the establishment of socialism; and it created an
urban proletariat, the only class which can bring about socialism.
This was why Marx supported the rising capitalist class in Poland and
Ireland in their bid to capture political power. They were at the
same time vehemently against the nationalist aspirations of many
Slavic peoples. However, once capitalism reaches the point where
socialism is a practical proposition, there is no need for socialists
to advocate the capitalist industrialisation of every corner of the
globe; they can concentrate fully on the task of establishing
socialism. Hence the Socialist Party gives no support to any
nationalist group, and in place of the opportunism and hypocrisy of
the left-nationalists, our call is for "Workers of All
Countries, Unite!"
Socialist Principles
The
basic principles of the Socialist Party are that reforms (‘palliative
measures’) will not change the position of the working class; that
the goal is the abolition of all classes;
and this can be achieved by the organised working class seizing
power, expropriating the capitalist class, and socialising the means
of production.
Socialists
hate capitalism with our heads and with our hearts because we see in
it an out-dated social system, an anomaly in our present world,
holding back that wonderful development of technology and resources
that the present state of our knowledge could turn to the well-being
of the people. We see in it a social system that carries within
itself slumps and wars, poverty amid plenty, exploitation and
oppression. All of us in the Socialist Party want to end it as soon
as possible. Our aim is replacing the present capitalist system by
socialism, understood as a society where there will be common
ownership of the means of production and distribution. socialism is a
society where the means of production and distribution are socially
owned, in the hands of the working people.
Socialism
is a society where material wealth will be in the hands of those who
produce it, where the exploitation of man by man will be ended, where
production will be used not for private profit, where a new
relationship of fraternity will develop between peoples based on
equality, where individual men and women will find totally new
possibilities to develop their abilities. Although we strive to
replace capitalism by socialism, we all of us believe that it is both
possible and essential to fight now, within capitalism to defend and
improve the immediate lot of the working people. We understand
therefore the great importance for the Socialist Party which is
working for a new social order to give their support to those
organisations of the people whose main present concern is improving
conditions under the existing social order. We therefore support such
organisations as trade unions and community organisations. We see
both the need and the possibility to win the overwhelming majority of
the population for the fight against capitalism and for socialism and
see the working class as the driving force in the advance to
socialism. Marxists and the practical experiences of the
international working class movement has shown that without the
winning of political power and the transformation of the state, no
successful advance to socialism is possible. We Marxists believe that
this has always been and remains true. This after all is the essence
of the old conflict of revolution versus evolution, because
revolution means in essence a change of political power.
As
Marxists we do not believe that the state in Britain is in essence
different from the state in any capitalist country. We do not believe
that it is neutral or above classes, and we do believe that in order
to advance to socialism it is necessary for the working class
majority to take political power out of the hands of the capitalists
and to transform the State so that it becomes an instrument of the
will of the majority in expropriation of the capitalists and the
abolition of capitalism. We do not stand for violence, but if
violence should be used by the old ruling class against the people,
then the people themselves will, with all legitimacy behind them,
have to find appropriate methods to deal with it. The enemy is modern
capitalism. British capitalism is the oldest, most cunning, most
skilled, most experienced in the world. It is no mean enemy to
overcome and we would do wrong in any way to underestimate it. To
defeat capitalism we
need all our resources,
and the issue of the moment is how best to bring them together in
unity for the common struggle.
The
Labour Party and their left-wing hangers-on possess a platform that
is reformist when the task is revolutionary — that is, socialist.
While capitalism is moving out to slash the many gains already won,
straight-jacketing organized labour with anti-union laws, cutting
down on social legislation, they talk in terms of the affluent
society and the amelioration of class conflicts. They project a
perspective of merely removing what they present as minor defects in
the existing capitalist order of things, of patching capitalism up
and making it more tolerable, instead of a perspective of fundamental
change with a leadership preaching conciliation, peaceful
co-existence with capitalism, not class struggle against it. In
desperation they are attempting to shore up the system. Capitalism
promises the people not amelioration of conditions but austerity,
oppression, and either nuclear destruction of mankind or the
environmental destruction of humanity. Only through an irreconcilable
struggle against capitalism, towards its elimination and the
establishment of socialism, will the people of the world find the
full freedom, equality and democracy for which they aspire. Despite
the campaign of lies and distortions about the socialist viewpoint we
are confident that developing realities, together with the conscious
participation of all who consider themselves socialists will offer
the people the powerful leap forward on the march to a socialist
world.
Sunday, October 27, 2019
Bringing it Together
Standing
in the way of social progress is the capitalist class. The ruling
class control the destinies of millions of others around the globe.
In opposition to this minority is the vast majority of the rest of
the population. In the final analysis, the conditions of life for 99%
of the people cannot fundamentally improve without the overthrow of
the ruling class. The capitalists are a powerful enemy and it will
require protracted efforts to overthrow them. This class is the enemy
of the revolution and the vast majority of the people. These
capitalists live off the exploited labour of others. The vast
majority of people belong to the working class. The working class
produces the wealth appropriated by the capitalists and its basic
interest lies in the abolition of the private ownership of the means
of production.
Socialism
means a class-free society, and a classless society means that a
privileged minority of the population are not in a position to enjoy
the national wealth, while the majority live only on their labour to
produce it. It means especially that privileged individuals who do
have excess income cannot invest it in the instruments of production
with which others work, thus reducing them to a position of fixed
subservience. It means an end of rent, profit, and interest on stocks
and bonds, an end of “surplus value,” an end of the exploitation
of labour. To all those other cultural goods of which we have been
speaking, this economic change was regarded by socialists as
pre-requisite and fundamental. Socialism means fewer officials than
capitalism, not more. It is capitalism, with its huge bureaucratic
organisation of administrators, directors, managers, under-managers,
foremen, sales managers, advertising agents and production experts
that outweighs – at the expense of the ratepayer – the official
against the operative side of industry.
Socialism
has a future and Marxism retains its validity. Revolution does not
fall out of the sky. It requires organization–an organization
committed to this goal. After we have overthrown the capitalists we
will establish socialism. It will put an end to the exploitation of
man by man. It will bring freedom to all those oppressed by capital
and open up a new period of history for people. The enormous waste of
capitalism will be abolished. Industrial democracy will wrest the
earth from its exploiters and its vast and inexhaustible storehouse
will yield abundance for all. The growth of socialism is the promise
of freedom. What the people want they can't have. The trouble is that
they have been too patient and too modest, but one of these days they
are going to realise that this earth is theirs, and then they will
take possession of it in the name of the humanity. Politically the
people are not yet ready for socialism. They do not understand that
the capitalist system is not capable of feeding, clothing, or
sheltering them. Because of this political backwardness they are
capable of seeing only their immediate ills, and hence are capable of
making only immediate and emergency demands. Because of the political
backwardness the struggle for socialism is small and isolated. The
burning problem of the day for millions is to construct the bridge
between the present political backwardness of the masses and the
socialist revolution. But they can see the surrounding plenty. They
can see the fertile fields full of crops. They can see the packed
warehouses, the idle machines. And they can see just as clearly the
empty plates at their dinner table. They can hear their children
crying for food. They can feel all the horrible misery of the rotten
conditions, the shame and degradation in which they are compelled to
live. We are convinced that in spite of all the difficulties the
ideas of socialism will continue to grow in strength, that socialism
will conquer. The workers are in the majority, and their interests
are in line with Socialism, which may, therefore, be realised as soon
as they desire, and are resolute enough to put their desires into
practice.
Capitalism
has only known how to cause humanity misery and unhappiness;
socialism will establish peace and harmony among men and women.
Socialism maintains and proves that there is only one solution to the
social problems as it presents itself in capitalist civilization:
it’s that all the centralized labor instruments, such as the
railroads, factories, textile works, mines, large farming properties,
banks, etc, become common property and be given over to the
associated workers, who will operate them , not for the profit of a
few capitalists, do-nothings and thieves, but for the benefit of the
entire community. This transformation of
capitalist property into common property will create social
well-being. The
anarchic production of capitalist civilization , which only knows how
to engender the poverty of the producers with its overabundances of
merchandise and its periods of overwork and of unemployment, will be
replaced by nationally and internationally regulated production,
calculated according to the needs that are to be satisfied.
Industrial inventions and improvements, no longer serving to enrich a
few individuals, will increase the means of leisure and enjoyment of
all members of society.
Socialism
is international, just like capitalism. But whereas the
internationalism of the bourgeoisie is continually frustrated by the
mutual competition of national capitalisms, the internationalism of
the workers is nourished and perpetually strengthened by the active
solidarity of the interests of all the workers, regardless of their
nationality. The situation of the workers is identical in its
essential features throughout all capitalist countries. Whilst the
interests of the bourgeoisies of different lands unceasingly conflict
one with another, the interests of proletarians coincide. the social
revolution cannot count upon success unless at the outset it
involves, if not all, then at least the major capitalist countries.
For this reason, from the moment when the workers begin to become
aware that their complete emancipation is unthinkable without the
socialist reconstruction of contemporary bourgeois society, they take
as their watchword the union of the workers of the whole world in a
common struggle for emancipation.
Saturday, October 26, 2019
Organisation and Consciousness
Capitalism,
by its method of production, has brought isolated workers together
and constituted them as a class in society. Capitalism has made the
workers a class in themselves. That is, the workers are a distinct
class in society, whether they recognise this fact or not. Historical
development calls upon this class to reorganise society completely
and establish socialism. To do this, the workers must become a class
for themselves. They must acquire a clear understanding of their real
position under capitalism, of the nature of capitalist society as a
whole, and of their mission in history. They must act consciously for
their class interests. They must become conscious of the fact that
these class interests lead to a socialist society. When this takes
place, the workers are a class for themselves, a class with socialist
consciousness.
How are the workers to acquire this consciousness – this clear,
thoroughgoing understanding of capitalist society, their position in
it, and the need to replace this society with socialism? In the
factory, the worker tries to get better wages and working conditions
from the employer. If he cannot get them by a simple request, he soon
learns the need of union organisation with which to enforce his
requests and to defend himself from attacks by the employer. He
learns, too, that the workers must resort to political action in
order to influence the government in their interests. He and all
other workers are forced by capitalism to engage in the class
struggle. The thinking of the workers, which guides their fight, is
based upon the ideas of the capitalist class, acquired directly from
the capitalist media. What the workers still lack is a fundamental
and thorough understanding of their real position in society and of
their historic mission to establish socialism. This lack of a
socialist consciousness reduces the effectiveness of their
organisation, of their struggle, and prevents them from accomplishing
their mission in society.
To
imbue the workers with this rounded-out class consciousness, or
socialist consciousness; to organise and lead the struggle for
socialism – that is the specific function of the Socialist Party.
It is composed of those workers who already understand the nature of
capitalism and the historical task of the working class. Their aim is
to develop the same understanding among all the workers, so that they
no longer fight blindly, or with only one eye open but with a clear
and scientific knowledge of what their class enemy is, of what the
working class itself really is and of what it can and must do in
society. They and their party therefore have no interests separate
from the interests of the working class as a whole. It makes clear to
the workers the full meaning of their fight. It shows how even the
local struggles, against one capitalist, are really class struggles
against capitalism; how the local struggles must be extended on a
national and international scale if the workers are to win a lasting
victory. It points out the political meaning of the economic
struggle. It shows how the workers must organise as a class to take
political power, and use it to inaugurate socialism. It combats the
open and the insidious ideas of capitalism so that the working class
as a whole may be better equipped to fight its enemy. To put it
briefly, the Socialist Party is needed to win the working class to
the principles of socialism. Socialism will never come by itself. It
must be fought for.
Without an organised, conscious, active mass
socialist party, the triumph of socialism is impossible. To judge the
different parties, it is necessary to check on their words and their
deeds. Socialism cannot be achieved, and the workers cannot
effectively promote their interests, without class consciousness.
Class consciousness means an understanding working class, a
self-confident and self-reliant working class.The socialist who has
no conscious understanding, cannot work to make non-socialist workers
conscious of their task.
The
Socialist Party represents a long and rich tradition. The Socialist
Party knows the nature of the capitalist class and its long, brutal
history, some of which is known to every worker. It is proud of the
fact that its principles are founded on the teachings of the greatest
scientific thinkers of the international working class, Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels. The Socialist Party describes itself as Marxist
which merely signify it stands firmly on the basic principles of the
greatest teachers in the history of the working class. The Socialist
Party champions the idea of social revolution. What is a social
revolution? It is the replacement of one ruling class by another.
History is filled with such revolutions and in almost every case they
made possible the progress of society. The socialist revolution is
simply the overthrow of capitalist despotism and the establishment of
the cooperative commonwealth. Socialism can be established by the
workers gaining a majority of the votes for their candidates to
public office. Once they have been elected in sufficient number they
can introduce socialism relatively painlessly.
Capitalism
is a world system, and it can be thoroughly destroyed only on a world
scale. The Socialist Party is internationalist because it considers
nationalism reactionary and the brotherhood and equality of all
peoples of the human race the highest social aim. It is
internationalist because it understands that the class-free socialist
society cannot be established within the framework of one country
alone. It is internationalist because it considers that national
frontiers have become an obstacle to social progress and a direct
contributing source to conflicts and wars. Socialism cannot
conceivably be restricted to one country, no matter how big it is.
Socialism is world socialism, or it is not socialism at all.
Socialism means peace and freedom for the entire world. That is why
the Socialist Party endeavours to promote an international
organisation, to build unity and solidarity of the working class. The
Socialist Party itself is only the link of a world chain of similar
parties and organisations that aim to establish a world socialist
movement. The Socialist Party therefore gives no
support to war
and
opposes them at all times. It is the party of peace, not war; of the
brotherhood of the peoples, not the slaughter of the peoples.
Socialists are opposed to all exploitation and oppression
Friday, October 25, 2019
The Socialist Party and the Workers' Future
“All
previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the
interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the
self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the
interest of the immense majority.” - Communist Manifesto
Socialism
at its core does not depend on theory or programmes but is based on
real life. Socialism expresses the desire for a free, non-governed
society, which offers freedom, equality and solidarity for its
members. Our oppressors
do their best to distort the ideal of socialism. The idea of
socialism is bound up with mankind's awareness of the suppurating
sore of injustice in capitalist society. Capitalism is for the
preservation of the Master/Slave relationship. It is the lash of
hunger which compels the poor to submit. In order to live we MUST
SELL OURSELVES every day and hour. The greed for wealth is closely
associated with the greed for power. Wealth is not only a generator
of more wealth, it is also a political power. The goal of a world in
which the working class organises and controls its own destiny can
only be achieved through the combined development of socialism in
individual nations. Socialism cannot be imposed from outside – it
can only be made by, and for, the working class. Working class unity
makes it impossible for the capitalists to go on in the old way of
divide and rule. Working class unity enables us to combine our
tactics for defending our class with the strategy of liberating our
class. Working class unity is revolutionary.
The
socialist movement will not advance significantly until it regains
the initiative and takes the offensive against capitalism and all its
agents. What is needed is not a propaganda device or trick, but a
formulation of the issue as it really stands; and, indeed, as it has
always stood with real socialists ever since the modern movement was
first proclaimed. Our task, as socialists living and fighting in this
day and hour, is simply to restate what socialism means. This
restatement of basic aims and principles cannot wait; it is, in fact,
the burning necessity of the hour. There is no room for
misunderstanding among us as to what such a restatement of our
position means and requires. It requires a clean break with all the
distortions of the real meaning of socialism. A return to the
original formulations and definitions, the authentic socialist
movement, as it was previously conceived Nothing short of this will
do.
Marx
and Engels never taught that
nationalisation signified the establishment of socialism. That’s
not stated by Marx and Engels anywhere. Still less could they have
imagined the monstrous idea that socialism would be without freedom
and without equality, controlled by a ruthless police-state. Marxists
defined socialism as a class-free society—with abundance and
equality for all; a society in which there would be no state.
Capitalism under any kind of government, is a system of minority
rule, and the principal beneficiaries of capitalist democracy are the
small minority of exploiting capitalists; scarcely less so than the
slave-owners of ancient times were the actual rulers and the real
beneficiaries of the Athenian democracy. To be sure, the workers
have a right to vote periodically for one of two sets of candidates
selected for them by the two capitalist parties. And they can
exercise the right of free speech and free media. But this formal
right of free speech and free media is outweighed rather heavily by
the inconvenient circumstance that the small capitalist minority
happens to enjoy a complete monopoly of ownership and control of all
the press, and of television and radio, and of all other means of
communication and information. We who oppose the capitalist regime
have a right to nominate our own candidates. That is easier said than
done. But even so, with all that, a little democracy is better than
none. We socialists have never denied that. After the experiences of
fascism and of military and police dictatorships in many parts of the
world, we have all the more reason to value every democratic
provision for the protection of human rights; to fight for more
democracy, not less. The socialist task is not to deny democracy, but
to expand it and make it more complete. That is the true socialist
tradition.
Without
freedom of association and organisation, without the right to form
groups and parties of different tendencies, there is and can be no
real democracy anywhere. The Marxists, throughout the century-long
history of our movement, have always valued and defended bourgeois
democratic rights, restricted as they were; and have utilised them
for the education and organisation of the workers in the struggle to
establish full democracy by abolishing the capitalist rule
altogether. The right of union organisation is a precious right, a
democratic right, but it was not “given” to the workers. It took
mighty and irresistible labour upheavals to establish in reality the
right of union organisation. In the old days, the agitators of the
IWW—who were real democrats—used to give a shorthand definition
of socialism as “industrial democracy”, the extension of
democracy to industry, the democratic control of industry by the
workers themselves, with private ownership eliminated. That socialist
demand for real democracy was taken for granted in the time of Debs
and Haywood. The class struggle of the workers against the
capitalists to transform society is the fiercest war of all.
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Our Goal Remains Socialism
“...all
creatures have been turned into property, the fishes in the water,
the birds in the air, the plants on the earth; the creatures, too,
must become free.” - Thomas
Münzer, cited approvingly by Marx
Socialists
did not invent human aspirations for a just, egalitarian and free
society; men and women have cherished that dream for a long time.
What socialists did was to take these ideals and shape them into a
revolutionary objective to achieve the better society to which all
humanity desires. Socialism is not an authoritarian creed despite the
history of those dictators who called themselves socialist. Socialism
is a society without a government. It is a free society; a society
without rulers and ruled, leaders and led, masters and slaves.
Socialism is not only on the side of freedom but is equivalent to
freedom.
Working
people are losing trust in the existing institutions, and realize
that they are defeating the very purpose they were supposed to serve.
The world is at a loss for a way out. Parliamentarism and democracy
are being challenged and salvation is being sought in right-wing
populism and “strong man” political leaders. The
employer is in business to make a profit. The lower his costs, other
things remaining the same, the higher his profits. Now, labor cost is
one of his principal costs. Therefore, the lower the wage, the higher
the profit. The primary function of racism is in keeping wage and
salary earners split, economically and politically. It is one of the
principal weapons on the “divide and conquer” arsenal. If their
ability to join together in unions is cut down, then their ability to
raise their wages or prevent cuts will be impaired. Thus, their wages
and working conditions will be worse than if they worked together.
The lower wages represent higher profits for the employer. Racism
benefits the bosses and hurts the wage earners of all races.
The
function of the Socialist Party is to expose and fight false ideas,
to open minds to the possibility of the construction of the free and
class-free society. We are convinced that socialism is the only hope
of the workers. Neither reforms nor palliatives can in any way remove
the great economic contradictions inherent in capitalism. The time
has now arrived when all revolutionary workers must either join hands
with the Socialist Party or strengthen the hands of the reformists.
Socialism can only win the workers when the Socialist Party has been
so strengthened that it can carry out its work upon an even larger
scale. To that end our organisation appeals for members where he or
she can best assist the socialist movement. Outside the Socialist
Party your efforts are probably being exhausted in a wrong efforts;
inside the Socialist Party your energy will be directed upon the
greatest work in history—helping in the emancipation of the working
class and the freedom of humanity. Our goal is to lift the working
class everywhere from wage bondage to dignity, and self-liberation.
Capitalists are on one side of the class war, workers on the other.
To inaugurate the era of freedom, harmony, and love involves a social
revolution. The land and their resources and the machinery of
production must become the property of the people, owned in common by
them and democratically controlled by them.
To make the means of
production common property, the only possible solution of the
problem, the working class must secure control of the government
machine. Then only can it exercise its political power and execute
its will. This is why the class struggle is a political struggle and
why the lines must be shaped and uncompromisingly drawn between the
Socialist Party, representing the exploited working class, and all
others, including reformist parties, that represent the exploiting
capitalist class. Socialism alone promises escape from the despotic
and grinding exploitation of the present system. It is in the
workers' own enlightened self-interest to secure to the collective
people all the means of wealth production, thus achieving industrial
democracy and creating the socialist commonwealth.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Scottish Racism
Racial harassment is a "common experience" for staff and students at Scottish universities, according to a new report from the Equality and Human Rights Commission which says some institutions are "oblivious" to how big the problem is. The report also says there are also examples of anti-English sentiment expressed at Scottish universities.
The figures suggest incidences of racial harassment are lower among students at Scottish universities than at institutions in England, however. The report says this may reflect the fact that England has a more ethnically-diverse student population.
NUS Scotland's black students officer, Franklin Jacob, said: "It lays bare the unacceptable scourge of racial harassment experienced by staff and students at university.
"To read that 24% of students surveyed had been the victim of racial harassment whilst 20% of students had been racially attacked. is damning. The figure in Scotland (11%), whilst lower, still shows the work that must be achieved by the entire sector."
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-50141372
Our Message to Fellow-Workers
Whether
Scotland remains part of the United Kingdom or becomes a separate
sovereign state will make no difference whatsoever to the basic
structure of society where a privileged class monopolises the means
of production while the rest have to work for wages and where wealth
is produced not to satisfy human needs but for sale with a view to
profit. It won’t even make much difference to your present standard
of living in terms of wage levels, housing, unemployment and the
other problems you face. It is this class structure of society —
which exists equally in England, Northern Ireland, Wales and in
Scotland — that is the basic cause of the economic and social
problems faced by the great majority of society, those who, whatever
their religious background, depend for a living on earning a wage or
salary. This is why a mere constitutional change will make no
difference.
Look at the Twenty-Six Counties of the Irish Republic
which achieved “Independence” in 1921 after a bloody war against
the British Army. What difference has this made to the position of
wage and salary earners there? It has merely provided a different
political framework within which they can suffer the problems of
capitalism, governed by Irish, instead of British, politicians
representing capitalist interests. Not of course that staying part of
the United Kingdom is going to make any difference to these problems
either.
The
only change that will is a world-wide social revolution that would
make all that is in and on the Earth the common heritage of all
mankind to be used to provide an abundance of wealth to which all
could have free access according to need. This essentially peaceful
revolution can only occur when the great majority of wage and salary
earners in all countries are in favour of it and organise
democratically to carry it out. It involves a rejection of all
nationalism and all attempts to solve problems on a national scale.
In the context of Scotland it requires you to reject both nationalism
and unionism.
The
Socialist Party has no desire for social chaos, that vision of
despair would drift into nothingness if people could only be brought
to understand— to understand themselves and the social system under
which they live and which makes them the unhappy beings that they
are. We are endeavouring to give our non-socialist fellow-workers an
exposition of life as it now is as it might soon be, and as,
eventually it will be. What we desire is a sane
and healthy system of society, to be created on the dead ashes of the
system which is passing, wherein no man shall be called upon to
sacrifice his ability and no woman her body in order to obtain the
wherewithal to live; wherein the workman, the artist, the scientist
(possibly a trinity in one person) may unite with and dovetail into
one another in the production of wealth, which would be the property
of an appreciative and enlightened humanity; not, as now, the
property of a few unworthy and unappreciative parasites.
Capitalism,
as a system geared to producing profits out of which those who own
the means of production accumulate more and more capital, is quite
incapable of serving human interests, mankind does have the technical
knowledge to provide for much more than its present numbers. The
problem is not overpopulation, but the underproduction and waste that
are built-in to capitalism. The plundering and pollution of the world
is not caused by modern technology but by its misuse in the service
of profit. If the resources of the Earth, natural and man-made,
belonged in common to all mankind they could be used in a
conservationist and non-polluting way to provide for the needs of
all. If overpopulation were ever to become a potential problem in a
socialist world, then mankind also has the knowledge of how to
control births.
The
theory of The Socialist Party is Marxist in the sense that certain of
our key ideas about society, economics and politics are derived from
Karl Marx. Although our case rests entirely on its own merits and not
on what Marx may or may not have said, we have always been ready to
defend Marx’s views where we believe them to be correct against
criticisms based on an ignorance of what he wrote.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Paternalism is a common attitude among well-meaning social reformers. Stemming from the root pater, or father, paternalism implies a patria...