Money is merely a means of exchange, in a commonly owned
world, where production is for use, no means of exchange would be necessary
access could be free and, money would be in the museums of antiquity.
The monetary system has evolved gradually and has been in
existence as a system for about 250 years in England and for a much shorter
period abroad. We make a distinction between the ancient coinage of Greece,
Carthage and Rome, which although used to effect the exchange of commodities
was at that period incidental to the main stream of an exchange system which
was based on surpluses and barter.
As a general social form, money developed alongside the
development of commodity production, and at the point in history when all
wealth was produced in the form of commodities money became the universal
medium or equivalent through which all exchange transactions were carried out.
The first condition for the introduction of a monetary
system is when social products become commodities, i.e. articles produced for sale
and exchange. It is quite obvious that commodities cannot go to the market on
their own. As they are owned by someone or other, he is the person who will
take or send them there.
Likewise, there are other owners of commodities carrying out
a similar function. Each will recognize the other as a private proprietor —
that is, they respect each other’s rights to dispose of the social product to
their own immediate advantage. Eventually they embellish their right through a
set of legal relations:
"This juridical relation, which thus expresses itself
in a contract, whether such contract be part of a developed legal system or
not, is a relation between two wills, and is but the reflex of the real
economical relation between the two. It is this economical relation that
determines the subject matter in each such juridical act." (Marx, Capital
Vol. I, p. 96. Kerr ed.)
Read the chapter on Money on Capital, on how money is
transformed into capital. Money by itself is not capital.
The transformation of Money into Capital
Wealth is torrented upwards to the owners of the means of
producing and distributing it. It is created by the wage slaves but rationed
out to them in the form of wages and salaries based upon the value of the
workers commodity, 'labour power'.
The value of a commodity, even the workers commodity, is
dependent upon the amount of 'socially necessary' labour time incorporated within
it. (Note value and price are not the same thing.) Exploitation takes place at
the point of production. This labour power produces a surplus value for the
employer which is realised on the market place. This is so even if the employee
is engaged in non-manufacturing, say a service industry as they are a part of
supporting the wealth generating sector or a part of its maintainance, say as
health workers.
Capitalists are not 'bad’ people, it is not a question of morality, but rather, the necessity of capital
to accumulate arises out of its economic class interest, which can only be done
so from exploiting the workers disadvantaged economic situation (i.e.
non-ownership of the means of production and distribution) for their capacity to
produce surplus value, when exploited for waged rations. We are not making a
moral argument, but a class one.
Wee Matt
No comments:
Post a Comment