Skip to main content

Road Map to Socialism

The aim of the Socialist Party is to establish socialism and abolish the right of one person to rob another of the fruits of his or her labour. This is what makes the Socialist Party different from all others. Nowhere in the world has socialism been established. Socialism. in the old days was often called the society of the free and equal where democracy was defined as the rule of the people. In the old days, the socialist activists and the IWW used to give a shorthand definition of socialism as "industrial democracy," the extension of democracy to industry, the democratic control of industry by the workers them. selves, with private ownership eliminated. That socialist demand for real democracy was taken for granted in the time of Debs. These simple definitions still ring true. You never hear things like that said today.

When some people say it would be a fine idea for all of us to get together in the struggle for socialism and democracy, it is appropriate to ask: "Just what do you mean by socialism, and what do you mean by democracy? Do you mean what Marx and Engels said? Or do you mean what Lenin and Stalin did?" They are not the same thing as can be easily proved and it is necessary to choose between one set of definitions and the other. Our task, as socialists living and fighting in this day and hour, is simply to restate what socialism meant to the founders of our movement, and to bring their formulations up to date and apply them to present conditions. This restatement of basic aims and principles cannot wait; it is, in fact, the burning necessity of the hour. There is no room for misunderstanding among us as to what such a restatement of our position means and requires. It requires correcting all the perversions and distortions of the real meaning of socialism and a return to the original formulations and definitions. Nothing short of this will do and no formulation can improve on the classic statement of the Communist Manifesto, which said: "All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, in the interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority”, later reiterated that "the emancipation of the working class is the task of the workers themselves," a way of saying that the socialist reorganization of society requires a workers revolution and that such a revolution is unthinkable without the active participation of the majority of the working class, who are the majority of the population. Nothing could be more democratic than that. No party has a right to call itself socialist, unless it stands four-square for the workers.

Marx and Engels never taught that the nationalisation of the forces of production signified the establishment of socialism. That's not stated by Marx and Engels anywhere. All Marxists define socialism as a class-free society - with abundance, freedom and equality for all; a society in which there would be no state, not even a democratic workers' state. Capitalism under any kind of government, whether bourgeois democracy, or fascism or a police-state - under any kind of government, capitalism remains a system of minority rule, where the principal beneficiaries are the small minority of exploiting capitalists. The formal right of free speech and free press is outweighed rather heavily by the inconvenient circumstance that the small capitalist minority happens to enjoy a complete ownership and control of all the main media.

Socialism cannot be anything but global. All attempts to make Socialism national have failed, because the economy is global and there cannot be a socio-economic solution of the problems within the narrow borders of a country. For most members of the Left socialism has been a chimera and reforming existing society by spreading its benefits around was their solution, no matter how militant the rhetoric or the means used to achieve the end. The Socialist Party has always attempted to project a more radical ambitious political and economic platform on these movements but it has never stuck because it was alien to them. They were solely concerned with eliminating the “glass ceiling” that deprives their constituency of the rewards due them under the rules that apply to others in this society. Socialists cannot expect a movement with such concerns to worry much about what a socialist society would look like, nor expect people who are trying to remove the glass ceiling to help you demolish the building. Their demands tend to split movements along lines of gender or race identity. They do not automatically lead to a progressive, class-based, inclusive movement but lead to the further fragmentation.
Socialism is not made, but it is grows out of the needs and struggles of organised labour. We can’t force consciousness upon our fellow-workers, we allow it to develop and to ripen. Let's start with understanding what it means to be truly Marxist. We cannot make a cult, as it has been done for Mao or Stalin. Being a Marxist today does not mean agreeing with everything that Marx wrote or said, but to know how to critique or exceed him.


Popular posts from this blog

What do we mean by no leaders

"Where are the leaders and what are their demands?" will be the question puzzled professional politicians and media pundits will be asking when the Revolution comes. They will find it inconceivable that a socialist movement could survive without an elite at the top. This view will be shared by some at the bottom. Lenin and his Bolshevik cohorts argued that we couldn't expect the masses to become effective revolutionaries spontaneously, all on their own. To achieve liberation they needed the guidance of a "vanguard party" comprised of an expert political leadership with a clear programme. The Trotskyist/Leninist Left may remix the song over and over again all they want but the tune remains the same: leaders and the cadres of the vanguard can find the answer; the mass movements of the people cannot liberate themselves. The case for leadership is simple. Most working-class people are too busy to have opinions or engage in political action. There’s a need for some…

Lenin and the Myth of 1917

A myth pervades that 1917 was a 'socialist' revolution rather it was the continuation of the capitalist one. What justification is there, then, for terming the upheaval in Russia a Socialist Revolution? None whatever beyond the fact that the leaders in the November movement claim to be Marxian Socialists. M. Litvinoff practically admits this when he says:In seizing the reigns of power the Bolsheviks were obviously playing a game with high stake. Petrograd had shown itself entirely on their side. To what extent would the masses of the proletariat and the peasant army in the rest of the country support them?”This is a clear confession that the Bolsheviks themselves did not know the views of the mass when they took control. At a subsequent congress of the soviets the Bolsheviks had 390 out of a total of 676. It is worthy of note that none of the capitalist papers gave any description of the method of electing either the Soviets or the delegates to the Congress. And still more cu…

No More Propertyless

Socialism is the name given to that form of society in which there is no such thing as a propertyless class, but in which the whole community has become a working community owning the means of production—the land, factories, mills, mines, transport and all the means whereby wealth is created and distributed to the community. The first condition of success for Socialism is that its adherents should explain its aim and its essential characteristics clearly, so that they can be understood by every one. This has always been the primary purpose of the Socialist Party's promotion of its case for socialism. The idea of socialism is simple. Socialists believe that society is divided into two great classes that one of these classes, the wage-earning, the proletariat, is property-less the other, the capitalist, possesses the wealth of society and the proletariat in order to be able to live at all and exercise its faculties to any degree, must hire out their ability to work to the capitalis…