Many
people think that socialism means government ownership. They have
been taught this through the schools, the media and other agencies of
capitalism. This lie about socialism has been spread because it keeps
people from finding out what socialism really is. Furthermore,
socialism has never existed anywhere, in any country, at any time.
There has never been socialism in Sweden, in the former Soviet Union,
in Cuba, in China, Venezuela or in any other country that claims to
be socialist.
Socialism
is a new social system in which the people own in common and
democratically control the industries and social services of society.
With socialism, the workers would operate and manage the industries
themselves. In each factory and plant, they would elect their own
administrative committees. In addition, the present political
government run by politicians would be replaced by and community
assemblies and neighbourhood councils. Today, we have formal
constitutional democracy only. People do not have genuine economic
democracy. The employer has almost absolute power over his employees.
He can fire whomever he wishes, whenever he wishes. He can close his
plant down and move to another state. In fact, he can manufacture
something worthless or even harmful. In short, he has all the power
of a dictator. Inside socialism we would have industrial democracy,
which is truly meaningful.
When
we use the word "worker," we mean anyone who sells his or
her labour power, or ability to work, at so much per hour, or so much
per week, per month or an annual salary to a capitalist employer.
Under capitalism workers receive only a small fraction of the wealth
that they alone produce, while the lion's share goes to the
capitalist owners and to the bankers, landlords, insurance companies,
lawyers, politicians and all the other parasites who live off the
back of labour and perform no useful work. In a socialist society,
there will be no wage system. And since the people will collectively
own the industries, anyone will be free to select any occupation in
which he has an interest and aptitude. No longer will workers live
under the fear of being laid off, or be compelled to spend their
lives at some job they hate or are unsuited for. Also since the
people will collectively own the colleges and universities, no longer
will workers be denied education or training because they lack the
money to buy it.
Socialism
we will produce for use and to satisfy the needs of all the people.
Under capitalism, the industries operate for one purpose-to earn a
profit for their owners. Under this system, food is not grown
primarily to be eaten. It is grown to be sold. Cars are not
manufactured primarily to be driven. They are made to be sold. If
there are enough buyers here and abroad, then the capitalists will
have their factories turn out cars and everything else for which
buyers can be found. But if people lack money, if the domestic and
foreign markets cannot absorb them, then these factories shut down,
and the country stagnates, no matter how much people need these
commodities. At the present time, farmers know that they can produce
more than market conditions and price-protecting government
restrictions, compensated for by cash subsidies, permit them to.
Meanwhile, millions suffer from malnutrition and hunger. In
socialism, the factories and industries would be used to benefit all
of us, not restricted to the creation of profits for the enrichment
of a small group of capitalist owners. Inside socialism, farmland
would yield an abundance without great toil; the factories, mines and
mills would be the safest, the most modern, the most efficient
possible, and productive beyond our wildest dreams - and without
labourious work. Our natural resources would be intelligently
conserved, our schools would have the finest facilities, and they
would be devoted to developing complete human beings, not wage-slaves
who are trained to hire themselves out for someone else's profit. Our
hospitals and social services will create and maintain the finest
health and recreational facilities.
In
all previous ages of human history, poverty for most of the people
was inescapable. There was simply not enough to go around. But not so
today. Automated technology and our scientific knowledge have so
vastly increased man's ability to produce what he needs and wants,
that there is no longer any excuse whatsoever for the poverty of a
single member of society. Today, we have the material possibility of
abundance for everyone, and the promise of the leisure in which to
enjoy it. But under capitalism, automation and computers are
used to replace workers and increase profits. Instead of creating a
society of abundance, capitalism uses new technology to create
unemployment and poverty. Our cities are being converted largely into
festering slums in which impoverished people, not understanding the
cause of their miseries, engage in crime and violence to release
their frustrations, hopelessness and anger. But it is not automation
that threatens us at all. Improved machinery is not an evil. It is a
blessing. It is under capitalism that automation is used for
anti-social purposes. When
manufacturing and distribution belong to all of society, then
everyone in that society will benefit. New technology would no longer
pot workers out of jobs. Instead, socialism, it would reduce hours
and working days. Automation would be used to produce an abundance
for all.
The
Socialist Party does not advocate violence. It seeks changes through
lawful and constitutional means. When the time comes that the
majority of the people want to change from capitalism to socialism,
they can make this move through peaceful and lawful means. That is
why the Socialist Party has candidates in general and local
elections. But if socialist candidates should be elected to office,
they would have only one task – to teach workers how to abolish
capitalism and the State. Workers all over the world would take
possession of the factories and industries where they work. The bus
drivers and truckers would take possession of the transportation
systems. The mechanics and auto workers would take possession of the
auto plants. The printers, reporters, and all other would take
possession of their newspapers. The nurses and doctors would take
control of the administration of hospitals. The teachers would take
over the schools and universities. Then these industries and services
would be declared the common property of society and would be
operated democratically in the interest of all.
No comments:
Post a Comment