We in the Socialist Party only want the votes of those who
want socialism (a worldwide society of common ownership and democratic control
where things are produced to meet people's needs not to try to make a profit).
If you are just against "illegal" wars and would be in favour of a
"legal" one or if you are against war but not against capitalism
(i.e., are against the symptom but not against the cause), please vote for one
of the other candidates. But, be warned, in voting for them you'll be voting
for capitalism and capitalism is the root cause of wars, preparations for war
and threats of war because built-in to it are conflicts between rival groups of
capitalists backed by their governments over sources of raw materials, trade
routes, markets and investment outlets. Normally, this competition is
commercial and diplomatic but, when push comes to shove, the conflicts are
settled by forces of arms. This is why Britain and America (or, rather, America
and Britain) invaded Iraq where the former regime represented a threat to their
supply of oil, a key raw material. Capitalism means war, so the only consistent
anti-war stance is to work to get rid of capitalism.
Very few people would deny that the present state of the
world leaves a lot to be desired. Humanity staggers from one crisis to the next
-- from war to famine to slumps to repression.
Capitalism has developed a huge productive capability but its social
organisation and relationships cause extremely serious problems and render it
incapable of meeting the basic needs of its people.
A vast amount of the world's resources is expended in the
production of weapons of war, from bullets and bayonets to nuclear and chemical
weapons. Alongside these weapons are the armed forces which every state
organises, clothes, feeds, trains and deploys. This is a massive waste of human
effort; it is all intended to be destructive and none of it to create anything
useful to human beings. In a world which could produce more than enough to feed
and care for its population millions are homeless and tens of millions die each
year because they don't have enough to eat or for lack of proper medical
treatment. None of this is necessary. It happens while farmers in Europe and
North America are being paid to take land out of cultivation; from time to time
even food that has been produced is destroyed or allowed to rot. This makes
sense to the profit motive; in terms of human interests it is wildly insane.
The environment is increasingly under threat from pollution
and from the destruction of some of its natural, ecologically vital features.
We hear well-informed warnings of an ultimate impending disaster unless we act
to eradicate the problem but these warnings are always met with the objection
that to save the environment can be a costly, profit-damaging business. Yet it
is not necessary for industry and agriculture to pour out noxious effluents
into the air, the earth, the rivers and the seas. They do this today because
pollution is seen as being cheaper, which means more profit-friendly and to a
society where profit is the dominant motive for production that is
justification enough to override human welfare.
These are a few examples of how capitalism works against the
interests of the world's people. In contrast, socialism -- real socialism, that
is, not the obscene caricatures we've seen in Russia and elsewhere -- will have
fundamentally different social relationships, motives for production and
concepts about the interests and security of human beings.
All the programmes now being daily advanced by the
professional politicians for dealing with the problems of capitalism through
reforms must fail because of their essentially piecemeal approach. They attempt
to treat symptoms instead of going for the basic cause. That is why, after a
century or more of reformism the problems the politicians claim to deal with
are still here. A far more radical, fundamental change is needed to create the
framework within which they can be solved: the common ownership and democratic
control of the means of producing wealth so that production can be geared to
meeting people's needs, not making profits for a wealthy elite.
Because of we have endless problems of poverty, poor
services and all the issues politicians love to spend time telling you they can
solve, if only given the chance. We don't believe any politician can solve
these problems, as long as the flawed basis of our society remains intact. In
fact, we believe only you and your fellow workers can solve these problems. We believe
that it will take a revolution in how we organise our lives, a fundamental
change. We want to see a society based on the fact that you know how to run
your lives, know your needs and have the skills and capacity to organise with
your fellows to satisfy them.
You know yourselves and your lives better than a handful of
bosses ever can. With democratic control of production we can ensure that
looking after our communities becomes a priority, rather than something we do
in our spare time. We all share fundamental needs, for food, clothing, housing
and culture, and we have the capacity to ensure access to these for all,
without exception. Together, we have the capacity to run our world for
ourselves. We need to build a movement to effect that change, by organising
deliberately to take control of the political offices which rule our lives, and
bring them into our collective democratic control. We make no promises, offer
no pat solutions, only to be the means by which you can remake society for the
common good.
NEITHER LEADERS NOR FOLLOWERS.
NEITHER THE MARKET NOR THE STATE
No comments:
Post a Comment