What
is socialism? To answer in a single sentence, it means the common
ownership by all the people of all the means of wealth production and
distribution. The word has been so misused for so long that it is
worth re-stating its basic principles. There has been a pressing need
for explaining and advancing the socialist case as the reformists
have preempted the field. There has always been the tendency to
confuse socialism with reform of one sort or another, to make it
acceptable and palatable, sapping it of its essence which compels the
Socialist Party to repeatedly draw clear and true lines between
socialism and social quackery, between reform and revolution. They
want a capitalism without its economic laws as if we can have a
universe without the law of gravity, or zoology with the law of
evolution left out. What reformists advocate would not be socialism,
any more than a house without foundation, walls, floors or roof would
be a house. Socialism means but one thing, and that is the abolition
of capital in private hands, and the turning over of the industries
into the direct control of society. Socialism means that the tools of
production are owned and controlled by society so that what is
produced can be shared out according to people’s needs.
Anything
else is not socialism, and has no right to use that name.
Capitalism
does not consist merely in the private ownership of the necessaries
for production. If such ownership were the determining feature and
quality of capitalism, then capitalism reigned in the days of
serfdom. The serf owned his tools, the feudal lord owned the land,
the two necessaries for production. Yet that was not capitalism.
Capitalism is that social system under which the tool of production
(capital) has grown to such mammoth size that the class that owns it
rules land, sea and air like a despot, steadily swelling the number
of its slaves, the wage slaves, thereby itself recruiting the forces
that will overthrow it, and push civilization onward to the socialist
society. That is capitalism, not any one or set of seemingly
capitalist manifestations.
So
with socialism. It does not consist merely in the overthrow of
private ownership in any or all of the necessaries of life. Socialism
is that social system under which the necessaries of production are
owned, controlled, and administered by the people, for the people,
and under which, accordingly, the cause of political and economic
despotism having been abolished, class rule is at end. That is
socialism, nothing short of that.
Therefore,
while not opposing any reforms or improvements which may be secured
under capitalism, the Socialist Party steadfastly sets its face
against taking time away from its main battle, for revolution, in
order to carry on the struggle for reform. It refuses to be
maneuvered into abandoning its main demand that the means of
production become common property in order to fritter away its
energies chasing immediate demands. It turns away from the tempting
baits to lead workers into side issues and blind alleys. The one
demand of the Socialist Party is socialism, unadulterated and
undiluted. It demands the unconditional surrender by the capitalist
class of the machinery of industry.
The
Socialist Party insists that it is the most humanitarian movement on
earth. More so than all philanthropic ventures of Bill Gates, all the
charitable societies, and associations; it, and it alone, carries
within its programme the highest humanitarian hopes and possibilities
of the humanity. All the other movements are based on aspiration
alone. The the Socialist Party stands out unique as the only one
based on the material programme which will make the realisation of
those aspirations an accomplished fact. Socialism alone will supply
the basis for any permanent improvement in the condition of mankind.
the Socialist Party declares that economic freedom is the supreme
question that confronts the people. The working class are dependent
upon the capitalist class, who own the means of production; and the
capitalist class, by virtue of their economic mastery, are the ruling
class of the nation, and it is useless under such conditions to claim
that men and women are equal and that they all are sovereign
citizens. No person is free in any just sense who has to rely upon
the arbitrary will of another for the opportunity to work. Such a
person works, and therefore lives, by permission, and this is the
present economic relation of the working class to the capitalist
class.
Socialism
is nothing other than people's conscious self-organisation of their
own lives, the management of production by the producers themselves.
State
capitalism is capitalism by
the state and for
the state. It is capitalism by
the government and for
the government. It is state capitalism by
the ruling classes and for
the ruling classes. The
idea that state ownership of the means of production constitutes
socialism is wrong. Engels pointed out long ago in Socialism,
Utopian and Scientific:
“...the
transformation, either into joint-stock companies or trusts, or into
state ownership, does not do away with the capitalist nature of the
productive forces. In the joint-stock companies and trusts, this is
obvious and the modern state, again, is only the organization that
bourgeois society takes in order to support the external conditions
of the capitalist mode of production against the encroachments as
well of the workers as of the individual capitalists. The modern
state, no matter what its form, is essentially a capitalist machine,
the state of the capitalists, the ideal personification of the total
national capital. The more it proceeds to the taking over of the
productive forces, the more does it actually become the national
capitalist, the more citizens does it exploit State ownership of the
productive forces is not the solution to the conflict...”
The
kind of “socialism” that state capitalists envisage is not what
the Socialist Party means by socialism. Not at all. What the state
capitalists mean is that the capitalist governments will make
themselves responsible for the organisation of production. The
workers will remain just where they are – sweating in the factories
and in the fields and piling up the profits for their masters. The
ministerial functionaries are more capitalistic than the capitalists
themselves in their unceasing struggle against the working class.
Socialist
society represents the historical development of human society of a
class-free system. The Socialist Party believes in the organisation
of the working class for the overthrow of capitalist society as the
only cure for the crimes of capitalism. For this reason we shall
every day and everywhere and on all possible occasions carry on the
most relentless struggle against those who mis-use the name
socialist.
No comments:
Post a Comment