Many on the Left insist that before the ultimate overthrow
of capitalism, there are a litany of immediate demands, shorter hours, higher
wages, better conditions etc., to address first and they declare that a
socialist party must present a platform of such immediate demands. The
reasoning is that until the overthrow of capitalism is attained, “immediate”
demands are bound to appear on the socialist platform proceeds from a confusion.
The moment that a demand for a reform is raised they are apt to be, and
generally are, confused with the goal itself. A political party that sets up
“immediate” demands blurs its aim and is an invitation for compromise and
concession, even corruption. The Socialist Party accepts that an economic
organisation such as trade union may and must reach out for improved
conditions. The very nature of these organisations keeps it from resting on its
laurels and has to keep seeking gains as its goal. For the socialist party it
must be all or nothing. Goals determine methods. The goal of social evolution
being the final overthrow of class rule, its methods must fit the goal. The
principle of the class struggle is a basic principle from which socialist
tactics proceed. The employers wage a class war upon the lines of their class
interests. Their aim is to conserve the power they now enjoy to exploit and fleece
the workers.
“Single-issueism” is the process of watering principles down
and entering into alliances with our class enemies so to construct a broadly
acceptable minimum plank in order to achieve a particular demand or reform.
“Single-issueism” is the road to reformism and invariably ends up in the crass corruption
of socialist ideas. Instead of building a radical social movement and
constantly striving to raise its level of consciousness and revolutionary content,
those who concentrated on single-issues transformed themselves into liberal organisers
foregoing the goal of socialism for illusionary concessions. The single-issue
is the dead-end issue. It always ends up against the wall. it moves radicals to
the right, not to the left, blurring whatever clarity, integrity and
responsibility that once existed. It is a barren pathway. We must reject the respectability
of liberalism.
The working class holds
little economic or social power. Time was when the workers still held some
economic power. They could combine in trade unions, and by the force of their
numbers ensure for themselves a certain amount of compensation. That was when
technology had not yet reached its present perfection, when capitalist concerns
had not reached their present stage of globalisation, when, consequently, there
were not more applicants for jobs than there were jobs to be had. Now all that
has changed. Owing to the vast reserve army of the unemployed, coupled with the
elimination of skill by the machine and the expansion of the gig-economy and
uber-workers, the division of labour, and the concentration of capital, the
economic power once wielded by the workers is a thing of the past, and whatever
little power they may still seem to possess in this respect, their bosses can
at any moment shatter to pieces, as they have done again and again, with the
aid of the legislative powers. Stripped of all economic power, made insecure,
vulnerable and dependent, working families barely endure from week to week, our
fellow-workers have nothing to lose by using the vote to rid itself of its
chains and cease being wage-slaves. The continuance the social system of private
property brings misery. Labour alone produces all wealth. The capitalist class
does no manner of useful work, directly or indirectly but is a parasite on the
body social. The property found today in the grasp of the capitalist class is
none other than stolen property by some fraud or even some blacker crime. To re-possess
the property of the capitalist class is to restore it to the working class, to
the overwhelming majority, and thereby reorganise society in such a form as may
promote the happiness of all its members.
Capitalism is the last expression of class rule. The
economic foundation of class rule is the private ownership of the necessaries
for production. The social structure, or garb, of class rule is the political
State, an organ separate and apart from production, with no vital function
other than the maintenance of the supremacy of the ruling class. The overthrow
of class rule means the overthrow of the political State, and its substitution
with the industrial cooperative commonwealth, under which the necessaries for
production are owned in common and operated by and for the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment