Skip to main content

Socialism in our hearts


The world we're living in right now won't allow fundamental change of the sort we need to eliminate all the social problems that make our lives a misery. You don’t get people to change by scaring them, or pointing fingers. Instead, give them an alternative that’s so compelling they want to have change. So let’s tell stories of our dreams and not the nightmares. A fear-based politics breeds cynicism, apathy or hopelessness. The more people start believing we can create a better society, the sooner we can start taking positive action. We should be planning for a future in which things get better. When you realise something’s wrong with the world, the first step has to focus on educating yourself about it. Then, when you begin to have a grasp on the issue, you step up and do something about it. We can change the world, but the key to doing so is in you and me and others all working together.

We live in extreme times. We are over-worked and undernourished. Those of us not caught in violence and poverty, are traumatised by its images. We are reaching our limits. People can't stand their jobs. People want out. You don't have to be in jail to feel imprisoned. People are wakening up and are realising how crazy it is to live in this society. Despite millions of years of evolution and fighting to stay alive, members of the most advanced species on the planet are now choosing to end their own life through lack of purpose and meaning. Seemingly disparate crises are not happening separately and accidentally. They are interrelated symptoms of our global capitalist system. The global elites have no intention of interfering with the profits they make. Those who are despoiling the planet do so for personal and corporate gain. Their worship of Mammon, the idol of power and greed, threatens to doom the human race. If we keep going the way we do, there won’t be a planet left.

Isn’t it very strange that the two most basic things needed to live, food and a home, are still not a right. To have a safe place to sleep and food to eat is the foundation of all life. Yet that costs money, which is created and hoarded by a tiny elite, in effect making all other rights void because people have to submit to all kinds of cruel and undignified ways to make enough money to simply stay alive. Automate whatever menial jobs can be automated, get rid of unnecessary jobs. Growing food can be a community service – each member working 4 hours a week. It might not be perfect but it’s a heck of a lot better than what we have going on now. Many people think money makes the world go around, or the global economy, at least. They consider it in a similar way that gravity holds the planet in orbit. But this is simply not fact. Money’s creation is no law of nature.

According to Kropotkin, anarchism (and for us in the Socialist Party, his definition is a valid description of socialism): “is a name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government – harmony in such a society being obtained, not by the submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfaction of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilised being.” It is a form of social organisation with a set of key principles, such as self-organisation, voluntary association, freedom, autonomy, solidarity, direct democracy, egalitarianism and mutual aid. It rejects both a capitalist economy and a nation state.

Resistance and struggle are not separate from the rest of life. Caring about politics is optional for too many people. As if it somehow doesn’t affect them. Political activity is not just someone’s hobby. Radical grassroots movements are the groundwork for the new world we carry in our hearts. At first they start as essential support lines for survival and small-scale resistance that are available to the weak. At the same time these networks and communities are the same ones in which we live, learn, play, work, invent and build alternative social and political structures. As a movement’s strength grows, and as crises expose weaknesses in its enemies, these networks become the infrastructure for open revolution.


The best way to give away your power is to think you don’t have any. Over and over, people say that they cared deeply about the need for social change, but were hesitant to speak since they weren’t experts. They deferred to others who knew more. But we need all voices — not just experts on Marxist theory. It is important to have all kinds of people, from all walks of life, be part of the socialist movement — whether you’re new to it or a many-year socialist veteran. More voices means more power to make change. You don’t have to be an expert to join in the call for a just future. Once you start learning about social justice, the learning never stops. We can’t afford to wait until we “know enough” to raise our voices. Socialism won’t be achieved without a movement that is big and diverse enough that everyone has a voice, regardless of the amount of knowledge they possess of Marx and Engels. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What do we mean by no leaders

"Where are the leaders and what are their demands?" will be the question puzzled professional politicians and media pundits will be asking when the Revolution comes. They will find it inconceivable that a socialist movement could survive without an elite at the top. This view will be shared by some at the bottom. Lenin and his Bolshevik cohorts argued that we couldn't expect the masses to become effective revolutionaries spontaneously, all on their own. To achieve liberation they needed the guidance of a "vanguard party" comprised of an expert political leadership with a clear programme. The Trotskyist/Leninist Left may remix the song over and over again all they want but the tune remains the same: leaders and the cadres of the vanguard can find the answer; the mass movements of the people cannot liberate themselves. The case for leadership is simple. Most working-class people are too busy to have opinions or engage in political action. There’s a need for some…

Lenin and the Myth of 1917

A myth pervades that 1917 was a 'socialist' revolution rather it was the continuation of the capitalist one. What justification is there, then, for terming the upheaval in Russia a Socialist Revolution? None whatever beyond the fact that the leaders in the November movement claim to be Marxian Socialists. M. Litvinoff practically admits this when he says:In seizing the reigns of power the Bolsheviks were obviously playing a game with high stake. Petrograd had shown itself entirely on their side. To what extent would the masses of the proletariat and the peasant army in the rest of the country support them?”This is a clear confession that the Bolsheviks themselves did not know the views of the mass when they took control. At a subsequent congress of the soviets the Bolsheviks had 390 out of a total of 676. It is worthy of note that none of the capitalist papers gave any description of the method of electing either the Soviets or the delegates to the Congress. And still more cu…

No More Propertyless

Socialism is the name given to that form of society in which there is no such thing as a propertyless class, but in which the whole community has become a working community owning the means of production—the land, factories, mills, mines, transport and all the means whereby wealth is created and distributed to the community. The first condition of success for Socialism is that its adherents should explain its aim and its essential characteristics clearly, so that they can be understood by every one. This has always been the primary purpose of the Socialist Party's promotion of its case for socialism. The idea of socialism is simple. Socialists believe that society is divided into two great classes that one of these classes, the wage-earning, the proletariat, is property-less the other, the capitalist, possesses the wealth of society and the proletariat in order to be able to live at all and exercise its faculties to any degree, must hire out their ability to work to the capitalis…