Mocking politicians is alright to a certain extent but it can give rise to the mistaken idea that it is because of corrupt and self-seeking politicians that we suffer from the social problems we do. It's not. It's the fault of capitalism. Even if all politicians were saints they still couldn't make capitalism work in our interest. Nor is it true that all elections are a joke and a waste of time. While what the professional politics who currently dominate politics get up to at Westminster and the antics they engage in to get votes do deserve to be mocked, especially as the media give them so much publicity, there is a serious side to elections.
Elections are ultimately about who controls the government
and who gets to make the laws. Ever since most electors have been wage and
salary workers the capitalist class has needed to persuade workers into voting
for politicians who will support their system. This is what elections are
about: tricking workers into voting for pro-capitalist politicians. It is right
to expose this, but wrong to conclude that this means we should never have
anything to do with elections. The response should be, as Marx once put it, to
transform universal suffrage "from the instrument of fraud that it has
been up till now into an instrument of emancipation". Which is one of the
points we are trying to make in contesting this and other elections.
Universal suffrage came into being partly as a result of
pressure from below. From the 1760s the elections were associated with radical
politics: demands for reform of the political system and protests against the
economic hardships and lack of liberty for the labouring classes began to
appear in the speeches. But what was reform of the political system if not the
extension of the suffrage and its use to gain access to political power to try
to improve the situation of the labouring class, such as the Chartists later
campaigned for? And what did the Suffragettes want if not to extend the suffrage?
Was this wrong? We say no, the extension of the vote to workers is a gain and
is a crucial difference between today and the situation in 1700s. Certainly, at
present the vote is not used wisely -- in fact it is used very unwisely -- but
that doesn't mean that it can't be used when once workers have woken up to the
fact that capitalism can never be made to work in their interests. To try to
speed up this awareness is another reason why we contest elections.
Any suggestion to try to disrupt the elections, is
completely irresponsible is probably just anarchist bombast. If anybody really
tried it, they should remember the song "I fought the Law...And the Law
Won".
Political parties invariably try to give us confidence that
this time promises will be kept, regulations will be tightened and adhered to,
unemployment will be tackled and reduced (figures can be manipulated). A minor
change here, a cosmetic tweak there, but the status quo will endure regardless.
When reading or listening to the election promises and then thinking back rationally
to other, similar pledges by previous candidates and recalling the reality of
U-turns, excuses and failure to deliver over the years, how could anyone doubt
the absolute imperative of addressing the question of what’s gone wrong with
politics with the utmost seriousness? If we simply moan and complain from our
armchairs what will change? A compliant, too passive electorate is repeatedly
defrauded.
If you think you've been cheated over the years, you're
right; capitalism is nothing but a racket. The proof of the failure of the
world capitalist system to meet the needs and aspirations of the majority of
the population of every country of the world is there for all to see, clear and
manifest, if only they will open their eyes wide and acknowledge the overwhelming
evidence. Politics, the activities
associated with how a country or an area is run, is something which should
engage the interest and activity of every citizen worldwide as it bears
directly on all aspects of life. The reason for contempt or indifference
towards politics comes from a history of being excluded, the expectation of
being excluded and the acceptance of being excluded. To be heard, to be
considered, to be represented honestly we need to be involved in the
decision-making processes, not to be told what is in our best interest by
self-serving professional politicians. We need a system that works for us all,
of which we're all an integral part, a system we're prepared to work to attain.
What we need is socialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment