People
on every continent have risen in resistance. Developments
show in every way that the capitalist world system inevitably leads
to crises and war. The goal – socialism and throughout the world
– is a common one. And the need for consensus is great. The
workers' movement in most countries is weak and involves a lack of
“roots” within the our fellow workers. The has led to great
discord, division and desolation. One might say that the situation of
the working class is difficult. But the situation is not exclusively
dark. We are capable of participation in active cooperation on
different tasks of common interests. There is today an urgent need to
strengthen workers solidarity across the borders. It will strengthen
class struggle
Capitalism's
enormous development of the powers of
production, and an enormous technological revolution but under
capitalist forms of production this development leads to ever deeper
contradictions within the capitalist system, and between different
states, and leads to enormous problems and suffering for the working
class and the masses. No short-lived cyclical economic booms can stop
this development. With socialism new labour saving technology could
have led to a comprehensive liberation of human beings, and paved the
ground for great social and political advances. It illustrates the
need for an alternative future – socialism. The
idea that reformism is radical and pro-working class movement is a
myth. In fact, reformism is today one of the biggest barriers to the
development of the forces of revolution. The tasks are so large
reformism will not solve any of the fundamental problems.
We
have recently seen many protests against the power of the
corporations whether it is Monsanto, the oil companies, or the
computer industry.
As
long as the capitalist system remains unchallenged, why a corporation
does what it does and the logic driving them is not questioned. Where
the faults of the capitalists are attributed to “corporate greed”
we are left with a moral argument of “good versus bad”
corporations which encourages an assumption of capitalism’s
potential to be kinder and gentler. The fight over pharmaceuticals,
for example, is not just about monopoly pricing and mega-profits.
It’s about private property rights (patents and intellectual
ownership) and commodification—where access to essential medicines
is not constituted as social rights, but as commodities bought and
sold for profit. The corporations, as powerful as they are, are
only vehicles for capitalists. In other words, they are a means to an
end.
Anti-corporatism
isn’t necessarily anti-capitalist. Small businesses tap into
popular anger and resentment against corporations by pushing a
populist agenda of breaking up monopolies and restoring competition
and competitive pricing. Anti-corporate populism is based on the
recognition that the capitalist system needs competition if it’s to
be efficient, effective and constantly expanding. The end result is
that while investors may suffer temporary losses from bad publicity
that results in a fall in share-value and sometimes are obliged to
restructure and reorganise their business empires, the capitalists
are far from defeated. The protectors of capitalism recognise that
unless anti-corporate populism is effectively contained and
concessions are made, then there’s a real danger that discontent
could escalate and actually transform into anti-capitalism. The
Socialist Party seeks to engage in a struggle against capitalism
itself and not restrict ourselves to attacking just specific
corporations. The Socialist Party are not trust-busters, but
system-breakers.
No comments:
Post a Comment